You are on page 1of 7

Case 2:04-cv-08425 Document 214 Filed 07/09/10 7 Pages

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

DAN WOODS (State Bar No. 78638)


EARLE MILLER (State Bar No. 116864)
AARON KAHN (State Bar No. 238505)
WHITE & CASE LLP
633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007
Telephone: (213) 620-7700
Facsimile: (213) 452-2329
Email:
dwoods@whitecase.com
Email:
emiller@whitecase.com
Email:
aakahn@whitecase.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Log Cabin Republicans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a


nonprofit corporation,

14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
ROBERT M. GATES (substituted for
Donald H. Rumsfeld pursuant to FRCP
25(d)), SECRETARY OF DEFENSE,
in his official capacity,

20

Defendants.

Case No. CV04-8425 VAP (Ex)


AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFFS
DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND
DEFENDANTS COUNTERDESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS
THERETO
Judge:

Hon. Virginia A. Phillips

Complaint filed: October 12, 2004


Trial Date:
July 13, 2010
Pretrial Conf:

June 28, 2010


2:30 p.m.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND


DEFENDANTS COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

In accordance with Central District Local Rule 16-2.7, the parties hereby

submit an amended index of deposition designations and counter-designations and

objections thereto. Defendants designations below are submitted only as counter-

designations to Plaintiffs designations.

In addition to the objections reflected in the table below, Defendants object

to all depositions submitted as evidence at trial, in their entirety, on the ground that

no evidence outside the legislative record is appropriate in a facial challenge to a

statute.

9
10

Dated: July 9, 2010

WHITE & CASE LLP

11
By:

/s/ Dan Woods


Dan Woods
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Log Cabin Republicans

12
13
14

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT


OF JUSTICE, CIVIL DIVISION,
FEDERAL PROGRAMS BRANCH

15
16

By:

/s/ W. Scott Simpson


W. Scott Simpson
Attorneys for Defendants
United States of America and
Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense,
in his official capacity

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND


DEFENDANTS COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

Deposition Designations of Jamie Scott Brady

Designations

From
6:1
6:9
7:14
7:19
8:21
9:21
10:3
12:14
20:14
21:10
22:7
22:12
23:7
26:18
27:2
27:15
28:15
29:7
29:10
30:8
30:22
31:4
31:11
31:17
31:22
33:3
33:16
34:1
34:8
34:13
36:6
36:8
37:2
44:3
44:21
45:14
55:13
55:21
56:8
59:12
59:16
60:2
61:3
65:1
66:1
66:12

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

To
6:6
7:13
7:18
8:14
9:20
10:2
12:13
20:13
21:9
22:6
22:11
23:6
26:17
27:1
27:14
28:14
29:6
29:9
30:5
30:21
31:3
31:10
31:16
31:21
33:2
33:15
33:22
34:7
34:12
36:5
36:7
37:1
44:2
44:20
45:13
55:12
55:20
56:7
59:11
59:15
59:22
61:2
64:22
65:22
66:11
67:15

Party
(P/D)
D
P
D
P
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
P
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
P
D
P
P
D

Objections

21:3-9 Irrelevant
Irrelevant
Irrelevant

28:22-29:6 Irrelevant
Irrelevant

Irrelevant
Irrelevant

Irrelevant
Irrelevant
37:2-39:4; 39:12-40:5; 40:22-44:2 Irrelevant
53:7-54:13 Irrelevant
59:6-11 Vague

28
-2LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND


DEFENDANTS COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

Deposition Designations of Jamie Scott Brady (Continued)

Designations

From
67:16
68:3
71:15
72:2
83:12
89:14
95:14
96:8
98:15
104:17
105:17
106:3
107:9
108:18
109:5
126:12
128:22
131:19
133:22
138:6
152:17
153:5
154:9
169:21
192:7
192:14
193:1
193:22
194:2

To
68:2
71:14
72:1
83:11
89:13
95:13
96:7
97:17
104:16
105:16
106:2
107:8
108:17
109:4
126:11
128:21
131:18
133:21
138:5
152:16
152:21
154:8
166:5
192:6
192:13
192:22
193:21
194:1
195:1

Party
(P/D)
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
P
P
D
D
P
D
P
D
P

195:2
201:17
203:21
206:6
206:17
207:15
208:11
209:9
210:8
211:4
211:22
215:3
221:13
226:11
226:16

201:16
203:20
206:5
206:16
207:14
208:10
209:8
210:7
211:3
211:21
215:2
221:10
226:10
226:15
228:6

D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
P
D
P

228:7

228:21

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Objections

83:12-84:14 Irrelevant
92:10-93:12 Irrelevant
Irrelevant
97:9-97:17 Irrelevant
Irrelevant
Irrelevant

137:4-138:4 Irrelevant
138:18-152:16 Irrelevant
Irrelevant
153:5-11 Vague
170:9-173:6; 175:15-183:6 Irrelevant

194:18-195:1 Calls for speculation, lack of


foundation, vague

Irrelevant
209:9-18 Irrelevant

220:7-17 Irrelevant, vague


226:11-15 Irrelevant
226:16-227:14 Irrelevant
227:20-228:6 Irrelevant, calls for speculation,
lack of foundation

-3LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND


DEFENDANTS COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

Deposition Designations of Jamie Scott Brady (Continued)

Designations

From
228:22

To
235:3

Party
(P/D)
P

235:4
235:18
240:7
243:13
245:21
246:9
258:7

235:17
240:6
243:12
245:20
246:8
248:21
260:18

D
P
D
P
D
P
P

10

262:20

263:12

11

263:17
265:18
266:15
268:11

265:16
266:12
268:9
273:22

D
D
D
P

4
5
6
7
8
9

12

Objections
230:17-22 Vague
232:2-19; 234:4-235:3 Irrelevant

243:22-245:12 Irrelevant
259:6-14 Calls for speculation, lack of
foundation
259:16-19 Lack of foundation
259:20-260:6 Vague
262:21-263:12 Speculation, an incomplete
hypothetical question
265:12-16 Leading
265:18: Leading

13
14

///

15

///

16

///

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND


DEFENDANTS COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

Deposition Designations of Dennis Drogo

2
3
4

In addition to the objections reflected in the table below, Defendants object


that the entire deposition of Dennis Drogo is irrelevant.

Designations

From
6:2
11:4
12:12
20:7

To
11:3
12:11
20:5
39:5

Party
(P/D)
P
D
P
P

39:6
39:17
53:7
55:19
56:6
56:8
58:2
61:1
62:2
62:11
63:16
64:8
65:1
67:14
68:14
68:11

39:16
52:9
55:3
56:5
56:7
58:1
60:22
62:1
62:10
63:15
64:7
64:22
67:6
68:10
70:21
68:13

D
P
P
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
D
P
P
D

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

///

20

///

21

///

Objections

20:7-19 Argumentative, calls for speculation


21:5-18 Calls for speculation
33:12-34:6 Asked and answered
36:15-20 Vague
38:1-11 Argumentative
Calls for speculation
Calls for speculation
56:17-57:3 Vague

70:15-21 Calls for speculation

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND


DEFENDANTS COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

1
2
3
4

Deposition Designations of Paul Gade


In addition to the objections reflected in the table below, Defendants object
that the entire deposition of Paul Gade is irrelevant.

Designations

From
6:1
91:6
94:1

7
8
9

To
91:5
93:22
118:18

Party
(P/D)
P
D
P

Objections

99:2-20 Vague
101:4-102:13 Vague, lack of foundation
114:1-8 Lack of foundation

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-6LOSANGELES 870946 (2K)

AMENDED INDEX OF PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS AND


DEFENDANTS COUNTER DESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS THERETO

You might also like