c
 

 
 
  

   

    





 
!
""# $

Thursday, September 21, 2000

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2000/sep/21/20000921-012051-4804r/print/

The failing U.S.-Russian relationship, laid bare in a 209-page report released Wednesday by
Rep. Christopher Cox, provides a searing indictment of the lost opportunities to fight
international crime under the Clinton-Gore administration. Not surprisingly, much of the blame
lands squarely on Janet Reno's scandal-racked Justice Department.







































   
September 21, 2000
Glenn A. Fine
Acting Inspector General
U.S. Department of Justice
http://www.justice.gov/oig/testimony/0009.htm

On April 14, 1997, the Department of Justice Security and Emergency Planning Staff (SEPS)
conducted an unannounced, after-hours sweep of the ICITAP offices after receiving an
allegation that an ICITAP manager had improperly given classified documents to ICITAP staff
who did not have security clearances. During that sweep and a follow-up review conducted by
the Criminal Division Security Staff, 156 classified documents were found unsecured in the
office of ICITAP Associate Director Joseph Trincellito. The OIG and SEPS probed further to
determine the extent of ICITAP's security problems and ICITAP management's responsibility
for the security failures.

The OIG found that the problems discovered in the 1997 security reviews had existed for
many years. Evidence showed that senior managers provided or attempted to provide
classified documents to uncleared consultants or other staff. ICITAP employees, including
senior managers, routinely left classified documents unsecured on desks, including when
individuals were away from their offices on travel. We found one instance where classified
information was sent over an unsecure e-mail system. ICITAP managers also improperly took
classified documents home. Highly classified documents containing Sensitive Compartmented
Information (SCI), or "codeword" information, were brought to the ICITAP offices even though
ICITAP did not have the type of secure facility (a Sensitive Compartmented Information
Facility or "SCIF") required to read or store such material. The evidence also showed that
ICITAP inaccurately certified to United States Embassies that individuals had security
clearances when they did not.

As an example of the inattention ICITAP managers gave to security, our report sets forth the
troubling history of ICITAP Associate Director Trincellito's handling of classified information.
From 1995 through early 1997, ICITAP's security officers repeatedly found classified
documents left unattended in Trincellito's office and warned him that he was violating security
rules. They also notified other ICITAP managers about the problem. One security officer, after
becoming aware of repeated violations, documented the violations in writing and
recommended discipline for Trincellito although none was ever imposed. The ICITAP Director
on occasion spoke to Trincellito about his violations and attempted to make it easier for him to
comply with security rules by putting a safe in his office. However, in the face of repeated
violations, we found that senior ICITAP managers failed to take sufficient action, such as
initiating discipline, to ensure that Trincellito complied with security regulations.

We concluded that ICITAP managers' own violations of the security rules and their tolerance of
known violations sent a message that security of classified documents was not important at
ICITAP. We also found that the Criminal Division did not adequately supervise ICITAP's
security program even though security reviews conducted by both SEPS and the Criminal
Division beginning in 1994 showed a pattern of security violations.

   
September 21, 2000

Glenn A. Fine
Acting Inspector General
U.S. Department of Justice
http://www.justice.gov/oig/testimony/0009.htm

Bratt and other ICITAP and OPDAT managers violated government travel regulations by flying
business class without authorization and by using frequent flyer miles accrued on government
travel for personal purposes, among other violations. Government and Department of Justice
travel regulations restrict the use of business class by government travelers. Even in
circumstances when business class may be used, it must be authorized by the traveler's
supervisor. On none of these trips was Bratt's use of business class authorized. On one trip,
we found that ICITAP and OPDAT managers made travel decisions for personal reasons, such
as where to spend the weekend and what airline to use, that unnecessarily increased the cost
of the trip. On three trips, we found that Bratt and other travelers improperly invoked the "14-
hour rule" that allows authorized travelers to fly business class when a flight, including
layovers, is longer than 14 hours. One these trips, the Department's travel agency had
suggested an alternative itinerary that would have saved the government substantial money.
However, in each case the less expensive itinerary was rejected.

We found that Bratt, contrary to travel regulations, repeatedly approved his own travel
requests or had subordinates approve them. In addition, the majority of travel vouchers Bratt
submitted for reimbursement were either signed by Bratt, his subordinates, or someone at the
same rank as Bratt - again, a violation of travel regulations that require approval of all
government travel by an official occupying a higher rank than the traveler.

We found that the Justice Management Division (JMD), which is responsible for auditing
foreign travel vouchers, did not question the use of business class travel by Bratt or the other
managers who accompanied him even when a lack of authorization was apparent on the face
of the travel documents.

During the course of the investigation we also found that ICITAP, OPDAT, and Office of
Administration managers violated other government travel regulations, including those
involving the use of frequent flyer benefits. For example, we concluded that Bratt and others
used government-earned frequent flyer miles for personal use in violation of Department
regulations.