Professional Documents
Culture Documents
U N I T E D STATES OF A M E R I C A *
Plaintiff
V. No.l:03-CR-131-CC
*
S C O T T HINTZ, *
Defendant *
Defendant requests the Court accept this filing and takes notice of the items contained herein
in support of all pending motions currently pending in the Atlanta U S D C case No.l:03-CR-131.
Defendant requests ths Court afford all efforts required to ensure pro se constitutional rights are
not further violated. Appointed counsel has made it clear that Defendant is now without the
assistance of counsel.
In the revocation proceedings there are three false allegations originating from Robert
Willison: (1) Willison (and those parroting Mm) alleged Defendant fraudulently altered liens,
(2) Willison (and those parroting him) alleged Defendant committed fraud to receive
approximately $16,000 for himself, and (3) Willison (and those parroting him) alleged a
Defendant owned a company and an account, and (4) Willison (and those parroting him)
alleged Defendant (and people allegedly acting on Defendant's behalf) have made Willison feel
he was i n danger. A l l four of these items are fabrications of Robert Willison's design which he
was able to foster i n the minds of others with the his long-time, and well-practiced, fraudster co-
Pagel of 6 S ff
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 2 of 26
(1) Robert Willison (and those parroting his false statements) alleged Defendant wrote in
items to alter various liens, but they were rendered, by a professional Forensic Document
Examiner, to be very highly likely riot written by this Defendant. Willison agreed
everything was correct i n the liens in his sworn, and Halter's notarized, November 2010
statements; see and herein incorporate doc.281 pages 6-10. The liens listed "Hamilton
has stated he is owner of Hamilton Construction and has stated he acted as an agent for
the company paying him for his work in Columbus, Ohio. Robert Willison knew these
items to he true and met the owner of P T Holdings i n Ohio i n 2010. Finally, Robert
Willison was aware of the existence of the liens prior to their filing, and he very clearly
knew Defendant did not fill i n liens prior to the date Willison's made false statements to
(2) Robert WUlison (and at least one person parroting his false statements)
acknowledged Defendant and PT Holdings owed absolutely nothing to Net Five Group
(previously Gerova Real Estate Group), and they also acknowledged Defendant and PT
Holdings had done absolutely nothing unethical or illegal. These facts are evidenced
with Robert Willison's sworn and Eric Halter's notarized November 2010 statements; see
and herein incorporate doc.281 pages 6-10. Further, Robert Willison represented he
and Net Five Group completely waived any claim against Defendant and PT Holdings
even i f they had owed anything at all—which, of course, the facts show they did not; see
(3) Robert Willison (and at least one person parroting his false statements) knew
Defendant did not own P T Holdings and knew Defendant did not own any account for PT
Page 2 of 6
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 3 of 26
Holdings. In fact, in late 2009 and early 2010, Robert Willison met with the owner of PT
Holdings. During these meetings, Robert Willison represented he, and his allegedly
'billionaire' partner from California controlled Gerova Financial Group Ltd (previously
representations during these meetings, coupled with several promises and other Willison
numerous significant financial rewards and the use of a company jet), that caused the
owner of P T Holdings to agree to take over maintenance and management of the Ohio
properties, and other properties scattered across the country. Robert Willison used the
assets of P T Holdings for his own personal use. Robert Willison has a long history of
looting other people's credit and money. In fact, Robert Willison, himself, has
acknowledged that he regularly uses the credit and assets of others for his own use. JS of
Georgia, P T Holdmgs, Paul Rohan, Gerova Real Estate Group, Scott Huitz, Net Five
Equities, and Westmoore are just a few of the people and entities that Robert Willison has
allegedly used as his own personal piggy bank.. Worse yet, Robert Willison plays the
part of a "believable" fraudster so well that his "Robbing Peter to Pay Paul" plot
has continued f o r decades—and whenever he has gotten close to being caught-he, and
his co-conspirators, usually find someone else to set up for his actions; see attached and
herein incorporated E x h i b i t C ; see also herein incorporated doc. 329, doc. 310,
(4) Robert " R o b b y " Willison (and those parroting his false statements) know Defendant
has N E V E R threatened any danger, or any illegal activity, against A N Y Gerova-Net Five
Page 3 of 6 ^
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 4 of 26
associate or any other person, h i fact, it was Robert Willison, Mike Garone, Paul Rohan
and at least one attomey representing Gerova-Net Five associates that have threatened
Defendant. The threats included causing Defendant unwarranted problems with his
probation officer (which they have now completed with these proceedings), they have
threatened physical assaults against Defendant (which Robert Willison has committed),
they have threatened death, and they have threatened to use their influence with
(which they appear to have accomplished with flieir attomey's efforts); see attached and
herein incorporated Exhibit D ; see also herein incorporated doc.281 i i o m this case.
This Court has acknowledged Defendant is not a flee risk and is not a danger to the
community A F T E R Defendant had been sentenced to, but before he started serving, a 57 months
term in the underlying case that has been on appeal since 2004 (the U.S. Supreme Court vacated
and remanded the case for further proceedings and the 11* Circuit acknowledged it was the
statements of allegedly conflicted counsel that ended the proceedings before the US Supreme
Court ruling).
The Govemment has acknowledged Defendant is not a flee risk during these revocation
proceedings. The only alleged, but false, statements of "danger" to the community have come
firom the very same people that have threatened this Defendant's life. These same
"questionable" accusers have significant motive to try to "jail" Defendant in order to try to
hinder Defendant's valid civil claims against them and in order to tty to discredit Defendant from
testifying against them i n future proceedings. The accusers have been unjustly attacking the
Defendant ever since January 4, 2011 when they were contacted by Forbes Magazine for a
Page 4 of 5 ^ t f
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 5 of 26
Jamiary 5, 2011 article that alleged at least some of the accusers were involved with a $53
Robert WilHson's criminal defense attomey, Jerome J. Froehch\ was the one that allegedly
subpoenaed some items items for these proceedings and provided them to USPO Lisa Moore,
and presented these and other misleading items to the Govemment for these proceedings (the
judge authorizing " M r . Froelich's" receipt of the subpoenaed materials is still unknown [see
attached and herein incorporated Exhibit E], but Mr. Froelich has recently alleeed he has talked,
exparte, with one or more judge(s) i n the record of this case to try to cause Defendant
unwarranted problems; see attached and herein incorporated E x h i b i t F ; see also herein
incorporated doc.296.
concem about information sent through emails to the US Probation office being leaked to Robert
Willison's defense attomey, Jerome J. Froelich, but received no reply to Ms numerous requests
for the integrity of their commrmications. Defendant has requested, on numerous occasions, to
be able to go to make copies of the items requested to verify scheduled visits, to go to the U S
Probation office to drop off such items, or minimally to have a U S Probation Officer come to
Defendant's home to view or pick up such items. A l l such requests have been ignored and have
Page 5 of 6 5^
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 6 of 26
In light o f all the above, Defendant respectfully requests this Court act immediately to prevent
further interference with Defendant's Constitutional First, Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights.
CONCLUSION
This Court should take judicial notice of all o f the above, and : (A) stay revocation hearings
pending the final decision o f 11* Circuit Appeal N o . 11-11905, and (B) move to hold an
immediate hearing to release Defendant from home confinement and back into the community,
Scott Hintz,
Pro Se Defendant
Page 6 of 6
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 7 of 26
Page 1 of 1
I, Scott Hintz, state die following are trae under the penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 USC Section 1746.
1. Robert Willison met with the owner of PT Holdings to discuss the Gerova Financial Group Ltd
(previously known as ASSAC) project during the end of 2009 and the early part of 2010. Mr.
Willison told the owner of PT Holdings, in my presence, that Willison and his allegedly
'billionaire' California partner were going to take Gerova Financial Group Ltd (ASSAC) to the
NYSE. Robert Willison said he wanted us to help with the maintenance and management of the
company assets all across the country.
2. A professional Forensic Document Examiner has determined it is highly likely I did not write
anything on the liens Robert Willison alleges I have fraudulently altered in the revocation
proceedings of #1:03-CR-131-CC.
3. Robert WiUison was aware of, and approved, the liens included in the revocations proceedings of
#1:03-131-CC before they were filed and he suggested they be filed. Robert Willison expressed a
financial interest in collecting fundsfiromNet Five.
4. Robert WiUison was aware Mike Hamilton Construction was not the only contractor working for
PT Holdings in Ohio during the summer of 2010.
5. Robert Willison knew his statements regarding PT Holdings and the hens referenced in paragraph
#3, above, were false when Robert Willison made his statements to the U.S. Govemment earlier
this year.
I state the above are true under the penalty of perjury. I state the above this 27*^ day of May 2011.
Scott Hintz
Exhibit A
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 8 of 26
'iiniiiiijrr.T'Yji
3, Jibflrvt pS«*in*TtW rttStiTWt "T^e Ef»6tte»"% that * « ;ypt«m«ftt» ««l MWWtftta iva4t
factyrtfct Thtt Eottce* PT MoMii^ Smtp), !bc wkJ HswBan Cijnjt/ircilon *ws male
vifttRtfwi«TyiiKtBfctocniifedg,<fe<aioa>Bd 8f<aH5va^fli one w mora »tft*pfaetiog«eMtgf
Rot«rt V. wafljon hw, «ftor |i«)w<afi<E»«Sd«««*J«t^ trf hi* idenfiftf, tppeavti Matt tat w4 J%ned
thiidocummntin my p««ncethtt i ^ c t ^ i r f ^
II n ff Mip'T*^""
EUIMETHWmtH
ltetirfP««!8c
Exhibit B
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 9 of 26
WHEft£A5, H« fft*Ho^!ttn^A liC, f(« Rve qrcwp, ttC asd any totityjHa} ovmtsj OV or wtler
the opsfstJon*I cotimi of NetfiveHdidm^, LLCortmB^ e^wp, lit, and Rebert V, WSfekh^,
an imfiviAal {iii«inaft«co8ectivti¥ jfso «ferr«i to *»
MHIer, tmwrtsctf drtw^ Sratt an4 MJchaeJ Garop* (h«/«teaiter atw referredtow 'TRie
J
Feifew County ,
By ConOTtokm%im<te'r 1.2013
Exhibit B
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 10 of 26
OGT-eS-501S ISi'
October 28,3010
MttcaKsffllllon
377K5r2rtCt
lawretjcavlffe, GA 30045
Mr.Wflce Hamllloft,
L certify I am an autharhed officer of Nat Rya Group, llc with full authority to IggaUy bfnEi $o agreement
Het Five Oroup, W.C and any assodated entity Bsted as an ownar end/or wansger of any oTihe
pfoperttes listed 5rt the twenty-fbur (14) machaRlCs ^fens {herelpaftef re^rrsd to at th« "«e*sftk
!fens»5reti;ird8dflplrjstthfipr<ipirt{estlstftdfntheatacfteiJ££fie{3ula''A*, (furtnercarttlV and agree |
hava rewfesti and revtewacJ sufftctens ^EVWence m b!J accqudts assidatad wlEh the mechanic's Ifehs and
fuUyagraaanamcuntaf$23,636j2{Twenty-ThreeT}ioUKndjS&HimdrBdThIiiv-SIxand7VW*s .
OoflarsJ Isrfghtftifly nwed Jts alJa^ied In tftefftachanfc*i ?|ensanE( as I ggn?s tsowad asa^JdltJonal
expenses inmrrad soIeJyasaresAiftof NetFlve Hotdlna, LLCfaHlnjta timely pay thasiiaccqynffi, Laitly, l
certify anS agres aH worit sssoctetod wfth tfiese mechsofc'yff^nshaa basn al^aJutaly and istlifeetoriJy
completed asBgresd sr}Ei rasjusrtBd,
:Ha]£5C,
cots
NetRvfiGtoup^liC
Eric Halter Has, •sMt pwvWIna aufflcleni: svldenca of his identity, appaarad bafpra and slsnerf
doowiaftt Ifi rrty prosanca thfe_._^.._ day of OcKbar Joio.
UN\A.\LU
Notary Public
My Nptary EKplres).
NrasrySeBt
Exhibit B
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 11 of 26
Page 4 of 5^-^^^
tesalasdtesoc^ttfcjrkwT!reafflnabteBi)d|aIrd«f|^
ErlcHalta-j
ratsrysesi:
Exhibit B
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 13 of 26
Pagel of 1 J'^
\ Scott Hintz, state the following are true under the penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 USC Section 1746.
1. Robert Willison met with the owner of PT Holdings to discuss the Gerova Financial Group Ltd
(previously known as ASSAC) project during the end of 2009 and the early part of 2010. Mr.
Willison toid the owner of PT Holdings, in my presence, that Willison and his allegedly
'bilUonaire' California partner were gouig to take Gerova (ASSAC) to the N Y S E and he wanted
us to help with the maintenance and management of the assets all across the country.
2. Robert Willison stated there would be significant profits and stock available for PT Holdings, JS
of Georgia and myself for helping at such an early stage with this sizable project.
3. Robert Willison stated his allegedly 'billionaire' California partner had hundreds of millions of
liquid cash and that this Gerova (ASSAC) project would be very lucrative for everyone involved.
WiUison even forwarded pictures of a private jet allegedly bought out of company assets and
promised its use to myself and others.
4. Robert Willison used at least some of the assets of Gerova Financial Group, JS of Georgia, and
PT Holdings for his own personal use.
5. Robert Willison has used the company cards of JS of Georgia and PT Holdings for his own
personal use and without authorization. I have never been an owner of either of these two
companies. I have been authorized to represent at least one of these companies.
6. Robert Willison misrepresented, and altered, invoices and supporting documents to or from the
following companies: Gerova Financial Group, Net Five, PT Holdings, aad other related
companies.
7. The United States Bankruptcy Court trustee for 21^' Century Technologies provided a report
regarding Robert WilHson's ongoing pattern offraudulentconduct entitled, Chronology of
Events Constituting Fraudulent Misconduct: Recap of 21''* Century Technologies, Inc.
Disbursements to TransOne & Robert Willison"
I state the above are true under the penalty of perjury. I state the above this 27"' day of May 2011.
Exhibit C
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 14 of 26
Page;,! o f , ^ ^ / ^
], Bryan Rush, hereby state the following are true statenvents under the penalty of perjury.
1. lam over the age of eighteen, t am of sound mind, t am a resident of the state of Georgia and I am an
attomey in good standing with the State Bar of Georgia.
2. On or about January 26,2011, Belli, Weil, Grozbean & DavisfiledScott Hintz v. Gerova Financial Group
Ltd, Net Five Group LLC, et ai in the Atlanta Division of the United states District Court for the Northern
District of Georgia, civil action file no. l:ll-cv-00265-JOF (hereinafter called the "Clvii Action") on behalf
of the Plaintiffs in that action.
3. On or about the morning of March 10,2011, attorney Steven J. Estep met with me, attorney Doug Davis,
and Scott Hintz at my law office which is tocated-at 8010 Roswell Road, Suite 200, Atlanta, GA 30350 to
discuss the clvH Ittigation listed in paragraph # 2 (heretnaftercalled the "Civil Litigation Discussion").
4. Attorney Steven i. Estep entered an appearance on behalf of several defendants in the CMl Action ar^d
was representing these same clients during the Civif Litigation Discussion.
5. During the Civil Litigation Discussion, and in the presence of Scott Hintz, Doug Davis and myself, attorney
Steven J. Estep specifically mentioned he and his clients had previously conversed with Scott Hintz's
United States Probation Officer, Lisa iVloore, seemingly to gain advantage in the civil action.
6. Attorney Steven J, Estep was made aware by Scott Hintz, during the Civil Litigation Discussion, that his
clients threatened to cause Scott Hintz unwarranted problems with his supervised release and attomey
Steven J. Estep listened to the recorded threats of Net Five associates. Specifically, the voice recordings of
Paul Rohan, Mike Garrone, and Robert Willison threatening Scott Hintz were played for Steven J, Estep.
7. I, and Scott Hintz, told attorney Steven J. Estep that we would not withdraw the Civil Action against his
clients, which included a claim of civil RiCO, during the Civil Litigation Discussion.
8. Scott Hintz was arrested on March 22,2011, apparently pursuant to allegations presented by Net Five
associates to Lisa Moore, and released on bond March 23,2011.
1 hereby state the above are true under the penalty of perjury. 1 state the above this ^g^'day of May 2011.
\,„BrfanRus«
The individual, above, has signed this affidavit in my presence after first providing sufficient proof of his identity.
Exhibit D
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 15 of 26
Page 2 of 4 <^
AffWa^^ofUsaHUtUn
i, Usa HuWn, hereby state the following statements are true and hereby state the following under the penalty of perjury
pursuant to 28 USC Section 1746:
1. 1 am over eighteen, am of sound mind, and give these statements from my personal knowledge.
2. Oft November 20,2010,) attended the birthday party of Paul Hackett at the Ca ntina restaurant in the Buckhead-area
of Atlanta, €A with Scott Hintz as invited guests of Paul Hackett
3. Upon arrival, Scott Hintz and t noticed Robbie WilBson was already there, as an uninvited guest.
4. Scott and t did our best to avoid Robbie Willison by sitting at the opposite end of a long row of tables that were used
for Paul Hacfcetes birthday party.
5. Robbie Willison immsdlately got up and came overto Scott Hintz; I was slttirtg next to Scott Hintz.
6. Robbie Wiftison sterted cussing at Scott Hintz and told Kim he needs to "shut the fuck up about the FBI investigations
against me iRobbie Willison}". Robbie Willison also said "alt It will take Is for two of us to tell the same Ite aboutyou
and your ass wilt «£i •faiaif". Scott Hintz toid Robbie WHlJson that the birthday party was not an appropriate setting
for these discussions and moved himself and me away to a difFerent part of the party.
7. Robbie Willison continued to approach Scott Hintz white cussing at him at tell Scott Hintz that he was "going to rip his
fucking head off/
8. Robbie Willison continued to follow Scott Hintz around the party while verbally assaulting him and when Scott Hintz
and 1 took another seat, Robbie Willison took a full margarlte and hit Scott Hintz's back and shoulders with the
contents of the glass and the glass itself.
9. Robbie Willison then attempted to taunt Scott Hintz into a physical altercation, Scott Hintz told Robbie WiUison to
leave as did many others that were upset that Robbie Willison had ruined Paul Hacketfs birthday party. Robbie
Willison refused to leave.
10. On Aprti 22,2011, and tmmediately before I was to testify in a Fulton County court about my knowledge of tlie events
above, Robbie Willison and Mike Sarone continued to stare at me in an obvious attempt to intimidate me from
testifying.
11. The April 22,2011 hearing was reset after Robbie Willison stated his attorney, Jerry Froelich, was observing Good
FrWay.
12. Scott Hlnti and 1 had other Items to attend to in the court for almost a half hour after Scott Hintz, Robbie Wiirison,
Mike Sarone and 1 left the courtroom.
13. When Scott Hintz and 1 finally gotto the parking d«ck, wefoundRobbie Willison and Mike Sarone waiting for us-
They past us very slowly, stared at Scott Hintz and I white in Robbie Willison's black convertible and motioned a band
gesture of cutting off a head,
14. 1 feel all the actions 1 have witnesses are specifically Intended to intimidate people from testifying against Robbie
Willison, Miice Garone and those associated with them.
15. I feel threatened as this group has threatenedfrivolouslaw suits, frivolous criminal complaints and even death
against poterftjal witnesses.
Stating the above are true under penalty of perjury, 1 hereby state the above this 28* day of April 2011.
'1
Exhibit D
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 16 of 26
Page 3 of 4 S'^
Afii^totit Statement
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 17 of 26
Page 4 of 4
I, Scott Hint2^ hereby state the following statements are true and hereby state the following underfliepenalty of
peijury pursuant to 28 USC Section 1746;
1. I am over ei^teen, am of sound mind, and give these statementsfrommy personal knowledge.
2. I have known Robert "Robbie" WiUison since the 1990's and had considered hun afiiendbecause of our
interactions in the past. The items I discovered about Mr, Willison changed everythittg I had Wiwed
about him.
3. I discovered Robert Willison has a very significant association, and involvement, with an alleged multi-
billion dollar criminal organization tiathas been involved with numerous crimes, including some that are
alleged to be very violent In the September/October 2010 time frame, 1 visited Robert Willison's home in
Alpharetta and was verbally and physically assaulted by Mr. WiUison. It was clear he wanted me to stay
quiet about his allegedly illegal activities.
4. On November 20,2010,1 learned even more about Robert Willison and realized he had never been a friend
but has rather always been using me when be stated, "If you thmk we fucked you ten years ago, wait until
you see what we do to you this time around."
5. This stetement was made to me at Paul Hackett's bulhday party at the Cantina restauraat in Atlanta, GA.
6. I tried to avoid Robbie Willison during this party by sitting farfromhim.
7. Robbie Willison continued to follow me and cuss and threaten me. He said things like "shut the fuck up
about the FBI investigations against me [Robbie Willison]", "don't tell anyone about the investigations or
you will never see what is owed", all it will take is for "two of us to tell the same lie aboitt you and your
ass will go to jail". I told Robbie Willison the party was not an appropriate place to talk because it showed
disrespect towards Paul Hackett and his other guests. Willison continued to cuss and said he was "goiag to
rip your [my] fucking head off." He reminded me he was a black belt. I avoided hhnfiirtherand sat down.
Willison continued his verbal assaults and when I took a seat, he threw a glass at me that hit me ia the back.
8. Robbie Willison then tried to get me to hit Mm as he continued to verbally taunt me. I refused tofighthim
and told him to leave the party. Odses^ also asked Willison to leave the party, but he refused.
9. On April 22,2011,1 was supposed to testi:fy about my knowledge of Robbie Willison and Mike Garone.
Outside the court room, Mike Garone said "see you in jail Monday", Insidefeecourtroom Robbie Wilhson
and Mike Garone stared me down to try to intimidate me. This hearing was reset when Robbie Willison
told the court derk that his attorney, Jerry Froelich, was observmg Good Friday and could not make it into
court
10. After leaving the courtroom, I waited for Robbie WilHson and Mike Garone to leave as instructed by
counsel to avoid any interaction with them.
11. When I got to the parking deck, I found Robbie Willison and Mike Garone waiting for me. it was clear
they wse staMng me. Both Robbie Wilifeon and Mike Garone were hi Robbie's convertible and slowly
drove by me, stared at me and made a gesture clearing sendmg the message theyfateodedto cut off my
head.
12. I feel Robbie Willison, Mike Garone and theh associates have threatened to aue me, unjustly put me in jail,
andtiffeatenedmy life to try to keep mefromtalking about their allegedly illegal activities.
Stating the dwve are trae under penalty of perjury, I hereby state the above this 28* day of April 2011.
Scott ektz
Exhibit D
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 18 of 26
Amanda A
West/GANP/ll/USCO
URTS To
Lisa A
04/20/201109:09 Moore/GANP/ll/USCOURTS@USCOURTS
AM cc
Subject
Hintz-Discovery
Exhibit E
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 19 of 26
Page 2 of 2 S
This ieirer certifies that the documents provided regaidiag tiie above referenced
•subpoena case are badeed authentic reproductions of Fifth Third origiaai statements,
checks, deposits, loan files, etc.. mainiained in the ordinary cottrse of btisiness by Fifth
Tnird Bank.
Should you have any questions abujut any materials you received in response to ihis
subpoena, please call the number listed below.
Pnankyou. '•'
Lisa Duncan
[.513) 358-1350
Fax:513-358-1279
Records Custodian Clerk
Fifth Third Bank
pugi; ct':
Exhibit E
187
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 20 of 26
Page 1 of
I, Soott BMz^ state the follcwing are true to fee best of my knowledge, and tmder the penalty of
A . On April 22» 2010 Robert Willison stated his and Mike Garone's attomey, Jerry
Froelidb, was observing Good Friday and would not be aYailable to represent th.em
"because Jvfr. Froelich was observing this religious holiday. To accoimnodate Mr,
Froelich's observance of the religions holiday, fhe warrant heanng was reset to April
29, 2011, Mike Gamne aad Robert Willison, before and after this criminal warrant
hearing, took actions against me and others to clearly intimidate and discourage
B. On April 29, 2011, various witness heard attorney Jerry Froelich slate he had
discussed this case (apparently exparte as there is no record evidence of any such
conversations in this case) with Judge(s) involved with this case and he stated that I
had already been fonnd goiity and that everything has already been set up to send me
backtojaih
C. 1 m s told about some of Mr, Froelich's statements and came mto the courtroom to
hear Mx...grpeKch's statements and ensure he would not have exparte. coiamuni<^tions
Exhibit F
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 21 of 26
Page 2 of 3 5"/^
with the state judge. I overheard Mr. Proelich make false srtatemenfe to the state xidge.
Wheu I corrected attorney Jeny Froelich about his false statements, and informed Mr,
Froelich that &e allegations his clients have made against me are false and would still
have to be determined by trial, Mr. Froelich told me he has already talked to Judge
CoopCT and that Judge Cooper had already determined I wonid '''go back to jail" at my
hearing before Judge Cooper and that the only thing left to do was to determine only a
sentence. Others were present to overhear Mr. Froelich's statements to me, to his
D. M r . Jerry Ffoehch became agitated when I corrected ium aboiit his clearly false
statements and'-began raising his voice so much so that a c-ourt deputy came over to
him, He asked the warmnt hearings be held as far in the fiitute as possible. I
requested Ihe hearing be held anmediately because Mr. Ftoehch, bofli H s clients, my
witnesses and evidence, and I were all present for the h ^ i n g . The state judge
cotopromlsed and reset the wairant healing for a second time to give Mr, Froelich
E. Immediately afier Jetty Froelich's April 29, 2011 court outbursts, he was questioned
issues are also visible In CBS Atlanta's April 29,2011 news story entitl64 "Attorney
Gets Physical TrviBg To Stop Toogh Questions." The video Is at the fofiowing
linki
http://vwwxbsatIanta.coni/localvideo/iiidex.html7grabnetworks_video, I d -
F. Jerry Froelich showed a similar, but not as extreme, outburst when I intended to call
him as a witness for. Ms peisoaal actions and stateaneats durmg the A^l 13, 2011
Exhibit F
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 22 of 26
Page 3 of
hearing o f this case. His outbursts can be beard in the background of the <x>urt
O. On April 29,2011,1 was informed by USPO Lisa Moore that Jerry FroeEch had just
contacted her. The statements be made were false statements aad I informed Ms.
Moore that Mr. Froelich was lying and was acting very questionably.
H . On April 29, 2011, I was specifically informed Mr. Froelich's questionable actions
and his fake statements to United States Govemement employees wore made very
specifically to interfere with the civil RICO elahns I have brought against Ms chents.
I state the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge this 30* day of April 2011,
Scott Hintz
Exhibit F
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 23 of 26
Pagel of 3
Lisa,
Brian Mendelsohn communicated to me that he is also not receiving return emails from you. He said he
has sent you at least a couple emails that have gone unanswered or ignored.
Thank you,
Scott • •
Exhibit G
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 24 of 26
Lisa,
I just wanted to confirm you have previously iafonned me you could not
open attachedfileson your computer. As a result df your statements,
and as a result of the numerous leaks of information, I have requested
to be able to go to a copy store to make copies for you, or to be able
to go to your ofBce, or to have you meet me at my home to confirm any
appointment you would like to confirm. My email requests to you have
not received any replyfiromyou.
Please confirm you have received all my requests. I have provided you
an email for each and every trip away, and back to, my home. Please
let me know, immediately, if you have ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT ANY TRIP
firom or back to my home (y/hile on home confinement for these
revocation proceedings) immediately and I will immediately resend the
email confimiation to you.
Thank you,
Scott Hitttz
Forwarded message
From: lisa a moore(a),ganp.uscourts.goY
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:21:26-0400
Subject: confirmation
To: Scott Hintz
Lisa,
Today, an investigator told me you, Jerry Froelich and Steve Estep have
been working together to try to help the Gerova-Net Five group avoid
criminal scrutiny.
Exhibit G
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 25 of 26
Thank you,
Scott
Original Message
To: Lisa Moore
Subject: Important
Sent: May 23,2011 5:55 PM
Lisa,
Since I have not ireceived permission to work and I have not been given
scheduleflexibilityin regards to access to the courts/attomeys/law
enforcement and church, my attorneys have suggested I continue to
request the official "home confinement" rules you are following so we
can determine if the Irniits are imposed by the "rules" or as the
result of individual decisions to limit my constitutional rights.
Again, I assume these are not your personal decisions, but are likely
rather the result of someone else's direction to you.
Thank yo\i,
Scott
Exhibit G
Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC Document 339 Filed 05/27/11 Page 26 of 26
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
A U S A Leslie J. Abrams
600 U . S . Courthouse
75 Spring Street, S W
Atlanta, G A 30303
Respectfully,