Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This chapter presents the gathered information from books, articles, and online
information that have a significant bearing on the study. All these related literature and
Related Literature
C. F. Niederriter (April 1997, physics. edu) says for the past several years, the
Dean's office and the Faculty Senate have struggled with defining teaching loads at
Gustavus for the purposes of determining overload situations and staffing allocations.
Several ad hoc committees have looked into the matter, without resolution. At least since
the 1992-1993 school years, the Registrar has tabulated “Faculty Load” data by
department, including number of sections (or contact hours) taught full time load (as
All of the data is confused by the various ways that they calculate and/or discuss
teaching load; courses, contact hours, and combinations of the two. This has been (and
currently is) the source of much frustration for the committees discussing the issue. Some
have suggested that things would be better if only they used semester hours instead of
courses as a measure, but this ignores the inherent differences in the courses they teach
and the evaluation tools that they use. The author has taken data provided by the
registrar's office for both the Fall Semester of 1996 and the Spring Semester of 1997 and
tabulated a number of parameters associated with teaching loads. The data provided
7
included First Term Seminars (for the Fall) and Curriculum II (both semesters),
independent studies, etc. However, for the purposes of calculation, courses that have
arranged times were not counted, including such things as music lessons and independent
study research. This was not done as a result of any prejudice, but due to the fact that the
number of contact hours and the combined scores could not be measured for arranged
courses. This obviously affects some departmental data more than others, particularly
Music, some science departments, and other areas with a significant number of arranged
courses. [4]
primarily designed for Institutions of Higher Education (IHE), but can easily be
incorporated into web solutions for a variety of business lines. The core functionality of
the system allows designating faculty and staff to set schedule of availability and
designate individuals enter the system and schedule appointments as needed with the
faculty and staff. The user base of the scheduler can be broken into groups so as to allow
(b)Career counselor appointment schedule for graduate students or other specific groups
Graysail (1995) says that the core functionality of the Interview Scheduler is in
essence the same as the appointment scheduler. Designated faculty and staff will
maintain schedules, but instead of a group of authorized users having the ability to
schedule meeting times as needed, individuals are sent invitations to come and set a
8
meeting time. An example of this systems use is best illustrated by the idea of inviting
Both systems are built on the JSR168 standards, and are available for stand alone
implementation or integration with a portal system. The open structure of the code behind
the systems also allows for headache free information sharing between databases.
Related Studies
help create school’s master schedule. The schedule created by the scheduling system can
be analyzed, adjusted and rerun an unlimited number of times until the desired results are
achieved. The power of Scheduling system will greatly reduce the time it takes to create
school’s master schedules. [2]Fully integrated with the senior registrar system, the system
has the following features: (a) works on next years schedules can begin at any time; (b)
can easily work with current year and next years schedule, (c) alphanumeric course
identifiers; (d) unlimited number of courses and sections; (e) tracking of co-requisites and
pre-requisites for each course; (f) comprehensive faculty staff information; (g) real time
conflict checking, and (h) conflicts are displayed in red for any identification. User
definable query system allows for the easy selecting and sorting of records. It has also
the add/drop logging and the details of all schedule changes are tracked. [3]
9
End Notes
Conceptual Framework
concept. A proposed system consists of the input, the processing and the output, with part
of feedback specified.
In this study, the input refers to the subject to be offered, curricular programs,
Process converts input into outputs. The process in this study is the preparation of
The output, which is the expected result of the process, includes the final schedule
performance of the system. It would serve as the guide for changing or modification
regarding system requirements and user demands. It includes the suggested changes and