Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 296-8 #:7038

Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 3 Page ID

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

LISA LIBERI; LISA M. OSTELLA; GO ) Case No. 8:11-CV-00485-AG (AJW) EXCEL GLOBAL; PHILIP J. BERG, ) Hon. Andrew Guilford 12 ESQUIRE; and THE LAW OFFICES OF ) Courtroom 10D PHILIP J. BERG, ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 13 Plaintiffs, ) DEFENDANT, YOSEF TAITZS ) MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT 14 vs. ) TO FRCP, RULE 12(b)(6)
11 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ORLY TAITZ, a/k/a DR. ORLY TAITZ; ) LAW OFFICES OF ORLY TAITZ; ) ORLY TAITZ, INC.; DEFEND OUR ) FREEDOMS FOUNDATIONS, INC.; ) NEIL SANKEY; SANKEY ) INVESTIGATIONS, INC; TODD ) SANKEY; THE SANKEY FIRM, INC.; ) REED ELSEVIER, INC.; LEXISNEXIS ) GROUP, INC., a Division of Reed ) Elsevier, Inc.; LEXISNEXIS RISK AND ) INFORMATION ANALYTICS ) GROUP, INC.; LEXISNEXIS SEISINT, ) INC. d/b/a ACCURINT, a Division of ) Reed Elsevier, Inc.; LEXISNEXIS ) CHOICEPOINT, INC., a Division of ) Reed Elsevier, Inc.; LEXISNEXIS RISK ) SOLUTIONS, INC., a Division of Reed ) Elsevier, Inc.; INTELIUS, INC.; ) ORACLE CORPORATION; ) DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL ) INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.; ) YOSEF TAITZ, individually, and as ) Owner / CEO of DAYLIGHT ) CHEMICAL INFORMATION ) SYSTEMS, INC.; and DOES 1 through ) 186, inclusive, ) Defendants. )
-1-

Date Action Filed: Discovery Cut-Off: Final Pre-Trial Conf.: Trial Date: Hearing Date: Hearing Time: Courtroom: Location:

May 4, 2009 March 5, 2012 May 21, 2012 June 5, 2012

August 22, 2010 10:00 AM 10D Santa Ana Courthouse 411 W. Fourth St. Santa Ana, CA 92701

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6)

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 296-8 #:7039

Filed 07/19/11 Page 2 of 3 Page ID

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On August 22, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., YOSEF TAITZs Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6), as to Plaintiffs, LISA LIBERI, PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, THE LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG, LISA M. OSTELLA, and GO GLOBAL EXCELs First Amended Complaint, came regularly before the Honorable Andrew Guilford of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Divison, in Courtroom 10D, at the Santa Ana Courthouse located at 411 West Fourth Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Appearing on behalf of DEFENDANT and moving party was Orly Taitz, Esq., and Peter Cook of Schumann, Rallo & Rosenberg, LLP; on behalf of PLAINTIFF, was PHILIP J. BERG, ESQ. After hearing oral argument from the involved parties, the Court ruled as follows: [ ] 1. The FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION for INVASION OF PRIVACY of

Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 2. The SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION for PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF

PRIVATE FACTS of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 3. The THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION for FALSE LIGHT of Plaintiffs

Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 4. The FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION for VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL CODE 1798.53 of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 5. The SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION for VIOLATION OF

CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 1798.85 of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 6. The EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION for DEFAMATION PER SE,

SLANDER AND LIBER PER SE of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 7. The NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION for INTENTIONAL INFLICTION

OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 8. The FOURTEENTH CAUSE OF ACTION for NEGLIGENCE AND
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6)

Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 296-8 #:7040

Filed 07/19/11 Page 3 of 3 Page ID

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

NEGLIGENT NON-COMPLIANCe WITH FRCA 15 U.S.C. 1681b, 1681o of Plaintiffs Complaint has failed to state a claim. [ ] 9. Plaintiff has no leave to file an amended Complaint as to the following

causes of action:________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ [ ] 10. Plaintiff has __ days leave to file an amended Complaint as to the

following causes of action:_____________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ If no amended Complaint has been filed after __ days, Defendant shall file an Answer within __ days after Plaintiffs amended Complaint filing due date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date:_______________

__________________________________ Hon. Andrew Guildford

-3[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6)