Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peer Review Report Phase 1 Legal and Regulatory Framework THE BAHAMAS
must be provided, including bank information and information held by fiduciaries,
regardless of the existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual
criminality standard.
All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identified by the Global Forum
as relevant to its work, are being reviewed. This process is undertaken in two phases.
Phase 1 reviews assess the quality of a jurisdiction’s legal and regulatory framework for
the exchange of information, while Phase 2 reviews look at the practical implementation of
that framework. Some Global Forum members are undergoing combined – Phase 1 plus
Phase 2 – reviews. The ultimate goal is to help jurisdictions to effectively implement the
international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes.
All review reports are published once approved by the Global Forum and they thus
represent agreed Global Forum reports.
For more information on the work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of
Information for Tax Purposes, and for copies of the published review reports, please visit
www.oecd.org/tax/transparency.
ISBN 978-92-64-10828-8
www.oecd.org/publishing
23 2011 17 1 P -:HSTCQE=VU]W]]:
232011171covBAHAMAS.indd 1 11-Apr-2011 10:26:16 AM
Global Forum
on Transparency
and Exchange
of Information for Tax
Purposes Peer Reviews:
Bahamas 2011
PHASE 1
April 2011
(reflecting the legal and regulatory framework
as at November 2010)
This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD.
The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect
the official views of the OECD or of the governments of its member countries or
those of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax
Purposes.
Series: Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes: Peer Reviews
ISSN 2219-4681 (print)
ISSN 2219-469X (online)
You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD
publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and
teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given.
All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to rights@oecd.org
Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed
directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at info@copyright.com or the Centre français d’exploitation du
droit de copie (CFC) at contact@cfcopies.com.
TABLE OF CONTENTS – 3
Table of Contents
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Information and methodology used for the peer review of The Bahamas. . . . . . . 9
Overview of The Bahamas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Recent developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
A. Availability of information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
A.1. Ownership and identity information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
A.2. Accounting records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
A.3. Banking information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
B. Access to Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
B.1. Competent Authority’s ability to obtain and provide information . . . . . . . . 46
B.2. Notification requirements and rights and safeguards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
C. Exchanging Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
C.1. Exchange-of-information mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
C.2. Exchange-of-information mechanisms with all relevant partners . . . . . . . . 56
C.3. Confidentiality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
C.4. Rights and safeguards of taxpayers and third parties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
C.5. Timeliness of responses to requests for information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
4 – TABLE OF CONTENTS
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
ABOUT THE GLOBAL FORUM – 5
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – 7
Executive Summary
1. This report summarises the legal and regulatory framework for trans-
parency and exchange of information in The Bahamas.
2. The international standard which is set out in the Global Forum’s
Terms of Reference to Monitor and Review Progress Towards Transparency
and Exchange of Information, is concerned with the availability of relevant
information within a jurisdiction, the competent authority’s ability to gain
timely access to that information, and in turn, whether that information can
be effectively exchanged with its exchange of information (EOI) partners.
3. The Bahamas has worked with the OECD in respect of tax informa-
tion exchange since 2002 when it committed to implementing the interna-
tional standards of transparency and information exchange. The Bahamas
does not have direct taxation and consequently the usual framework for tax
authorities to have access to information for income tax purposes is not in
place. In 2009, The Bahamas renewed its commitment which it then worked
quickly to implement and by March 2010 it had concluded more than 12
tax information exchange agreements (TIEAs). As at November 2010, The
Bahamas has an exchange of information (EOI) network covering 22 jurisdic-
tions; seven of these agreements are presently in force, and The Bahamas has
taken all steps for its part which are necessary to bring the remaining agree-
ments into force. Recently concluded, these agreements, with the exception
of its TIEA with the US, are based on the OECD’s 2002 Model TIEA.
4. The principal concern identified in the report relates to the availabil-
ity of accounting information and the report notes that essential element A.2.
of the Terms of Reference is not in place. The shortcomings in the legislative
requirements to retain accounting records in respect of international business
companies, partnerships, authorised purpose trusts and foundations are such
that this information may not be available in certain cases in respect of these
entities and arrangements. In respect of the remainder of the report, each of
the elements is found to be in place. For some elements, recommendations
have been made concerning ownership and identity information (element
A.1.), access powers (element B.1.) and appeal rights (element B.2.).
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
8 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
INTRODUCTION – 9
Introduction
Information and methodology used for the peer review of The Bahamas
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
10 – INTRODUCTION
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
INTRODUCTION – 11
workforce was employed in the tourism industry in 2009, with the financial
services sector accounting for approximately 3-4% of employment.1
1. Data taken from The Bahamas’ Central Bank Quarterly report to March 2010,
and the Labour force survey to December 2009.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
12 – INTRODUCTION
Cooperation Act 2010 which gives effect to all other TIEAs signed by The
Bahamas.
22. The legal authority to exchange information for tax purposes derives
from Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAs) once these agree-
ments become part of domestic law. As at November 2010, The Bahamas
had signed TIEAs with 22 jurisdictions, of which seven agreements are cur-
rently in force. Sixteen of these agreements are with OECD members, and 12
of them have been signed since the beginning of 2010. Most recently it has
signed agreements with Australia, Germany and Canada. By enacting the
International Tax Cooperation Act in July 2010, The Bahamas has now taken
all necessary steps to bring each of the remaining 21 agreements into force.
23. In addition to its TIEA network, cooperation in criminal tax matters
may be provided in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Justice
(International Cooperation) Act; and the terms of the mutual legal assistance
treaties with the United States and Canada under the Mutual Legal Assistance
(Criminal Matters) Act 1988.
Recent developments
24. As noted above, The Bahamas passed the International Tax Cooperation
Act (ITC Act) on 1 July 2010, which gives effect to tax treaties signed by
The Bahamas. Further, recent amendments to the United States of America
Tax Information Exchange Agreement Act now permits the US competent
authority to conduct tax examinations in The Bahamas consistent with pro-
visions contained in the OECD 2002 Model Agreement on the Exchange of
Information in Tax Matters, and brings the arrangements into line with the
options available to the competent authorities of The Bahamas’ other EOI
partners, under the ITC Act.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 13
A. Availability of information
Overview
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
14 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
Jurisdictions should ensure that ownership and identity information for all relevant
entities and arrangements is available to their competent authorities.
2. Of which 42,825 are “active” IBCs i.e. with registration fees paid up to date.
Figures as at 30 November 2010.
3. Terms of Reference to Monitor and Review Progress Towards Transparency and
Exchange of Information.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 15
General Company
31. A General Company must have at least 60% of its ultimate owners as
Bahamian residents to be a Bahamian company.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
16 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
37. For a GC, a memorandum must specify the location of its registered
office (which must be in the Bahamas), the amount of capital and the number
and value of its shares (sections 5-8, Companies Act), and any change to these
details must be advised to the Registrar within 14 days (s9, Companies Act).
A GC must also file its articles of association within 6 months of incorpora-
tion (s14, Companies Act). In addition, a GC is subject to an obligation to
file an annual return with the Registrar which includes the name, address
and occupation of all legal owners, as well as any person who ceased to be
an owner during the previous year, and to confirm that 60% of its shares are
ultimately owned by Bahamian residents.
38. In the case of an IBC, as well as its memorandum, it must also provide
its articles of association to the Registrar at the time of incorporation. The mem-
orandum must contain details including the location of the registered office and
registered agent of the company, the amount of capital and the number and class
of shares. An IBC must provide the Registrar with an authenticated copy of its
Memorandum or Articles within 28 days of any amendment (s18, IBC Act).
39. Failure by either a GC or an IBC to file any required document car-
ries a penalty of BSD 10 000 or up to 2 years imprisonment (sections 292-
293, Companies Act; and sections 181-182, IBC Act).
Foreign companies
40. Once a foreign-incorporated company is carrying on an “undertak-
ing” or has a “trading branch” in The Bahamas, Part VI of the Companies
Act will apply, and it is required to register with the Registrar of Companies.
In order to be registered, the foreign company must file certain information
with the Registrar, including:
a copy of its memorandum or articles of association;
full address of the principal office of the company, both within and
outside of The Bahamas;
full name, address and occupation of each of the directors of the
company.
41. The foreign company must also maintain a registered office in The
Bahamas, and its address must be notified to the Registrar (s181, Companies Act).
42. Following registration, the foreign company must meet all of the obli-
gations imposed on General Companies incorporated and registered under the
Companies Act which relevantly includes maintaining an up to date register
of shareholders. A foreign company which is registered in The Bahamas may
in turn establish as an IBC and in that case would be subject to the IBC Act
obligations.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 17
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
18 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
Business Licences
51. Any person who carries on any business with a view to obtaining
any amount of gross turnover in a given year must obtain a business license
under the Business License Act (BL Act). However, certain Private Trust
Companies that may otherwise fulfil this criterion will be exempt under
regulation 3 of the Banks and Trust Companies (Private Trust Companies)
Regulations. However, it is noted that PTCs are regulated by the Central Bank
(see paragraph 107).
52. At the time of application for a business licence and on an annual
basis, the BL Act requires that the applicant must provide the names of
owners of the business and the applicant’s address.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 19
53. The penalty for non-compliance with the BL Act, including the car-
rying on of a relevant business without a licence, is either a fine of up to
BSD 10 000 or imprisonment up to 2 years. Additionally, a fine of between
BSD 250 and BSD 1 000 per day in breach may be imposed, as well as a fine
of up to five times the licence fee that would have been payable. A Court may
also order the confiscation of business goods and machinery as it sees fit.
Regulatory laws
54. Regulation of The Bahamas’ finance sectors are overseen by sector-
specific regulators. The regulatory framework is complemented by the AML
regime, and which applies to all regulated licensees in addition to some non-
licensed persons.
55. The licensing and supervision of the financial services sector is arranged
as follows: bogus note 44
4. The Bahamas has foreshadowed that it will consolidate the non-bank regulators
although the date for the conclusion of this reform exercise is not yet determined.
Such changes are not anticipated to materially affect the relevant obligations
imposed on licensed entities.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
20 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
5. “Financial and Corporate Services” means the provision of such services for
profit or reward either in or from within The Bahamas, and is inclusively defined
to comprise persons who register, manage or administer IBCs; conduct or carry
on “financial services”; or provide partners, registered agent or registered office
services for exempted limited partnerships. The term “financial services” is
not defined in the FCSP Act, however the Inspector of Financial and Corporate
Services has advised that the definition of the WTO will be adopted, which defi-
nition includes money broking, lending of all types and related activities.
6. Individual trustees and nominees who are not carrying on business or providing
relevant services for profit or reward are not required to be licensed, and there-
fore are not subject to the regulatory obligations.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 21
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
22 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
Investment Funds
65. With the banking and trust company sector, the investment funds
sector is a significant part of The Bahamas’ financial services industry,
holding assets valued at almost BSD 190 billion as of 31 December 2009. A
more specific regime for maintaining identity information applies to invest-
ment funds, which may take a variety of legal forms including a company
or trust. As at 30 November 2010, there were 764 investment funds in The
Bahamas, of which 698 were companies (including IBCs), 13 were trusts, and
53 were partnerships. An investment fund, is defined in s2 of the IF Act, and
must be either licensed by the Securities Commission or registered with the
Commission as a recognized foreign fund (which must be from a prescribed
jurisdiction). A different licensing process applies to fund administrators than
to the funds themselves.
66. All fund administrators are required by s32 of the IF Act to be
licensed (Regulated Licensees), except where they meet certain conditions
including that they will be administering no more than one specified fund:
s32(3), IF Act. As Regulated Licensees they are subject to the AML regime
however an exception in the AML regime provides that documentary evi-
dence in respect of client identity information will not be required in respect
of an investment fund licensed or registered in The Bahamas.7
67. There are three types of resident investment funds in The Bahamas:
“professional”, “standard”, or “SMART” funds (Specific Mandate Alternative
Regulatory Test fund). Under s11 of the IF Act, all Bahamian investment
funds must seek a licence from either the Commission, or an investment fund
administrator who holds an unrestricted license pursuant to section 34(1) of
the IF Act. An unrestricted license-holder may only issue a license for those
funds for which it is the fund administrator and provides the principal office.
In the case of self-administered funds, only the Securities Commission may
be the licensor (s8(3), IF Act).
68. Both professional and standard funds are required to appoint an invest-
ment fund administrator to provide a principal office (who is a Regulated
Licensee, noting the exception referred to in paragraph 66 concerning the
exception from documentary evidence for client identity information).
However, there is no requirement to appoint an investment fund administra-
tor for professional or standard funds which are self-administered. The person
responsible for administering a self-administered professional or standard fund
may only administer one fund and may not act as a principal in respect of that
fund.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 23
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
24 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 25
9. Including where there is reasonable grounds to believe that transactions are being
structured to avoid the prescribed limit: s7(1)(b), FTR Act.
10. Controlling interest for the purposes of the Central Bank Guidelines and Compliance
Commission’s Codes of Practices means 10% or more shareholding in a company.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
26 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
a new holder is added to the facility. All identity verification documents which
are obtained must be held for not less than five years from the end of the rela-
tionship or from the date of the transaction, whichever is longer (s24, FTR Act).
81. A breach of the customer verification obligations is an offence under
section 12 of the FTR Act, liable to a fine on the AML Service Provider of
up to BSD 20 000 for individuals, or BSD 100 000 for s body corporate. A
failure to comply with any regulation, or an instruction issued by a regulator,
upon summary conviction carries a maximum fine of BSD 10 000; or upon a
conviction on information, BSD 50 000 for a first offence, or a maximum of
BSD 100 000 for a subsequent offence.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 27
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
28 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
General Partnerships
89. Neither the common law nor the Partnership Act creates any obliga-
tions for general partnerships to provide any identity information to govern-
ment authorities. However, a partnership is a relationship formed for the
carrying on of a business, and when a partnership (including a General Partner-
ship) is carrying on that business in The Bahamas, it must obtain a licence pur-
suant to the Business License Act. In applying for the licence and on an annual
basis, the partnership must provide the names of the owners of the business (see
paragraph 51).
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 29
93. A change to any of the above details must be advised to the Registrar
within 60 days; however a change whereby a person ceases to be a general
partner must be notified within 15 days (s10, ELP Act). Failure to comply
with these obligations shall incur liability on each general partner of BSD 25
per day in default.
General Partnerships
94. Under s29 of the Partnership Act, partners in a General Partnership
are bound to “render true accounts and full information of all things affecting
the partnership” to any partner. It is unclear whether this obligation includes a
requirement for identity information in respect of the partners to be retained.
These types of partnerships would need to obtain a business licence and
provide identity information annually to the Business Licence Authority (see
paragraph 51).
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
30 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 31
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
32 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
11. Except where the eligible introducer fulfils certain criteria, including that the respec-
tive bank or trust company provides company incorporation or registered agent/
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 33
office services to it, and is part of the bank or trust company’s financial group. In
those cases, the KYC information need not be provided to the bank or trust company
but must be available to it within 3 days upon request to the eligible introducer.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
34 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 35
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
36 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 37
Determination
The element is in place.
Factors underlying Recommendations
recommendations
It is unclear whether an exemption The Bahamas should ensure that any
for investment funds in the Security exemption in respect of investment
Commission’s Guidelines is funds is consistent with the AML
subordinate to the more general regulations to ensure that all such
requirement in AML regulations for funds are subject to appropriate
ownership and identity information. ownership and identity requirements.
Whether an exemption does exist is
particularly relevant for determining
ownership and identity information
requirements for self-administered
private funds.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
38 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 39
128. In respect of each SA, the obligation to lay the financial statements
at a general meeting may be waived indefinitely (although the waiver is revo-
cable) by the owners of that SA. Each year an SAC must file a declaration
that it has complied with the Act. Any person who makes a statement that he
knows or has reasonable grounds to believe is false, deceptive or misleading
he is liable on summary conviction to a fine of BSD 50 000 or imprisonment
or both. There is no express obligation for an SAC to maintain underlying
documentation, and there is no express obligation to maintain accounting
records for a minimum of a 5 year period under the SAC Act.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
40 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
equity and cash flows of the fund. Except where exempted by the Securities
Commission, a licensed investment fund must also have its financial state-
ments audited annually by an approved auditor (s31, IF Act). There is no
express obligation to maintain underlying documentation, and there is no
time period specified for the retention of records.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 41
through them. Given the reliance that many entities and arrangements,
particularly IBCs, authorised trust companies and foundations place on the
AML regime to ensure that relevant accounting records are maintained (in
the absence of satisfactory obligations imposed directly on those entities and
arrangements), these limitations are such that full accounting records may not
be available in certain cases in respect of these entities and arrangements.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
42 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
the foundation”. These are to be kept at the registered office of the founda-
tion, or such other place as the officers think fit. An income and expenditure
account shall be prepared annually, however this obligation may be waived
by the foundation council Hor other supervisory person (s43, Foundation
Act). However, foundations are required to have either or both a foundation
agent and secretary who are licensed FCSPs or bank or trust companies (s12,
Foundation Act), and therefore the regulatory and AML obligations will apply
to require the maintenance of accounting records in respect of the foundation.
141. The Bahamas has requirements for legal entities and arrangements
to maintain certain forms of accounting records but the approach taken is
inconsistent and these requirements are not sufficient in terms of their com-
prehensiveness or the minimum retention period.
Determination
The element is not in place
Factors underlying Recommendations
recommendations
All relevant entities and arrangements The Bahamas should ensure that
including international business reliable accounting records, including
companies, registered private and underlying documentation, are
foreign-incorporated companies, required to be kept in respect of all
authorised purpose trusts and relevant entities and arrangements for
foundations are not subject to express a minimum five year period.
obligations to maintain reliable
accounting records for a minimum five
year period
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION – 43
143. As part of these obligations, banks are subject to the Guidelines issued
by the Central Bank. These Guidelines are binding, with any “financial insti-
tution” (including a bank) that fails to comply with any “guidelines, codes of
practice or other instructions” issued by the Central Bank,12 liable upon sum-
mary conviction to a fine of up to BSD 10 000; or upon conviction on informa-
tion, to fines up to BSD 50 000 or for subsequent offences, to BSD 100 000.
144. As concerns the requirement that banking information is available for
all account-holders, the Central Bank’s “Guidelines for licensees on the preven-
tion of money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism” sets out the
binding obligations to keep transaction records, which expands on the obliga-
tions in sections 23-25 of the FTR Act. In particular, paragraphs 206-208 of the
Guidelines specify that the following transactional information must be retained:
the parties to a transaction;
the facility through which the transaction was conducted any other
facilities directly involved n the transaction;
the beneficial owner of the account/facility and any intermediaries
involved;
the volume of funds flowing through the account/facility;
the date, amount and currency of a transaction; and
the files and business correspondence and records connected to the
facility.
145. All such transaction records must be kept for a minimum five year
period from the date the transaction is completed.
146. Considered in conjunction with the client identity obligations
imposed on banks found in the Central Bank’s Guidelines at paragraphs 49
and 57 in particular (similar to the obligations on trust companies, described
in paragraph 104 of this report), The Bahamas requires that banking informa-
tion is required to be available for all account holders.
Determination
The element is in place.
12. Or other “relevant agency”, which is defined to include the Compliance Commission,
the Securities Commission, the Registrar of Insurance and the Gaming Board”: regu-
lation 2, Financial Intelligence (Transactions Reporting) Regulations, 2001.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: ACCESS TO INFORMATION – 45
B. Access to Information
Overview
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
46 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: ACCESS TO INFORMATION
Competent authorities should have the power to obtain and provide information that is the
subject of a request under an exchange of information arrangement from any person within
their territorial jurisdiction who is in possession or control of such information (irrespective
of any legal obligation on such person to maintain the secrecy of the information).
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: ACCESS TO INFORMATION – 47
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
48 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: ACCESS TO INFORMATION
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: ACCESS TO INFORMATION – 49
Convention, apply in The Bahamas. That is, The Bahamas is not required to
exchange information which is subject to attorney-client privilege; would dis-
close any trade, business, industrial, commercial or professional secret; or would
be contrary to public policy. In addition to the public policy exception, both
Acts create a specific exception for matters that would be contrary to national
security.
Determination
The element is in place
Factors underlying Recommendations
recommendations
In the case of the US TIEA Act, The The Bahamas should ensure that it
Bahamas does not have the power has the power to access information
to obtain and provide information sought under its TIEA with the US
held outside of The Bahamas, even if which is controlled by persons in
such information is in the control of a The Bahamas, even if it is located
person within its territorial jurisdiction. extra-territorially.
The rights and safeguards (e.g. notification, appeal rights) that apply to persons in the
requested jurisdiction should be compatible with effective exchange of information.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
50 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: ACCESS TO INFORMATION
period, under section 7(2). Thus, whilst such an extension could equally affect
the exchange, the Minister is not bound to extend the period thereby delay-
ing the exchange of the information. Therefore, section 7(c) of the ITC Act
may impact the legal framework for effective access to information. There
is however no notification requirement under The Bahamas’ legislation, and
further, The Bahamas has advised that to date there have been no legal chal-
lenges to the Minister’s powers under the ITC Act or the US TIEA Act, or
to an exchange of information pursuant to an EOI agreement. Whether this
obligation on the Minister to retain information is compatible with effective
access in practice will be considered in the Phase 2 review of The Bahamas.
167. In respect of rights and safeguards of persons, the OECD Model
TIEA provides that they remain applicable “to the extent that they do not
unduly prevent or delay effective exchange of information”. In contrast, a
number of The Bahamas’ agreements13 provide that a requested party “shall
use its best endeavours” to ensure that they do not so unduly prevent of delay
effective EOI. It is unlikely that this variation will materially affect access to
information in line with the international standards.
Determination
The element is in place.
Factors underlying Recommendations
recommendations
In the case of information exchange The Bahamas should ensure that
with all EOI partners except the US, its domestic law provisions are
the competent authority is required compatible with the timely access and
to retain information provided to him exchange of information with all of its
where a taxpayer or interested person EOI partners.
has sought judicial review or other
legal recourse. Under the domestic
law concerning information exchange
with the US, the Minister has discre-
tion whether to withhold the exchange
of information which he has accessed.
13. With Australia, Belgium, Monaco, New Zealand, San Marino and the UK.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: EXCHANGING INFORMATION – 51
C. Exchanging Information
Overview
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
52 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: EXCHANGING INFORMATION
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: EXCHANGING INFORMATION – 53
14. With Argentina, Belgium, Germany, Mexico, Monaco, New Zealand, San Marino,
Spain, the UK and the USA.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
54 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: EXCHANGING INFORMATION
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: EXCHANGING INFORMATION – 55
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
56 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: EXCHANGING INFORMATION
Determination
The element is in place.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: EXCHANGING INFORMATION – 57
jurisdiction advised the assessment team that The Bahamas had refused to
negotiate or conclude a TIEA with it.
196. The Bahamas has indicated that it has approached a number of
other jurisdictions and indicated its willingness to negotiate a TIEA which
would meet the international standards however some of the jurisdictions
approached had declined to negotiate or indicated that they would only nego-
tiate DTAs, or had not responded to The Bahamas’ invitation.
Determination
The element is in place
Factors underlying Recommendations
recommendations
The Bahamas should continue to
develop its EOI network with all
relevant partners.
C.3. Confidentiality
The jurisdictions’ mechanisms for exchange of information should have adequate
provisions to ensure the confidentiality of information received.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
58 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: EXCHANGING INFORMATION
15. The Bahamas’ agreements with Argentina, Belgium, Mexico, Monaco, New
Zealand, San Marino, the United Kingdom and the US.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: EXCHANGING INFORMATION – 59
Determination
The element is in place.
Determination
The element is in place.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
60 – COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: EXCHANGING INFORMATION
16. With Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Mexico, Monaco, the Netherlands,
New Zealand, San Marino and the UK.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS: EXCHANGING INFORMATION – 61
208. There are no laws or regulations in The Bahamas that impose restric-
tive conditions on exchange of information that would be incompatible with
the international standard.
Determination
The assessment team is not in a position to evaluate whether this
element is in place, as it involves issues of practice that are dealt with in
the Phase 2 review.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
SUMMARY OF DETERMINATIONS AND FACTORS UNDERLYING RECOMMENDATIONS – 63
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
64 – SUMMARY OF DETERMINATIONS AND FACTORS UNDERLYING RECOMMENDATIONS
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
SUMMARY OF DETERMINATIONS AND FACTORS UNDERLYING RECOMMENDATIONS – 65
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
ANNEXES – 67
1. The Bahamas would like to thank the assessment team and the peer
review group members for the productive and constructive engage-
ment during the course of the review and the useful observations
made. The Bahamas acknowledges the findings of the report and
notes its continuing commitment to the review process.
* This Annex presents the Jurisdiction’s response to the review report and shall
not be deemed to represent the Global Forum’s views.
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
68 – ANNEXES
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
ANNEXES – 69
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
70 – ANNEXES
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
ANNEXES – 71
Foundations Act
Fraudulent Dispositions Act (FD Act)
Insurance Act
International Business Companies Act (IBC Act)
Investment Funds Act (IF Act)
Investment Funds Regulations (IF Regulations)
Partnership Act
Partnership Limited Liability Act (PLL Act)
Purpose Trust Act (PT Act)
Segregated Accounts Companies Act (SAC Act)
Securities Industry Act
Securities Industry Regulations (SI Regulations)
Trustee Act
PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK – THE BAHAMAS © OECD 2011
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION
AND DEVELOPMENT
The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the
economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the
forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments
and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of
an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare
policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to
co-ordinate domestic and international policies.
The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the
Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland,
Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom
and the United States. The European Commission takes part in the work of the OECD.
OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering
and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions,
guidelines and standards agreed by its members.
Peer Review Report Phase 1 Legal and Regulatory Framework THE BAHAMAS
must be provided, including bank information and information held by fiduciaries,
regardless of the existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual
criminality standard.
All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identified by the Global Forum
as relevant to its work, are being reviewed. This process is undertaken in two phases.
Phase 1 reviews assess the quality of a jurisdiction’s legal and regulatory framework for
the exchange of information, while Phase 2 reviews look at the practical implementation of
that framework. Some Global Forum members are undergoing combined – Phase 1 plus
Phase 2 – reviews. The ultimate goal is to help jurisdictions to effectively implement the
international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes.
All review reports are published once approved by the Global Forum and they thus
represent agreed Global Forum reports.
For more information on the work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of
Information for Tax Purposes, and for copies of the published review reports, please visit
www.oecd.org/tax/transparency.
ISBN 978-92-64-10828-8
www.oecd.org/publishing
23 2011 17 1 P -:HSTCQE=VU]W]]:
232011171covBAHAMAS.indd 1 11-Apr-2011 10:26:16 AM