Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS
1. Aim
To determine the H vs Q, power vs Q and efficiency vs Q curves for a centrifugal, and
compare with the published H-Q and theoretical P-Q and - Q curves.
2. Apparatus
1. Procedure
1. Theory
To determine the power, head and efficiency curves, the affinity laws need to be used.
Once the experimental values are obtained, the curves were to be drawn and compared
to the pump published curve.
P' = P/ρN3D5
By selecting relative points corresponding to the flow rate of the published P-Q
curve, the theoretical and experimental values can be equated to each other to
determine the experimental power at 2900 rpm (refer to Appendix B).
ψ = gH/N2D2
Equating the published and experimental using the formula above, the
experimental head can be obtained at 2900 rpm (refer to Appendix B).
The corresponding flow rates at 2900 rpm were obtained using the affinity law
formula:
Ф = Q/ND3
By equating the published data and the experimental data, the flow rate at 2900
rpm can be determined (refer to Appendix B).
η = PoutPin
1.4.Expected Trends
Figure 1: Centrifugal Pump Performance curve (www.aldobarbera.it/eng/prod-dett)
The expected curve of the experimental power at 2900 rpm should resemble that of
the published, with the power output lower at the same speed.
According to theoretical centrifugal pumps, η-Q curves should have the same trend
as other centrifugal pumps, with similar values of efficiency.
2. Results
The published power-flow curve is not seen running with a trend starting/ending at
zero flow rate, which illustrates that the valve governing flow to the flow meter
was not fully closed, but is shown in operation between 9-24 m3/h. In the
experiment, the pump was programmed to run at a motor speed of 1950 rpm.
From the graph of Power vs Flow Rate, it is evident that the reduction of the motor
speed reduces the power that can be delivered by the pump. It is also evident that a
reduction in the motor speed reduces the rate of flow through the flow meter.
It is understood that the reduction in motor speed reduces the angular velocity of
the impeller, resulting in less fluid dispensation through the flow meter and into the
storage tank. Due to the loss of angular velocity, the input power is reduced,
according to the formula P=Tω. The system losses thus reduce the output power,
making it lower at a lower speed.
The η-Q trends will remain the same no matter the motor speeds that are set. This is
because the speed increase/decrease would cause the input and output power to
increase/decrease at the same rate. Therefore the efficiencies would remain the same,
or in the same region as another speed-as experiments do give you varying values.
The experimental H-Q reading at zero flow-rate was not the maximum head value.
However, during the experiment, when the gate valve was completely closed and the
flow rate was zero, the torque reading fluctuated. The group therefore had to take an
average reading, which made the point at zero flow inaccurate. It could be
recommended that the gauges be more precise.
Losses were to be neglected. If all losses were considered, the outcome of the readings
could have varied to the readings obtained in this laboratory.
5. References
Inlet Outlet Pump Motor Volume Motor Pump Pump Pump Pump
pressure pressure Differential Speed Flowrate Input Inlet Outlet Total Power Overall
Sample Torque Efficiency
Pressure Power Velocity Velocity Head Output
Number P1 [Nm] Egr
P2 dPp1 n1 Qv Pe1 V1 V2 H1 P1
[Bars] [Bars] [bars] [rpm] [m³/h] [W] [m/s] [m/s] [m] [W] [%]
1 -0.16 0.44 0.6 1950 2.09 10.83 426.785 1.432 3.548 6.65331 196.351 45.68
2 -0.14 0.52 0.66 1950 2.03 9.747 414.533 1.289 3.184 7.15983 190.169 45.87
3 -0.14 0.58 0.72 1950 1.98 8.664 404.323 1.146 2.842 7.6842 181.414 44.87
4 -0.13 0.64 0.77 1950 1.92 7.581 392.071 1.008 2.483 8.112 167.576 42.74
5 -0.12 0.69 0.81 1950 1.84 6.498 375.736 0.8595 2.1292 8.4503 149.6599 39.83
6 -0.11 0.73 0.84 1950 1.75 5.415 357.356 0.716 1.769 8.6959 128.3014 35.903
7 -0.11 0.76 0.87 1950 1.66 4.332 338.978 0.573 1.428 8.9557 105.7164 31.19
8 -0.10 0.79 0.89 1950 1.57 3.249 320.5995 0.4297 1.088 9.1233 80.773 25.194
9 -0.10 0.8 0.9 1950 1.45 2.166 296.095 0.286 0.708 9.18845 54.227 18.314
10 -0.09 0.82 0.91 1950 1.3 1.083 265.465 0.143 0.3548 9.28162 27.3914 10.318
11 -0.05 0.85 0.9 1950 1.18 0 240.9602 0 0 9.1743 0 0