Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of Business &
Finance (LSBF)
Module Global Marketing
You must submit an electronic copy of your work. Your submission will be
electronically checked on content and presentation.
Harvard The Harvard Referencing System must be used. The Wikipedia website must not
Referencing be referenced in your work.
Write a report:
Using your imagination, describe your company and its operations, relative size and
so forth. Give reasons for your decision to go international.
10 marks
Describe the control and evaluation methods you are going to use for your
marketing plan.
15 marks
Guidelines All written submissions must be properly Harvard referenced. Word count can only
be exceeded by 10% excluding references and appendices. High quality and
professional presentation is essential.
1. Answering the central focus of the assignment topics – you must read the
coursework assignment thoroughly and carefully.
2. A critical appreciation of relevant literature and its use to support
argument, substantiate model(s) and other aspects of the assignment.
3. Taking ownership of the content. A submission made up of
extracts from published sources which is descriptive and just theoretical, is
not acceptable. Your submission must have interpretation and
consideration of the challenges and issues of taking theory into practice
(using cases and/or personal experience).
4. Logical flow of ideas and treatment; imaginative approaches; appropriate
selection of real world factors related to the model(s) or specific
assignment topic.
5. Evidence of additional personal research, and the ability to analyse
material from a variety of appropriate relevant perspectives. A clear listing
of references and/or bibliography – using Harvard referencing protocols.
6. Presentation, structure, appropriateness of methodology, breaking into
section headings/subheadings, tidiness.
7. A strong conclusion.
Please ensure that you reference material which you take from text books,
published documents, internet etc… in the main body of your report, at the place
you use it, as well as listing the publications in an appendix. Also, try to evaluate
and critique this material and the experience you get from applying and using it.
Such personal critique gains high reward in postgraduate level work!
NB: Marks will be awarded for proper referencing and originality of work. Also note
that plagiarism is a serious offence and your submission will be electronically
checked.
Formatting
Deviations from the set formatting guidelines will severely affect your grade,
regardless of report content. This is to ensure optimal length consistency and
fairness for all submitted student reports.
London School of MSc in Marketing
Business &
Finance (LSBF)
Module Integrated Marketing Communications
Assignment Title Integrated Marketing Communications
Grade Description of Achievement
70%+ The Harvard Referencing System has been both used and applied correctly.
Very high standard of critical analysis using appropriate marketing communications
conceptual frameworks. Excellent understanding and exposition of relevant issues
Clearly structured and logically developed arguments
Good awareness of nuances and complexities
Substantial evidence of well-executed independent research
Excellent evaluation and synthesis of source material
Excellent use of relevant data and examples, all properly referenced
60%-69% The Harvard Referencing System has been used and applied, but with minor errors.
High standard of critical analysis using appropriate conceptual marketing
communications frameworks. Clear awareness and exposition of relevant issues
Clearly structured and logically developed argument
Awareness of nuances and complexities
Evidence of independent research. Good evaluation and synthesis of source
material
Good use of relevant data and examples, all properly referenced
50%-59% The Harvard Referencing System has been used and applied but some mistakes
have been made.
Uses appropriate conceptual marcoms frameworks
Attempts analysis but includes some errors and/or omissions
Shows awareness of issues but no more than to be expected from attendance at
classes. Arguments reasonably clear but underdeveloped
Insufficient evidence of independent research
Insufficient evaluation of source material
Some good use of relevant data and examples, but incompletely referenced
40%-49% The Harvard Referencing System has been used and applied but major mistakes
have been made.
Adequate understanding of appropriate conceptual marketing communications
frameworks
Answer too descriptive and/or any attempt at analysis is superficial, containing
errors and/or omissions
Shows limited awareness of issues but also some confusion
Arguments not particularly clear
Limited evidence of independent research and reliance on a superficial repeat of
class notes
Relatively superficial use of relevant data, sources and examples and poorly
referenced.
30%-39% The Harvard Referencing System has been used and applied sporadically but major
mistakes have been made.
Weak understanding of appropriate conceptual marketing communications
frameworks
Weak analysis and several errors and omissions
Establishes a few relevant points but superficial and confused exposition of issues.
No evidence of independent research and poor understanding of class notes. Poor
or no use of relevant data, sources and examples, and no references
Below 0-29% The Harvard Referencing System has not been used.
Very weak or no understanding of appropriate conceptual marketing
communications frameworks
Very weak or no grasp of analysis and many errors and omissions
Very little or no understanding of the issues raised by the question
No appropriate references to data, sources, examples or even class notes