You are on page 1of 4

Human Rights Alert

PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750


Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

11-05-30 Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge of the 9th Circuit, is asked for Jewish ethics
perspective on judicial corruption
Under Kozinski’s tenure the justice system was estimated by experts to be the worst in a century, with
widespread corruption of the state and US judges. “Simulated Litigation” has become a routine, even by
Kozinski himself…

Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge


th
US Court of Appeals, 9 Circuit

Los Angeles, May 30 – in a letter to Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit,
Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has asked for Kozinski’s Jewish ethics perspective on
judicial corruption.
The letter notes that Kozinski’s essays show his keen interest in ethics in general, and Jewish ethics in
particular. [i ]
What are the ethics duties of the Chief Judge in view of rampant corruption of the justice system under the 9th
Circuit?
The Jewish ethics questions raised by Zernik were:
1) Should Simulated Litigation [ii ] be considered Gneivat Ha-Da’at? (a Jewish ethics term for Fraud and
Deceit) [iii ]
2) Is a US judge bound, pursuant to his/her Oaths of Office, by an ethics duty that is not
delegatable to "initiate appropriate action when the judge becomes aware of reliable evidence
indicating the likelihood of unprofessional conduct by a judge or lawyer"?
3) Is a US judge bound, pursuant to the Code of Conduct of US Judges, Canon 3 B. (3) by an
ethics duty that is not delegatable to "initiate appropriate action when the judge becomes
aware of reliable evidence indicating the likelihood of unprofessional conduct by a judge or
lawyer?
4) Should Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, be bound by an
ethics duty that is not delegatable, to "initiate appropriate action", in view of the recent official
Staff Report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations, which referred to
"corruption of the courts and the legal profession" in California? [iv ]
Attached to the letter was Zernik’s recent press release: Corruption of the Courts – the Roaring Silence of the
Jewish Community, detailing racketeering in the courts by current and former leaders of Bet Tzedek – the Los
Angeles “House of Justice” – and refusal of the Anti Defamation League and others in the Jewish community
to respond on the matter. [v ]
z Page 2/4 May 30, 2011

Condition of the justice system under Kozinski’s tenure was estimated by experts to be the worst in a
century...
“In reviewing Kozinski’s performance as Chief Judge of the 9th, one should consider conditions of the justice
system under his tenure,” says Zernik, “It was estimated by experts to be the worst in a century. He must be
held personally accountable, both in his administrative capacity and in his personal conduct as judge.”
The evidence shows that the US District Court, Central District of California, and the US Court of Appeals,
9th Circuit, are actively patronizing racketeering by California judges in Los Angeles County and beyond:
• The large-scale false imprisonment of the Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) – thousands of
victims of court corruption in LA County, almost exclusively black and Latinos – continues to this
date. It is a Human Rights disaster of historic proportions. [vi ]
• Large-scale financial institution and real estate fraud by judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court
continues for almost two decades, through racketeering of judges and attorney in the courts. [vii ]
The official Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) estimated that corruption of the justice system today is
worse than during the notorious “Water Wars” a century ago. The Panel recommended “external
investigation” of the California Courts. Such investigation has not been instituted to this date. [viii ]
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and Kozinski himself are routine practitioners of Simulated Litigation.

Richard Fine
Former US Prosecutor

Figure 1: False and deliberately misleading Simulated Arrest and Booking Records, repeatedly provided by the Los Angeles Sheriff, purporting that
ix
Richard Fine was arrested and booked on March 4, 2009, on location and by authority of the non-existent “Municipal Court of San Pedro”. [ ]
z Page 3/4 May 30, 2011

th
Figure 2: False and Deliberately misleading, unsigned, June 30, 2009 Simulated Order (Dkt #4) in Fine v Sheriff (09-71692), US Court of Appeals, 9
Circuit, issued in the name of Alex Kozinski, denying the Emergency Petition of Richard Fine from the Simulated Litigation of Fine’s habeas corpus in the
x
US District Court, Central District of California. [ ]

Of particular concern is the abundance of cases of Simulated Litigation in both the state and US courts under
the 9th Circuit. [xi ,xii ]
The case of the 70 year old former US prosecutor Richard Fine is a textbook case: [xiii , xiv ]
• Richard Fine exposed and rebuked the taking of “not permitted payments” (“Bribes”) by judges of the Los
Angeles Superior Court, which required the signing of “retroactive immunities” (“Pardons”) for all such
judges.
• Richard Fine was arrested and imprisoned through Simulated Litigation in the Los Angeles Superior
Court. What media reported as the March 4, 2009 “Sentencing Hearing” was a Simulated Proceeding. It
failed to appear in court records, and no valid Warrant, Judgment, Conviction, or Sentencing records were
ever entered in his case.
• Richard Fine was held by the Sheriff of Los Angeles County in solitary confinement for 18 months under
Simulated Arrest and Booking records, stating that Fine was arrested and booked on location and by
authority of the non-existent “Municipal Court of San Pedro”. (Figure 1)
• Richard Fine’s habeas corpus petition was conducted as a Simulated Litigation in the US District Court,
Central District of California, where minutes, orders, judgments were never authenticated as valid court
records.
• Richard Fine’s Petition to the 9th Circuit was denied in an unsigned, Simulated Order, issued in the names
of Alex Kozinski, Richard Paez, and Richard Tallman. (Figure 2)
The US Congress should perform its duties…
“He is no Louis Brandeis… Kozinski got the smarts, but is awfully lacking in integrity,” says Zernik, “Under
his tenure the 9th Circuit was established as a Simulated Justice System, where justice is doled out in an
arbitrarily and capriciously manner, and judges and attorneys consider corruption their inherent privilege.”
The US Congress should perform its duties…
_____
LINKS

i
00-00-01 93-09-13 Kozinski, A: Sanhendrin II, The New Republic, Sept 13, 1993
z Page 4/4 May 30, 2011

http://www.scribd.com/doc/55975574/
00-02-00 Kozinski, A - Don't Drop the Torah, CalLawyer (2000) Pp 21-2
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56100655/
04-00-00 Konzinski A - The Appearance of Propriety Legal Affairs 2004
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56041981/
ii
Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons,
complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the
document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that
the document was delivered.
The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
iii
“Gneivat ha-da’at”.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneivat_da'at
iv
10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights
in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with reference to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
v
11-05-27 Corruption of the Courts – the Roaring Silence of the Jewish Community
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56417845/
vi
09-12-17-Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons) - Review
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729660/
vii
11-01-07 Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California: Widespread Public Corruption and Refusal of US Department of Justice to Take
Action
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46460640/
viii
06-07-15 Rampart Reconsidered: LAPD's Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
ix
January 8, 2010 Repeat mailing of Supervisor Michael Antonovich response, including attachments
that were communications by the Sheriff's Department of the County of Los Angeles.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/25555341/
x
09-06-30 unsigned, unauthenticated Simulated Order (Dkt #4) in Fine v Sheriff (09-71692) in the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, issued in
the names of Circuit Judges Alex Kozinski, Richard Paez, and Richard Tallman denying the Emergency Petition of Richard Fine from the
Simulated Litigation of the Habeas Corpus Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) in the US District Court, Central District of California.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27626788/
xi
Regarding Simulated Litigation, See: 11-04-14 PRESS RELEASE: Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler has been asked to review the
evidence of large-scale computer fraud in the US courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/52993968/
xii
Regarding Simulated Litigation, See: 11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion
to Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers as published in the online PACER dockets
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46516034/
xiii
11-04-23 Habeas Corpus in the United States - the case of Richard Isaac Fine
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24729084/
xiv
April 20, 2010 Motion to Intervene and related papers in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court
i) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Face pages of five filings by Dr Joseph Zernik with stamps showing receipt by the US Supreme Court s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30304657/
ii) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 1 Amended Motion to Intervene s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/
iii) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 2 Amended Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/
iv) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 3 Amended Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court Records
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/
v) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 4 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/
vi) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 5 Amended Appendices
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34050423/

You might also like