Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.2. rule 6 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, has been deleted w.e.f.
03.03.1980. As a result it is no longer necessary to go through the
exercise of determining whether any part of the qualifying service of the
retiring Government servant was unsatisfactory. Thus, the question of
making any reduction in pension would not arise except in cases where
provisions of Rule 9 relating to departmental or judicial proceedings are
invoked.
1.3. After pension has been granted, future good conduct is an implied
A(24) condition of its continued payment. The appointing authority can
withhold or withdraw a pension or any part of it if the pensioner is
convicted of serious crime or is found guilty of grave misconduct [vide
Rule 8 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972].
1.4. Under Rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, the President has
A(24) reserved to himself the right of withholding or withdrawing a pension or
any part of it, whether permanently or for a specified period, and of
ordering recovery from the pension of whole or part of any pecuniary
loss caused to Government if the pensioner is found, in a departmental
or judicial proceedings, to have been guilty of grave misconduct or
negligence during the period of his service including his service under
re-employment.
267
Chap. XV] ACTION AGAINST PENSIONERS
___________________________________________________________________________________
2. Action in cases in which departmental proceedings had been
initiated before retirement.
2.3. In terms of Rule 9(2) (a) of the C.C.S. (Pension) Rules, 1972, the
Central Government has the power to withhold or withdraw pension even
as a result of minor penalty proceedings instituted against the Government
servant, while in service, and continued after his retirement, provided
grave misconduct or negligence is established. It should however be the
endeavour of the disciplinary authority to see that minor penalty
proceedings instituted against a Government servant, who is due to retire,
are finalised quickly and preferably before his retirement so that the need
for continuing such proceedings beyond the date of retirement does not
arise.
2.5. If common inquiry had been ordered when all the co-accused were
in service and if one of them retires before the completion of the inquiry,
the proceedings can be continued under Rule 9 (2) of the CCS (Pension)
Rules, 1972. It is not necessary to split up the enquiries the moment
one of the officers retires. On receipt of the report of Inquiring Authority,
the disciplinary authority can straight-away impose a punishment on
the officers in service. But he will have to submit his findings to the
Government in respect of the retired officer.
3.4. On receipt of the reply of the pensioner the Union Public Service
Commission will be consulted in all cases in which action is proposed to
be taken under rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. After considering
the reply of the pensioner and the advice of the Union Public Service
Commission, orders will be issued in the name of the President under
D(8) the signature of an office authorised to authenticate order on behalf of
the President.
4. Judicial proceedings
Similar action against officers of the All India Services can be taken
in accordance with the provisions of Rule 6 of the All India Services
(Death cum Retirement Benefit) Rules, 1958.