Professional Documents
Culture Documents
. /
--OO 2:O 4:O 6:O 8~O ' IO~C) ' 12'O ' 14'O
DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF CASTING (cml
2"0 4YO 670 SYO I0'0 12'0 E4'O
(c) DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF CASTING (cm)
Fig. l--Solute profiles for direetionally solidified Pb-20 pet F i g . 2 - - S o l u t e profile for directionally solidified Sn-4 pct
Sn alloys under the conditions shown. The solid lines are Pb. No raaerosegregation i s predicted by the model for this
theoretical curves calculated using the data in Table ITI. a l l o y , shown by the solid l i n e .
Calculated
Average Average Distance Between Primary
Alloy Temperature Growth Liquidus and Dendrite Macro-
Fig. Composition Gradient Rate Solidus Isotherms Spacing segregation
No. (wt pet) (~ (cm/sec) (cm) (microns) Structure (txC pet)
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS V O L U M E 5, D E C E M B E R 1 9 7 4 - 2 5 4 1
Fig. 3-Autoradiographs
showing the extent of
tracer movement one hour
after tracer was added (a)
directionally solidified (b)
quenched from liquid.
Solidification conditions
given in Table II. Magnifi-
cation 2 times.
(a) (b)
Calculated
Average Average DistanceBetween
Alloy Temperature Growth Liquidus and
Fig. Composition Gradient Rale Solidus Isotherms
No. (wt pct) (~ (cm/sec) (cm)
3(a) Pb-20 Sn 1.9 0.0033 48.9
3(b) Pb-20 Sn - quenched -
4(a) Pb-20 Sn 1.5 0.0047 62.0
4(b),5 Pb-20 Sn 1.9 0.0033 48.9
(a)
? ?- : ..(/
If ,r
I~--;.~7:7~- "r i,
e x p e c t a n e t m o v e m e n t of s o l u t e in the d i r e c t i o n of l e n g t h w i l l o n l y b e s u b j e c t to g e o m e t r i c a l s c a t t e r ,
g r o w t h u n l e s s t h e r e w a s l i q u i d m i x i n g on a m a c r o - since microsegregation only extends over relatively
scopic scale. This mixing could take place either s h o r t d i s t a n c e s . K n o w i n g t h e m e a n s and s t a n d a r d d e -
w i t h i n the s o l i d - l i q u i d z o n e , o r b e t w e e n t h i s z o n e and v i a t i o n s f o r t h e top and b o t t o m h a l v e s of the ingot, the
the b u l k l i q u i d a h e a d of the d e n d r i t e t i p s . " t - t e s t " m a y b e u s e d to c h e c k w h e t h e r t h e c o m p o s i -
An e s t i m a t e of t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e of t h e m a c r o s e g r e - tion differences are significant.
g a t i o n v a l u e s in T a b l e T c a n be o b t a i n e d b y u s i n g e l e - F o r a s i g n i f i c a n c e l e v e l of 0.01, one m a y c o n c l u d e
mentary statistics. The composition measurements t h a t t h e r e is no s i g n i f i c a n t m a c r o s e g r e g a t i o n w h e n
f o r e a c h s a m p l e a r e s u b j e c t to m i c r o s e g r e g a t i o n and AC < 0.19 p c t Sn f o r P b - 2 0 p c t Sn i n g o t s , o r AC < 0.11
g e o m e t r i c a l s c a t t e r , h o w e v e r , it is r e a s o n a b l e to a s - p c t lab f o r S n - 4 p c t Pb i n g o t s . T h u s t h e m e a s u r e d v a l -
s u m e t h a t t h e m e a n of s a m p l e s o v e r h a l f the ingot u e s of AC in T a b l e I f o r both q u e n c h e d i n g o t s s h o w no
g,
The e x p e r i m e n t w h e r e t r a c e r was added to the liquid ~ 03
$
at the top of the c a s t i n g ( F i g . 3) c o n f i r m s that s o l u t e
c o n v e c t i o n took p l a c e , which is a t t r i b u t e d to the f o r m a -
0.1
tion of l o w e r d e n s i t y liquid in the s o l i d - l i q u i d r e g i o n .
In the c a s e of P o - 2 0 pct Sn, the i n t e r d e n d r i t i c liquid ~0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 I00
b e c o m e s e n r i c h e d in tin, up to the e u t e c t i c c o m p o s i - We~t Percent Tm
DO ' 2r0 ' 470 ' 6tO ~ 8TO IOTO 1270 14'0 O J -w
~0 O ~]0 4~0 6FO ' 8:0 ' tOlO 1 ~2'0 ' t41C
DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF CASTING (cm)
OISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF CASTING (cm)
Fig. 9--Solute distribution as a function of the structure (ef-
fective number of channels). Fig. ll--Solute distribution as a function of growth rate.
~ M
H=Scm
= ~ _ _ = ; H : [4 r ~
~. H=lOcm
~ " _
E p
/ number of channels (NC) =O-6x IOs numberof layers (L) =28
oj viscosity of the liquid 9 O-O~peise
number Of layers ( L ) - 2 B
~
9 DO 0 2:0 4'0 6:0 8'0 I0:0 12'0 14'O
| o:, dz o:3 o~, o:5 o~ dr o'.a o:9 ,.'o DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF CASTING (cm}
DISTANCE F ~ BOTTOM OF CASTING(X/H)
Fig. 12--S01ute distribution as a function of temperature
Fig. 10--Solute distribution as a function of ingot height. gradient.