Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S.1 Welcome
The meeting began at 5:37 PM
I would like to take a few seconds to outline the process that will be followed today in order to consider
elections appeals regarding the SFUO General Election. As per a decision adopted by this Board of
th
Administration on Sunday February 27 2011 the appeals today shall be considered following these
guidelines:
! The meeting will be open only to the members of the Board plus the appellants, defendants and
their representatives, the Chief Electoral Officer, the Secretary of the Board and the Chair of the
Board.
! The appellant s will be given 3 minutes each to explain their case to the BOA, they may choose to
allow a representative to speak on their behalf, or to share their allotted time with their
representative.
! After that the defendants will be given 3 minutes each to make their remarks to the BOA, they may
chose to allow a representative to speak on their behalf, or to share their allotted time with their
representative.
! After the presentations are made, members of the BOA will have up to 20 minutes to consider the
written submissions and relevant documentation.
! When the members of the BOA are ready to proceed and after the presentations by the parties to
the appeal, the BOA will have 15 minutes to debate the appeal, this period of time may be
extended once by a simple majority vote.
! At the conclusion of the debate a final decision by the BOA will be made.
! Once an appeal has been dispensed with, the parties will be asked to vacate the room and the
parties to the following appeal will be invited to the meeting.
As Chair of the Board I am responsible for maintaining order at meetings, no disturbances will be tolerated,
whether by members of the BOA, parties to the appeals or any other individual. I ask that each of you as
well as all parties involved in the appeals behave in a respectful manner and adhere to the rules of order
which govern our meetings. Any person who insists on causing disturbances will be asked to leave the
meeting room.
There have been a number of appeals received, those that were submitted within the prescribed timelines
as per the SFUO constitution will be considered by the BOA today. There will be a total of 6 appeals. The
submission by the appellants, the responses by the defendants and any relevant documentation submitted
by the CEO or Elections Committee has been compiled and will be distributed prior to the beginning of each
appeal for your consideration.
On whether or not the meeting is constitutional because the motion that was used to allow it not to have
people in the meeting did not follow Robert’s Rules of Order or the Constitution and should have been a 2/3
vote and not a majority vote
S.1 Welcome
S.2 Roll Call
S.3 Comments from the chair
S.4 Adoption of the agenda
S.5 General Elections Appeals
S.6 Ratification of Election Results
S.7 Closing of the meeting
Appeal number 1.
Because of the technical difficulties with the live streaming of the meeting, I propose to give the student
media permission to listen in on the meeting from inside the room in order to insure transparency and the
right to access to information
As long as we allow 3 people per media (3 from la Rotonde, 3 from the Fulcrum)
Be it resolved that the three members of La Rotonde and The Fulcrum respect the safe space rules
and that if these rules are broken, there is a process and following this process the members of the
media will be asked to leave the room
In order to maintain this safe space the media shall not have speaking rights while at the
meeting nor shall they disrupt in any way
Adopted
Adopted unanimously
Appeal number 2.
Amendment
The Chair hands out communications received from SFUO legal counsel
Motion to elect a member of the Board to draft the written decision of the Board on the matter of the
appeals of Tristan Dénommée and Nick Crawford
Amendment
That the chair of the board, with the assistance of legal counsel, drafts a written statement reflecting
the decisions made by the Board on the appeals regarding the V.P. Finance Race to be ratified by
the board at the next Board meeting
Appeal number 3.
Logan Ouellette wanted to give his rights to the appellant, Amy Hammett objected on the
grounds that both parties had their chance and that if they talk again its unfair. The Chair
said he agreed with Amy Hammett even though he thinks that the appellant should still be
able to talk on points of information if required.
Motion to sustain the ruling of the chair regarding giving speaking rights to the
appellant
Appeal number 4.
Appeal number 5.
!" #$%&'()&*+,-.&/01%&0&234.345&6$06&537%4&6$%&63/%-34%&+2&6$%&%4.&+2&6$%&%-%*63+4&
*0/80354&8%93+.&04.&6$%&7+6345&8%93+.:&36&;0<&3/8+<<3=-%&2+9&6$%&>?(&.%0-&;36$&6$%&
203-,9%&6+&*+/8-@&;36$&6$%&A0B+9&C%40-6@&,4.%9&<%*63+4&DE"F"D"&&)<&6$3<&/066%9&4%%.%.&6+&
=%&.%0-6&;36$&34&0&63/%-@&/044%9&8+<6G%-%*63+4&04.&8+<6G9%0.345&;%%1:&36&;0<&9%0<+40=-%&
2+9&6$%&?-%*63+4&*+//366%%&6+&$%09&6$%&088%0-&+2&A<"&H345&04.&;%35$&0--&6$%&%73.%4*%:&
34*-,.345&6$%&203-,9%&=@&A9"&I%4+//J&6+&*+/8-@&;36$&6$%&A0B+9&C%40-6@&<04*63+4"&&#$%&
'()&<$+,-.&/01%&0&<8%*323*&234.345&6$06&6$%&203-,9%&6+&*+/8-@&;36$&6$%&A0B+9&C%40-6@&$0.&
0&.39%*6&%22%*6&+4&6$%&+,6*+/%&+2&6$%&%-%*63+4<&04.&0<&<,*$&6$%&.%*3<3+4&6+&.3<K,0-32@&3<&
,8$%-."&
Appeal number 6.