Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fill out the form below to signup to our blog newsletter and we'll drop you a line when new articles come up.
In the last 200 years the population of our planet has grown exponentially, at a rate of 1.9% per year. If it continued at this rate, with the population doubling every 40 years, by 2600 we would all be standing literally shoulder to shoulder. Stephen Hawking
Stand On Zanzibar
In his 1969 science fiction novel Stand on Zanzibar John Brunner depicted a future in the year 2010. The Earths population, 7 billion people, are in various conflicts including a war between the U.S. and China. The metaphor of the books title is measuring the human population in terms of an island large enough to hold everyone standing shoulder to shoulder. In 1969 the 3.5 billion people could stand on the Island of Man (U.K.) and at the 2010 level of 7 billion projected by
The calculations in this case are correct, but they fail to take into account the ecological footprint the area required for growing food, obtaining water, disposing wastes, obtaining energy and mineral resources of the average person. The average ecological footprint per person in the world is 5.6 acres an average that takes into account developed nations like the U.S. and the undeveloped nations like the Sudan. Converting 5.6 acres to square miles and multiplying by 6.92 billion people on Earth yields 60.6 million square miles. That is larger than the Earths total land area! (57.5 million square miles). We are already deficit spending in terms of resources. Plus, as developing countries embrace technology, modern transportation and agriculture, the average ecological footprint will increase. The expected outcome however, is that their growth rate will level off as their standard of living increases. Population and immigration are very difficult issues to discuss. Democrats and Republicans alike for very different reasons avoid it. Gaylord Nelson There are many economists, politicians and average citizens who equate population growth with economic prosperity. More people means a higher GDP, more consumers to buy goods and dollars to be spent to stimulate the economy. This economic mindset is nothing but a Ponzi scheme, where a privileged few reap profits by resource and labor exploitation (e.g. outsourcing to countries with high populations and growth rates), while passing on the problems to later generations of the world; increased poverty, hunger, and pollution.
in turn mentioned the number of children and/ or grandchildren they have. Representative Michelle Bachmann boasted of having had five babies and 23 foster children. Our nation will need more Republicans like Michelle Bachmann to raise all the unwanted babies born to teenage parents, who will be unable to obtain birth control from defunded Planned Parenthood centers. (As an aside it is ironic that Bachmann, an outspoken flat Earth denier of the theory of evolution is inadvertently boasting about her own Darwinian fitness). Democrats may take a stand on many environmental issues, but instead of confronting it they tiptoe around the issue of overpopulation. The reason is simple. Certain demographic groups that vote Democratic also have large families.
the events going on in Libya and Syria, but I would characterize the worlds political climate as volatile. History is full of violent conflicts between and within nations, so I admit that it may also be recent news events affecting my perceptions. However, Calhouns behavioral sink seems to explain the state of affairs in the world. Even our cognitive abilities and various coping mechanisms are being overwhelmed by the enormity of the population issue. As the the human population expands outward to the shores of Zanzibar to use Brunners metaphor, a more apt metaphor might be Billy Corgans (of the Smashing Pumpkins song Bullet with Butterfly Wings Despite all my rage, Im still just a rat in a cage. by James Check