Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 T H E M c K I N S E Y Q U A R T E R LY 20 0 0 N U M B E R 4
This Quarter
Despite all this activity, many academics, analysts, regulators, and consul-
tants challenge the value of mergers. At McKinsey we believe that mergers
do create value, but only if the right deal is struck and integration is tailored
to the situation and managed well.
Even in the best of transitions, mistakes are made, important issues are over-
looked, and alternatives are left unconsidered. The three articles that make
up our feature section are devoted, in different ways, to those things that
mergers too often miss.
(004-005) Q4-ThisQ v5 9/25/00 11:16 AM Page 5
THIS QUARTER 5
While planners might think too little about people, they certainly do think
about synergies, which are the obvious source of near-term value creation
in mergers and fundamental to the value of a deal. Although much is made
of cost reduction, increased purchasing power, and a lower cost of capital,
few notice the enormous potential of pricing. This is odd, since even small
pricing changes can have a dramatic effect on the bottom line. The authors
of “The hidden value in postmerger pricing” ponder the neglect of the sub-
ject and then go on to explain how a combined company can optimize its
pricing.
Finally, “When to think alliance” reminds us that mergers are not the only
way to obtain synergies, know-how, and access to new markets. Long con-
sidered a kind of stepsister to full-blown M&A, alliances have become more
prevalent as a result of the effect of the Internet on interaction costs and the
demands it creates for speed. But, although there has been much research
into the value of M&A, there has been little study of alliances. The authors
of this article draw on a study of the market’s reaction to more than 2,000
alliances and reach a number of conclusions about when alliances are to be
avoided or embraced.
The market does notice when alliances happen, and it cares—often, quite a
lot. The authors advise management to consider alliances when it works in
or with fast-moving industries, when it ventures into uncharted terrain, and
where M&A is for whatever reason not feasible. But about joint ventures,
a more committed form of alliance, the market tends to be skeptical. The
authors stress the importance of considering the complete range of options
in an unbiased fashion and keeping all stakeholders fully informed. Which
might be to say that alliances are not so different from mergers and acquisi-
tions after all.
David Fubini
Director, Boston office