Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2010
General Principles of Remedial Law BERNABE V. ALEJO (Cf. MEDINA) def. vested right- one that is absolute, complete and unconditional, the exercise of which no obstacle exists, immediate and perfect in itself, and is not dependent on any contingency (Cf. BUSTOS) substantive law creates substantive rights which gives rise to causes of action; procedural law prescribes methods for enforcing rights and obtaining redress (Cf. FABIAN) takes away- substantive; creates- may be substantive; implements- procedural KO V. PNB- not for the advantage of litigants, but to provide order and enhance the efficiency of our justice system; orderly administration of justice by for the effective enforcement of substantive rights, by providing a system that obviates capriciousness and arbitrariness SPS. DELOS SANTOS V, MANGUBAT- procedural law can be retroactively applied (Cf. NEYPES- 15 day fresh period rule) BORRE V. CA- procedural law can be only retroactively applied to cases which are pending and undetermined at the time of its approval and not those which have become final and executory REPUBLIC V. CA- procedural law retroactively applied (SC CIRCULAR)- 60 day period for certiorari begins from denial of MR not receipt of assailed decision MAGALLANES V. SUN YAT SEN- liberality in applying procedural law taking into account the considerations 1) results in deprivation of justice 2) that the SC is not a slave to technicalities, backseat to substantive rights CALLEJA V PANDAY- quo warranto does not include intra-corporate Jurisdiction 08-08-7 SMALL CLAIMS 100K civil+civil from criminal lease, loan, service, mortgage, sale or mortgage + damages (fault, quasi-contract, contract) + enforcement of baranggay amicable settlement or arbitration
ATUEL V. VALDEZ- Jurisdiction can only be conferred by law and cannot be acquired by or waived to by any agreement of the parties ZAMORA V. CA- Jurisdiction cannot be changed by an agreement or act that would contravene the legislative will; questions involving jurisdiction can be raised at any time. DELA CRUZ V. MOYA- Jurisdiction over subject matter determined by the law in effect at time of the commencement of action otherwise judgement is null and void CHING V. MALAYA- Jurisdiction of court and nature of action determined by allegations in pleading
Rule 5- Uniform Procedure BAYUBAY- must submit papers in summary procedure LUCAS- MR prohibited PASCUAL- failure of judge to abide SP subject to admin BONGATO- EXCEPTION MD LACK OF JURISDICTION Rule 6- Pleadings CALO- when compulsory counterclaim is beyond jurisdiction, bar does not apply CHAN- counterclaim distinct and independent cause of action ICTSI- CF. permissive not barred if not setup METALS- if principal denied then counterclaim must be dismissed too CRUZ-AGANA- 04-94 CF.UST DOES NOT APPLY TO CC ONLY INITIATORY PLEADINGS SINGAPORE- 3RD party complaints
Rule 12- Bill of Particulars SALITA V. MAGTOLIS Evidentiary matters must not be obtained through a bill of particulars but rather through the modes of discovery as provided for in Rule 29 AGCANAS V. MERCADO A court must first resolve a motion for a bill of particulars before declaring a party in default SANTOS V. LIWAG- Fraud alleged must be defined through a bill of particulars
Rule 17- Dismissal of Actions 2-dismissal rule cf. Jurisdiction court with competent jurisdiction not necessarily same court DAEL V BELTRAN- notice of dismissal automatic should state whether or not with or without prejudice GO V CRUZ- service not filing much more receipt precludes the exercise of plaintiff of his right to dismissal by notice JALOVER V YTORIAGA- plaintiff presence not required if defendants turn VALLANGCA V CA- if notice doesnt state, general rule no prejudice; think 17(1) (generally without prejudice) if (2)- if plaintiff declares it so; if (3)- with prejudice
Rule 18-Pre-Trial PPA V ILOILO the consolidation of issues in the pre-trial conference bars the question of the same on appeal-cant change theory on appeal EX. CF. LIANGA- interest of justice, sound discretion and wont require additional evidence; SARMIENTO V JUAN- should be set after the last pleading has been filed (usually the reply); ALARCON V CA- basis of facts admitted in pre-trial is binding TIU V MIDDLETON- pre-trial not just formality and judge has discretion to exclude witnesses- however may be allowed by judge and /or failure of witness to object; must pay attention to record of pre-trial conference- Rule 18(7) DULOS V CA no SPA+ no counsel = dismissal (remedy is MR) TROPICAL V VILLALUZ- SPAs terms must be comprehensively written FOUNTAINHEAD V CA- insufficient SPA is no SPA at all SAGUID V CA- pre-trial brief SON V SON- implied assent= failure to object in pre-trial plus waiver in cross-examination CITIBANK V CORPUZ- importance of coordination with clients as ptc is mandatory Rule 19- Intervention Cf. Intervenor- not one of the parties; 3PC- one of original parties PAGTALUNAN V TAMAYO importance of legal interest MAGSAYSAY V CA importance of legal interest- interest immediate and direct character wherein party will gain or lose cf. Rule 12(2) which must be direct ORDONEZ V GUSTILLO- intervention not allowed because complaint in chief dismissed via approval of compromise judgment 1) compromise judgment 2) motion to admit compromise 3) did not object
Subpoena witness cf. Summons = defendant Appear or produce documents; must file responsive pleading or Contempt, warrant of arrest; default Criminal+ civil cases; only civil 100 km.; no limitation.
General rule- person can refuse subpoena if more than 100 km (viatory right) only in civil cases remedy is take deposition cf. Rule 23.
UNIVERSAL V CA- subpoena duces tecum documents must be relevant to case PEOPLE V MONTEJO- viatory right only in civil cases GENORGA V QUITAIN Rule 22- Computation of Time NACTOR V IAC last day Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday then next business day MAYOR V IAC LUZ V NAC- MExt should be counted from original date regardless of Saturday, Sunday, etc.; always check reckoning date
MODES OF DISCOVERY MEMORISE TITLES FOR EXAM. MEMORISE BENEFITS (cf. FORTUNE) MEMORISE 23 (4), 23(29), MEMORISE 24 (1) (6) OPPOSITION- bad faith, annoy and embarrass, irrelevant, and domains of privilege 5 MODES OF DISCOVERY- CANT FILE THEM ALL AS A MATTER OF RIGHT 24- even before case is filed, venue is residence of any expected party (1) 23, 24, 25, 26- with leave of court after assumption of jurisdiction without leave of court after filed of answer 27,28- always with leave of court + showing with good cause = not matter of right.
25- exceptions a)privileged b)prohibited by court order 25(6)- if not served with written interrogatories then cant use adverse witness (however subject to waiver) = remedy MUST FILE motion to quash 26(1) genuineness of any document, not necessarily actionable document (2)- period implied admission if not complied 27-can oppose on the basis of materiality and sufficiency of description -cant seize (TANDA) 28- physical and mental condition must be related to the subject matter involved -not covered by doctor/client privilege -not for the purpose of curing but rather merely extent of illness CF.VALLEJO DOCTRINE-DNA 29- ALWAYS with motion + discretionary Sanctions : a) dismissal b)default c)contempt d)arrest e)payment of reasonable expenses including those that are incident to the motion f) stay proceedings g)precluding presentation of evidence h)striking out
Rules 24-28 Other modes of discovery LANADA V CA- counsel may answer interrogatories + dont use modes just to repeat answer contrary to purpose which is to discover new facts SECURITY BANK V DEL ALCAZAR 24(4) anywhere 24(11) ROSETE V LIM- difference between criminal and civil cases cannot refuse 1) if its civil in nature only exception if question in itself is self incriminating person himself Obiter: ad cautelam no difference to answer. Answer period. Rule 29 Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery LOPEZ V MACEREN- must show that falls within exceptions FORTUNE V CA- other modes not a bar to the use TRIAL Complaint-answer-reply-pre-trial (CARP) Plaintiff- Testimony. Documents formal offer Rule 30- Trial LALUAN V MALPAYA- clerk of court allowed if does not impair rights of aggrieved party YU V MAPAYO if there has been judicial admission no need for presentation for proof LEE V ROMILLO cf. LALUAN no law prohibiting
Rule 36 Judgments, FO, and Entry If compromise then final and executory (GENERAL RULE)- REMEDY 1) motion to set aside CA then 2)motion to set aside compromise judgment CF. 47- intrinsic fraud and lack of jurisdiction and lack of due process. PENGSON- If courts decision is incomplete ie facts and law are not stated then SC can remand MANGELEN- MR if new decision especially if reversal must state facts and laws (if aggrieved party doesnt know how will they appeal) BARRERA TC+CA cant issue minute resolutions but SC can = decision on the merits because all in all tells lower court as correct LIANGA- draft decision does not operate as judgment 1)signed 2)delivered to clerk of court until promulgation LINDO- definition of promulgated, officially announced- known to the parties/delivery to clerk of court and notice to parties however notice of promulgation in advance is mere procedural
extrinisic fraud (outside trial test if intrinsic can meet head on),-
default,
WITHIN reglementary period to appeal 15 DAYS IF NON-MULTIPLE (one only files notice of appeal- all with be transported by clerk) AND 30 IF MULTIPLE (record of appeal- not whole case will be transported you will do it too) 2) SAME COURT OF ORIGIN GROUNDS: NT: 1) FAME+ AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT 2)NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE-a) discovered after trial b) could not have been produced during c)would alter the decision (MALLARE) : MR: damages are excessive, insufficient evidence, contrary to law NO NEED FOR FAME+AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT BECAUSE decision APPEAL- TAKEN BY NOTICE, PERFECTED UPON EXPIRATION (Cf. 40-45)
General rule- interrupts reglementary but if denied NEYPES applies CF. however if pro forma continues CF. BA FINANCE- if interlocutory restatement interrupts. If final judgment then, pro forma then does not interrupt; IE- without notice of trial, stated the grounds but did not aver specifics, 3) YOU CAN FILE A SECOND MNT. BY EXPRESS PROVISION YOU CANT FILE 2ND MR. 4) MNT- not immediately decision MR- decision immediately ABE modified by NEYPES YAP- If MR is equivalent to an MNT based on FAME then must attach affidavit of merit if grounded upon it MENDOZA CF.YAP if MR not equivalent to MNT then affidavit
Rule 38-Relief from Judgment Orders, Pleadings. EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL FIRST STEP- TIMELINESS Find out receipt KNOWLEDGE and ENTRY Interlocutory in nature- not subject to appeal DEMETRIOU CF. 47 extrinisic fraud outside litigation (36,37,47) intrinsic fraud within Extrinsic fraud refers to any fraudulent act of the prevailing party in the litigation which is committed outside of the trial of the case, whereby the defeated party has been prevented from exhibiting fully his side of the case, by fraud or deception practiced on him by his opponent (Macabingkil vs. People's Homesite and Housing Corporation, 72 SCRA 326 cited in Canlas vs. CA, 164 SCRA 160). On the other hand, intrinsic fraud takes the form of "acts of a party in a litigation during the trial such as the use of forged or false document or perjured testimony, which did not affect the presentation of the case, but did prevent a fair and just determination of the case" (Libudan vs. Gil, 45 SCRA 17). ARCILLA unextendable and uninterruptible IBABAO- when party has other remedies do it not relief ie Petition for Relief cant revive lost appeal MARASIGAN- CAN APPLY TO WRITS QUELNAN- LEARN DOES NOT MEAN READ CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE DELACRUZ V ANDRES AND PURCON- relief does not apply to CA nor SC- any court refers to MTC/RTC because CA- no rule of filing SC not trier of facts Maam- 41 then not final and executory; if 65- then not appeal Rule 39- Execution. Satisfaction and Effects of Judgments Jurisdiction lost- if appeal perfected and transmitted Writ - judicial process authorising an officer to execute a judgment FINAL DISPOSES OF THE CASE ON MERITS FINAL AND EXECUTORY- DECIDED ON MERITS AND REGLEMENTARY PERIOD HAD LAPSED
FIESTAN- 39 applies to ordinary execution sale, 69 if judicial sale, ej foreclosure sale 3135 as amended by 4118 REPUBLIC- DILATORY MOVES STAYS THE PERIOD 7- IF DEATH BEFORE LEVY INVOLVING A SUM OF MONEY CF. 3(16,20) FILE AGAINST ESTATE! MOSLEM- REFUSAL TO LEAVE NOT A GROUND FOR CONTEMPT BUT IF RETURNS THEN CONTEMPT. REMEDY SHERIFF MUST OUST. IF DEMOLISHMENT, THEN FILE A CASE. IF IMPROVEMENTS,GIVE TIME. ONG TATING- 1. bond does not deprive TC of jurisdiction 2. 3rd party can file affidavit- if denied then separate CF.MARIANO- - cannot be 3rd party stranger contemplated in Rule 39(16) if redounded to the benefit of the family cf. BUADO AND WONG
SOLAR- option to choose before levy not upon or after FORTUNADO- TENDER OF CHECK TO SUFFICIENT COMPEL REDEMPTION- when tender of check and accepted equals exercise right of redemption but doesnt absolve of payment TOLENTINO- redemption does not create debtor/creditor redemptioner cant be compelled to make redemption BACOS- affidavit must be proof of ownership CF. TERCERIA NAGUIAT- modes of 3rd party claimants exclusive and cumulative NAPOCOR- 39(39) ALLOWED IF ADMITTED APPLY (36) BUT IF DEBT DENIED THEN CAN- APPLY 43- SEPARATE ACTION JUDGMENT CREDITOR CANT LEVY REDEMPTION RIGHT BUT THIRD PARTY CANPOLICARPIO- ej sale, foreclosure, and judicial sale MINISTERIAL TO ISSUE WRIT OF POSSESSION exception 3 rd party Cf. RETROACTIVITY TO LEVY. CF. DEED OF CONVEYANCE- opertates as a transfer to rights debtor to purchaser CERTIFICATE OF SALE- memoranda of fact there was a sale indeed but does not transfer rights to the same CF. GONZALES RES JUDICATA (cf. Valenzuela defintion) CF. BUAN SPEAKS OF 1) BAR AND 2)CONCLUSIVE- TEST IS EVIDENCE IF PRESENTED (MORE IMPORTANT THAN REQUIREMENTS)F OROPEZA- APPLY CONCLUSIVE OF JUDGMENT NOT IDENTITY OF THE SAME PARTIES PER SE BUT INTEREST AND BUT NO IDENTITY OF CAUSES OF ACTION PER SE
Rule 40 Appeal from MTC to RTC Ordinary appeal is an appeal from a judgment/final order on questions of fact and law Can be both appellant and appellee if both appeal (CF. cannot file extension compared to review) Steps file a notice of appeal with court of origin -parties, judgment (CTC), material dates -serves copy In case of SP- file the record with same court Record contains a) full names b) judgment c) chornological order of copies of pleasdings, motions, and all interlocutory d) data showing timeliness e) issue of fact raised and the evidence (if exceeds 20 pages add a subject index) and f) serve copy OA Matter of right All records are elevated form court of origin
When perfected upon filing of notice in due time By record on appeal due time Effects- lose jurisdiction (dependent on party who files- would not deprive the other party) prior to the transmittal may issue injunctive .protective , approve compromise not subject of appeal, permit appeals of indigent, (RESIDUAL) DOCKET FEES AND OTHER LAWFUL- with clerk of court of origin, full and non payment is ground for the outright 40(8)- appeal from dismissing case without trial on merits but on the lack of jurisdiction on SM -RTC may affirm or reverse -if court of origin without trial on the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter RTC affirms and has jurisdiction try on the merits. RTCreverses remand -if court tried the case on merits without jurisdiction over SM RTC affirms- dismissal is proper RTC reveses- shall decide without prejudice Failure to perfect appeal- if failed to perfect due to fame and appeal is dismissed 38 if denied 65.
MCBURNIE- FILING OF BOND IS MANDATORY AND JURISDICTIONAL AS APPEAL IS NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT but A MERE STATUTORY PRIVELEGE FRANCISCO- memorandum must contain conclusion in facts and of law and must be direct not remote. CASOLITA- furnish other party notice of appeal- lack of same will not CASALLA- CANT APPEAL MR OR MNT ENRIQUEZ- brief is mandatory non compliance is a ground for dismissal RULE 41-APPEAL FROM RTC DIFFERENT MODES OF APPEALOA Orginal, notice or record, pay fees, give copy to adverse party, within 15 days
RULE 67-EXPROPRIATION 1. FILING 2. APPEAL+30 days capable of multiple appeal ARELLANO CF. MANILA V CHINESE COMMUNITY- requirement private land+public necessity EPZA- just compensation is a judicial function (commissioner) ROBEM- defect in verification allowed what is important is body LINTAG- just compensation determined at time of taking/filling of complaint PHIL-VILLE- 2 stages determination of authority/just compensation- payment determines transfer FAR-EAST- requirements for writ 1) filing 2)due notice 3)payment 4)proof of funds SOLAMAR- courts cant reclassify RULE 68- FORECLOSURE GSIS- not a banking institution CRUZ- waived ROXAS- failure to publish auction sale= jurisdictional defect TIGLAO- notice for confirmation 1)opposed 2) cut off KHO- DURING AND AFTER purchase entitled to writ. RULE 69- PARTITION Multiple appeal Allegations required- nature and extent of his title, adequate description of the real estate, and defendants 2 kinds- voluntarily by the parties/ compulsory Accion in rem Partition does not prescribe- because one cannot be forced to be owner- exception acquisitive prescription. It is definitive. It is an appealable judgment Why: because it decides rights. DECIDE OWNERSHIP FIRST Commissioner- only duty to effect partition Must be recorded in proper civil registry