Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ancheta
Facts: Manuel Pomipic had witnessed the killing of Vicente Palabay as the latter was standing in front of a waiting shed along the National Highway of Bacolod. It was about 11:00 P.M. on May 30, 1990 that a motorcycle, driven by Pat Edgardo Gedo Cruz, stopped in front of the victim. On board the motorcycle was herein appellant Romeo Ancheta who invited the victim to ride as to bring him to his destination. The Victim declined and crossed the street but was followed by the appellant who shot him 9 times as he turned around. The appellant claimed to have been at the PC Camp in Kolambugan together with his fellow policemen at the night of the killing but the court found him guilty of murder. The qualifying circumstance of treachery which absorbed the circumstance of nighttime, was appreciated against the appellant. The rest of the qualifying circumstances of evident premeditation and abuse of superior strength were disregarded. Issue: Whether the RTCs decision, as affirmed by the Court of Appeals, correctly appreciated treachery and disregarded the other qualifying circumstances of evident premeditation and abuse of superior strength. Ruling: The Court ruled that both the RTC and CA correctly appreciated the qualifying circumstance of treachery although the attack was frontal because the victim had no opportunity of defending himself due to the fact that the attack was made deliberately, suddenly, and unexpectedly. For the other circumstances of evident premeditation and abuse of superior strength, it was disregarded due to the lack of proof.