How To Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style

How to Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5740-how-move-mountains-leedskalnin-style...
Energetic Forum > Energetic Forum Discussion > Renewable Energy User Name Remember Me?
How to Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style Password
Homepage Energetic Science Ministries Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search My Blog Profiles
Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the
environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 > Last »
LinkBack Thread Tools
05-21-2010, 01:42 AM #1 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
How to Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style
By Peter Shushmaruk
©2010 April 1, Shushmaruk Ltd.
Where to begin,
Prerequisite:
If you want to understand what I'm talking about and you have never heard of the Coral Castle or Edward Leedskalnin, please
do some research specifically about Magnetic Currents. This book will explain almost everything I have to say with
experimentation.
Ill begin by explaining the Perpetual Motion Holder quickly for clarity in case you are rusty on your Edward. Here is a picture
1 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
of Ed's own PMH (He had many). This is a very interesting device.
Ed's PMH
There are two coils on either side that are connected together to form a continuous loop. The coil on the left we will call the
positive and the coil on the right we will call the negative. The beginning of the positive is connected to the end of the
negative and the beginning of the negative is connected to the end of the positive. Ed has added two terminals, one is
connected to the positive coil and the other is connected to the negative coil. These terminals are used to charge the PMH like
a capacitor *except this one does not discharge when it gets full.
The bar across the bottom is not physically connected in any way. It is only after you charge the PMH that this bar becomes
magnetized to the 'U'. It is basically the light switch of the system. When the bar is on, the switch is on. When the bar is off,
so is the PMH.
When you charge the PMH using a car battery, you connect the negative to the negative of the car battery and when you
connect the positives, you only need to make the connection for a second and then disconnect the battery. You can repeat
this if you want but the PMH is already charged. The PMH will remain magnetized (charged) for an indefinite amount of time
and will only discharge when the bar across the bottom is pulled off manually. This has been experimented on by Edward.
According to him, he left one for several months before discharging it without loss of energy.
The discharge is then released back out the coils as energy and you can see it by connecting a light-bulb to the ends of the
leads before pulling the crossbar. The light will flash.
Video Demonstration
Ok, once you really understand that, lets move on to Ed's “Generator”...
Magnets Setup: (Stacked five high)
2 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Here is the magnetic polarity of the magnets used in Ed's flywheel. This pushes all the magnetic fields away from each other
squeezing them into small pockets. This is also the reason for having them stacked five-high is so the middle magnetic field
becomes compressed and multiplies in strength.
Magnets with Vertical bolts and magnet strength
Then with the addition of the vertical bolts, which are not primarily for support, are for the generation of a vertical field and
to shape the magnetic field into a 3D pyramid over the flywheel. The eight bolts around the outside, that are inside the 'V' are
used to draw in the magnetic field to limit its strength of the magnets they are in. The Four bolts on the inside are placed on
the outside, between two 'Vs', to draw most of their magnetic field into the bolt. These twelve bolts are magnetized by
induction from the 'Vs' and help to produce a vertical field above the flywheel as it is rotating.
Magnetic Flywheel With Gates.
3 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
The iron plates that are shaped like semi-circles, on top of the flywheel are used to help shape the vertical magnetic field into
a vortex as it is spinning. They attract the vertical magnetic fields and make magnetic “gates” that funnel magnets into the
flywheel and out the sides. The handle also helps in generating the vertical field.
Flywheel showing magnetic pyramid shape
Here is an outline of what the magnetic pyramid would look like from the top. The green line is a diagram of the shape of the
magnetic field caused by the induction of the bolts that hold it together.
Ed working:
4 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Here is a picture of Ed showing us how his generator works but he is also showing us something else. Look carefully at the
device sitting on the wooden bench because this is the “missing pieces” of the machine. The long bar is showing polarization.
*This bar has been aligned 90 degrees to the magnetic field of the Earth. When the flywheel is spinning the strong alternating
flux pattern, pushes charged particles to either end of the bar and separates them into usable poles of perfectly balanced
energy. One side positive and the other side negative. Two separate flows of energy in opposite directions. It has been coined,
"Magneticity," by Edward Leedskalnin.
Now look closely, just below that you will see that Ed has placed a chain-link in between two terminals and is using this
polarized energy to charge up the chain-link. That's right. Let's take a closer look.
Chain Link Setup
5 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Here is what it looks like with the flywheel and the “separator” bar. The chain link is being treated like a PMH and he is
charging the link up. There is no other reason for him placing a link there in this manner except to charge it up like a PMH.
Chain Link Setup Closeup
First you must understand that there are two fields involved in magnetism, a B-field and an H-field. When the chain-link is
being charged, it generates another field that would normally orbit the link in the shape if a toroid but because there is
another chain-link this field is inducted into the 90-degree link with great efficiency. There is no loss of either the b-field or
the h-field down the line when they are connected in this way. I cant find the website but someone explained this effect of a
chain shape and the efficiency of energy transfer for the links.
I will try to recreate the principles I learned on that website. The picture above shows three examples of how energy is
transfered through induction. A) The light is lit but it is very dim because the process of induction is magnetic. The output
voltage is very low. B) When there is a loop placed between the gap, there is no loss in voltage and the loop doesn't even
need to make contact to transfer the energy. C) You can also put a loop of uninsulated wire across the gap to produce the
same results as 'B'.
This was the basic concept showing how a chain link structure inducts the magnetic field and transfered the voltage across the
gap with 100% efficiency. Edward used this principle and may also be the reason he was able to get more energy out then
was required. If you only need to power one field to make two spin then you are releasing two fields worth of energy on
discharge.
Let's Continue:
Ed's Chain "Crinkling"
Above the flywheel the same chain is hanging and is being affected by the vertical field that is being produced and this is
evident when you look at how the magnetic-field is causing the links to attract each other. So in essence he created a pole in
the chain above the flywheel and this caused the magnetic energy to be pulled through the chain saturating it with magnetic
energy. The longer the chain the more magnets he could collect.
The Chain being charged
Here is a simple version of what Ed is doing with the chain. He is using the vertical field to pull the magnets through the chain
as he charges the horizontal chain link with balanced energy. Ok....
Here is Ed showing us how to collect the magnets, now if we want to use them, we have to separate them first according to
Ed.
So Ed would have to carry his chain over to the quarry without letting it touch the ground and he didn't use metal in his posts
because this would weaken the magnets or discharge them. His A-frame is also wooden so to not interfere with the magnetic
6 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
energy in the chain. He then climbed up or setup the A-frame with charged block and tackle and connected the chain to the
box above the A-frame.
Whats in the box? I believe it to be nothing more then Ed's PMH. He put it in a box to keep the weather off the iron. We all
know what happens when rain and oxygen meet iron. I think he was just trying to protect it from the weather and it also
explains the “mysterious” cables running down the poles.
The whole chain is connected to the PMH using the same principles of the 90 degree induction and you can just use winds of
wire to connect the two together (The PMH in the box and the magnetized chain). As long as there is a physical connection in
the form of a loop at 90 degrees to each other.
7 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Then you need to stretch the chain strait so the magnetic energy can flow more efficiently, this is done by connecting the
chain to the stone and allowing the natural weight of the stone to help in keeping the chain strait. Then you run your leads
down to opposite sides of the stone along the *east and west axis so that the polarity of the leads is negative against the west
face and positive against the east face. This matters since you can either cause the stone to weigh more or weigh less
depending on the polarity you use.
Climb the ladder to the top of the poles and pull the crossbar off to release the magnetic energy through the stone. This will
cause all the energy in the chain to be discharged at once instantly through the stone, just like the light-bulb. Ed may have
even used wires through the stones for help especially with his 30-ton stone.
There is way more detail about this in my book, 'How To Move Mountains... The Ancient Way.' Especially about how he
quarried the stone and what the phi-ratio has to do with vibrations in stone, the flywheel, and the ancient connection to it all.
Thank you all for being interested.
Peter.
For More Information:

http://www.remelic.com
*my explanation for this and may be incorrect because of lack of experimentation but I would appreciate anyone willing to confirm this hypothesis in any way. I would
appreciate the results.
Last edited by remelic : 05-23-2010 at 04:03 PM.
Sponsored Links
First Call Jewel Electric Electrical services Reliable, Fast, Generators, Lighting, Panel, Repair firstcalljewel.com
What is Quantum Jumping? Discover Why Thousands of People are "Jumping" to Change Their Life www.QuantumJumping.com
Home Generator Systems Affordable Whole House Power by GE! Learn More About Home Generators. www.HomeStandbyGeneratorSystems
05-21-2010, 01:49 AM #2 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
8 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
It wouldn't let me edit so here is a fixed link

http://www.remelic.com
Thanks
05-21-2010, 01:59 AM #3 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
Experiment
Here is a smaller version of the process that anyone can try to see if it works.
-A PMH, preferably built to Ed's specifications

-The size of the stone: 3"D x 4"H x 8"L
-The type of stone should be part of the experimentation
but try a non-ferrous stone like limestone or a calcite-crystal first.
-12-Volt Car Battery
-Floating Container like a plastic or glass bowl.
Charge up the PMH by tapping the switch on the negative terminal. Then pull the keeper/crossbar off the PMH. The theory is
that the water level will change on the container holding the stone. If you reverse the poles you should notice the water level
change in the opposite direction. This setup should lighten the stone by using static-discharge or magnetic-discharge?
Peter
Cheers to Ed.
05-21-2010, 02:00 AM #4 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2008

Xenomorph Posts: 463
Senior Member
Make sure to look into this:

gravity waves found
9 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
05-21-2010, 06:50 AM #5 (permalink)
Join Date: Jul 2009

Posts: 1,102
Harvey
Senior Member
Great Job on those Images Peter.
So in Ed's writings, did he ever say that he used this stuff to reduce the effects of Gravity?
I haven't read his work as of yet , I know, either lazy or apathetic or busy, not sure why I haven't taken the time to dig into
his stuff. I did follow up on some of the stuff related to his prime number sequence though on one project I was working on
though - but nothing as in depth as I usually do.
I too am interested in seeing if anyone can document the gravitational aspect of this.
Cheers,
05-21-2010, 03:33 PM #6 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harvey

Great Job on those Images Peter.
So in Ed's writings, did he ever say that he used this stuff to reduce the effects of Gravity?
I haven't read his work as of yet , I know, either lazy or apathetic or busy, not sure why I haven't taken the time to
dig into his stuff. I did follow up on some of the stuff related to his prime number sequence though on one project I
was working on though - but nothing as in depth as I usually do.
Also, Ed said nothing about it reducing Gravity but he does say he understood gravity. He was obsessed with magnets and
10 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
according to this source: "A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of
coral to move like hydrogen balloons. The only tool that Leedskalnin spoke of using was a 'perpetual motion holder.' " - Coral
Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This theory only uses the PMH as its tool.
Cheers,
I wouldn't say it has anything to do with gravity but i guess it could if you look at it like that. This is a magnetic effect.
Lets call it static-magnetism. The more static-magnetism inside an object the less it will weigh inside a "gravity"-field. The less
static-magnetism the more is weighs..
When you discharge the chain you are discharging equal amounts of neg/pos magnets into the stone adding to its static-
charge and thus reducing it's mass until the stone reaches equilibrium again with its surroundings.
This may be a wet dream but I believe in a Magnetic Universe and this is completely possible using magnetic particles as the
lifters.
Just because something isn't attracted or repelled by magnets does not mean it cannot be affected by them. After-all anything
made of Atoms can be altered by magnets and if you have access to the magnetic particles then anything is possible.
Peter
05-21-2010, 03:39 PM #7 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
"A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like hydrogen
balloons. The only tool that Leedskalnin spoke of using was a 'perpetual motion holder.' "
Coral Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
05-21-2010, 04:39 PM #8 (permalink)
11 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
I will be experimenting so I will document the findings either way. If it goes well or not, it may answer other questions that
have no relation so it's worth trying.
I will keep you posted but don't expect results too soon. Maybe a month or two.
Thanks.
05-21-2010, 07:48 PM #9 (permalink)
Join Date: Jul 2009

Posts: 1,102
Harvey
Senior Member
Hi Peter,
You have quoted me above, but then you have inserted a few lines there in my quote - essentially making it appear that I
have said those things whereas I have not.
This is a common mistake when quoting posts and is easily corrected.
Edit your post and simply remove the lines you have inserted that appear before the '[/quote]' tag and add them after that
tag and all will be fixed
Best Regards,
Harvey
05-21-2010, 08:02 PM #10 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
12 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Sorry about that. Must be my browser because I'm having all kinds of issues posting with this site.
05-21-2010, 11:58 PM #11 (permalink)
Join Date: Jul 2009

Posts: 1,102
Harvey
Senior Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by remelic

Sorry about that. Must be my browser because I'm having all kinds of issues posting with this site.
No worries, I understand.
As with any type of authorship it is important even in posts to try our best to get things accurate and true.
Your Edit was certainly a gallant try, and I give you an E for effort - but now you have moved some of my quote into the body
of your post making it appear that you have stated my words and truncating my quote. I don't mind the partial quote, but I
thought I would mention the error just in case you missed it.
Cheers,
Harvey
Sponsored Links
Chegg ® Textbook Rentals Chegg is #1 in Textbook Rentals! Fast Delivery and Easy Returns www.Chegg.com
Air Cooled Induction No Water Cooling Brazing, Soldering, Heated Pipes www.iTherm.com
Anti Gravity Cars Big savings on anti gravity cars. 30 day money back guarantee. www.wallcruiser.com
05-22-2010, 12:51 AM #12 (permalink)
13 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Join Date: Dec 2007

Location: North Carolina, USA
Matthew Jones Posts: 1,267
Senior Member
Quote:

....Lets call it static-magnetism. The more static-magnetism inside an object the less it will weigh inside a "gravity"-field.
The less static-magnetism the more is weighs.....
Peter
Lets just call it Negative energy. The magnetic field emitted from negative energy generator causes an anti gravitational
effect. It pretty well documented stuff too. Searl, Floyd Sweet, ect... You can find stories about it in several free energy
researchers.
Its the same thing no matter the application.
Nice stuff you wrote.

Cheers
Matt
05-22-2010, 02:07 AM #13 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
Quote:

No worries, I understand.
As with any type of authorship it is important even in posts to try our best to get things accurate and true.
Your Edit was certainly a gallant try, and I give you an E for effort - but now you have moved some of my quote into
the body of your post making it appear that you have stated my words and truncating my quote. I don't mind the
partial quote, but I thought I would mention the error just in case you missed it.
Cheers,
14 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Harvey
Ah sorry about that again. heh. I just noticed the line I forgot to quote.
Quote:

- This line should be quoted by Harvey in post #6.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Jones

Lets just call it Negative energy. The magnetic field emitted from negative energy generator causes an anti
gravitational effect. It pretty well documented stuff too. Searl, Floyd Sweet, ect... You can find stories about it in
several free energy researchers.
Its the same thing no matter the application.
Nice stuff you wrote.

Cheers
Matt
I guess you could call it Negative Energy but I wouldn't. It's using magnetism from both positive and negative sources so I
would call it balanced energy. Static-magnetism just makes sense when explaining it.
Last edited by remelic : 05-22-2010 at 03:31 AM.
05-22-2010, 03:19 AM #14 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2007

Senior Member
Quote:
15 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
I guess you could call it Negative Energy but I wouldn't. It's using magnetism from both positive and negative
sources so I would call it balanced energy. Static-magnetism just makes sense when explaining it.
I don't want to argue semantics but...

If that were the case it wouldn't pick up rocks. It wouldn't pick up anything. The generator creates negative energy, charges
the PMH and the PMH emits an anti gravitational field. The charge come from a combination of magnetic fields.
This can't be done with energy in its definition. EMF, Iron Induced magnetism, radiation, or anything the like. This is another
beast altogether that is opposite of our understanding. It the same source for the constant acceleration and expansion of the
universe. Planetary rotation and so on.
And magnetism is not static in any form. Iron induced magnetics have constant rotating fields. If it were static there would be
no more effect from the magnetism.
One of the primary reasons people have to go over and over with the theory of this whole area of study is do to the semantics
that everyone has to come up with every time we have a discussion. New words that could mean anything flying off the shelf
as fast as one can imagine them.
We have clear and well used definitions for most of this stuff, why can't they be used.
Keep it simple, ya know?
I apologize for being petty.
Matt
05-22-2010, 03:27 AM #15 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Jones

I apologize for being petty.
No need to apologize, I listen to everyone. I will have to read into Negative Energy more to make a decision.
Last edited by remelic : 05-22-2010 at 03:29 AM.
05-22-2010, 01:53 PM #16 (permalink)
16 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Join Date: Jan 2010

Posts: 304
SuperCaviTationIstic
Senior Member
Ed's work seems to be most related to Viktor Schauberger's.... But, I think the pictures in the book The Secret World of
Magnets show the link:
Spintronics -The Secret World of Magnets (2006 by Howard Johnson) | Scribd
It's about spintronics.... Nano magnetic vortexes

One pole is implosive, one explosive
05-23-2010, 02:40 PM #17 (permalink)
Join Date: Aug 2007

Location: Latvia
Jetijs Posts: 1,963
Senior Member
Hi Peter.
I have a question. In your book you write that Eds PMH had aluminum tubes between the coils and the iron rod and the coils
were wound on these aluminum tubes and then they would just slide on the U shaped iron rod. Where did you get this info? I
have never heard of this. Leedskalning does not mention aluminum anywhere in his book. Also I have doubts that aluminum
was easy to get in Eds time.
Thanks,
Jetijs
05-23-2010, 03:02 PM #18 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetijs

Hi Peter.
I have a question. In your book you write that Eds PMH had aluminum tubes between the coils and the iron rod and
17 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
the coils were wound on these aluminum tubes and then they would just slide on the U shaped iron rod. Where did you
get this info? I have never heard of this. Leedskalning does not mention aluminum anywhere in his book. Also I have
doubts that aluminum was easy to get in Eds time.
Thanks,
Jetijs
Good question...
He did describe this on page 21 of Magnetic Current:

Quote:
Make two spools from brass or aluminum six inches long and big enough for the bar to go in.
Thanks Jetijs
Last edited by remelic : 05-23-2010 at 03:12 PM. Reason: Addition Info.
05-25-2010, 07:14 PM #19 (permalink)
Join Date: Jan 2009

uusedman Posts: 206
Senior Member
Nice observation. Put it to work. However, nice work.
05-26-2010, 08:20 AM #20 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
Quote:

Good question...
He did describe this on page 21 of Magnetic Current:
Thanks Jetijs
18 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Sorry I meant page 19...
He describes how to build the PMH and he does say to use aluminum spools. I believe this has to do with the magnetic flux on
the inside of the coil, and preventing direct contact with the iron. Also he needed to remove/reset the coils all the time so he
needed a way to do this easily.
05-26-2010, 09:01 AM #21 (permalink)
Join Date: May 2010

david lambright Posts: 505
Senior Member
how can you tell?
matt over at leedskalnin.com can tell you that once energized the coil does not even need to be there....at all....how can you
tell if they know about Eds "best machine" as he called it..... they will use words like electricity, volts,amps etc.....blinded by
electricity .... electricity is a by product of "magnetic current".....Ed did what he said he did.....as soon as i get confirmation
that at least 1 [one] person is getting results,from replicating my device, i will post the video showing exactly how he did
it....by demonstration, no theory, no computer generated graphics, just doing it........anyway, this saturday may 29 at River
Road City Park, Salem, Oregon 97303, United States in the 2900 block....i will be showing my device....it will be
interesting............david
Sponsored Links
Magnetic Sheeting Direct sales channel for Visual Magnetics products www.drytac.com
Buy Strong Magnets Here Top Quality Strong Magnets Huge Invertory. Beat Any Prices. www.Magnet4Sale.com
Magnetic Chucks Electromagnetic or Permanent for Sine Plates or Surface Grinders www.subtool.com
05-28-2010, 05:05 PM #22 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
Quote:
A few teenagers claimed to have witnessed his work, reporting that he had caused the blocks of coral to move like
hydrogen balloons. The only tool that Leedskalnin spoke of using was a "perpetual motion holder."
19 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
-Coral Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This hypotheses only uses the PMH as its tool. Everything I said about how Ed did it does not contradict Ed's own words or
photos. Saying he used speakers, or tones, or a strange spinning perpetual motion holder under the stone, does. Nor is their
evidence to support these ideas.
The way I see Ed, was a man trying to be scientific about his method. His photos and phrases can be taken literally once you
see the world the way he did. If you take all his writings as truth you can then place yourself in his mindset and imagine
things with the same detail that he did.
If you want the resonant frequency of a stone, all you need to do is strike it with a hammer and listen to the stone with a
microphone. You can also calculate the frequency by the given speed of sound in the stone and its dimensions. The only thing
I could see Ed doing with these vibrations would be to strike the stone (perhaps once on each side) after inducing magnetic
current to further align the magnetic domains (like you would to magnetize iron).
05-29-2010, 03:20 AM #23 (permalink)
Join Date: Aug 2009

leedskalnin Posts: 26
Junior Member
The Secret Of Gravity Revealed - Scientific Experiment Included ...
Quote:

-Coral Castle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This hypotheses only uses the PMH as its tool. Everything I said about how Ed did it does not contradict Ed's own words
or photos. Saying he used speakers, or tones, or a strange spinning perpetual motion holder under the stone, does.
Nor is their evidence to support these ideas.
The way I see Ed, was a man trying to be scientific about his method. His photos and phrases can be taken literally
once you see the world the way he did. If you take all his writings as truth you can then place yourself in his mindset
and imagine things with the same detail that he did.
If you want the resonant frequency of a stone, all you need to do is strike it with a hammer and listen to the stone
with a microphone. You can also calculate the frequency by the given speed of sound in the stone and its dimensions.
The only thing I could see Ed doing with these vibrations would be to strike the stone (perhaps once on each side) after
inducing magnetic current to further align the magnetic domains (like you would to magnetize iron).
Thank you Remelic nice thread and Ideas it seams you want to reveal some of the clues.
20 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
For those who want to know more about how Ed did that I fully recommend this thread:

The Secret Of Gravity Revealed - Scientific Experiment Included, page 1
The thread originator at the nick name of ALLIS0NE shows that he knows more that what he wrote in the thread. For me very
nice clues there! Read his posts word by word.
Regards
Mahdi
05-29-2010, 04:20 AM #24 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2007

Senior Member
Quote:

The Secret Of Gravity Revealed - Scientific Experiment Included, page 1
The thread originator at the nick name of ALLIS0NE shows that he knows more that what he wrote in the thread. For
me very nice clues there! Read his posts word by word.
He only has one problem. If what he says is true a magnet by itself will loose weight or gain weight based on the direction it is
pointed down.
But they don't.
I don't post over there or I would let him know.
The Earth is round (Despite what engineering says). The wire is simply pointing towards the pole on a vector that makes it
appear it is going down. Remember a compass rotates 360 deg. The apparatus he describes is rotating at 720.
He is not wrong about gravity though. It is magnetism we just haven't proven it yet. Though that experiment won't bring you
any closer.
Matt
21 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
05-29-2010, 12:12 PM #25 (permalink)
Join Date: May 2010

pha3z Posts: 31
Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by david lambright

...anyway, this saturday may 29 at River Road City Park, Salem, Oregon 97303, United States in the 2900 block....i
will be showing my device....it will be interesting............david
OH MAN!! I just saw this thread today! And I'm all the way over in Missouri! I can't get to Oregon soon enough. I hope there
is a video.
05-29-2010, 01:06 PM #26 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2008

mk1 Posts: 72
Member
Hi all
I have been thinking and reading about Ed for some time now.
Let put my 2 cent , the PMH is quite cool if you think about it it stores amps in a coil ...
But once the charge is stored , only removing the keeper will release it .
What if we put 2 additional coil and pulse one , what will come out from the other coil , will the stored charge get released or
will it just go around ...
Now for the gravity machine , he once said he moved stone like water moved a iron nail .
All i get from that is once the nail is rusted out it can be moved by water .
Maybe a hint at some type of ferofuilde , use in the bowl ...
22 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
To me the machine is some emulation of a singularity (sun ,planet , black hole type deal) creating it own gravity ...
Some interesting things it seems like could store electrical charge in granite.
The glass bottle with coil around it , layden jar ?
The fountain is a duplicate of the machine there is 2 horse shoe magnet missing ...
Light gravity magnetism ... earth changes polarity from day time to night time , solar winds up going down in the day time ,
and opposite at night ...
This will be fun ...
Mark
Btw one the picture where ED is turning the wheel look how the chain is crooked
Last edited by mk1 : 05-29-2010 at 01:09 PM.
05-29-2010, 01:22 PM #27 (permalink)
Join Date: Aug 2008

IndianaBoys Posts: 173
Senior Member
MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitor
This demonstration video may be relevant:
MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitor

YouTube - MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitor
Best regards,
IndianaBoys
05-30-2010, 05:10 AM #28 (permalink)
Join Date: May 2010

Senior Member
23 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
nobody showed...
Quote:
Originally Posted by pha3z

OH MAN!! I just saw this thread today! And I'm all the way over in Missouri! I can't get to Oregon soon enough. I hope
there is a video.
no one showed...but my niece saw it for the first time...so it was worth it!!!
next saturday...saturday market in salem...the whole block....between summer and winter streets and union and marion
streets in salem 9:00am to 3:00pm...i help my mom in law set up her booth there....lots of people! better for
sure!....david...plenty of video then......
05-30-2010, 12:25 PM #29 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2010

remelic Posts: 26
Junior Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by david lambright

no one showed...but my niece saw it for the first time...so it was worth it!!!
next saturday...saturday market in salem...the whole block....between summer and winter streets and union and
marion streets in salem 9:00am to 3:00pm...i help my mom in law set up her booth there....lots of people! better for
sure!....david...plenty of video then......
24 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Thunderbolts Forum • View topic - gravity waves found
Please, people do some research before blindly following someone. David is making up things left right and center and
everyone is eating it up here. The visual presentation is an optical illusions that is created by spinning objects.
The light is being REFRACTED not bent. There are many well established physics to model this. Lazy Shadow.
I gave a quote from another forum about how the digital camera can create distortions, and someone here asked me "What
are his credentials?" and I had to laugh because the person asking me was blindly following someone claiming to "bend" light
who hasn't even completed a normal grade 12 education:
25 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Quote:
lets play!...refraction....what is causing the light to refract? no theories ...the light is being bent ....we know that part
....is it convection currents causing temperature differences?...are heat/convection causing this refraction?
remember..this should be easy for someone of such vast intellect. i have NO formal schooling, [GED]...but what i
do have is something you lack...truth ...now hold on,lets do this step by step so the readers can follow..should be
easy....what exactly is causing the light to refract? ..choose your answer carefully! this should be easy[you know you
are being baited,right?...take your time or blurt it out....it matters not.....there was a man who liked to do "thought
experiments"....maybe you do this? i do and i know where this is going........magtricity...thats what Ed would have
called it....theriously.........david......and since we are on the SAME subject...what did Eds generator generate? for the
readers..........david
lol
MIT OpenCourseWare | Physics | 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002 | Home
Don't take it from me (even though I've written books about magnetism, studied physics with a university professor of
advanced mathematics, and completed university)... Here is a MIT lecture on refraction of light for those who want to learn
that light can be REFRACTED by air density changes (such as heat waves), water, etc. Also some people are more sensitive to
magnetic fields then others (well witcher) and it is no wonder that some people can feel the pulse from the device. Any
spinning magnet causes a spinning magnetic field... who knew? (Nikola Tesla, Edward Leedskalnin, just to name two). This
creates a pulse.
But I honestly dont have time to argue this point. If you want to believe that "Gravity waves have been found" then go
ahead. Just leave it out of this thread. If you want to discuss "Gravity waves" there is a thread for that: gravity waves found
Cheers.
05-31-2010, 12:10 AM #30 (permalink)
Join Date: May 2010

Senior Member
making it up?
Quote:
26 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Thunderbolts Forum • View topic - gravity waves found
Please, people do some research before blindly following someone. David is making up things left right and center and
everyone is eating it up here. The visual presentation is an optical illusions that is created by spinning objects.
The light is being REFRACTED not bent. There are many well established physics to model this. Lazy Shadow.
I gave a quote from another forum about how the digital camera can create distortions, and someone here asked me
"What are his credentials?" and I had to laugh because the person asking me was blindly following someone claiming to
"bend" light who hasn't even completed a normal grade 12 education:
27 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
lol
MIT OpenCourseWare | Physics | 8.02 Electricity and Magnetism, Spring 2002 | Home
Don't take it from me (even though I've written books about magnetism, studied physics with a university professor of
advanced mathematics, and completed university)... Here is a MIT lecture on refraction of light for those who want to
learn that light can be REFRACTED by air density changes (such as heat waves), water, etc. Also some people are
more sensitive to magnetic fields then others (well witcher) and it is no wonder that some people can feel the pulse
from the device. Any spinning magnet causes a spinning magnetic field... who knew? (Nikola Tesla, Edward
Leedskalnin, just to name two). This creates a pulse.
But I honestly dont have time to argue this point. If you want to believe that "Gravity waves have been found" then go
ahead. Just leave it out of this thread. If you want to discuss "Gravity waves" there is a thread for that: gravity waves
found
Cheers.
so what am i making up?..... and being honest i got my ged in prison.....since when does education matter?.....so what you
are saying is; i am less educated than you, this is true...how many discoveries have been made persons with little or no
formal education?...[the illustration reminds me of megadeths symphony of destruction... ]...who was it who said "It is a
magnetic pulse you are seeing. Magnetism bends light. The generator is only the generator and not responsible at all for the
"anti-gravity" effect. It was his tool for drawing in magnetic energy. That is all. No one needs to go anywhere to understand
this."...you!....you can bend light with a magnet....how exactly?.....i must admit though, i am glad i never went to
"school"..better to learn nothing than to learn falsely.......if it is nothing, it will fall apart...we will see......david
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 > Last »
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads

You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
28 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM
Posting Rules
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 PM.
Energetic Forum - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4

Copyright ©2000 - 2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
2007 Copyright ? Energetic Forum? A Non Profit Corporation - All Rights Reserved
29 of 29 6/1/2011 1:27 PM

How To Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

How To Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How to Move Mountains... Leedskalnin Style http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5740-how-move-mountains-leedskalnin-style...

Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 > Last »

LinkBack Thread Tools

05-21-2010, 01:42 AM #1 (permalink)

Join Date: Apr 2010