CMFR produced a monograph report on the issues of journalists’ safety, from the perspective of owners/their representatives. The report included discussions on how the owners see their responsibilities and their capacity to provide protection, the problems and what they perceive to be the most serious challenge to the protection of journalists.
CMFR produced a monograph report on the issues of journalists’ safety, from the perspective of owners/their representatives. The report included discussions on how the owners see their responsibilities and their capacity to provide protection, the problems and what they perceive to be the most serious challenge to the protection of journalists.
CMFR produced a monograph report on the issues of journalists’ safety, from the perspective of owners/their representatives. The report included discussions on how the owners see their responsibilities and their capacity to provide protection, the problems and what they perceive to be the most serious challenge to the protection of journalists.
The Asia FoundationJournalists’ Safery:
Involving Media Owners
Copyright * 2010
By the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility
‘This monograph is made possible by the generous support of the American people
through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The
‘contents are the responsibility of the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility
and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government,
or The Asia Foundation,
ISBN 978-971-93724-8-6
All rights reserved. No part of this monograph may be reproduced in any form.
or by electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval
systems, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer
who may quote brief passages in a revi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A grant from the United States Agency for International
Development (USAID) through The Asia Foundation made this
publication possible.
Melinda Quintos de Jesus and Luis V. Teodoro edited this
monograph. Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility staff
members Kathryn Roja G. Raymundo, Melanie Y. Pinlac, Martha
A. Teodoro, Rupert Francis D. Mangilit, Hector Bryant L, Macale,
and Alaysa Tagumpay E. Escandor provided research, initial
reports, and other editorial support.
Photos by Lito Ocampo.
Cover and layout design by Design Plus.CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .
More than the bottom line
Private ownership of medi 10
ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION
ON MEDIA SAFETY 2010 oeccscccsssscsssssessesseesessneeresseeseeeee 15
The role of national associations ......sesssseereereeseesees 16
Landscape of impurity ...sseeesecsseecesseecentenenneersnneereenensesas 18
Legal awareness wausensievenessecsn-sssascesssesssasepessanecsseseeremeerseeee, LP
Safety principles ........ccccsssetesesssssesesesaseecceernnneecesennneeenss 20
Danger 2Omes map .-rssssssceecseessnescnreoneessneeanessneesseuaresanenen
Safety communication system
Impact of the discussions
Coordinating actions .
MEDIA DEFENSE AND SAFETY ...0.:sccsessessneessteeneeranee 35
THE VISAYAS EXPERIENCE......sesseessesonre
“Peanehal” cities szcscccisccosintavaennenntenieanee
Legal harassment .
Closure...
Engagement
Professionalism as protection .
A. Strong Press COMMUTIILY ..-.ssecsseceseeeseseeneteeeseseeseeesees AL
"THE MINDANAO EXPERIENGE ws.ccsssscscssssseesseassscansusssses 45
Asctarches cara tlie sees isscs teccessaa tesigtevonvasaseeaitencesnes 46
Protocols anid trainin pS ssessccccsscesssscsscernsveceruspsstossecsnevescne 47
Ganitlont siiticiiaaa neta derma: hahaniutieien mone: 40
Legal defense.....cssesccsssssvsseensesessseses
National effort,
Other effort:
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONSG.............51
MATRIX ON MEDIA OWNERSHIP......
Government-owned and -controlled media......
Members of national media associations .....:.seseseeonee 56
Philippine mass media and their Owners .........00:--se0ee 57
CMFR DATABASE ON THE KILLING OF
JOURNALISTS AND MEDIA WORKERS IN THE
PHILIPPINES SINCE 1986 .. a 69
THE PHILIPPINE JOURNALIST'S
CODE OF ETHICS .3, ee
IMPUNITY:
It took 18 years from the fall of the Marcos
dictatorship for the issue of journalists’ safety to
become a central concern for the national media
rrr linia
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
More than the bottom line
THE SAFETY of journalists and media workers has been
an issue in the Philippines since the restoration of the institutions
and fundamentals of liberal democracy, including free expression
and press freedom, in 1986, when the 21-year-old government of
Ferdinand Marcos was overthrown by the civilian-military mutiny
known as EDSA 1.
Although the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility
(CMER) had started a database on killings in 1991, it took 18 years
from the fall of the Marcos dictatorship for the issue of journalists
safety to become a central concern for the mational media
community. In 2004, work-related killings spiked to seven. But for
the first time, a witness to a killing was willing to testify, and the
prospect of prosecuting the murder of broadcaster Edgar Damalerio
encouraged the creation of a network of media organizations and
press freedom advocacy groups in a national campaign against
impunity. The same network established the Freedom Fund for
Filipino Journalists Inc. (FFFJ) which focused on providing legal
and other assistance to besieged journalists and the families of the
slain, among other aims.
The dismantling of the Marcos government and Corazon
Aquino's assuming the presidency was followed within two months
by the killing of Reuters correspondent Willy Vicoy. Vicoy wasPress Freedom Protection and Journalists’ Safety:
A Media Community's Responsibility
killed while working in a conflict zone. By the end of Aquino's
six year term in 1992, 21 journalists had been killed in the line
of duty. CMFR's study of the cases established that the killings
were perpetrated by various groups and with varying motives. The
murders were a result in part of the unleashing of violent forces
following the end of military control, poor law enforcement, and
judicial corruption and delays. None of the cases had ever been
taken to court.
The killings continued during the term (1992-1998) of
Aquino's successor Fidel V. Ramos, although the number was less,
at 11. The short-lived administration of Joseph Estrada was no
exception, though "only" six journalists were killed between 1998
and 2001, when Estrada was removed from office by the popular
uprising known as EDSA 2.
Estrada was succeeded by Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, who not
only served the rest of Estrada’s six-year term from 2001 to 2004; she
also managed to remain in power after the 2004 elections, which she
claims to have won, until 2010. This turn of events made Arroyo
the longest serving President of the Philippines since Marcos.
In addition to over a thousand political activists killed, a record
79 journalists and media workers were also slain in the nine years of the
Arroyo watch, including 32 in the Ampatuan (Maguindanao) Massacre
of 2009, The end of Arroyo's term and the beginning of that of the
current President, Benigno Aquino IIL, in July, 2010, did not end the
killing of journalists. Radio broadcaster Miguel Belen was shot by an
assailant riding tandem on a motorcycle on July 9. Belen survived the
attack tnut died July 31:
‘The record number of political activists and journalists killed
during the nine years when Arroyo was in power has been explained
a
Introduction
as a consequence of both government policy (the killing of activists
was part of the anti-insurgency policy) as well as indifference. But in
the case of journalists the killings also occurred in the context of the
Arroyo government's anti-press and anti-media initiatives, which
included the filing of numerous libel suits, threats to withdraw
network franchises and to file charges of inciting to sedition against
some media organizations, and the inclusion of journalists’ groups
in the military’s dreaded Orders of Battle, which in effect authorize
the neutralization of the members of the groups listed.
Among the initiatives media organizations took in 2003, when
they recognized the need to do something about the killing of journalists,
was the founding by CMFR, the Center for Community Journalism
and Development, the Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster ng Pilipinas (KBP,
Association of Broadcasters of the Philippines), Philippine Center for
Investigative Journalism (PCIJ), Philippine News, and the Philippine
Press Institute (PPT) of the FFFJ.
These groups, along with the National Union of Journalists
of the Philippines (NUJP), had been conducting safety and security
training. FFFJ had also identified media ethics as a necessary
component of journalist protection as good practice earns strong
community support and protection. Since then the campaign
against the culture of impunity that has encouraged the continuing
killing of journalists and media workers has been a key element
of the advocacies of a number of journalists’ and media advocacy
groups.
KBP and PPI, as organizations, represent the owners
of broadcast and print news organizations, respectively. But
beyond this institutional involvement, the owners of large media
corporations limit their protective measures only to their employees
and some of these measures were sometimes inadequate, especially,Press Freedom Protection and Journalists" Safety:
A Media Community's Responsibility
for those working as correspondents and stringers. Most of the
owners of community news organizations cannot afford to provide
even minimal protection. CMFR found that few newsrooms even
conduct basic safety measures.
Private ownership of media
The development of the Philippine press, including radio
and television, had always been in the hands of private owners. But
the efforts of media advocacy and journalists’ groups have not been
supplemented or echoed by the corporations that own broadcast
networks and newspapers. And yet the private ownership of the
Philippine media has been an important factor in the way journalists
and media workers cover and comment on events.
Philippine media are not only privately owned; the corporations
that own them are also part of conglomerates with interests other than
broadcasting or publishing, In most cases these conglomerates also have
political interests, given the reality of state regulation over commercial
enterprises in the Philippines. But some media organizations have
direct political links in terms of their publishers’ being themselves
political players and even candidates for various offices including the
Presidency.
It’s a pattern established during the U.S. colonial period
(1900-1946), when political parties went into publishing as a means
of defending themselves against their political rivals as well as
an instrument in advancing their political interests. Eventually,
business interests also went into publishing, and expanded into
broadcasting after the Second World War.
The pattern has held till the present. The economic interests
of media owners have ranged from real estate to telecommunications
Introduction
to the hotel business, fast food franchises to shopping malls,
airlines and shipping to public utilities. Inevitably the defense and
advancement of these interests have helped shape media reporting,
commentary, and analysis. Although not all owners intervene in
the daily operations of their newspaper or broadcast network,
editors, and other decision makers are nevertheless well aware of
owner interests, and therefore, their probable preferences in the
coverage of an event or issue that’s likely to have an impact on the
business and/or political concerns of media owners.
The system of media ownership has made the public service
that the media are, privately owned and functioning for the defense
and enhancement of private interests, in which the bottom line,
or profitability, particularly in the broadcast networks, has been
shaping editorial policy. The bottom line is at the root of such media
problems as bias and lack of fairness, sensationalism, and the drive
for exclusives, which at times have put journalists in danger. In one
instance, a broadcaster's search for an exclusive in behalf of boosting
her network's ratings, for example, led to her and her camera crew's
being kidnapped by the kidnap-for-ransom Abu Sayyaf Group.
On the other hand, the broadcast organizations’ focus on
exclusivity has also led to airing stories which were later found
to be false. In the August 23 hostage-taking incident, the same
competitive environment led to one error after another which
contributed to its bloody outcome (eight hostages were killed).
But ordinary day-to-day reporting has also put journalists in
danger, particularly in environments where responsible journalism
compels journalists to report corruption, bad governance, and
criminal activity, as was the case with some 90 percent of those
journalists killed in the Philippines since 1986.
10
oTPress Freedom Protection and Journalists’ Satety:
A Media Community's Responsibility
Most of the owners of the media have nevertheless been
remarkably aloof to the imperative of assuring the safety and security
of the staffs of their broadcast networks and newspapers. This must
change. The owners of the media must recognize that the safety of
those who assure them the profits that keep them in business, and
on whose skills depend the continued existence of radio and TV
networks as well as newspapers and online news sites, should be
their concern as it has been that of individual practitioners as well
as journalists’ and media advocacy groups.
This recognition can and should take specific forms, among
them providing with appropriate equipment and insurance those
journalists in dangerous areas and those who consent to cover
hazardous beats, making legal assistance available to journalists
in trouble, and holding safety training regularly, among others.
While providing journalists in hazardous beats or assignments
insurance, is among the precautions some media corporations have
taken, this practice must be standardized across the profession,
and must be supplemented by other measures. Those measures
and others are detailed in this monograph, which also includes
the recommendations to owners that the Cebu Citizens Press
Council has prepared so they can contribute to assuring the safety
of journalists.
Ethical and professional compliance, establishing journalist
networks, and gaining the respect of the communities, this
monograph also points out, are still among the approaches
necessary to put a stop to the continuing killing of journalists and
Introduction
media workers in the Philippines, These have been the staple of
the training provided by journalist and media advocacy groups
for years, But to these must be added the media owners’ assuming
greater responsibility for the safety of journalists and media workers
as well.Press freedom and journalists’ safety require the
PURO M eS se eC Mena
but particularly that of the owners of media
Roundtable Discussion On Media Satety 2010
ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION ON
MEDIA SAFETY 2010
THE CENTER for Media Freedom and Responsibility
(CMEFR) held a roundtable discussion on “Media Safety: Campaign
and Election Period 2010” last March 5 in Makati City to address
the need for safety measures of journalists covering campaign and
elections. The start of the campaign in February had raised threat
levels against journalists in a number of areas in the Philippines.
The purpose of the discussion was to promote awareness by the
press community of the safety mechanisms and means that can
be adapted for the greater protection of journalists and media
workers.
CMFR organized thiseventinc cooperation andin partnership
with the network of news organizations and media associations
of the Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists (FFFJ), with grants
from the Open Society Foundation Media Program and the United
States Agency for International Development (USAID) through
The Asia Foundation (TAF)
Theculture of violence constitutesacontinuingthreatnotonly
against journalists. Periods of political tension, such as campaigns
and elections, raise levels of media activity. As the political story
unfolds, it invites press attention and coverage. As tensions increase,
how the press reports the claims and counterclaims of contending
political forces becomes a critical factor in how the public perceives
one side and the other. Journalists and media workers become
the targets of threats and attacks, even of assassinations. CMFR
prepared an agenda that would serve to consolidate the response of
media to heightened threats and attacks.
15Press Freedom Protection and Journalists’ Safety:
A Media Community's Responsibility
CMEFR recognizes that press freedom protection and
journalists’ safety requires the involvement of the entire media
community, but particularly that of the owners of media
organizations. Several media-oriented non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) have focused on safety training. And quite
a number of journalists have attended these exercises. But it is the
media owners and their appointed managers who have a special
responsibility to establish internal and community-based systems
that enhance the security of their workers.
The sessions of the day’s programs identified safety and
protection strategies. Resource persons shared information with
media owners during the roundtable discussion. The RTD allowed
them and other members of the press community to exchange
views on the feasibility of adopting measures used in other places
to assist besieged journalists and prevent attacks and threats against
those covering the campaign and elections.
The role of national associations
To insure the participation of media owners in print and
broadcast, CMFR invited the current board members of the
Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster ng Pilipinas (KBP, Association of
Broadcasters of the Philippines) and the Philippine Press Institute
(PPI), which represent the two largest national associations of
media owners and their appointed representatives.
There were 32 participants from Luzon, Visayas and
Mindanao including the staff of CMFR and the presenters.
Members of the PPI board of officers and trustees who came
to the meeting included: Isagani Yambot (Philippine Daily Inquirer);
Vergel Santos (BusinessWorld); Fr. Jonathan Domingo OMI
46
Roundtable Discussion On Media Safety 2010
(Mindanao Cross); Eden Estopace (The Philippine Star), representing
Antonio Katigbak; Jose Pavia (Mabuhay), Marlon Purificacion (The
Journal Group of Publications), representing Augusto Villanueva;
Juan Mercado (Press Foundation of Asia); Alban Quirino (Makiling
Journal); and Dalmacio Grafil (Leyte Samar Daily Express).
The members of the KBP board of directors and officers
who attended the discussion were: Ruperto Nicdao Jr. (Manila
Broadcasting Company); Herman Basbaiio (Bombo Radyo
Philippines); Lucky Paul Taruc (Radio Corporation of the
Philippines), representing Francis Cardona; Erwin Galang (GV
Broadcasting System/Mediascape Inc.); Rey Hulog (KBP executive
director); and Joselito Yabut (Primax Broadcasting System).
‘The members of the boards of the PPI and the KBP are
elected each year. PPI has 70 member organizations, KBP’s member
organizations include 143 television stations and 604 AM and FM
broadcast stations.
CMEFR invited Rowena Paraan of the National Union
of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) who is in charge of the
International Federation of Journalists- NUJP Media Safety Office.
She is also a member of the NUJP board. Paraan shared how her
‘organization prepares media practitioners who cover dangerous
assignments. CMFR included her in the program so she could
inform the group what kind of safety training the NUJP will be
organizing for the election season, as some of NUJP members
belong to the organizations represented by KBP and PPI.
Other participants included representatives of various news
media organizations and members of the community press from
GMA-7, TV5, Sun.Star Cebu, and Cebu Daily News.
7