MEMO REPORT

To : Mr. Samak Sundaravej, Prime Minister

From : Stephen Hawking, Analyst
Date : August 25, 2008
Subject: Nuclear Power Plant Plan in Thailand

In response to your request, I have examined the plan to build a nuclear power plant in Thailand
and prepared this report. The 4,000 megawatt nuclear plant, whose blueprint was started in 1991
and abandoned until now due to strong opposition from some quarters, is now expected to be
built in 2002, generating electricity in the same year. Still, many Thai environmentalists are
expressing their concerns. The findings and analysis in this report are based on interviews with
the EGAT's governor and officials, environmentalists, and records from the IAEA (International
Atomic Energy Agency).

Findings and Analyses

The planned nuclear plant can substantially benefit Thailand. Firstly, Thailand can meet its
international commitment not to exacerbate global warming because nuclear energy emits less
carbon dioxide than other sources such as coal. Secondly, the cost of electricity production will be
2.01 baht per unit lower than that of using conventional means. Finally, the country will be less
dependent on other countries for coal and gas imports.
On the other hand, there is a negative aspect of building such a nuclear plant. It will cost US$6
billion dollars, which is much higher that what would need to build a conventional power plant.
Moreover, there is a security concern, as the plant might be threatened by terrorists and accidents
could also occur. Furthermore, it is difficult to dispose of nuclear waste properly and safely.

Recommendations
I suggest that the following measures be taken to ensure the smooth operation of the plant if it is
to be built.
1. The government should invite the private sector to invest in the project,
guaranteeing privileges and benefits for the participants.
2. A special task force should be formed out of the military to guard the plant.
3. The EGAT should seek guidance and receive regular checks from the IAEA.
4. Thailand should send its nuclear personnel to countries such as the USA and
Japan to be trained.
5. Emergency plans should be drawn up with the help of such countries, which
have experience and expertise.
6. Thailand should consult with those countries to properly process and dispose of
nuclear waste.

Conclusions
I am convinced that if the above recommendations are implemented, the potential hazards of the
nuclear plant can be avoided. The private sector's participation in the project can lessen the
burden on the government's budget. With strict security provided by the military and the
guidelines and help of the IAEA, terrorist threats and accidents can be avoided. Finally, if the
Thai nuclear personnel receive expertise and training, cooperation from friendly countries that
have know-how, running the nuclear plant and processing spent fuel will not be a problem and
Thailand can meet its ever growing energy demand.