Downloaded from rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.

org on July 22, 2011

Giant panda conservation science: how far we have come

Ronald R. Swaisgood, Fuwen Wei, David E. Wildt, Andrew J. Kouba and Zejun Zhang Biol. Lett. 2010 6, 143-145 first published online 28 October 2009 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0786

Supplementary data

"Data Supplement" http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/suppl/2009/10/23/rsbl.2009.0786.DC1.ht ml

This article cites 16 articles, 5 of which can be accessed free

References

http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/6/2/143.full.html#ref-list-1
Article cited in: http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/6/2/143.full.html#related-urls

Subject collections

Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections behaviour (2149 articles) ecology (2535 articles)

Email alerting service

Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top right-hand corner of the article or click here

To subscribe to Biol. Lett. go to: http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions

This journal is 2010 The Royal Society

Downloaded from rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org on July 22, 2011

Biol. Lett. (2010) 6, 143145 doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0786 Published online 28 October 2009

Conservation biology

Meeting report

Giant panda conservation science: how far we have come

Ronald R. Swaisgood1,*, Fuwen Wei2, David E. Wildt3, Andrew J. Kouba4 and Zejun Zhang1,2
1 2

Applied Animal Ecology, San Diego Zoos Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego, CA, USA Key Lab of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, Peoples Republic of China 3 Conservation and Research Center, Smithsonians National Zoological Park, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA 4 Memphis Zoo, Memphis, TN 38112, USA *Author for correspondence (rswaisgood@sandiegozoo.org).

The giant panda is a conservation icon, but science has been slow to take up its cause in earnest. In the past decade, researchers have been making up for lost time, as reected in the urry of activity reported at the symposium Conservation Science for Giant Pandas and Their Habitat at the 2009 International Congress for Conservation Biology (ICCB) in Beijing. In reports addressing topics ranging from spatial ecology to molecular censusing, from habitat recovery in newly established reserves to earthquake-induced habitat loss, from new insights into factors limiting carrying capacity to the uncertain effects of climate change, this symposium displayed the vibrant and blossoming application of science to giant panda conservation. Collectively, we nd that we have come a long way, but we also reach an all-too-familiar conclusion: the more we know, the more challenges are revealed. While many earlier ndings are supported, many of our assumptions are debatable. Here we discuss recent advancements in conservation science for giant pandas and suggest that the way forward is more direct application of emerging science to management and policy. Keywords: giant panda; conservation science; habitat analysis; spatial ecology; molecular census; sustainable populations

major undertaking bringing 230 scientists and ofcials (50 from China) together in San Diego to share the latest ndings. East met West, captive managers met eld biologists, and many of us learned that panda conservation science had not been so stagnant as we thought, though much of it was Chinese research ying below our radar. Even George Schaller, founding father of Western panda conservation science, and noted pessimist concerning the pandas future, was impressed with the outcome of this conference, published in Lindburg & Baragona (2004). In the forward to this book, he remarked: In the 1980s, I was lled with creeping despair, as the panda seemed increasingly shadowed by fear of extinction. But now, in this new millennium (this book) rightly projects hope, optimism, and opportunity. As the volume editors note, the prospects for saving the giant pandas are today unequalled. The giant panda symposium at ICCB was a long overdue opportunity to review the activities of the last 10 years. The purpose of our brief report here is to highlight two major points from the symposium. First, panda conservation research is no longer impeded by lack of communication among international partners, and ndings often grace the pages of Science, Current Biology, Conservation Biology, Conservation Genetics, Biological Conservation and Biology Letters, among others. Second, there has been an explosion of knowledge since Panda 2000, all of which will continue to improve opportunities to effectively conserve and manage this iconic species. 2. MAJOR THEMES (a) Identifying and measuring critical habitat variables Panda habitat has been the subject of more research than any other aspect of panda ecology. As is so often the case in science, just when we believe a conventional wisdom has been established, a new fact comes to light that forces the need to reassess the original premise. For example, Swaisgood and colleagues presented a new analysis from data collected across more than 70 per cent of the pandas range as part of the State Forestry Administrations Third National Survey (Yu & Liu 2004). It turns outon a landscape scalethat topographic slope is not an important predictor of habitat use, as is commonly believed, but old-growth forests are. Old-growth forest also appears to be an important resource for panda mothers to rear their young. In the absence of warm, dry, panda-sized dens in large trees, panda mothers may be struggling to keep cubs alive in less desirable rock caves (see also Zhang et al. 2007). What should we do with all those recent habitat suitability modelsand conservation planning and policy recommendationsbased on a different understanding of habitat suitability (Liu et al. 2001; Shen et al. 2008)? More important, perhaps, is what these new results mean for the logging ban (Loucks et al. 2001; Morell 2008), soon to expire throughout the pandas range. As ofcials in the Chinese State Forestry Administration ponder this decision, it is important that they understand the importance of old growth for pandas. Of course, attention remains focused on the most important question in panda conservation todayhow
143
This journal is q 2009 The Royal Society

1. INTRODUCTION When we arrived on the giant panda scene about 15 years ago, we were surprised by how little was known about the worlds favourite animaland how this dearth of knowledge prevented meaningful conservation management in wild and captive settings. After a promising start (e.g. Schaller et al. 1985), it appeared that science had dropped the panda ball. Maybe the ball got rolling again in 2000, when the San Diego Zoo and WWF-US co-organized Panda 2000, a
Electronic supplementary material is available at http://dx.doi.org/10. 1098/rsbl.2009.0786 or via http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org. Received 29 September 2009 Accepted 5 October 2009

Downloaded from rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org on July 22, 2011

144 R. R. Swaisgood et al.

Meeting report. Giant panda conservation science collared pandas in the Foping Nature Reservethat challenge some of our notions about panda mating ecology. Most striking was the documentation of an adult female that temporarily dispersed up to 50 km from her home range during the mating season twice. What does this mean for our understanding of panda mating strategies and gene ow? Zhang also provided new evidence that greatly expands previous estimates of home range size estimated from VHF radiotelemetry. Rounding out the symposium, two presentations from Michigan State University further increased our understanding of the all-important socioeconomic context surrounding panda conservation. Wei reported preliminary evidence that the increasing number of ecotourists to the Wolong Nature Reserve (a UNESCO World Heritage Site) affected habitat use patterns by pandas. However, the May 2007 earthquake halted tourism, allowing pandas to resume use of habitat in areas previously frequented by tourists. Thus, this catastrophe may be providing the chance for policy-makers to reconsider more appropriate strategies to manage tourism (and other human activities) in sensitive panda areas (see also Wang et al. 2008). In this context, Guangming He reported an interesting programme predicting such impacts: an open-access web-based programme to model the effects of various socioeconomic variables, a tool that may be especially useful for facilitating dialogue between scientists and policy-makers.

much habitat is out there and is it continuing to be lost? Ouyang (Chinese Academy of Sciences) reported that, based on satellite imagery, there has been an overall range-wide loss in habitat, but acknowledged encouraging localized gains from Chinas visionary Grain-to-Green policy (Loucks et al. 2001). Also heartening is Lius (Tsinghua University) GIS-based ndings that at least in one new reserve (Guanyinshan) panda habitat is re-establishing itself. We can hope that a similar process is at play in the more than 50 new panda reserves established in the past two decades, despite evidence to the contrary in one key reserve (Liu et al. 2001). No discussion of habitat availability would be complete without addressing the potential aftermath of the massive 2008 earthquake. Ouyang tackled this muchdebated issue, concluding that range-wide loss has been about 5.5 per cent. As this species normally lives at low densities, it may well be that pandas have temporarily left the quake-damaged areas to forage elsewhere while the bamboo re-establishes itself. And, of course, all of this plays out against the backdrop of one great uncertaintythe effects of climate change. Although the data are still emerging and the best models still need to be identied, Delion (Smithsonians National Zoological Park) demonstrated how theoretically climate alterations could cause the loss of 35 40% of panda habitat in the next 80 years. (b) Molecular ecology steps forward The notoriously intractable questionhow many pandas are there?was addressed at the conference both in a plenary address by Fuwen Wei and by several symposium speakers. With the application of modern molecular censusing techniques using faecal samples, we have a much better estimate of giant panda population size (Zhan et al. 2006) . . . or do we? Even these seemingly more rigorous estimates of population size are not immune to challenge (Guo 2007; Garshelis et al. 2008; Zhan et al. 2009). Regardless, wild panda numbers are extremely low, with the most optimistic estimate under 3000. Population census is not the only disparity highlighted by molecular censusing. Two genetic studies suggested female-biased dispersal (Hu, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Zhan et al. 2007), which is also supported by direct observations for one GPS-collared subadult female (Zhang). In contrast, one intriguing study reported by Zhu (Chinese Academy of Sciences) found genetic evidence for male-biased dispersal. In another report with immediate implications for policy makers, Zhu shared DNA evidence that rivers, and perhaps roads, are barriers to gene ow. Ouyang conrmed that these ndings supported inferences gleaned from the Third National Survey that pandas avoid roads. (c) Other ecological and socioeconomic research Critical new ecological information is trickling in now that the Chinese government has lifted the decadelong moratorium on radiocollaring pandas (review in Durnin et al. 2004). Zhang reported new ndings based largely on data gathered from a few GPS satellite
Biol. Lett. (2010)

3. SYNTHESIS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS Although much progress has been made, there are still gaps in our scientic knowledge that need to be closed if we are to develop a more informed conservation strategy for pandas. One of the most difcult, but important, challenges will be identifying (and then enhancing) the ecological variables that limit population size. Only then can sustainable populations be realized. That knowledge will also guide the implementation of another high-priorityre-establishment or augmentation of populations through translocation of surplus or rescued wild pandas or release of captive-reared individuals. Development of such reintroduction programmes will meet considerable obstacles that can only be overcome if science is rmly wedded to management (Armstrong & Seddon 2008; Swaisgood in press). The ecology and behaviour of movement patterns will also be critical to designing a reserve and corridor system that will accommodate panda movements, such as long-distance dispersal, necessary to maintain genetic and demographic health. Too often policy makers espouse a buildit-and-they-will-come approach to establishing linkages to unoccupied reserves. However, in reality, many animals will not disperse and settle in these areas unless appropriate behavioural and environmental considerations are met (Stamps & Swaisgood 2007; Swaisgood in press). To date, only four pandas have been tracked since the advent of GPS satellite telemetry, largely owing to the government moratorium on radiocollaring that has recently been lifted. Certainly, an expected increase in tracking giant

Downloaded from rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org on July 22, 2011

Meeting report. Giant panda conservation science panda movements using the latest remote technologies (Rutz & Hays 2009) will help inform the processes important for conservation decision-making. Finally, as can be ascertained from the afliations listed in the symposium presentations (see electronic supplementary material), western zoos have played a signicant role in conservation science for wild pandas, suggesting that zoos are beginning to full their stated goals of becoming conservation organizations (Swaisgood 2009). Zoos also have contributed signicantly to the dramatic increase in biomedical, reproductive and behavioural knowledge that has helped create a sustainable ex situ conservation breeding programme for this notoriously difcult-to-breed species (Wildt et al. 2006). This success has been largely based on scientists representing diverse disciplines (from both Chinese and western institutions) working hand-in-hand to develop basic knowledge and then transforming that intellectual capital into practical problem-solving. While this same strategy has been initiated for wild giant pandas, the challenges are far more complex. The recent giant panda symposium in Beijing demonstrated encouraging progress in the production of new biological information on the giant panda and its habitat.
The future of the panda should be bright, given the considerable public appeal, nancial and institutional support from China and abroad and the apparent political will of Chinas State Forestry Administration to save the animal they refer to as their national treasure. Science is advancing, rapidly. Now it is time for science, management and policy-making to advance together.

R. R. Swaisgood et al.

145

Armstrong, D. P. & Seddon, P. J. 2008 Directions in reintroduction biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 2025. (doi:10. 1016/j.tree.2007.10.003) Durnin, M. E., Swaisgood, R. R., Czekala, N. M. & Zhang, H. 2004 Effects of radiocollars on giant panda stress-related behavior and hormones. J. Wildl. Manag. 68, 987 992. (doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0987: EOROGP]2.0.CO;2) Garshelis, D. L., Wang, H., Wang, D., Zhu, X., Li, S. & McShea, W. J. 2008 Do revised giant panda population estimates aid in their conservation? Ursus 20, 168 176. Guo, J. 2007 Giant panda numbers are surgingor are they? Science 316, 974975. (doi:10.1126/science.316.5827. 974) Lindburg, D. G. & Baragona, K. (eds) 2004 Giant pandas: biology and conservation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Liu, J., Linderman, M., Ouyang, Z., An, L., Yang, J. & Zhang, H. 2001 Ecological degradation in protected areas: the case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant

pandas. Science 292, 98101. (doi:10.1126/science. 1058104) Loucks, C. J., Lu, Z., Dinerstein, E., Wang, H., Olson, D. M., Zhu, C. & Wang, D. 2001 Giant pandas in a changing landscape. Science 294, 1465. (doi:10.1126/science. 1064710) Morell, V. 2008 Letting 1000 forests bloom. Science 320, 14421443. (doi:10.1126/science.320.5882.1442) Rutz, C. & Hays, G. C. 2009 New frontiers in biologging science. Biol. Lett. 5, 289 292. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009. 0089) Schaller, G. B., Hu, J., Pan, W. & Zhu, J. 1985 The giant pandas of Wolong. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Shen, G., Feng, C., Xie, Z., Ouyang, Z., Li, J. & Pascal, M. 2008 Proposed conservation landscape for giant pandas in the Minshan Mountains, China. Conserv. Biol. 22, 11441153. (doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008. 01038.x) Stamps, J. A. & Swaisgood, R. R. 2007 Someplace like home: experience, habitat selection and conservation biology. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 102, 392409. (doi:10.1016/ j.applanim.2006.05.038) Swaisgood, R. R. 2009 Zoos dream of becoming conservation NGOs. Conserv. Biol. 23, 13381340. Swaisgood, R. R. In press. The conservation welfare nexus in reintroduction programs: a role for sensory ecology. Anim. Welfare. Wang, D., Li, S., Sun, S., Wang, H., Chen, A., Li, S., Li, J. & Lu, Z. 2008 Turning earthquake disaster into long-term benets for the panda. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1356 1360. (doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01070.x) Wildt, D. E., Zhang, A. J., Zhang, H., Janssen, D. & Ellis, S. 2006 Giant pandas: biology, veterinary medicine and management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Yu, C. & Liu, S. 2004 National survey of the giant panda. In Giant pandas: biology and conservation (eds D. Lindburg & K. Baragona), pp. 234235. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press Berkeley. Zhan, X., Li, M., Zhang, Z., Goosens, B., Chen, Y., Wang, H. & Bruford, M. W. 2006 Molecular censusing doubles giant panda population estimate in a key nature reserve. Curr. Biol. 16, 451452. Zhan, X., Zhang, Z. J., Wu, H., Goosens, B., Li, M., Jiang, S. W., Bruford, M. W. & Wei, F. W. 2007 Molecular analysis of dispersal in giant pandas. Mol. Ecol. 16, 3792 3800. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007. 03450.x) Zhan, X. J., Tao, Y., Li, M., Zhang, Z. J., Goosens, B., Chen, Y. P., Wang, H. J., Bruford, M. W. & Wei, F. W. 2009 Accurate population size estimates are vital parameters for conserving the giant panda. Ursus 20, 5662. Zhang, Z., Swaisgood, R. R., Wu, H., Li, M., Yong, Y., Hu, J. & Wei, F. W. 2007 Factors predicting den use by maternal giant pandas. J. Wildl Manag. 71, 26942698. (doi:10.2193/2006-504)

Biol. Lett. (2010)