Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3. The City's RFP further assured offerors that, if conducted, discussions would be
to:
4. The City failed to use discussions with Bombardier to fulfill the above purposes
and thereby deprived Bombardier of fair and "meaningful discussions," as
defined in long-standing public contract law standards;
6. The City's disqualification of Bombardier's proposal was contrary to law and the
Request For Proposals (“RFP”) because:
For the reasons addressed in Bombardier’s Protest, the contract award to Ansaldo
Honolulu Joint Venture ("Ansaldo") should be terminated. In accordance with Hawai`i
Administrative Rules ("HAR") § 3-126-7(d) and related authority, Bombardier requests that the
Chief Procurement Officer:
2. Stay all further action on this procurement pending resolution of this protest
pursuant to HRS § 103D-701(f);
6. Accept and complete the evaluation of the revised Bombardier BAFO #2 from
the point where it was previously stopped prior to the improper finding of non-
compliance; and
7. Award the contract to the responsible offeror whose BAFO #2 the City
determines in writing to be the most advantageous taking into consideration
price and the evaluation factors set forth in the RFP.