You are on page 1of 40

Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 1 of 40

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
McALLEN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CASE NO: M-08-CR-1242


)
Plaintiff, ) CRIMINAL
)
vs. ) McAllen, Texas
)
JOSE JOAQUIN MORALES, ) Monday, March 8, 2010
)
Defendant. ) (3:25 p.m. to 4:12 p.m.)

SENTENCING

BEFORE THE HONORABLE RANDY CRANE,


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Appearances: See Next Page

Court Recorder: Richard Cortez

Transcribed by: Exceptional Reporting Services, Inc.


14493 S. Padre Island Drive
Suite A-400
Corpus Christi, Texas 78418-5940
361 949-2988

Proceedings recorded by electronic sound recording;


transcript produced by transcription service.
EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 2 of 40
2

APPEARANCES FOR:

Plaintiff: CAROLYN FERKO, ESQ.


Assistant United States Attorney
1701 W. Business Hwy. 83
Suite 600
McAllen, Texas 78501

Also present: Special Agent Garrett Huling

Defendant: JOHN R. TEAKELL, ESQ.


Milner & Finn
2828 N. Harwood Street, Suite 1950
Dallas, TX 75201

U.S. Probation: Karla Webb


1701 W. Business Hwy. 83
Suite 729
McAllen, Texas 78501

EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC


Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 3 of 40
3

1 McAllen, Texas; Monday, March 8, 2010; 3:25 p.m.

2 Call to Order

3 THE COURT: Okay, 08-1242, USA versus Jose Joaquin

4 Morales.

5 MS. FERKO: Government's present and ready, your

6 Honor.

7 MR. TEAKELL: John Teakell for Mr. Morales, present.

8 THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Morales there was a

9 Presentence Report prepared about you in your case as well.

10 Have you had the opportunity to review and discuss your

11 Presentence Report with your lawyer?

12 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.

13 THE COURT: And did you have any questions about your

14 Presentence Report that your lawyer could not answer for you?

15 THE DEFENDANT: No, he answered.

16 THE COURT: Okay. And was everything factually

17 correct about you in the report?

18 THE DEFENDANT: I believe so, yes, sir.

19 THE COURT: Okay. Let's deal with some of the easier

20 issues first.

21 I assume the Government will move for the third

22 acceptance point?

23 MS. FERKO: Your Honor, I move for that point at this

24 time.

25 THE COURT: Okay. And so we had -- you had a lot of


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 4 of 40
4

1 issues about the career offender, but I guess they come -- they

2 come out only with respect to the criminal history issues with

3 the role enhancement he was given it comes out to 37 either

4 way.

5 MS. FERKO: That's correct, your Honor.

6 THE COURT: So -- and I did receive your request for

7 a downward departure based on assistance which didn't quite

8 rise to the level of the Government's filing a motion. And so

9 I need to kind of hear about what that was, which I don't know

10 anything about.

11 Anything you'd like to begin with, Mr. Teakell?

12 MR. TEAKELL: Yes, your Honor, if I may. I'd like to

13 just make a couple -- state a couple of things for the record

14 --

15 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

16 MR. TEAKELL: -- if I can.

17 Well, here in the relatively recent past Mr. Morales

18 had spoken about trying to withdraw his plea, but it's my

19 understanding he's abandoned that --

20 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

21 MR. TEAKELL: -- that issue or that thought. And

22 we're here to go forward.

23 In regard to the career offender status is it my

24 understanding that the Court has ruled or is ruling that the

25 career offender status does apply regarding --


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 5 of 40
5

1 THE COURT: No, I'm just saying it's not something I

2 had to directly reach on the base Offense Level because he --

3 it's academic, it comes out to the same and his Criminal

4 History points bring him to a V. The career offender is what

5 bumps him to the VI. So it does matter because it's one

6 criminal history level --

7 MS. FERKO: Right.

8 THE COURT: -- difference.

9 MS. FERKO: And your Honor, I just want to be clear.

10 I believe the last time we were here when we were dealing with

11 the base Offense Level, the Defendant -- probation held him to

12 the statements he made in a proffer -- in his proffer, in which

13 he was under a proffer letter for. So as far as -- it's up to

14 the Court obviously what the Court wants to assess. The

15 Government was going to just state that we are -- in that he's

16 definitely accountable for the six kilos of the cocaine and I

17 think that drops him from a 32 or 34 to -- and I just want to

18 be clear -- I'm trying to pull up the amount. I think he goes

19 to a level from a 34 to a 32, but I don't want to misspeak.

20 THE COURT: Wasn't all this corroborated by Ms. Frey

21 and some --

22 MS. FERKO: Yeah, your Honor, Ms. --

23 THE COURT: -- somebody else, I mean, it's not like

24 --

25 MS. FERKO: -- Tiffany Frey, it's actually Ms. Frey.


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 6 of 40
6

1 THE COURT: Frey.

2 MS. FERKO: She actually was independently approached

3 after Mr. Morales debriefed by ICE in Baltimore. She gave a

4 full statement. She did confess that -- to wearing a maternity

5 suit. I had advised Counsel regarding Ms. Frey that, you know,

6 if his client was going to proceed to trial we were going to

7 consider charges here in our district against her even though

8 it was what's normally looked at like as a dry conspiracy. We

9 didn't have her on this trip, but we did have a full statement

10 from out of Baltimore. Because, you know, based upon his plea

11 we never had it -- I never reached that decision, I never had

12 to make any decisions regarding Ms. Frey, but you know, she

13 still faces, you know, whatever in whatever jurisdiction

14 outside of Texas.

15 As far as -- and as I said, we were -- that was

16 corroborated, she couldn't exactly give us a number but her

17 statement did say there was a number of trips and there was

18 packages being delivered from Texas, mailing packages. She was

19 aware he was picking them up.

20 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

21 MS. FERKO: She believed it contained narcotics, but

22 how much she did not know.

23 THE COURT: These were going to her grandmother or

24 something?

25 MS. FERKO: I believe your Honor, the statement was


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 7 of 40
7

1 her grandmother and then a house that he was being -- that he

2 was rehabbing and then there was another -- like somehow or

3 another family member or a friend was somehow also involved.

4 (Pause)

5 THE COURT: Okay. So we have Ms. Frey corroborating

6 or we have her information on the 12 kilo load. We have the

7 actual 6 kilo loads, that's 18 kilos, maybe just under that.

8 So with just those two --

9 MS. FERKO: Right.

10 THE COURT: -- again, require no corroboration by

11 this Defendant.

12 MS. FERKO: No, your Honor, it does not. And -- but

13 as I said he was under a proffer letter at the time. But since

14 your Honor, this -- while this is open court there was no one

15 else in this courtroom related to this case. I don't know if

16 Counsel wants to speak afar or he can speak here.

17 Initially he -- Mr. Morales was under a proffer

18 letter because he alleged that his attorney in Baltimore and

19 I'd asked this section --

20 THE COURT: Right.

21 MS. FERKO: -- be sealed --

22 THE COURT: That's all in the Presentence Report.

23 MS. FERKO: -- related to Mr. Needleman (phonetic)

24 and that's why we were concerned. We contacted Baltimore U.S.

25 Attorneys' Office, they sent an AUSA along with an ICE agent


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 8 of 40
8

1 and like we spent four days debriefing Mr. Morales only just

2 basically to realize that he'd been lying almost the entire

3 time.

4 So --

5 THE COURT: About this Mr. Needleman stuff?

6 MS. FERKO: Yes.

7 THE COURT: Okay.

8 MS. FERKO: Yes, I mean, there was no -- there was

9 not one -- not one corroborating fact to Mr. Morales's about

10 any statements of Stanley Needleman. We tried to make phone

11 calls, you know, if you just tell us when and where's the

12 money, where's the receipt, who heard you, what did you say to

13 somebody else and you know going back in time and it was just

14 not --

15 THE COURT: And he was just playing games.

16 MS. FERKO: It was just playing games, your Honor.

17 So that was four days of that. And then afterwards we were

18 just ready to proceed.

19 THE COURT: Okay. Let's deal with the career

20 offender stuff because if there's an issue about quantity the

21 base Offense Level that I should have looked at -- it was less

22 than 34, then the career offender really is implicated here

23 based on the statements of Ms. Frey and the amounts actually

24 seized. I conclude that's in excess of 15 kilos of cocaine and

25 therefore the base Offense Level of 34 is applicable.


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 9 of 40
9

1 But let's, in the event that that is an erroneous

2 finding, or held to be erroneous, then the career offender

3 issue matters. I want to see if those documents were filed

4 under seal in support of that.

5 MS. FERKO: I believe I did file everything under

6 seal, your Honor, related to those documents.

7 The Government did file an exhibit. I provided the

8 Court with a courtesy copy which is about an inch thick, killed

9 a lot of trees doing it.

10 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

11 MS. FERKO: But I did want to make sure the Court

12 could actually look at the documents and see everything. There

13 were some issues -- sometimes the scanning is a little blurry

14 on the PDF so I just wanted to be clear the Court had ample

15 time to look at the documents.

16 THE COURT: Yes, it was about that thick of

17 documents. I assume you got the same --

18 MR. TEAKELL: I did, your Honor.

19 THE COURT: -- thing, Mr. Teakell.

20 MR. TEAKELL: And I made a response to that.

21 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

22 (Pause)

23 THE COURT: And what happened to the co-conspirator,

24 the gentleman who was also flying down here doing some of this

25 stuff?
EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 10 of 40
10

1 MS. FERKO: Your Honor, Mr. Malinowski had -- both

2 Defendants were actually stopped by DEA in the airport until it

3 was ascertained how much money they roughly had on them. Mr.

4 Morales was not searched, Mr. Malinowski was, so --

5 THE COURT: He had 80,000 on him, I think, or

6 something.

7 MS. FERKO: That's correct, your Honor. And Mr.

8 Morales unfortunately was -- and a DEA task force agent that

9 had dealt with him so he didn't search him, so we only know

10 what he told us and he said he had $13,000 on him.

11 As far as Mr. Malinowski, he's up in Baltimore. He's

12 -- I think they tried to give -- I think he's retained a lawyer

13 in Baltimore. An ICE agent went to speak to him, you know, he

14 didn't want to talk to anyone else, so at that time Mr.

15 Malinowski's up in Baltimore.

16 THE COURT: And this --

17 MS. FERKO: And I believe there's some other charges

18 in Baltimore that has arisen with Mr. Malinowski, so he's kind

19 of, I think, in the state system at this point.

20 THE COURT: Okay.

21 Okay, let's -- Mr. Teakell, let me -- is there

22 anything that you specifically want to point out.

23 I've reviewed all the documents in getting ready for

24 today. I did spend a -- I received the packet from U.S.

25 Attorneys' Office a couple of weeks ago.


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 11 of 40
11

1 MS. FERKO: That's correct, your Honor.

2 THE COURT: I've reviewed it then, I did not review

3 it this morning, but I reviewed it, looked at the issues then.

4 This case, because he was facing a lot of time, it was of

5 concern to me I don't have cases that frequently where people

6 grade out to career offender status and so I looked at it and

7 felt as though that those prior underlying convictions did

8 merit the enhancements. I did feel like that the malicious

9 burning was equal to arson.

10 I've had that issue come up in some immigration cases

11 to determine whether those people are enhanced 16 levels or not

12 and I've -- I -- a very similar statute of malicious burning, I

13 granted the enhancement finding it was arson. It was the

14 equivalent to the generic (indiscernible) meaning of the word

15 of arson. That was appealed and I was affirmed and so I feel

16 comfortable that the law would support the finding here as well

17 on this malicious burning.

18 And then he has a prior drug trafficking offense and

19 therefore career status. Would you like specifically to

20 address anything.

21 MR. TEAKELL: I do, Judge.

22 THE COURT: I know you had a long brief that I did

23 read as well.

24 MR. TEAKELL: I do and I appreciate that. I'd like

25 to confer just for a moment with Ms. Ferko, if I can, before I


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 12 of 40
12

1 --

2 THE COURT: Sure.

3 MR. TEAKELL: -- come back to you.

4 (Pause; Counsel confers)

5 MR. TEAKELL: Yes, your Honor, may it please the

6 Court.

7 First of all in regard to the other enhancements that

8 the Court took up at the first part of the sentencing, we just

9 reiterate our objections to those of being the

10 organizer/leader.

11 There are supposedly five people involved, the

12 Defendant, this Adam who traveled with him who was carrying

13 money, a large amount of money. The source of the controlled

14 substance who was here in the McAllen area.

15 THE COURT: Omar or something like that.

16 MR. TEAKELL: The -- Raul, I believe.

17 THE COURT: Raul, excuse me.

18 MR. TEAKELL: Anyway, there was the fourth person,

19 the female you've mentioned before, from Maryland. And then

20 supposedly the, as I understand it, the fifth person to

21 constitute the five people or more, was whomever the cocaine

22 was to ultimately go to.

23 It's our position that there at most -- there are

24 less than five because we don’t know who the person is in

25 Maryland, besides that it's a contact of Adam. Adam, the


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 13 of 40
13

1 person who had traveled at one time with Mr. Morales and was

2 carrying a lot of money. So, it's tentative at best and we'd

3 reiterate our objection to that.

4 In regard to the quantity, again, same thing. We'd

5 say that the -- we reiterate our objection that the evidence is

6 not credible and it's not been corroborated it came from the

7 woman you've mentioned who testified about other similar

8 activities -- other similar loads that she understood that --

9 now I don't know and I don't know if the Government knows if

10 the basis she has for that other than perhaps overhearing or

11 supposedly overhearing Mr. Morales or someone else. But,

12 again, we would deem it to be not credible to jack up his

13 quantity amount.

14 THE COURT: Okay. I understand your objection. A

15 couple of things that I noted with respect to Ms. Frey's

16 credibility about being involved in this load. She was not

17 pregnant, she was asked to wear a pregnancy outfit. She wore

18 it when it didn't have something in it and then wore it -- she

19 could sense it was loaded, she talked in great detail about

20 exactly what she did, how she was able to avoid security at the

21 airport because of that.

22 And then she talked in detail about cocaine being

23 mailed to her grandmother's that she retrieved and she seemed

24 -- her statements were credible, they were specific, they were

25 consistent with the Court's knowledge of how these operations


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 14 of 40
14

1 work. And so I find her statements to be credible and

2 therefore hold Mr. -- hold the Defendant here, Mr. Morales

3 responsible for at least that.

4 I thought, sir, that if we included amounts that were

5 being mailed that this would be significantly greater than the

6 -- more than 15 kilograms and I'm just -- that I'm holding him

7 for.

8 With respect to the five members, at least five

9 members of the conspiracy. There is this supplier and then

10 there -- Mr. Morales was in charge of buying and reselling and

11 transporting. And we have Mr. Morales, Ms. Frey, the co-

12 defendant that we spoke about up in -- up in the northeast and

13 then the person to whom ultimately it was being delivered or

14 transferred to. At least five people are involved in this. So

15 I believe the plus three was appropriately assessed.

16 I would also note that that's somewhat academic in

17 that if it wasn't assessed he's still getting bumped to the 37

18 because of the career offender. Either way he's at a level 37.

19 MR. TEAKELL: Yes, sir.

20 THE COURT: I did take off the three points for

21 acceptance which reduced him to a 34.

22 MR. TEAKELL: And also back to the quantity, your

23 Honor.

24 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

25 MR. TEAKELL: It's my understanding that at least --


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 15 of 40
15

1 at least some of what Ms. Frey had indicated the Government is

2 willing to -- as far as they're concerned, not accept as far as

3 additional quantities. So, if that makes a difference in the

4 calculation great, if it doesn't --

5 THE COURT: What, I'm sorry, what did you --

6 MR. TEAKELL: It's my understanding that Ms. Ferko is

7 -- is not opposing excluding some of what Ms. Frey had said.

8 Now, I don't know --

9 THE COURT: The mailed quantities or what is it --

10 MR. TEAKELL: -- I don't think she's -- I don't think

11 she's talking about all of it.

12 MS. FERKO: Your Honor, the mailed quantity -- I

13 mean, your Honor, all the statements he gave I guess were under

14 a proffer letter. And as I stated, you know, anything that had

15 any --

16 THE COURT: Right and so let's not talk about what he

17 said --

18 MS. FERKO: Right.

19 THE COURT: I mean, let's talk about --

20 MS. FERKO: So as I said --

21 THE COURT: -- independently.

22 MS. FERKO: -- independently ICE agents went to speak

23 with her, she gave a confession, she said she was involved, she

24 said what she did, she told about the quantities and that. And

25 that's up to the Court to decide.


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 16 of 40
16

1 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

2 MS. FERKO: I mean, as I said, I mean, we -- you

3 know, I just wanted the Court to be aware of the, you know, --

4 you know, we're not asking you to hold him to 40 kilograms --

5 THE COURT: Right.

6 MS. FERKO: -- which was estimated in the packaging

7 or he told us --

8 THE COURT: I'm not going to.

9 MS. FERKO: -- that's all in the letter. The

10 independent stuff, you know, we do feel that the Court can

11 consider that, but it was outside the proffer letter. And on

12 top of the fact that he lied, he was during the whole proffer

13 regardless, but you know, nevertheless, we're going to keep our

14 end of the bargain and just you know, we were asking for the 16

15 and then if the Court's going to consider Ms. Frey's statements

16 independently that's up to the Court.

17 THE COURT: Okay, that's what I'm doing.

18 MS. FERKO: Right.

19 THE COURT: I don't know what he said in his proffer.

20 I know what the investigation revealed as to Ms. Frey's

21 statements and so I'm considering those and then the seized

22 quantity. I have no knowledge of what he said in his proffer

23 to the Government. There's some information in the Presentence

24 Report, but I don't know what source, maybe some of it came

25 from his proffer, I thought most of it probably came from DEA


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 17 of 40
17

1 reports.

2 In any event I just feel holding him to at least the

3 17 kilos of cocaine is appropriate and for relevant conduct

4 which is a base of 34.

5 So, anything else, I mean, role and criminal -- and

6 career offender are really the only two big issues on this

7 case.

8 MR. TEAKELL: Yes, sir, in regard to the --

9 THE COURT: And quantity amounts.

10 MR. TEAKELL: -- to the career offender status. As I

11 stated just -- I'll just kind of summarize.

12 In the response we made to the motion to make the

13 finding of career offense status noted that arson and malicious

14 burning under Maryland law, especially in 1995, were the --

15 were two completely different crimes, different elements.

16 Also I noted that under the same Maryland law, or the

17 same statute, or a similar statute under Maryland law at that

18 time, that arson was deemed to be, along with a number of

19 specifically enumerated crimes, a crime of violence.

20 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

21 MR. TEAKELL: However, not included and rather

22 excluded from this list was the crime of malicious burning. It

23 has, as I stated, it's own statute, it's own punishment, it's

24 own elements and it is specifically not included in their list

25 of violent crimes.
EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 18 of 40
18

1 So the state of Maryland at that time did not

2 include, did not deem this to be a crime of violence. In fact,

3 it's one of those that, as I understand, was used from time to

4 time as a -- a lesser included, so to speak, of arson or a

5 reduction from arson pursuant to a plea agreement. So the

6 state of Maryland didn't consider it to be a violent crime

7 specifically and they specifically excluded it. So based on

8 that, your Honor, and based on the fact that it's not an arson

9 case, it is -- we, of course, state that it's not a crime of

10 violence.

11 Now I heard what you said a moment ago about -- in

12 relation to an immigration case.

13 THE COURT: Well, in terms of crimes of violence

14 there. And I even recall the specific facts of that case even

15 because they came up about a week ago and it was a person who

16 burned his automobile, collect insurance proceeds. And I know

17 that seems to be that's exactly what this statute talks about,

18 even mentions for the purpose of defrauding to collect. Seems

19 like I read that somewhere to collect insurance proceeds, maybe

20 that's not in this statute. Yes, just with intent to defraud.

21 But I once thought that arson could only be of a

22 dwelling or of a home, but it's much broader than that. And

23 the statute seems to be -- cover that other aspect of arson

24 which is burning things other than a dwelling, such as personal

25 property like an automobile.


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 19 of 40
19

1 MR. TEAKELL: The other -- aside from the fact,

2 Judge, that Maryland does not specify this to be a violent

3 crime, what we've gotten from the Government is more docket

4 entries and more docket information than we previously had,

5 however, it's still just that, entries on the docket. Some

6 things were handwritten in and we still don't have a judgment.

7 Now I take it that that's because of the way the

8 state of Maryland does their records and it's my understanding

9 that they don't keep any judgments, but rather they destroy

10 them, make some sort of, for the lack of better term, cursory

11 records, like we see today, sort of like minute entries. And I

12 would submit also that we don't know with certainty, we don't

13 have a judgment on that.

14 (Pause)

15 THE COURT: Anything you wanted to say?

16 MS. FERKO: Yes, your Honor.

17 Your Honor, related to the first point I guess of the

18 malicious burning.

19 We filed, I think the last time we were here in

20 November, a written response to that and a motion urging the

21 specific case laws that have to do with that and the Court

22 ruled on it and found malicious burning was appropriate as an

23 arson as a violent crime or a crime of violence pursuant to

24 U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. So, your Honor, I'm going to just

25 rely on what we've written on that rather than rehash that


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 20 of 40
20

1 argument.

2 The additional documents that we filed related to the

3 career criminal or career offender portion of the application

4 to Mr. Morales, your Honor, specifically states -- recites here

5 is a case on page 3, 2 and 3 of what the Government -- or the

6 brief the Government filed. In addition to, your Honor, the

7 documents that support that this is indeed Jose Morales that

8 committed this malicious burning in the first degree, documents

9 -- Exhibit C, your Honor, is what they call pretrial docket

10 that we obtained with certified copy. A trial docket, it

11 listed a guilty verdict, it lists the exact case, it lists what

12 he pled to. Your Honor then they supplemented it with pen

13 packet or what's termed a pen packet in, I guess colloquial

14 terms, that's basically documents from the Maryland Department

15 of Public Safety and Corrections Services as Exhibit D of that.

16 And your Honor, we start off with the actual

17 fingerprint set that went for Mr. Morales back when he -- his

18 data was received on 9-18-1995 related to the theft, less than

19 $300, Malicious Burning First Degree and Malicious Burning of

20 Property, it's his photo and his fingerprints.

21 Mr. Teakell at the last hearing kind of alluded,

22 that, oh, I don't know if this is Mr. Morales, in this -- from

23 this 1995 conviction. I think if you look at that photo it's

24 completely clear that that is the same individual standing

25 before the bar of the Court.


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 21 of 40
21

1 Additionally you have admission summary under docket

2 number 502244 which provides all the personal information

3 related to Mr. Morales, his wife's name, Terri Morales, dealing

4 with refrigeration, criminal information regarding the Theft

5 Less Than 300, Malicious Burning First Degree, Malicious

6 Destruction of Property, cites it -- lists what was given five

7 years consecutive, suspended for two years probation, there's

8 some corrections. And each there they have his entry into the

9 prison system in Baltimore and it follows by commitment record

10 which lists what he received for each of those counts from the

11 court. They're sealed from the district court of Maryland.

12 All those documents -- while they're not called a

13 judgment, your Honor, support the fact, support this individual

14 was convicted of this crime. You know, and as far as the case

15 law's concerned when it deals with a career offender several of

16 the cases cite, including the Tenth Circuit, and the Fifth

17 Circuit even states -- you know a New York certificate of

18 disposition in the Gary Hernandez case because it's only proven

19 to prove a prior conviction. All I have to prove for a career

20 offender is that he had a prior conviction for the malicious

21 burning.

22 So the Government's going to support -- suggest that

23 when you look at the abstract we have the documents related to

24 the arson, documents related to his drug conviction, the drug

25 conviction we actually have the information that -- the


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 22 of 40
22

1 charging documents, the judgment, we have -- it was closer in

2 time, it was in 2004, he ultimately pled guilty on that.

3 For the 1995 case, I mean, there's nothing different

4 related to that information we've provided from the pen packet

5 that's in that abstract. And again, the abstract, if you

6 consider by the court as a whole is a criminal record. There's

7 not one thing that this Defendant has put forward to say I did

8 not do that, that wasn't me, you know, this is a big mistake.

9 I mean, you asked him before he started this, you know, the

10 sentencing again, your Honor, and you said, you know, is there

11 anything wrong, is there anything correct, I believe

12 everything's okay.

13 Your Honor, as far as the case law of the Fifth

14 Circuit the Government would say that the evidence of the prior

15 conviction using the abstract compiled with the information

16 received from the Maryland Department of Corrections supports a

17 conviction of Malicious Burning of the First Degree which does

18 qualify as a crime of violence under the Sentencing Guidelines

19 and which does, in combination with the Defendant's conviction

20 for drug trafficking offense, rises him to the level of career

21 offender. And we believe that the 37 level is appropriate, we

22 believe the career Criminal History of VI is appropriate and --

23 THE COURT: It's a V.

24 MS. FERKO: Instead -- instead of V.

25 THE COURT: Yes, there's not a lot of difference here


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 23 of 40
23

1 between career offender and non-career offender because of the

2 quantities and the role and so these -- to me these are

3 somewhat academic arguments but are important for appellate

4 purposes. Because there's two ways we get at where we end up

5 here, one is through career offender finding and the other is

6 simply relevant conduct and role.

7 MS. FERKO: Right. And, your Honor, and again, I

8 also -- within that motion there's also -- depending on your

9 ruling on the career offender there's also a motion for upward

10 departure based upon what is not being considered in his

11 criminal history if the court doesn't (indiscernible) career

12 offender that this Court could clearly upward depart to a level

13 37, to a career criminal history of VI based upon this

14 Defendant's actions, this Defendant's criminal history

15 beginning at the age of what, 19.

16 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

17 MS. FERKO: And being as successful as he is at 35, I

18 believe.

19 THE COURT: Okay. I need to wind things down here.

20 Everybody's had a chance to speak, let me give Mr. Morales a

21 chance to speak.

22 MR. TEAKELL: Judge.

23 THE COURT: Mr. Morales, before I determine your

24 sentence you do have the right to speak. You're not required

25 to, but if there's anything you would like for me to consider


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 24 of 40
24

1 in determining your sentence now is your opportunity to speak.

2 MR. TEAKELL: Your Honor, if I may?

3 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

4 MR. TEAKELL: Could I address the career offender

5 status as well as the downward departure motion?

6 THE COURT: Let me let your client finish and then

7 anything you want to add on top of what he says I'll let you

8 speak.

9 MR. TEAKELL: Yes, sir.

10 THE COURT: Mr. Morales.

11 THE DEFENDANT: Sir, I know you asked if there was

12 anything wrong like Ms. Ferko said and I said -- I'm confused

13 about everything because when I pled guilty back here in your

14 courtroom --

15 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

16 THE DEFENDANT: -- she specifically told me when I

17 was back there that she wasn't going to enhance me if I pled

18 guilty and if I went to trial that I would be enhanced, that

19 Tiffany would be arrested and my family.

20 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

21 THE DEFENDANT: She then told me and my attorney that

22 if I pled guilty that she would drop the charges on the rest of

23 my family.

24 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

25 THE DEFENDANT: And I would only be accountable for


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 25 of 40
25

1 the six kilos of cocaine that I admitted -- that I would admit

2 to.

3 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

4 THE DEFENDANT: The gentleman who I come down here

5 with and for --

6 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

7 THE DEFENDANT: -- I told her everything. Yes, I did

8 tell some lies in the beginning with my first attorney who gave

9 me some very bad advice.

10 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

11 THE DEFENDANT: And he told me to make a story up, a

12 big story if I wanted the bail and that's what I did.

13 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

14 THE DEFENDANT: And then he -- I fired him. And then

15 I hired Mr. Teakell.

16 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

17 THE DEFENDANT: And then when I hired Mr. Teakell I

18 went in and as Mr. Teakell said to tell the truth on everything

19 and I did about Adam, about Raul, the person that come from,

20 everything, 100 percent of everything.

21 And I just -- she -- I don't understand -- I'm not --

22 I understand what the career criminal means, I understand all

23 that. But I feel like I was tricked into saying "Yes, I plead

24 guilty." And I've wrote you two letters on this as well. I've

25 wrote you two letters at different times based on the same


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 26 of 40
26

1 things, I was told one thing and when I pled guilty. And I'm

2 not saying that I'm innocent or an angel, I'm not saying I know

3 what I did --

4 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

5 THE DEFENDANT: But what I'm -- when I pled guilty

6 she told me that I wasn't going -- that if I didn't plead

7 guilty that I would be enhanced.

8 I had a public defender for, I think, two weeks, in

9 the process of firing my first attorney and the public defender

10 said the exact same thing as well. That if -- I would not be

11 enhanced if I pled guilty. And that's why I pled guilty under

12 all these intentions that I would not be enhanced. Otherwise

13 --

14 THE COURT: I'm not sure -- I mean there are --

15 THE DEFENDANT: Otherwise --

16 THE COURT: -- different enhancements that are out

17 there. There's a mandatory minimum of 20 years that you would

18 have faced in this case.

19 MS. FERKO: That's -- and that's --

20 THE COURT: And sometimes, well, frequently I see if

21 you plead guilty they don't enhance you with that mandatory

22 minimum of 20, but the chips fall then where they fall. In

23 every other aspect if you're a major player then you're looking

24 at a role enhancement there. If the quantities are such that

25 you have a base Offense Level where you come out here and
EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 27 of 40
27

1 again, I would note that I find you come out the same way. So

2 even if we -- put aside his career offender in terms of your

3 base Offense Level, you'd come out exactly the same.

4 Now, it does make difference in your criminal history

5 because you'd be looking at a range of 235 months and upward

6 instead of 262 months and upward. And because you pled guilty

7 I am going to sentence you at the low end of the guideline

8 range.

9 Now had you not pled then you would not get three

10 acceptance points off. So for example, if you'd gone to trial,

11 then you'd be looking at 360 to life. Based on what I know

12 here, if you'd gone to trial and lost, I would have sentenced

13 you to life.

14 So you -- there was a lot of benefits to you

15 pleading, but again, hindsight's always 20/20. We don't know

16 what would have happened if you'd actually gone to trial, maybe

17 the quantities -- we just don't know.

18 THE DEFENDANT: Maybe I would have been not guilty,

19 sir.

20 THE COURT: Maybe Ms. Frey would have been involved,

21 you could have worked some deal out, I mean, who -- we just

22 don't know the -- it's too speculative what would have happened

23 had you gone to trial.

24 You have no control over, Ms. Ferko has no control

25 over, Mr. Teakell has no control over what I find is relevant


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 28 of 40
28

1 conduct. I look at the facts, determine what's -- I think is

2 fair and appropriate based on the evidence. I treat your case

3 like I do any other that's similarly situated, make my rulings

4 and move on to the next case.

5 I mean -- granted you got a long and significant

6 criminal history, again, based on what Ms. Frey said I didn't

7 hold you for any of this other stuff that she talked about in

8 terms of the mailed stuff because it's too speculative. I

9 don't know if you were mailing two kilo quantities, which is

10 pretty typical, or one kilo, which is also common, but not as

11 typical, I didn't hold you to any of that it's too speculative.

12 But she's carrying the weight on her, she can estimate whether

13 it's consistent with what you're telling her, how much weight

14 she has on her and so I felt like that was very credible. I

15 could rely upon that in determining the quantities. Even if

16 Ms. Ferko told you she wasn't going to push for that, it

17 doesn't matter, it's what the facts are.

18 MS. FERKO: Your Honor, just for the record, I had no

19 conversations with this Defendant about doing whatever we're

20 doing. The only statements we made to his Counsel, both

21 Counsel actually, was that if he was going to trial we would

22 consider a dry conspiracy and that still had to go for

23 approval. And then the other thing was that Mr. Teakell and I

24 spoke and I said, "Look, you need to advise your client that

25 he's possibly a career offender." I said based upon an arson


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 29 of 40
29

1 conviction and based upon his drug -- and that was spoken about

2 prior to his arraignment and at length with Mr. Teakell because

3 I wanted him to be fully aware of what the ramifications were

4 even of a plea, so --

5 THE COURT: I understand. And Mr. Teakell has made

6 some good arguments. I'm not always correct, every, I don't

7 know, so often I'll get reversed on a case or I made a wrong

8 decision, it happens maybe once a year, twice a year -- not --

9 I mean it happens.

10 Your lawyer has done a very good job in making sure

11 that if I make a mistake he's going to appeal and correct me

12 and I want to be corrected if I'm wrong. I don't want you to

13 spend one day more in prison than what you should, what I feel

14 you should.

15 So, let me -- Mr. Teakell, you were going to make

16 some last response, last comment.

17 MR. TEAKELL: Yes, your Honor. I just was going to

18 point out that in regard to the career status, just kind of in

19 rebuttal, what Ms. Ferko was stating which I'd already put in

20 the response, Boykin versus Alabama (phonetic), the Supreme

21 Court case just says that the burden's on the prosecution, we

22 got to show that the Defendant knowingly and intelligently

23 entered the plea, waived his rights for -- in other words to

24 show that there's a -- something to enhance him with for

25 whatever that's worth to the Court.


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 30 of 40
30

1 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

2 MR. TEAKELL: And in regard to the downward

3 departure, as Mr. Morales has already pointed out, there were

4 what I characterize as two debriefings. One, early on before I

5 came into the picture and apparently that didn't go well. And

6 then later he was debriefed, provided information about this

7 Raul, about Adam, who was transporting a lot of money with Mr.

8 Morales.

9 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

10 MR. TEAKELL: And I think some other information

11 which the Government has not used at present, but he at least

12 provided that and tried to do that and tried to correct himself

13 from his first scenario.

14 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

15 MR. TEAKELL: And the cases I've cited are frankly

16 from the Second and the Sixth Circuit, they do say that the

17 Court can go ahead and downward depart even if there's no

18 fruits of his labors, so to speak.

19 THE COURT: I understand and I occasionally do that

20 when I think the 3553(a) factors merit it. Here I just don't.

21 So, from everything I know, I don't find that that's

22 appropriate given the -- all the misinformation he gave

23 previously really destroyed his credibility or usefulness to

24 the Government with his preposterous story about this lawyer

25 essentially directing this smuggling scheme.


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 31 of 40
31

1 Okay. Any final word from the Government?

2 MS. FERKO: Nothing, your Honor. We rely on what we

3 filed.

4 THE COURT: No, okay. Court will -- your client's

5 already spoken.

6 MR. TEAKELL: May have him make just another

7 statement to the Court?

8 THE COURT: Anything else you'd like to add before I

9 sentence you?

10 MR. TEAKELL: Can I have just a quick moment with

11 him?

12 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

13 (Pause)

14 THE COURT: Okay, anything else you anted to add, Mr.

15 Morales?

16 THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.

17 First I'd like to apologize to you and the courts for

18 even being here, for considering and transporting the cocaine,

19 which I did. I know I got a criminal history that's a long --

20 that's a lot and I'm not making excuses, you know, I apologize

21 it's just through years of drug abuse.

22 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

23 THE DEFENDANT: And I apologize for all this. And

24 believe me I've been here a year and a half, I haven't seen no

25 one in my family, I don't even know no one here in the valley,


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 32 of 40
32

1 not one person. And I realize now what I should have realized

2 years ago. I got four kids. I'm sorry, your Honor, I just ask

3 for you to just take that into consideration, please.

4 THE COURT: Okay. I will recommend you be placed in

5 an institution close to your family so that they can come visit

6 you and your children can grow up and see you when they can.

7 I would also remind you, something I know your

8 lawyer's already talked to you about and that is that you --

9 you still have an opportunity to reduce your sentence even

10 after I sentence you. If you provide substantial assistance to

11 the Government then within the next year they can -- they will

12 ask me to reduce your sentence and I'll take -- I mean I --

13 just from where you -- you're going to cut years and years and

14 years off of your sentence so if you do that. And there are

15 ways to do that, your lawyer can explain all of these. But I

16 feel based on your knowledge it's not very hard to do, you can

17 probably identify people who are in this business and help the

18 Government locate them --

19 THE DEFENDANT: Okay.

20 THE COURT: -- which would likely be enough to get a

21 reduction in your sentence. Anyway, you'll have -- I want your

22 lawyer to talk to you about that later.

23 I do -- let me make my findings and my sentence, I

24 have a jury waiting.

25 THE DEFENDANT: Can I -- can I say something else on


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 33 of 40
33

1 that?

2 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

3 THE DEFENDANT: I did, I gave the information on the

4 bank accounts where the money came from, what banks they come

5 from, where it was going, who supplied the money, to who it was

6 -- a copy of the guy's driver's license, the person down here

7 who we got it from.

8 THE COURT: Right.

9 THE DEFENDANT: And they say it's not good enough.

10 THE COURT: I'll find out about that.

11 Ms. Ferko, what -- he did -- remember when he went

12 into the restroom and took a photograph of the guy's wallet,

13 and his I.D., what happened with that?

14 MS. FERKO: Your Honor, I have Garrett Huling in the

15 back. If I may ask him to approach.

16 THE COURT: I mean maybe it's still under

17 investigation.

18 THE DEFENDANT: I mean I understand I did wrong and I

19 tried to redeem myself by identifying all the players, I mean,

20 the actual banks, the day we went, where the large checks got

21 cashed from the check cashing company, everything from A to Z.

22 THE COURT: Okay.

23 Your name first, for the record.

24 SPECIAL AGENT HULING: Special Agent Garrett Huling,

25 ICE.
EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 34 of 40
34

1 THE COURT: Okay. I just was asking about that one

2 issue where he did seem to -- with his cell phone he took

3 pictures of some I.D. information. What was -- how come that

4 wasn't very useful?

5 SPECIAL AGENT HULING: Which -- I'm not even -- is

6 this where we --

7 THE COURT: At one of the exchanges at the

8 gentleman's club, he took -- this gentleman I understood took

9 the supplier's wallet and went and photographed his I.D. And

10 he's telling me that information was given to you all, it had

11 the supplier's -- Omar or something or other, I forget his

12 name.

13 MR. TEAKELL: Raul.

14 THE COURT: Raul, I'm sorry, I keep calling him Omar.

15 Raul's I.D. --

16 THE DEFENDANT: They showed me a picture of it and

17 then I signed knowing who he was and all that.

18 THE COURT: Uh-huh. I think maybe Raul's already

19 serving a lot of prison time.

20 MS. FERKO: Your Honor, I believe --

21 MR. TEAKELL: I don't think anybody's been prosecuted

22 out of the rest of the group that --

23 MS. FERKO: Your Honor, I don't want to misspeak to

24 the Court. This case, as I said, has been since '08. I

25 believe when we looked in Raul there was -- the driver's


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 35 of 40
35

1 license -- apparently he took the photos when he got ripped

2 off. But I believe there was nothing that led back to

3 specifically that location or any other location where we could

4 rematch to his name.

5 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

6 MS. FERKO: And again, as I said there was also other

7 agents working with us on this. I don't want to misspeak, I

8 don't to want to say something to the Court, but I -- in the

9 long run I believe it was a dead end that's what I was

10 informed, but I don't want --

11 THE COURT: No corroboration, I mean, --

12 MS. FERKO: I don't recall --

13 THE COURT: -- he could take a photograph of

14 anybody's driver's license.

15 MS. FERKO: Right. And I mean, it's a name --

16 THE COURT: You got to have more than that.

17 MS. FERKO: -- but I think there was nothing else

18 that we went further -- that we went further with.

19 As I said, your Honor, I don't want to misspeak, but

20 I just know that initially, your Honor, we were charging

21 (indiscernible). We came back in, we talked, it about flights.

22 I mean, what this Defendant needs to understand is that this

23 district doesn't normally do six kilograms of cocaine. I mean,

24 the difference was was that he was utilizing an airplane to fly

25 back to Baltimore. There was a whole investigation, you know


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 36 of 40
36

1 that had all these possibilities for this area, not necessarily

2 this Defendant with his six keys, so --

3 THE COURT: Right, not a big case is what Ms. Ferko's

4 saying --

5 MS. FERKO: Right, I mean, it's really not.

6 THE COURT: -- six keys --

7 MS. FERKO: So I mean I just want -- I want the Court

8 to understand, I mean, the fact that he ended up being a career

9 offender, you know, changes -- you know, makes him a larger

10 Defendant, but as far as ICE was concerned, you know, there was

11 a lot of investigation going into the airport aspect to it.

12 You know, he did talk to us about who he dealt with

13 and there was some thought -- there was a dead-end follow-up on

14 that. And as I said as far as an individual license I recall,

15 your Honor, I was told that it didn't go anywhere. But again,

16 I don't want to misspeak, I don't want to misspeak to the

17 Court. I do have the agent here, but there were other agents,

18 your Honor from our ICE and Baltimore ICE.

19 THE COURT: Was there anything --

20 SPECIAL AGENT HULING: I vaguely remember that --

21 THE COURT: Uh-huh.

22 SPECIAL AGENT HULING: -- but like Ms. Ferko was

23 speaking we -- we were, you know, hard-charging at first and

24 tried to corroborate the information that was provided. We

25 flew down agents from Baltimore to follow over there. Even our
EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 37 of 40
37

1 U.S. attorneys up there in -- amidst multiple lies. I do

2 vaguely remember information about a lady that works at

3 Dillards --

4 MS. FERKO: That's correct.

5 SPECIAL AGENT HULING: -- nothing was -- nothing that

6 we could really work with.

7 MS. FERKO: And your Honor, everything we did follow

8 a lead on ended up absolutely nowhere and it was -- it was --

9 THE COURT: Who was his initial lawyer?

10 MS. FERKO: His initial was Eric Jarvis, actually his

11 initial lawyer was Nadia Medrano. He had Nadia Medrano I think

12 for like a week and then he hired Eric --

13 THE COURT: Yes, right, but that was just --

14 MS. FERKO: -- and then --

15 THE DEFENDANT: I had Eric first and then the public

16 defender.

17 THE COURT: Okay.

18 Okay. The Court adopts the factual findings

19 contained within the Presentence Report, grants the three

20 acceptance points which results in a total Offense Level of 34.

21 Based on my finding of a career offender this will be a

22 Criminal History Category of VI, otherwise I would have found

23 Criminal History of V.

24 Criminal History Category VI is a range of 262 to 327

25 months. Based on the circumstances and everything I know the


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 38 of 40
38

1 fact this was only 6 kilos in this load, another 11 kilos in

2 the other load, a 17 kilo case, I find that a sentence within

3 these guidelines satisfies them. Again, this is also closely

4 looking at his prior criminal conduct.

5 I considered all those factors under 18 U.S.C.

6 3553(a) and conclude that a sentence within these guidelines

7 satisfies them. And therefore pursuant to the Sentencing

8 Reform Act of 1984 it's the judgment of the Court the

9 Defendant, Mr. Morales, is hereby committed to the custody of

10 the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 262

11 months.

12 Upon release from imprisonment he is placed on

13 supervision for five years. With 72 hours of his release from

14 the custody of Bureau of Prisons the Defendant is to report in

15 person to the probation office in the district to which he is

16 released and while on supervision he is not to commit another

17 federal, state or local crime. He is to comply with the

18 standard conditions adopted by this court, abide by any

19 mandatory conditions as required by law.

20 In addition he's not to possess a firearm or other

21 destructive device. He's to cooperate in providing a DNA

22 sample. I find Mr. Morales cannot afford to pay a fine so I

23 waive it, but he is assessed a $100 special assessment which is

24 payable immediately.

25 Mr. Morales, you can appeal. You'd have 14 days to


EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 39 of 40
39

1 do so. If you could not afford the cost of an appeal you could

2 ask that I waive these costs of an appeal.

3 Are there remaining counts?

4 MS. FERKO: Your Honor, there are. And I ask that

5 you dismiss all the remaining counts at this time.

6 THE COURT: Okay, I will -- I will dismiss all

7 remaining counts.

8 Mr. Morales, I'll recommend you be placed in an

9 institution where you can receive treatment for drug

10 addiction/dependency and abuse. If you successfully complete

11 that program that will take a year off of your sentence.

12 I will also recommend that you be placed like I said

13 in an institution near your family.

14 Okay, best of luck to you, Mr. Morales, you're

15 excused at this time.

16 Okay.

17 (This proceeding adjourned at 4:12 p.m.)

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC
Case 7:08-cr-01242 Document 81 Filed in TXSD on 07/29/10 Page 40 of 40

CERTIFICATION

I certify that the foregoing is a correct transcript from the

electronic sound recording of the proceedings in the above-

entitled matter.

July 26, 2010 _

TONI HUDSON, TRANSCRIBER

EXCEPTIONAL REPORTING SERVICES, INC

You might also like