You are on page 1of 25

Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 1 of 25 Page ID #:5

~F'LED

1 ANDRE BIROTTE JR. :201J APR -5 AM II: 23


United States Attorney
2 ROBERT E. DUGDALE (:':."'<,:< ~U.'·. DIST;(/Ci' cOUr r
CL. ,if L DIS T. OF CALIF ..
Assistant United States Attorney LO t" CUES
3 Chief, Criminal Division

4
EVAN J. DAVIS (Cal. State Bar #250484)
Assistant United States Attorney
; oy
---_._----
Major Frauds Section
5 1100 United States Courthouse
312 North Spring Street
6 Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-4850
7 Facsimile: (213) 894-6269
Email: Evan.Davis@usdoj.gov
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

10

11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )


)
CR N 5
14 Plaintiff, ) PLEA AGREEMENT FOR DEFENDANT
) EDWARD STANTON
15 v. )
)
16 EDWARD STANTON, )
)
17 Defendant. )
)
18 )

19
20 1. This constitutes the plea agreement between EDWARD

21 STANTON ("defendant") and the United States Attorney's Office for

22 the Central District of California ("the USAO") in the

23 investigation of a charitable-giving tax scheme that involved the

24 preparation and presentation of tax returns that included

25 falsified deductions based on inflated appraisals of art work

26 donated to charity. This agreement is limited to the USAO and

27 cannot bind any other federal, state, local, or foreign

28
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 2 of 25 Page ID #:6

1 prosecuting, enforcement, administrative, or regulatory

2 authorities.
3 DEFENDANT'S OBLIGATIONS

4 2. Defendant agrees to:


5 a) Give up the right to indictment by a grand jury and,

6 at the earliest opportunity requested by the USAO and provided by

7 the Court, appear and plead guilty to a one-count information in

8 the form attached to this agreement as Exhibit A or a

9 substantially similar form.


10 b) Not contest facts agreed to in this agreement.
11 c) Abide by all agreements regarding sentencing factors

12 contained in this agreement.


13 d) Appear for all court appearances, surrender as

14 ordered for service of sentence, obey all conditions of any bond,

15 and obey any other ongoing court order in this matter.


16 e) Not commit any crime; however, offenses that would

17 be excluded for sentencing purposes under United States


18 Sentencing Guidelines (nU.S.S.G." or nSentencing Guidelines")

19 § 4A1.2(c) are not within the scope of this agreement.


20 f) Be truthful at all times with Pretrial Services, the

21 United States Probation Office, and the Court.


22 g) Pay the applicable special assessment at or before

23 the time of sentencing unless defendant lacks the ability to pay


24 and submits a completed financial statement (form OBD-500) to the

25 USAO prior to sentencing.

26
27

28
2
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 3 of 25 Page ID #:7

1 h) Not seek the discharge of any restitution

2 obligation, in whole or in part, in any present or future

3 bankruptcy proceeding.
4 i) To fill out and deliver to the USAO a completed

5 financial statement (form OBD-500) listing defendant's assets.


6 3. Defendant further agrees to cooperate fully with the

7 USAO, the Internal Revenue Service, and, as directed by the USAO,

8 any other federal, state, local, or foreign prosecuting,


9 enforcement, administrative, or regulatory authority. This

10 cooperation requires defendant to:


11 a) Respond truthfully and completely to all questions

12 that may be put to defendant, whether in interviews, before a

13 grand jury, or at any trial or other court proceeding.


14 b) Attend all meetings, grand jury sessions, trials

15 or other proceedings at which defendant's presence is requested

16 by the USAO or compelled by subpoena or court order.


17 c) Produce voluntarily all documents, records, or

18 other tangible evidence relating to matters about which the USAO,

19 or its designee, inquires.


20 4. For purposes of this agreement: (1) "Cooperation

21 Information" shall mean any statements made, or documents,

22 records, tangible evidence, or other information provided, by

23 defendant pursuant to defendant's cooperation under this


24 agreement; and (2) "Plea Information" shall mean any statements

25 made by defendant, under oath, at the guilty plea hearing and the

26 agreed to factual basis statement in this agreement.

27

28

3
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 4 of 25 Page ID #:8

1 THE USAO'S OBLIGATIONS

2 5. The USAO agrees to:


3 a) Not contest facts agreed to in this agreement.
4 b) Abide by all agreements regarding sentencing factors

5 contained in this agreement.


6 c) At the time of sentencing, provided that defendant

7 demonstrates an acceptance of responsibility for the offense up


8 to and including the time of sentencing, recommend a two-level
9 reduction in the applicable Sentencing Guidelines offense level,

10 pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, and recommend and, if necessary,

11 move for an additional one-level reduction if available under

12 that section.
13 d) Recommend that defendant be sentenced to a term of

14 imprisonment no higher than the low end of the applicable


15 Sentencing Guidelines range, provided that the offense level used

16 by the Court to determine that range is 15 or higher prior to any


17 departure downward in offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1

18 and provided that the Court does not depart downward in criminal

19 history category or offense level except to the extent requested

20 by the USAO pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1. For purposes of this

21 agreement, the low end of the Sentencing Guidelines range is that

22 defined by the Sentencing Table in U.S.S.G. Chapter 5, Part A,


23 without regard to reductions in the term of imprisonment that may

24 be permissible through the substitution of community confinement

25 or home detention as a result of the offense level falling within

26 Zone B or Zone C of the Sentencing Table.

27

28

4
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 5 of 25 Page ID #:9

1 6. The USAO further agrees:

2 a) Not to offer as evidence in its case-in-chief in

3 the above-captioned case or any other criminal prosecution that

4 may be brought against defendant by the USAO, or in connection

5 with any sentencing proceeding in any criminal case that may be

6 brought against defendant by the USAO, any Cooperation

7 Information. Defendant agrees, however, that the USAO may use

8 both Cooperation Information and Plea Information: (1) to obtain

9 and pursue leads to other evidence, which evidence may be used

10 for any purpose, including any criminal prosecution of defendant;

11 (2) to cross-examine defendant should defendant testify, or to

12 rebut any evidence offered, or argument or representation made,

13 by defendant, defendant's counsel, or a witness called by

14 defendant in any trial, sentencing hearing, or other court

15 proceeding; and (3) in any criminal prosecution of defendant for

16 false statement, obstruction of justice, or perjury.

17 b) Not to use Cooperation Information against

18 defendant at sentencing for the purpose of determining the

19 applicable guideline range, including the appropriateness of an

20 upward departure, or the sentence to be imposed, and to recommend

21 to the Court that Cooperation Information not be used in

22 determining the applicable guideline range or the sentence to be

23 imposed. Defendant understands, however, that Cooperation

24 Information will be disclosed to the probation office and the

25 Court, and that the Court may use Cooperation Information for the

26 purposes set forth in U.S.S.G. § IBl.8(b) and for determining the

27 sentence to be imposed.

28

5
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 6 of 25 Page ID #:10

6
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 7 of 25 Page ID #:11

1 d) At this time the USAO makes no agreement or

2 representation as to whether any cooperation that defendant has

3 provided or intends to provide constitutes or will constitute


4 substantial assistance. The decision whether defendant has

5 provided substantial assistance will rest solely within the

6 exclusive judgment of the USAO.


7 e) The USAO's determination whether defendant has

8 provided substantial assistance will not depend in any wayan


9 whether the government prevails at any trial or court hearing in

10 which defendant testifies or in which the government otherwise

11 presents information resulting from defendant's cooperation.


12 NATURE OF THE OFFENSE
13 8. Defendant understands that for defendant to be guilty of

14 the crime charged in the one-count information (violation of


15 Title 26, United States Code, Section 7206(2)), the following
16 must be true: (1) the defendant aided, assisted, advised, or

17 procured a person in the preparation or presentation of an income

18 tax return that was false or fraudulent; (2) the income tax

19 return was false or fraudulent as to any material matter


20 necessary to a determination of whether income tax was owed; and

21 (3) the defendant acted willfully. Defendant admits that


22 defendant is, in fact, guilty of this offense as described in the

23 one-count information.
24 PENALTIES AND RESTITUTION

25 9. Defendant understands that the statutory maximum

26 sentence that the Court can impose for a violation of Title 26,

27 United States Code, Section 7206(2), is: three years


28 imprisonment; a one-year period of supervised release; a fine of

7
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 8 of 25 Page ID #:12

1 $250,000 or twice the gross gain or gross loss resulting from the

2 offense, whichever is greatest; and a mandatory special

3 assessment of $100.
4 10. Defendant agrees to make full restitution to the

5 Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, for the losses

6 caused by defendant's activities. Defendant agrees that, in

7 return for the USAO's compliance with its obligations under this

8 agreement, the amount of restitution is not restricted to the


9 amounts alleged in the count to which defendant is pleading
10 guilty and may include losses arising from charges not prosecuted

11 pursuant to this agreement as well as all relevant conduct in


12 connection with those charges. The parties currently believe

13 that the applicable amount of restitution is approximately

14 $370,938, before crediting any payments applied to the 2004 tax

15 period for taxpayers G.M. and his spouse F.M., B.M. and his
16 spouse K.M., and T.R. and his spouse J.R., but recognize and

17 agree that this amount could change based on facts that come to
18 the attention of the parties prior to sentencing. The government

19 agrees to recommend that defendant be jointly and severally

20 liable for this restitution with any other person who is

21 convicted if that persons' offense conduct or relevant conduct

22 includes the same conduct described in the factual basis

23 contained In the plea agreement.


24 11. Defendant understands that supervised release is a

25 period of time following imprisonment during which defendant will

26 be subject to various restrictions and requirements. Defendant

27 understands that if defendant violates one or more of the


28 conditions of any supervised release imposed, defendant may be

8
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 9 of 25 Page ID #:13

1 returned to prison for all or part of the term of supervised

2 release authorized by statute for the offense that resulted in

3 the term of supervised release, which could result in defendant

4 serving a total term of imprisonment greater than the statutory

5 maximum stated above.


6 12. Defendant understands that, by pleading guilty,

7 defendant may be giving up valuable government benefits and

8 valuable civic rights, such as the right to vote, the right to

9 possess a firearm, the right to hold office, and the right to

10 serve on a jury. Defendant understands that once the court

11 accepts defendant's guilty plea, it will be a federal felony for

12 defendant to possess a firearm or ammunition. Defendant

13 understands that the conviction in this case may also subject

14 defendant to various other collateral consequences, including but

15 not limited to revocation of probation, parole, or supervised

16 release in another case and suspension or revocation of a


17 professional license. Defendant understands that unanticipated

18 collateral consequences will not serve as grounds to withdraw

19 defendant's guilty plea.


20 13. Defendant understands that, if defendant is not a

21 United States citizen, the felony conviction in this case may

22 subject defendant to removal, also known as deportation, which

23 may, under some circumstances, be mandatory. The court cannot,

24 and defendant's attorney also may not be able to, advise

25 defendant fully regarding the immigration consequences of the

26 felony conviction in this case. Defendant understands that by

27 entering a guilty plea defendant waives any claim that unexpected

28

9
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 10 of 25 Page ID #:14

1 immigration consequences may render defendant's guilty plea

2 invalid.
3 FACTUAL BASIS
4 14. Defendant and the USAO agree to the statement of facts

5 provided below. Defendant and the USAO agree that this statement

6 of facts is sufficient to support a plea of guilty to the charge

7 described in this agreement and to establish the Sentencing


8 Guidelines factors set forth in paragraph 16 below but is. not
9 meant to be a complete recitation of all facts relevant to the

10 underlying criminal conduct or all facts known to either party

11 that relate to that conduct.


12 a. Defendant is an art collector and in 1990,

13 purchased approximately 1,500 paintings by the deceased

14 Mexican artist Jesus "Chu Cho" Reyes Ferreira for


15 approximately $1 million, which was approximately $750 per
16 painting. Defendant grouped these paintings together as the

17 Milano Collection and at that time believed he was the

18 exclusive holder of this Collection.


19 b. Defendant also gifted and sold his art from the

20 Milano Collection to friends such as G. M. Defendant


21 typically sold his art at a discount of 15% of the "claimed

22 value," which value defendant set by using the offering

23 prices for similar work in the 1980s and then increasing

24 those prices by approximately 5% to 10% per year for

25 "inflation." Defendant set the claimed value without regard

26 to prices recently paid for similar Reyes paintings.


27 Defendant also knew that artwork prices can fluctuate up and

28 down from year to year and that recent sales were necessary

10
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 11 of 25 Page ID #:15

to substantiate a claimed value for these reasons. Not


1
until late 2004, however, did defendant understand that he
2
could not substantiate the claimed value if challenged.
3
c. Defendant was aware that the IRS allowed a tax
4
deduction for art donations to a charity, although the IRS
5
required appraisals of the artwork in some circumstances.
6
Defendant sold paintings to G.M. and then later to his
7
brother B.M., their corporation, and their business partner,
8
T.M. In order for the buyers, who were also collectors, to
9
receive a tax deduction, the art had to be donated to a
10
charitable or non-profit organization. Defendant suggested
11
in discussions that occurred in or about 1999 that the
12
buyers/collectors could donate the art after the requisite
13
IRS holding period expired to the charity A.A.V.C., a non-
14
profit 501(c) organization that was owned and operated by
15
A.V. Defendant and the buyers discussed the charitable
16
donations with the buyers' accountant B.G., who took the
17
transaction to the Board of Directors of G.M. and B.M.'s
18
corporation for approval.
19
d. Shortly before donating the artwork to the
20
A.A.V.C. non-profit, the art had to be appraised in
21
preparation for the charitable deduction. Photographs of
22
the art rather than the art itself were typically submitted
23
for appraisals. In or about 1999, defendant initially
24
offered to submit the art photos to appraiser A.L., but the
25
buyers and B.G. chose appraiser L.L. Although L.L. had
26
previously appraised Reyes pieces for A.A.V.C. in prior
27
years, L.L. still contacted defendant directly to obtain
28

11
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 12 of 25 Page ID #:16

1 prior sales information to assist in L.L. 's appraising the

2 art pieces. As defendant understood, because the pieces

3 from the Milano Collection did not generate much of an

4 individual retail sales market, there was little or no

5 recent public sales information, so L.L. relied on


6 defendant, the owner of the Milano Collection, for valuation

7 information.
8 e. On or about March 26, 2003, defendant purchased

9 from A.V. some of the paintings from the Milano Collection

10 that defendant has previously sold to G.M. and/or T.R.,

11 which were then donated to A.A.V.C. by G.M. and/or T.R. in


12 2001. These pieces were previously appraised by L.L. at

13 approximately $23,000 each in 2001. When A.V. sold the

14 paintings to defendant directly from A.A.V.C. and through an


15 A.V.-controlled entity, C.A.S., defendant paid A.V. $1,000

16 for each painting.


17 f. Defendant re-titled a few of the paintings,

18 although the art catalogue number or reference remained


19 unchanged. The re-titled paintings were resold to T.R. on

20 or about October 16, 2003, and to B.M. on or about November

21 19, 2003, for approximately $4,500 each, for a total of

22 $30,000 and $50,000 in sales, respectively. As defendant

23 then knew, these paintings were purchased for donation to


24 A.A.V.C. after being held for the requisite holding period

25 and were to be appraised by L.L. prior to the donation.


26 g. When defendant sent various photos of artwork to

27 assist L.L. 's appraising the Reyes paintings that T.R. and

28 B.M. were donating to A.A.V.C. in December 2004, the photos

12
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 13 of 25 Page ID #:17

1 included a few of the previously donated pieces. Defendant

2 failed to advise L.L. that the previously donated pieces

3 were being reappraised for donation to the same charity that

4 had received them before, A.A.V.C.


5 h. In mid-2004, L.L. asked defendant how some of

6 defendant's claimed values for the Reyes paintings were

7 justified, such as those in $30,000 or $40,000 range. In


8 response, defendant provided information regarding where the

9 art had been published, defendant's opinion of its


10 uniqueness, and a list of claimed values from previous

11 pieces. Defendant believed he held the exclusive Milano


12 Collection and that the only actual sales thereof were to

13 persons donating the artwork to A.A.V.C. Defendant's 2004

14 claimed values were derived from his self-generated formula


15 of using prices from the 1980s and adding 5% to 10% per year

16 to those prices, but did not reflect recent retail sales.


17 i. During or around the time in which defendant was

18 providing information for L.L. to appraise the December 2004

19 donations to A.A.V.C., defendant became aware that B.M. and

20 G.M.'s company was defending an IRS audit of previous

21 donations. Defendant was asked to substantiate the claimed

22 values and conferred with A.V. to obtain written sales


23 receipts. However, defendant was unable to substantiate any

24 claimed values as neither defendant nor A.V. had any written

25 retail sales receipts in support of the claimed values that

26 defendant had provided to the buyers and to L.L. when L.L.

27 was preparing his appraisals.

28

13
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 14 of 25 Page ID #:18

1 j. Because of the lack of documentation and the

2 realization that the way in which defendant had calculated

3 claimed values was flawed, defendant realized in late 2004

4 that he had given inflated claimed values to L.L. in the

5 past. Notwithstanding this realization, or his awareness of

6 the fact that some of the artwork being appraised in 2004

7 was being redonated after defendant had repurchased the

8 artwork from A.A.V.C. for approximately 4% of the appraised

9 value, defendant did not notify L.L. or his clients that his

10 claimed values for pre-2004 donated artwork were inflated.

11 Further, defendant provided claimed values to L.L. for the

12 December 2004 appraisals that defendant knew at the time he

13 provided them were inflated and could not be substantiated.

14 Defendant also knew that as in the past, L.L. 's appraisals

15 would be provided to accountant B.G. and used to support

16 charitable-giving deductions on B.M and F.M. 's 2004 tax

17 return.
18 k. On or about October 17, 2005, B.M. and his spouse

19 K.M., filed a 2004 federal income tax return containing the

20 inflated and unsubstantiated or false appraisals by L.L. to

21 justify the value of their donation of the Reyes paintings

22 to A.A.V.C., whose value totaled $336,000. Defendant knew

23 that his opinion as to the value of the paintings were

24 unsubstantiated by comparable market sales thus were

25 inflated.
26 1. Defendant also aided in providing the excessive

27 appraisals to be filed with the 2004 tax returns of T.R. and

28 his spouse J.R., and of G.M. and his spouse F.M., for

14
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 15 of 25 Page ID #:19

1 donations to A.A.V.C., along with B.M and K.M. 's tax return,

2 resulting in a tax loss for the 2004 calendar year of

3 $370,938.

4 SENTENCING FACTORS

5 15. Defendant understands that in determining defendant's

6 sentence the Court is required to consider the factors set forth

7 in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (1)-(7), including the kinds of sentence

8 and sentencing range established under the Sentencing Guidelines.

9 Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory

10 only, that defendant cannot have any expectation of receiving a

11 sentence within the Sentencing Guidelines range, and that after

12 considering the Sentencing Guidelines and the other § 3553(a)

13 factors, the Court will be free to exercise its discretion to

14 impose any sentence it finds appropriate up to the maximum set by

15 statute for the crime of conviction.

16 16. Defendant and the USAO agree to the following

17 applicable Sentencing Guidelines factors:

18 Base offense level: 18 [tax loss between $200,000 and


$400,000, USSG § 2T4.1(G)]
19
20 Defendant and the USAO reserve the right to argue that additional

21 specific offense characteristics, adjustments, and departures

22 under the Sentencing Guidelines are appropriate. In particular,

23 the government intends to argue that a two-point enhancement

24 under U.S.S.G. § 2T1.4(b) (1) should apply based on defendant

25 having receipt a substantial portion of his income from this tax

26 scheme. Defendant intends to oppose this sentencing enhancement.

27 17. Defendant understands that there is no agreement as to

28 defendant's criminal history or criminal history category.

15
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 16 of 25 Page ID #:20

1 18. Defendant and the USAO reserve the right to argue for a

2 sentence outside the sentencing range established by the

3 Sentencing Guidelines based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.

4 § 3553 (a) (1), (a) (2), (a) (3), (a) (6), and (a) (7) .
5 WAIVER OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

6 19. Defendant understands that by pleading guilty,

7 defendant gives up the following rights:


8 a) The right to persist in a plea of not 1
9 b) The right to a speedy and public trial by jury.

10 c) The right to the assistance of an attorney at trial,

11 including the right to have the Court appoint an attorney to

12 represent defendant at trial. Defendant understands, however,

13 that, despite defendant's guilty plea, defendant retains the

14 right to be represented by an attorney -- and, if necessary, to

15 have the Court appoint an attorney if defendant cannot afford one

16 -- at every other stage of the proceeding.


17 d) The right to be presumed innocent and to have the

18 burden of proof placed on the government to prove defendant

19 guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.


20 e) The right to confront and cross-examine witnesses

21 against defendant.
22 f) The right to testify on defendant's own behalf and

23 present evidence in opposition to the charge, including calling

24 witnesses and subpoenaing those witnesses to testify.


25 g) The right not to be compelled to testify, and, if

26 defendant chose not to testify or present evidence, to have that

27 choice not be used against defendant.

28

16
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 17 of 25 Page ID #:21

1 h) Any and all rights to pursue any affirmative

2 defenses, Fourth Amendment or Fifth Amendment claims, and other

3 pretrial motions that have been filed or could be filed.


4 i) Having been fully advised by defendant's attorney

5 regarding the requirements of venue with respect to the offense


6 to which defendant lS pleading guilty, to the extent the offense

7 to which defendant is pleading guilty was committed, begun, or


8 completed outside the Central District of California, defendant
9 knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waives, relinquishes,

10 and gives up: (a) any right that defendant might have to be

11 prosecuted only in the district where the offense to which


12 defendant is pleading guilty was committed, begun, or completed;
13 and (b) any defense, claim, or argument defendant could raise or

14 assert based upon lack of venue with respect to the offense to

15 which defendant is pleading guilty.


16 WAIVER OF APPEAL OF CONVICTION

17 20. Defendant understands that, with the exception of an

18 appeal based on a claim that defendant's guilty plea was


19 involuntary, by pleading guilty defendant is waiving and giving
20 up any right to appeal defendant's conviction on the offense to

21 which defendant is pleading guilty.


22 LIMITED MUTUAL WAIVER OF APPEAL OF SENTENCE

23 21. Defendant agrees that, provided the Court imposes a

24 total term of imprisonment of no more than 18 months, defendant

25 gives up the right to appeal all of the following: (a) the

26 procedures and calculations used to determine and impose any


27 portion of the sentence; (b) the term of imprisonment imposed by

28 the Court; (c) the fine imposed by the court, provided it is

17
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 18 of 25 Page ID #:22

1 within the statutory maximum; (d) the amount and terms of any
2 restitution order, provided it requires payment of no more than

3 $370,938; (e) the term of probation or supervised release imposed


4 by the Court, provided it is within the statutory maximum; and

5 (f) any of the following conditions of probation or supervised

6 release imposed by the Court: the standard conditions set forth

7 in General Orders 318, 01-05, and/or 05-02 of this Court; and the
8 drug testing conditions mandated by 18 U.S.C. §§ 3563(a) (5) and

9 3583 (d) .
10 22. The USAO agrees that, provided (a) all portions of the

11 sentence are at or below the statutory maximum specified above

12 and (b) the Court imposes a term of imprisonment of no less than


13 18 months, the USAO gives up its right to appeal any portion of

14 the sentence, with the exception that the USAO reserves the right

15 to appeal the amount of restitution ordered if that amount is


16 less than $370,938, before crediting any payments received by the
17 IRS related to underpayments arising from defendant's conduct for

18 the 2004 tax accounts of B.M. and K.M., G.M. and F.M., and T.R.

19 and J.R.
20 RESULT OF WITHDRAWAL OF GUILTY PLEA

21 23. Defendant agrees that if, after entering a guilty plea

22 pursuant to this agreement, defendant seeks to withdraw and

23 succeeds in withdrawing defendant's guilty plea on any basis

24 other than a claim and finding that entry into this plea

25 agreement was involuntary, then (a) the USAO will be relieved of

26 all o~ its obligations under this agreement, including in

27 particular its obligations regarding the use of Cooperation


28 Information; and (b) in any investigation, criminal prosecution,

18
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 19 of 25 Page ID #:23

1 or civil, administrative, or regulatory action, defendant agrees

2 that any Cooperation Information and any evidence derived from

3 any Cooperation Information shall be admissible against

4 defendant, and defendant will not assert, and hereby waives and

5 gives up, any claim under the United States Constitution, any

6 statute, or any federal rule, that any Cooperation Information or

7 any evidence derived from any Cooperation Information should be

8 suppressed or is inadmissible.
9 EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT

10 24. This agreement is effective upon signature and

11 execution of all required certifications by defendant,

12 defendant's counsel, and an Assistant United States Attorney.

13 BREACH OF AGREEMENT

14 25. Defendant agrees that if defendant, at any time after

15 the signature of this agreement and execution of all required

16 certifications by defendant, defendant's counsel, and an

17 Assistant United States Attorney, knowingly violates or fails to

18 perform any of defendant's obligations under this agreement (~a

19 breach"), the USAO may declare this agreement breached. For

20 example, if defendant knowingly, in an interview, before a grand

21 jury, or at trial, falsely accuses another person of criminal

22 conduct or falsely minimizes defendant's own role, or the role of

23 another, in criminal conduct, defendant will have breached this

24 agreement. All of defendant's obligations are material, a single

25 breach of this agreement is sufficient for the USAO to declare a

26 breach, and defendant shall not be deemed to have cured a breach

27 without the express agreement of the USAO in writing. If the

28

19
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 20 of 25 Page ID #:24

1 USAO declares this agreement breached, and the Court finds such a

2 breach to have occurred, then:


3 a) If defendant has previously entered a guilty plea

4 pursuant to this agreement, defendant will not be able to

5 withdraw the guilty plea.


6 b) The USAO will be relieved of all its obligations

7 under this agreement; in particular, the USAO: (i) will no longer


8 be bound by any agreements concerning sentencing and will be free

9 to seek any sentence up to the statutory maximum for the crime to

10 which defendant has pleaded guilty; and (ii) will no longer be

11 bound by any agreement regarding the use of Cooperation


12 Information and will be free to use any Cooperation Information
13 in any way in any investigation, criminal prosecution, or civil,

14 administrative, or regulatory action.


15 c) The USAO will be free to criminally prosecute

16 defendant for false statement, obstruction of justice, and


17 perjury based on any knowingly false or misleading statement by

18 defendant.
19 d) In any investigation, criminal prosecution, or

20 civil, administrative, or regulatory action: (i) defendant will

21 not assert, and hereby waives and gives up, any claim that any

22 Cooperation Information was obtained in violation of the Fifth

23 Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination; and


24 (ii) defendant agrees that any Cooperation Information and any

25 Plea Information, as well as any evidence derived from any

26 Cooperation Information or any Plea Information, shall be


27 admissible against defendant, and defendant will not assert, and

28 hereby waives and gives up, any claim under the United States

20
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 21 of 25 Page ID #:25

1 Constitution, any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of


2 Evidence, Rule 11(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure,

3 or any other federal rule, that any Cooperation Information, any

4 Plea Information, or any evidence derived from any Cooperation

5 Information or any Plea Information should be suppressed or is

6 inadmissible.
7 COURT AND PROBATION OFFICE NOT PARTIES
8 26. Defendant understands that the Court and the United

9 States Probation Office are not parties to this agreement and

10 need not accept any of the USAO's sentencing recommendations or

11 the parties' agreements to facts or sentencing factors.


12 27. Defendant understands that both defendant and the USAO

13 are free to: (a) supplement the facts by supplying relevant


14 information to the United States Probation Office and the Court,

15 (b) correct any and all factual misstatements relating to the

16 Court's Sentencing Guidelines calculations, and (c) argue on

17 appeal and collateral review that the Court's Sentencing


18 Guidelines calculations are not error, although each party agrees
19 to maintain its view that the calculations in paragraph 16 are

20 consistent with the facts of this case. While this paragraph

21 permits both the USAO and defendant to submit full and complete

22 factual information to the United States Probation Office and the

23 Court, even if that factual information may be viewed as


24 inconsistent with the facts agreed to in this agreement, this

25 paragraph does not affect defendant's and the USAO's obligations

26 not to contest the facts agreed to in this agreement.

27

28

21
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 22 of 25 Page ID #:26

1 26. Defendant understands that even if the Court ignores

2 any sentencing recommendation, finds facts or reaches conclusions

3 different from those agreed to, andlor imposes any sentence up to

4 the maximum established by statute, defendant cannot, for that

5 reason, withdraw defendant's guilty plea, and defendant will


6 remain bound to fulfill all defendant's obligations under this

7 agreement. Defendant understands that no one -- not the


8 prosecutor, defendant's attorney, or the Court -- can make a
9 binding prediction or promise regarding the sentence defendant

10 will receive, except that it will be within the statutory

11 maximum.
12 NO ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS

13 27. Defendant understands that, except as set forth herein,

14 there are no promises, understandings, or agreements between the

15 USAO and defendant or defendant's attorney, and that no


16 additional promise, understanding, or agreement may be entered
17 into unless in a writing signed by all parties or on the record

18 in court.

19 II
20 II
21 II
22 II
23 II
24 II
25 II
26 II
27 II
28 II
22
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 23 of 25 Page ID #:27

1 PLEA AGREEMENT PART OF THE GUILTY PLEA HEARING

2 28. The parties agree that this agreement will be

3 consldered part of the record of defendant's guilty plea hearing

4 as if the entire agreement had been read into the record of the

5 proceeding.

6 AGREED AND ACCEPTED

7 OFFICE
OF CALIFORNIA

10

11

12

13
14 3.~:a·\ \
Date
15

16

17
AM AN Date
18 Attorney fo_ Defendant
Edward Stanton
19

20

21

22

23

24
25

26

27

28
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 24 of 25 Page ID #:28

1 CERTIFICATION OF DEFENDANT

2 I have read this agreement in its entirety. I have had


3 enough time to review and consider this agreement, and I have

4 carefully and thoroughly discussed every part of it with my

5 attorney. I understand the terms of this agreement, and I


6 voluntarily agree to those terms. I have discussed the evidence

7 with my attorney, and my attorney has advised me of my rights, of

8 possible pretrial motions that might be filed, of possible

9 defenses that might be asserted either prior to or at trial, of

10 the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), of

11 relevant Sentencing Guidelines provisions, and of the

12 consequences of entering into this agreement. No promises,

13 inducements, or representations of any kind have been made to me

14 other than those contained in this agreement. No one has

15 threatened or forced me in any way to enter into this agreement.

16 I am satisfled with the representation of my attorney in this

17 matter, and I am pleading guilty because I am guilty of the

18 advantage of the promises set forth in

19

20

21 3.~. \ \
Date
22

23

24

2~

26

27

28

24
Case 2:11-cr-00285-UA Document 3 Filed 04/05/11 Page 25 of 25 Page ID #:29

1 CERTIFICATION OF DEFENDANT'S ATTORNEY

2 I am Edward Stanton's attorney. I have carefully and

3 thoroughly discussed every part of this agreement with my client.

4 Further, I have fully advised my client of his rights, of

5 possible pretrial motions that might be filed, of possible

6 defenses that might be asserted either prior to or at trial, of

7 the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), of

8 relevant Sentencing Guidelines provisions, and of the

9 consequences of entering into this agreement. To my knowledge:

10 no promises, inducements, or representations of any kind have

11 been made to my client other than those contained in this

12 agreement; no one has threatened or forced my client in any way

13 to enter into this agreement; my client's decision to enter into

14 this agreement is an informed and voluntary one; and the factual

15 basis set forth in this agreement is sufficient to support my

16 uilty plea pursuant to this agreement.

17

18
AMYF Date
19 Attorney for efendant
Edward Stanton
20

21

22
23

24

25

26

27

28

25

You might also like