You are on page 1of 17

Struggling to get united.

Contemporary student
movements in Poland as a part of international
networks.

Piotr Kowzan
Małgorzata Zielińska
Magdalena Prusinowska (absent)

Institute of Education, University of Gdańsk, Poland


ISA, 16.07.2010
RC47.12: United We Stand? Social Movements in Eastern and Western Europe
Goals & methods
● Discussing one “student” movement in Poland
in the context of global actions and the
International Student Movement (ISM)
● Authors were participants and founders of the
movement, have experienced it's crisis
Student movements in the global
context
➔ International Student Movement (ISM)- an independent platform uniting
groups struggling for free and emancipatory education.
➔ Originating in Germany
➔ Against neo-liberal reforms
➔ “International Day of Action against the Commercialization of Education”
(5/11/2008) - a series of coordinated protests in over 25 countries
➔ “Reclaim your Education - Global Week of Action” (20-29/4/2009)
➔ massive demonstrations and occupations (especially in Spain, Germany,
Croatia, Austria and the USA)
➔ violent police repressions
Bologna Process
● In Europe protests had often
“Anti-Bolognian” character,
● For Poland B.P. meant: mobility,
different structure of studies, and
in contrary to e.g. Germany, more
choice for students
● But the new reform plans that
introduced some elements of
commercialisation (more
dependency on business) were
presented in spring 2009, when
student movements in Poland
had already been mobilised.
Student movements in Poland
● Polish activists hearing about ISM and expecting that something should go on in
Poland too
● Independent movements in Gdańsk and Wrocław with clear alliance to ISM,
focusing on local issues
● Later also actions in Lublin, Poznań, Warsaw
● Mostly block recruitment of PhD students and former exchange students; multiple
membership
OKUPÉ

● Gdansk: lack of scholarships for PhD students, who first (in November 2008) decided to
act within the available organizational framework – first-year students “took over” the
PhD Student Council.
● need for an active and open organisation empowering students' voices and articulating
their grievance against the security policy at the university (increasing number of cameras
inside buildings, fencing of the previously open campus, and security guards controlling
everybody who enters the library).
● first meeting - March, 11, 2009, around 50 people turned up and there was a heated
discussion about everything that should be changed at the university.
● Otwarty Komitet Uwalniania Przestrzeni Edukacyjnych – Open Committee for the
Liberation of Educational Spaces
Organizational structure
● Based on:
● Consensus decision-making
● Working groups for particular issues
● Sign language at the meetings
● Online discussions between meetings
The fence around UG

Photo: Dominik Krzymiński


Issue Actions Results
Fencing the previously an open letter to the rector + discussion panel + = no changes with the fence; but a lot
open campus
Issues and actions
a clandestine direct action + a film + interviews
in the media
of discussion at the university and in
media
Police-like control in the research + petition + meetings with the = some minor changes
library administration 
Lack of scholarships for coordinated international flash mob + T-shirts 2 scholarships + at least 2 more
PhD students with slogans + letters from the student council to promised in year 2010/11
the dean
Cameras and over-reactive fake cameras installed = no changes, minor repressions to the
university police members of the movement
New reforms – more demonstrations, banners, discussions, T-shirts difficult to evaluate
commercialization of with slogans
public universities
Solidarity solidarity letters + meetings/conferences some degree of unity, a new
with other movements together+ coordinated film screenings organization on the national level is
being established
Cars parked on the grass discussion with the rector university guards started to deal with
and sidewalks the problem
Autonomy of the letter to the rector, legal research, individual more awareness about the autonomy
university vs. police control interventions at the university
Zombie Flæsh Mob
Reactions
● Some support (petition, protesting against the
reform)
● OKUPE as a collector of complains
● Lack of interest from most of students
● Destroying the elite image of the studies
● Activism in the cradle of “Solidarność”
The life-cycle of the movement
A lot of energy in the beginning, 50 members

Many left, dissatisfied with aggressive discussions


National/Common Education Congress – separate group
Latency, communication limited to a minimum
Occurring problems and their
possible explanations
● Consensus vs. different goals
● Membership crisis
● Incoherent group
● Different understandings of power (Weber vs.
Foucault)
● Polish authoritarianism
● Academic culture of criticism (Graeber D.,
2009, Twilight of Vanguardism)
Other conclusions
● Small group managed to attract a lot of
attention but not to mobilise masses
● Struggling to unite with other groups in Poland
and abroad – some successful, some not
● Western – (Central) Eastern Divide?
● Copying methods and goals from the West or
addressing universal needs?
● Local vs. global/Western know-how
Thank you!
Any questions or comments?

Contact to the authors:


malzi745@gmail.com
dokpko@ug.gda.pl
m-prusinowska@tlen.pl

You might also like