You are on page 1of 4

Amb.

Akbar Ahmed: Unless ordinary Pakistanis feel they can have justice and a se cure life, militant groups will have fresh recruits http://inthearena.blogs.cnn.com/2011/05/30/amb-akbar-ahmed-unless-ordinary-pakis tanis-feel-they-can-have-justice-and-a-secure-life-militant-groups-will-have-fre sh-recruits/ Posted by: Jay Kernis - Senior Producer ONLY ON THE BLOG: Answering todays six OFF-SET questions is Akbar Ahmed, Professo r at the School of International Service at American University in Washington, D C. Ambassador Ahmed is currently the Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies at Americ an University. He was also the First Distinguished Chair of Middle East and Isla mic Studies at the US Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md., and a Nonresident Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution. He has taught at Princeton, Harvard, and Ca mbridge Universities and has advised General David Petraeus, the late Amb. Richa rd Holbrooke, and many US agencies on Islam and foreign policy. A former Ambassador from Pakistan to the UK, Ahmed is also a playwright and the author of more than a dozen award-winning books, including "Discovering Islam," which was the basis of the BBC six-part TV series called Living Islam. The BBC cal led him the worlds leading authority on contemporary Islam. Earlier this May, his essay, "The Code of the Hills (It s not Abbottabad the Uni ted States should be worried about)" was published by Foreignpolicy.com. "Suspended Somewhere Between / A Book of Verse," is his new collection of poems "that takes the reader from the forbidding valleys and mountains of Waziristan i n the tribal areas of Pakistan to the think tanks and halls of power in Washingt on, D.C." Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made a surprise visit to Pakistan last week a nd said the U.S. will continue to work with the nation, but that it must make dec isive steps against Islamic militants there. In your view, should a main US conce rn be the Haqqani network - which is affiliated with the Taliban? What objective s does that network have? America needs to be concerned about the Haqqani network which is suspected of su pporting Taliban activity. More important it needs to watch the general law and order situation in Pakistan. The establishment is in disarray, people in despair . The leaders dont seem to have any vision or strategy. Ordinary Pakistanis are fed up. They say, one day they are killed by a drone str ike, the next by a suicide bomber, and then military action. They face real hard ships unemployment, shortage of electricity, and high prices. Worse the gap betw een the rich and ordinary Pakistanis has grown dangerously wide. Pakistanis see their leaders as corrupt and incompetent. Secretary Clintons recent visit underlined the concerns about Pakistan. It is a k ey ally in Americas war in Afghanistan. And it is a critical time in the relation ship. What is preventing the Pakistan military from taking decisive steps against the Haqqanior other militant groups? Can the military control militants with Pakistan , and does the military have the will to do so? Tackling militancy in Pakistan cannot be left to the military alone. When Pakist an used the military to solve a political problem in East Pakistan in 1971, it l ost its majority province (which became the new nation of Bangladesh). The milit ary already has large numbers in the tribal areas and the situation is as bad as

ever. No, the matter is more complicated. As a former administrator in Pakistan, I bel ieve the answer lies in establishing strong, clean, and efficient administration backed by an independent judiciary. Pakistanis must feel they can improve their lives without nepotism and corruption which are rife. Unless ordinary Pakistanis feel that they can have justice and that they can lea d a secure and hopeful life, militant groups will continue to have fresh recruit s. I still await long term vision and strategy from Pakistan on how to deal with its tribal areas and how to control the law and order collapse. I am working on a new study called "Showdown inWaziristan: 9/11 and its conseque nces for Muslim tribal societies. Recently, the Pakistan Taliban attacked a naval base in Karachibetween 10 15 mili tants somehow got onto the base with weapons, destroyed two airplanes and killed 12 security officers. This is a base that may be a nuclear weapons site, accord ing to a Pakistani newspaper. The Taliban said the siege was conducted in reveng e for the killing of Osama bin Laden. Has the Pakistan military explained how the Taliban could infiltrate the base? Bloody events that have killed and injured hundreds of Pakistanis after Bin Lade ns killing have plunged the nation into fierce debates reflecting deep crisis. T hey feel if the army cannot protect them, who can? Conspiracy theories are widespread. Pakistanis look for the American, Indian, or Isra eli hand every time there is a breakdown of law and order. Now they are confronte d face to face with the undeniable these murderers who have killed and maimed Pa kistanis are themselves Pakistanis. Americans dont know that the Taliban have openly declared that their number one e nemy is not America but Pakistan. Pakistanis point out that between 30-40,000 P akistanis have died since 9/11 although they had nothing to do with the terroris ts who were responsible. The Taliban are at war on two frontsin Afghanistan against NATO and in Pakistan against the state. The muddled strategy of ALL the state players has created mas s scale disruption and despair among Afghans and Pakistanis. From your point of view, is the relationship between the United States and Pakis tan getter better or more strained? Do you feel that U.S. drone attacks into Pak istan are necessary? According to military experts like David Kilcullen (author and consultant on cou nterinsurgency and counterterrorism), drone strikes have a very limited use kill ing a tiny fraction of the intended target. Most of those killed are innocent wo men and children. Apart from Pakistani leaders who dont particularly care for the se innocent fellow citizens in the tribal areas, most Pakistanis are infuriated by these strikes. They have also become a symbol of America violating Pakistans n ational sovereignty and feed into the anger. The relationship between the US and Pakistanis going through a very bad patch bu t I believe it will survive. Both administrations know the importance of each to the other. Unfortunately there is growing anger and antipathy in both publics. Americans be lieve that Pakistanis have been duplicitous or incompetent in their dealings wit h the militants. Pakistanis blame the Americans for everything under the sun. This is literally true. When the devastating floods destroyed millions of homes, Pakistanis believed they were engineered by the Americans. When the civilian pl ane crashed outside Islamabad killing all on board, Pakistanis believed American

s were behind it and aiming to fly it into the nuclear reactors. Both the American and Pakistani public need to know that this was not always the case. Take a look at the picture of Jackie Kennedy in Lahore in 1962 (left). Lo oking elegant and serene, she is standing alongside the President of Pakistan in an open car. She is surrounded by smiling Pakistanis throwing flower petals. Today no American could travel in an open car anywhere in Pakistan. A year earli er, the Pakistani President was hosted by the Kennedys at an unprecedented state dinner at Mt.Vernon. (Photo below left.) New York gave him a ticker tape parade and a joint session of Congress a standin g ovation. Today the Pakistani President cant dream of this reception. According to The Christian Science Monitor, since 2002, the United States has pr ovided $20.7 billion to Pakistan. What is the U.S. getting this aid and how impo rtant is it? America has always been a very generous ally. Unfortunately much of the aid to A fghanistan and Pakistan has gone into a black hole. The leaders in both countrie s have made palatial houses for themselves and have large bank balances as a res ult. Too few ordinary people benefit from it. In any case, Pakistanis will argue that the aid has gone largely for military operations which have made Pakistan into a client state. The US in turn has gained from the alliance with Pakistan. It could not have con ducted operations in Afghanistan without it. It needs Pakistans military and inte lligence support, and also the land routes for NATO supplies. Even when American troops finally come back from Afghanistan, Pakistan will rem ain of importance. It is a country of 180 million people. It is the only nuclear Muslim nation. Its geo-political situation will always make it an important cou ntry neighboring as it does China, India, Afghanistan, and Iran. Also, a fact often overlooked, its founder, M.A. Jinnah, had a vision of a moder n Muslim state based in democracy, human rights, womens rights, minority rights a nd respect for the constitution. (See my book Jinnah, Pakistan and Islamic Ident ity, 2002). An idea of democracy is part of the Pakistani DNA and should be encouraged. Besi des, there are hundreds of thousands of American citizens of Pakistani origin. T he Associations of Pakistani Physicians has some 12,000 members. These Pakistani s are a natural bridge between the two countries. When you look at the situation now in Pakistan and Afghanistan, what else should President Obama be doing? President Obama needs to pay more attention to the long term relationship with P akistan. He has an instinctive understanding of its culture. He spent some time there as a youth with his mother. He also had Pakistani friends as a young man. But his actions as president even provoked the generally pro-American former pre sident, Pervez Musharraf, to call them irresponsible and arrogant. Obama needs to take symbolic and substantive action. He needs to make an effort on two fronts: explain the importance of a long term relationship to his home au dience and thus counter the negative publicity around Pakistan. To Pakistanis he must appear a trusted ally. Pakistanis are acutely aware that O bama appears to have tilted far too much towards India a factor that always plays in Pakistani minds. It is well to keep the South Asian context in mind. India a nd Pakistan have had three wars. Things are thankfully quiet between them now bu t could escalate without warning at any time. Pakistanis complain that while Oba ma has been to India he has ignored Pakistan which is a key ally. Obama could also change the nature of the aid to Afghanistan and Pakistan. So fa r American money has largely disappeared, as I said, into a black hole. After bi llions of dollars of taxpayers money at a time when America itself is in debt th ere is still virulent anti-American sentiment in both countries. Intelligent use of aid will satisfy both the American tax payer and serve Afghans and Pakistani s better. Every Afghan and Pakistani parent wants nothing more than to educate their child

ren. It is an Islamic duty and parents believe in it passionately. I propose a s tudy be made of educational institutions like Forman Christian College in Lahore . It was run and still is - by Presbyterian teachers when I studied there in the 1960s. The college has produced several presidents and numerous parliamentarian s and scholars. Every Formanite I have met remains gratefulas proud Muslims and P akistanis. I am sure if colleges like this were spread throughout Pakistan and o rdinary Pakistanis had access to them the direction of the next generation could change. Obama should also stress the need to reform the madrassah system. New syllabi, t eachers training programs, technology, seminars, field-trips would help change t he mindset. In spite of the controversy around the madrassahs, they still contin ue to produce a steady stream of students with too narrow an understanding of Is lam. There is cause and effect. Yet the emphasis among the leaders in the US, Af ghanistan and Pakistan is on military solutions. These have already failed. So my advice to Obama: think long term and act holistic. For the leaders of Afgh anistan and Pakistana frown and a lecture to remind them of their duties. For the ordinary people of Pakistan, already reaching breaking point, that famous Obama smile will be seen as a friends gesture of comfort. Obama needs to remind Pakistan to honor the vision of its own founding father. I t may challenge Pakistani leaders to snap out of their stupor and pull back from the brink.

You might also like