Professional Documents
Culture Documents
forty days.
1
An
expedition against Tlacotepec, men
tioned by Torquemada without details, seems to be
the only other war in which Tizoc engaged during
his reign. 2 He either lacked the valor and skill in
war which distinguished his predecessors, or like the
Tezcucan monarchs believed he could best promote
his nation s welfare by attention to peaceful arts.
Very little is recorded of this king; his reign was
very short, and was marked by no very important
events. During this period, however, occurred a war
between Nezahualpilli and Huehuetzin, the lord of
Huexotzinco. This war seems to have been caused
by the plots of Nezahualpilli s brothers who had ob
tained the aid of Huexotzinco. According to Bras
seur the Acolhua king and Huehuetzin were born in
the same day and hour, and the astrologers had
predicted that the former would one day be conquered
1
Tezozomoc, in Kingsborough, vol. ix., pp. 93-8; Duran, MS., torn, i.,
cap. xl.; Acosta, Hist, de las Ynd., p. 495; Brasseur, Hist., torn, i., pp.
326-31 ; Ixtlilxochitl, pp. 265-6.
2
Torquemada, torn, i., p. 182.
438 THE AZTEC PERIOD.
rera, dec. iii., cap. xiii.; Veytia. torn, iii., pp. 271,276-8; Clavigero,
lib. ii.,
torn, i., pp. 253-4, 256. This author gives the date as 1482. Torquemada,
torn, i., pp. 182-5; Vetancvrt, Teatro, pt ii., pp. 36-7; Sahagun, toni. ii.,
lib. viii., p. 269; Brasseur, Hist., torn, iii., pp. 334-5; Codex Tell. Eem., in
Kingsborough, vol. vi., p. 141, date 1487; Tezozomoc,^ in Id., vol. ix., pp.
98-100; Ixtlilxochitl, pp. 265, 267; Codex Mcndoza, in Kingsborough, vol.
v., pp. 47-8. Ixtlilxochitl claims that Tizoc died a natural death, and that
Techotl died during his reign.
5 See vol.
iv., pp. 377-84.
6
Brasseur, Hist., torn, iii., pp. 337-40, tells us that the Xiquipilco cam
paign furnished captives for the coronation, while the products of the
other wars were reserved for the dedication. Tezozomoc, in Kingsborough,
440 THE AZTEC PERIOD.
vol. ix., pp. 99-108, speaks of the conquest of some city in Chiapas; while
Acosta, Hist, de las Ynd., p. 499, states that a place called Quaxutatlan
was taken by means of an artificial floating island. It is impossible to
form from the authorities any idea of these wars and their chronological
order. See, Duran, MS., torn, i., cap. xli.-ii.; Ixtlilxochitl p. 467; Si-
,
giienza, in Doc. Hist. Mex., serie iii., torn, i., p. 72; Vetancvrt, Teatro, pt
ii., p. 37; Clavigero, torn, i., p. 257; Veytia, torn, iii., p. 278; Torquemada,
torn, i., p. 186.
7 On
the dedication, see vol. ii., p. 577; Ixtlilxochitl, p. 268; Duran,
MS., i., cap. xliii-iv. ; Motolinia, in Icazbalceta, Col. de Doc., torn, i.,
torn,
254; Clavigero, torn, xvi., p. 257; Torquemada, torn, i., p. 186; Vetancvrt,
p.
rrt , , m 1 T T\
-T TV . T
~L _T ir*r.
9
Tezozomoc, in Kingsborough, vol. ix., pp. 109-12, 154, places the
Cuextlan war before the dedication, and calls Chimalpopoca s successor
Tlaltecatzin. See also Sahagun, torn, ii., lib. viii., pp. 269-70; Vetancvrt,
Teatro, pt ii., pp. 37-8; Torquemada, torn, i., p. 187; Veytia, torn, iii., pp.
294-5; Brasseur, Hist., torn, iii., pp. 345-7; Clavigero, torn, i., p. 258; Ix-
tlilxochitl, p. 268.
"
Torquemada, torn,
i., pp. 187, 191; Clavigero, torn, i., pp. 258-9; Bras
seur, Hist., torn, pp. 348-9; Veytia, torn, iii., pp. 295-6; Duran,
iii., MS.,
torn, i., cap. xL; Codex Tell. JKem., in Kingsborough, vol. v., p. 152.
442 THE AZTEC PERIOD.
Torquemada, torn, i., pp. 278-80; Srasseur, Hist., torn, iii., pp.
349-52.
12
Tezozomoc, \nKingsborough, vol. ix., pp. 120-7; Duran, JMS., torn,
,
i.,cap. xliv., torn, ii., cap. xlv. ; Brasseur, Hist., torn, iii., pp. 352-5. This
author also refers to Torquemada and Ixtlilxochitl, who have nothing to say
REVERSES TO AZTEC ARMS. 443
pp. 355-62.
is
Brasseur, Hist., torn, iii.,
446 THE AZTEC PERIOD.
O one evening
O in one of the miniature
lakes connected with his royal gardens. After he
had removed his clothing, a beautiful female form
appeared by his side in the moonlight, and announced
herself as the sister of Montezuma of Mexico, who
had heard of his valor, and had caused herself to be
miraculously transported to his side by the magic
arts of the Aztec enchanters. She assisted him in
his bath, left with him the bathing utensils of her
brother which she had brought, showed a peculiar
mark on the palm of her hand, by which she might
be identified, and disappeared as mysteriously as she
had come. Cociyoeza had before looked forward to
his marriage with some misgivings, but now, vio
lently enamored with the charms of his nocturnal
visitor, he made haste to send an embassy with the
richest gifts his kingdom could afford to bring back
his Aztec bride. A
grand display was made in
Mexico at the reception of this embassy, doubtless
intended to impress upon its members an idea of
Mexican power and wealth. The Zapotec nobles
were brought into the presence of the assembled
court beauties, and, noticed that one princess had
frequent occasion to arrange her tresses in such a
manner as to show her palm and its peculiar mark.
They were thus enabled at once to select the fair
sister of Montezuma, Pelaxilla, or Cotton-Flake, who
was borne in a litter on the shoulders of noblemen
with great pomp to the court of Teotzapotlan the
19 IlisL Gen., torn. lib. ix., p. 337, et seq.
ii..
MARRIAGE OF PELAXILLA. M7
account, mostly from Burgoa, is given in the Soc. Mex. Geog., Boletin, torn,
vii., pp. 167, 175-7, 183-7. Other authorities touch very vaguely upon the
events related above; most of them utterly ignoring the defeat of the
Aztecs. Duran, MS., torn, ii., cap. xlvi-vii., liv-v., puts the marriage in
Montezuma s reign, and says that the Tehuantepec king was told by his
wife of the plot against his life by 10,000 soldiers who had entered the cap
ital in small groups as guests; he caused the whole 10,000 to be put to
death. According to the Codex Tell. Hem., in Kingsborough, vol. v., p.
153, the king of Tehuantepec never afterwards allowed a Mexican to set
foot in his country. This document makes Pelaxilla a daughter of Mon-
tezuma. Clavigero, torn, i., p. 262, says that the Aztec forces penetrated
Guatemala at this time, referring to the Xuchiltepec campaign. Ixtlil-
xochitl, pp. 268, 271-2, states that the allies took 17,400 captives from the
Zapotecs in 1499. According to Remesal, Hist. Chyapa, p. 2, Chiapas was
made tributary to Mexico about 1498. See also for slight references to
events that may be connected with these campaigns in the south-west. Tc-
zozomoc, in Kingsborough, vol. ix., pp. 127-37; Torquemada, torn, i., p. 193;
Pineda, in Soc. Mex. Geog., Boletin, torn, iii., p. 347.
448 THE AZTEC PERIOD.
VOL. V. 29
450 THE AZTEC PERIOD.
Ixtlilxochitl, pp. 265, 267, 271-2; Vetancvrt, Teatro, pt ii., pp. 36-7; Vey-
tia, torn, iii., pp. 275-6.
24 Vol. ii., pp. 446-50.
ANECDOTES OF NEZAHUALPILLI. 451
Hist., torn, iii., pp. 375-7; Veytia, torn, iii., pp. 296-9; Vetancvrt, Teatro,
pt ii., p. 38.
INUNDATION OF MEXICO. 453
rected against Nopallan, Icpatepec, and Tol tepee; and tfiat during the
campaign Montezuma ordered the death of the tutors of his children and
the attendants of his wives. Tezozomoc, in Kingsborough, vol. ix., pp.
141-53, adds Huitzpac and Tepeaca to the towns mentioned by Duran.
See also on death of Ahuitzotl and accession of Montezuma II. Clavi-:
gero, torn, i., pp. 262-7; Torquemada, torn, i., pp. 193-5; Veijtia, torn, iii.,
pp. 303-9; Brasseur, Hist., torn, iii., pp. 382-97; Ixtlilxochitl, pp. 265, 277,
457; Acosta, Hist, de las Ynd., pp. 501-6; Herrera, dec. iii., lib. ii., cap.
xiv. ; Vetancvrt, Teatro, pt ii., p. 29; Codex Mciidoza, in Kingsborough,
vol. v., pp. 51-2; Gomara, Conq. 3fex., fol. 303; Sigiienza, in Doc. Hist.
Mex., serie iii., tonx i., pp. 74-6.
POLICY OF MONTEZUMA. 457
work, passim; also, Duran, MS. torn., ii., cap. liii.; Tezozomoc, in Kings-
borou(/k, vol. ix., pp. 145-6; Ixtlilxochitl, p. 278; Clavigero, torn, i., pp.
267-75; Veytia, torn, iii., pp. 309-19; Brasseur, Hist., torn, iii., pp. 398-402;
Torquemada, torn, i., pp. 196, 205-6; Acosta, Hist, de las Ynd., pp. 505-7;
Codex Mendoza, in Kingsborough, vol. vi.,p. 14; Vctancvrt, Teatro, pt ii.,
p. 39; Herrera, dec. iii., lib. ii., cap. xiv. ; Villa-Senor y Sanchez, Theatro,
torn. i. , pp. 4-5.
WAR AGAINST TLASCALA. 459
quemada,
torn, ill.,
velles Annales, torn, xcviii., pp. 178-86; Duran, MS., torn. ii. , cap. Ivii-
Ixi.; Ixtlilxochitl, pp. 271, 278; Tezozomoc, in Kingsborough, vol. ix., pp.
160-78; Oviedo, torn, iii., p. 497.
s* This famine occurred in the third
year of Montezuma s reign, accord
ing to Clavigero; in fourth year, as Torquemada says; and Ixtlilxochitl
puts it in 1505 and 1506. See Torquemada, torn, i., pp. 203-4,235. Ix-
tlilxochitl, p. 278; Clavigero, torn, i., pp. 282-3; Vetancvrt, Teatro, pt ii.,
p. 41; Brasseur, Hist., torn, iii., pp. 409-10; Veytia, torn, iii., pp. 331-2;
Sahagun, torn, ii., lib. viii., p. 270; Codex Tell. Eem., in Kingsborough,
vol. v., p. 153.
REVOLT OF THE MIZTECS. 461
iii., pp. 410-11; Duran, MS., torn, i., cap. lv., lix.; Tezczomoc, iii Kings-
Totecpec in 1507. Duran, MS., torn, i., cap. lv., speaks of the conquest,
at about this time, of Quatzoutlan and Toltepec, where Montezuma ordered
that all persons over fifty years of age should be put to death. Clavigero,
torn, i., pp. 284-6; Veytia, torn, iii., pp. 337-40; Brasseur, Hist., torn, iii.,
pp. 417-20; Torquemada, torn i., pp. 209-10.
lighting of the new fire took place at midnight, March 21-2,
38 The
1507, at the beginning of the year 2 Acatl, between the days 7 Tochtli and
8 Acatl. Codex Chimalp., in Brasseur, Hist., torn, iii., p. 423. The Codex
Tell. Rem., in Kingsborough, vol. v., pp. 153-4, says that the tie of the
years had usually taken place in 1 Tochtli (1506), but was changed by
Montezuma to 2 Acatl (1507). Most other authors name 1506 as the year
of the fete; but perhaps they mean simply that 1 Tochtli the last of the
seventh cycle corresponds for the most part, although not exactly of course,
to 1506. See Boturini, in Doc. Hist. Mex., serie iii., torn, iv., p. 240; Vey
tia, torn, p. 340; Torquemada, torn, i., p. 210-11; Clavigero, torn, i.,
iii.,
pp. 285-6; Vetancvrt, Teatro, pt iL, p. 41; see also vol. ii., p. 341, and vol.
iii.,pp. 393-6.
464 THE AZTEC PERIOD.
pp. 171, 177; Vetancvrt, Teatro, pt ii., pp. 41-2; Codex Tell. Rem., in
Kingsborough, vol. v., p. 154; Duran, MS., torn, ii., cap. Ixii.
OMENS OF DISASTER. 465
....
have been the threats of some exiled chieftain of
ancient times, or the vain imaginings of a fanatic
priest uttered to maintain his reputation among his
followers possibly the result of some native cosmog-
;
41 This was
very likely the occasion already noted when*the Tlatelulcas
rushed into the city, supposing it to be invaded.
42 See
pp. 422-4, of this volume; Torquemada, torn, i., p. 213.
468 THE AZTEC PERIOD.
428-41; Acosta, Hist, de las Ynd., pp. 510-14; Camargo, in Nouvelles An-
nales, torn, xcix., pp. 139-40; Duran, MS., torn, ii., cap. Ixiii., Ixvi-ix. ;
Sahagun, torn, ii., lib. viii., pp. 270-1; Boturini, Catdlogo, pp. 27-8.
470 THE AZTEC PERIOD.
46
punished. In the same or following year, the Cak-
chiquel records note the arrival of a numerous
embassy of the Yaqui, or Mexicans, at their court.
Nothing whatever is said of the object of this mis
sion, or its results; but the Abbe Brasseur has no
doubt that the object sought was information respect
ing the actions of the Spaniards on the coast of Cen
tral America. 47 Although Nezahualpilli seems to
have lost most of his interest in political affairs, and
to have contented himself with simply awaiting
future developments, no superstitious terror in Monte-
zuma s breast could overcome his ruling passion, am
bition; and according to the authorities he was
inclined to take advantage of his colleague s listless-
ness for his own
aggrandizement. Ixtlilxochitl
relates an act of
treachery against the Tezcucan
monarch, which, in view of the author s well-known
prejudice against Montezuma, may be received with
much doubt; according O to this author, the Mexican
^
of Quimichintepec and Nopala, towards Tototepec, and also that the stones
in that year threw out smoke which reached the skies. The same author
ity records the conquest of Tututepec on the Pacific, and an earthquake in
1513; the conquest of Hayocingo in 1514, and that of Jtzlaquetlaloca in
1515. See Ixtlilxochitl, pp. 278-80, 283-4. This writer also mentions the
wars of Mictlanzinco and Xaltaianquizco as among the last waged by the
Aztec monarchs. Duran, MS., torn, ii., cap. Ivi. Clavigero, torn, i., pp.
293-4; Veytia,tom. iii., pp. 359-60; Torquemada, torn. i.,pp. 214-5; Vetan-
cvrt, Teatro, pt ii., p. 42.
51
Torquemada, torn, i., pp. 218-19; Veytia^ torn, iii., pp. 3G1-3.
52 Vol.
ii., pp. 93-5.
LIMITS OF THE AZTEC EMPIRE. 473
Acalan, Vera Paz, and Nicaragua; the northern as the Gulf of California
and Panuco; makes the empire cover all the ancient Toltec territory, and
incorrectly includes hesides the north-western states, those of Tabasco
and Guatemala. Herrera, dec. ii., lib. vii., cap. xiii; lib. ix., cap. i. agrees
;
with the limits I have given, and shows that Goazacoalco and Tabasco
never belonged to the empire. Aztecs never subdued the region about
Zacatecas. Arlcgui, Chrdn. Zacatecas, p. 9. Clavigero, torn, iv., pp. 267-9,
tells us that the empire stretched on the Pacific from Soconusco to Colima;
that Chiapas was only held by a few garrisons on the frontier; that the
province of Tollan was the north-western limit; Tusapanthe north-eastern,
Panuco and the Huastecs never having been subdued; Goazacoalco was the
south-eastern bound.
4:74: THE AZTEC PERIOD.
ii., cap. Ixiv., and Tezozomoc, in Kingsboroiigh, vol. ix., p. 179, give an
entirely different version of the matter. They say that the Acolhua lords
were summoned to Mexico and invited by Montezuma to select their new
king. When they told him there were five competent sons only two of
whose names, Cohuanacoch and Ixtlilxochitl, are identical with those
named by other authorities he advised the election of Quetzalacxoyatl,
who was therefore elected and proved a faithful subject of the Mexican
king. He only lived a few days, however, and was succeeded by his
brother Tlalmitoltzin, and he, after a few years, by Cohuanacoch, during
whose reign the Spaniards arrived. See also, JBrasseur, Hist., torn, iv.,
pp. 14-21; Veytia, torn, iii., pp. 367-9; Clavigero, torn, i., pp. 297-9; Ve-
tancvrt, Teatro, pt ii., pp. 43-4; Herrera, dec. iii., lib. i., cap. i.
476 THE AZTEC PERIOD.
cap.
Yucatan, vol. i., pp. 49-52; Prescotfs Mex., vol. i.,~ pp. 222-4; Gomara.
Hist. Ind., fol. 60-1.
FINAL WARS OF MONTEZUMA. 477
pp. 223-7; Brasseur, Hist., torn, iv., pp. 21-3, 36-7; Vetancvrt, Teatro,
pt ii., p. 44; Ixtlilxochitl, pp. 283-4.
478 THE AZTEC PERIOD.
i-ii.; Torquemada, torn, i., pp. 351-8; Prescotfs Mex., vol. i., pp. 224-8.
480 THE AZTEC PERIOD.