Current State of Indian Economy June 2011

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GDP growth

GDP growth figures for Q4, 2010-11, highlight an unmistakable downward trend. While in Q1, 2010-11, GDP grew by 9.3 percent, in Q4, 2010-11, GDP growth came down to 7.8 percent. Sectors like manufacturing and mining & quarrying have seen considerable erosion of growth momentum over the last one year. While consumption demand is still holding, a sharp decline in growth of investments is seen. Growth in Gross Fixed Capital Formation [GFCF] has dipped from 17.4 percent in Q1, 2010-11 to 0.4 percent in Q4, 2010-11. Given the evolving situation, growth in 2011-12 is likely to be close to the 8 percent mark.
Quarterly Growth in GDP (2004-05 prices)
14 12 10 8 6

Current State of Indian Economy

2 0 11 0 1 0 2 Q1 11 0 1 0 2 Q2 11 0 1 0 2 Q3
Mining and quarrying GDP at factor cost Manufacturing

11 0 1 0 2 Q4

Weakness in industrial production trend continues. In April 2011, IIP registered a growth of 6.3 percent. In April 2010, growth in IIP was to the tune of 13.1 percent. Amongst the use based industrial groups, a similar streak of weakness is seen with growth in the capital goods segment, intermediate goods segment and consumer goods segment slowing down from 35.5 percent, 11.9 percent and 13.8 percent respectively in April 2010 to 14.5 percent, 3.4 percent and 2.9 percent in April 2011.
IIP growth and Repo rate
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 0 1 ' r p A 0 1 ' y a M 0 1 ' n u J 0 1 ' l u J 0 1 ' g u A 0 1 ' ep S 0 1 , t c O 0 1 ' v o N 0 1 ' ec D 1 1 ' n a J 1 1 ' eb F 1 1 ' r a M 1 1 ' r p A

Industrial Production

June 2011

This report has been prepared by the Economic Affairs and Research Division, FICCI Page | 1 2

IIP

Repo rate

 Data for April 2011 shows a perceptible decline in performance of the core sector with growth dipping from 8.5 percent in April 2010 to 4.6 percent in April 2011. Sectors like natural gas, fertilizers, cement and steel are largely responsible for this poor performance. Growth in the coal sector however moved from (-) 2.9 percent in April 2010 to 2.8 percent in April 2011.

Core Sector

Inflation
The inflation situation in the economy continues to be a cause for concern. Despite large scale tightening of the monetary policy by the RBI and other steps taken by the government, inflation continues to remain close to the double digit mark. In May 2011, WPI based headline inflation stood at 9.1 percent. This is higher than 8.7 percent inflation recorded in April 2011. Core inflation too has moved up from 8 percent in April 2011 to 8.6 percent in May 2011. Near term outlook for inflation is not too encouraging and there are chances that we may see inflation jump to the double digit territory on a few occasions. High international oil prices, likely decontrol of diesel prices, high global food prices and hike in Minimum Support Prices for the upcoming agriculture season are some of the factors that constitute the upside risks to inflation.

The strong momentum in exports, seen particularly during the second half of 2010-11, has continued in the year 2011-12 as well. In April 2011 exports totaled US$ 23.8 billion and represented a growth of 34.4 percent over the same month of the previous year when exports totaled US$ 17.7 billion. While this strong start in 2011-12 is encouraging, there are indications that this high growth will not be sustained in the months ahead. interest rates, rising raw materials costs and oil prices, withdrawal of incentive schemes like DEPB and Rising likely slowdown in Asian economies are some of the reason that have tempered the outlook for exports. April 2011, our imports totaled US$ 32.8 billion and registered a growth of 14.1 percent over the same In month of the previous year when imports amounted to US$ 28.8 billion. With developments in the Middle East and North Africa region showing no signs of a let up and with OPEC resisting any upward revision in daily oil production quota, oil prices are likely to remain firm in the near term. dZ]A]ooA}v]vA}AAA}vA/v][A}ooA}]oA]u}A]ooXA As regards non-oil imports, while a slowdown in the domestic economy could lead to some moderation in the non-oil import bill, any large respite here can be ruled as prices of commodities other than oil are also firming up.

Foreign Trade

In 2010-11, foreign investment flows into India saw a dip of about 17 percent over the previous year. Further, this dip is largely on account of a slowdown seen in case of FDI. In 2009-10, FDI inflows into India totaled US$ 37.7 billion. In 2010-11, this figure came down to US$ 27 billion. ata also shows that of out of the top 25 sectors, 15 sectors have seen a dip in FDI flows during April t Feb D 112010 compared to the same period in 2009-10. Sectors like services, construction, housing and real estate, telecommunication and agricultural services are the ones where investment flows have slowed down considerably. 2010-11, portfolio flows totaled US$ 31.5 billion and were only a tad below US$ 32.4 billion received in In 2009 -10. The outlook for portfolio flows in the current year is not too encouraging. Global fund managers are particularly concerned over the evolving macro-economic situation with inflation showing limited signs of abatement and growth slowing down at a fast clip.
Page | 3

Foreign Investments

 The re-emergence and intensification of the sovereign Growth in in Europe and the (%) debt crisis Total Expenses expected halt of Growth in Net Sales (%) quantitative easing policy in the US by the end of June 2011 are also downside factors for portfolio flows for emerging markets including India. 30 40

10 0 /vA]oAUA/v][A(}]PvAZvPAA}oAh^AA]oo]}vX 0 The -10 10 size of our foreign11 11 11 reserves has drawn attention of the policymakers. Just some time increasing 10 10 10 11 exchange 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 -10 back, Dr.0Kaushik9Basu, Chief Economic Advisor, Ministry of Finance, had raised the question of India to 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 -20 0 0few0independent1analysts1have opined that 0 1 1 consider having a Sovereign Wealth Fund. In more recent times, a -20 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 a part of these huge All industries be deployed to import commodities which are or could be in short supply in the reserves economy. Manufacturing Services (other than financial)

Forex 10 Reserves

20

30 20

The year on year growth in money supply in the period up to May 21, 2011 was 16.8 percent. Growth in the corresponding period [up to May 22, 2010] in the previous year was 15.1 percent. The year on year growth in non-food credit in the period up to May 21, 2011 has been almost 22.1 percent. This is higher than the credit growth target of 19 percent set by the RBI for the current year. Growth in deposits in the period up to May 21, 2011 has been of the order of 17.4 percent and is in line with RBI target growth of 17 percent for the current year. These numbers indicate that the trend seen in the previous year t of deposit growth lagging credit growth t continues in the current financial year. The growth rate in deposits has picked up in recent months and to that extent eased some pressure on the banks as they worked hard to maintain their margins.

Money and Banking

The provisional estimates for 2010-11 for various fiscal variables show a definite improvement over the revised estimates (RE), with a more than anticipated rise in revenue collection and reduction in expenditure. The striking feature of the new estimates is the reduction in fiscal deficit [4.7 percent] number compared to the revised estimate [5.1 percent] given during presentation of the union budget. Though the fiscal deficit numbers for 2010-11 are encouraging, maintaining fiscal discipline in 2011-12 is looking increasingly difficult.

Fiscal Situation

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010-11, corporate India turned out a good performance both in terms of sales and profits. Such a performance is particularly noteworthy as it came at a time when overall expenses are going up at a fast clip. EAoA}(AZooA/v][A]vAZA(}ZAA}(A-11 registered a growth of 23.5 percent. This is the highest growth in net sales that we have seen in the last eight quarters. Further, while firms from the manufacturing sector saw an increase of 22.26 percent in net sales in the last quarter of 2010-11, companies from the services (other than financial) sector saw sales going up by 27.46 percent. Within the manufacturing sector, growth in sales has been particularly strong in sectors such as textiles, cement, steel and transport equipment. Performance of the food and beverages sector and the chemicals sector lagged the average growth for the manufacturing sector as a whole. d}oAvA(}AZooA/v][AvAAAXAvA]vAYUA-11. This growth is the highest seen in last four quarters. Further, while the manufacturing sector saw total expenses rise by 21.68 percent in Q4, 2010-11, services (other than financial) saw an increase of 31.29 percent. Within the manufacturing sector, the increase in total expenses in the quarter under review was particularly high in sectors such as cement [48.12 percent] and steel [30.06 percent].
Page | 4 5

Corporate Sector Performance Q4, 201011

All industries Manufacturing Services (other than financial)

Current State of Indian Economy June 2011

INDEX MACRO ECONOMY GDP Growth Industrial Production Core Sector Inflatio n Foreign Trade Investments Foreign Forex Reserves Exchange Rate and Banking Money Fiscal Situation 27 CORPORATE SECTOR PERFORMANCE Q4, 201011 All industries Textile s Cement Steel Chemical s Transportatio n Food and 38 Beverages ROUND UP OF KEY DEVELOPMENTS Draft National Manufacturing Policy ZB/[A&]vv]oA^]o]AZ 39 }A CHARTS Industrial Production Inflatio n Foreign Trade and Foreign 43 Investments DATA ON INTEREST RATES 7 7 9 13 15 18 20 23 24 25

31 31 33 34 35 36 37

39 39 40 40 42

44

Current State of Indian Economy June 2011 GDP Growth

The Central Statistical Organisation (CSO) has released the revised estimates for GDP for 201011. Alongside, it also released the quarterly estimates for GDP for the fourth quarter of 201011. }]vPA}AZAoAvuAuA]ooAAC^KUA/v][A'WAA(}A}AA}vvA ]A registered an increase of 8.5 percent in the year 2010-11. This revised estimate of 8.5 percent growth for GDP in 2010-11 is only a shade below the advance estimates that had pegged GDP growth for 2010- 11 at 8.6 percent. This slight dip in overall GDP growth can be attributed to weaker performance in sectors such as Zmining and quarrying[, Zmanufacturing[, ZUAZ}oUAv}AvA}uuv]]}v[AvAZ(]vv ]vPUA]vvUA oAAvA]vA][AZvAv]] Ao]XAA In case of the agriculture and allied activities sector, we find that the revised estimates have pegged growth in 2010-11 at 6.6 percent, which is much higher compared to the advance estimates that had put growth at 5.4 percent. In this context it is important to note that the third advance estimates of crop production released by Ministry of Agriculture have shown a significant upward revision as compared to second the advance estimates in the production of wheat [84.27 million tonnes from 81.47 million tonnes], pulses [17.29 million tonnes from 16.51 million tonnes], oilseeds [302.51 lakh tonnes from 278.48 lakh tonnes] and sugarcane [340.54 million tonnes from 336.70 million tonnes]. These revisions are responsible for lifting the GDP growth rate for agriculture and allied activities sector. Another sector where we see a substantial upward revision in growth rate between the advance and revised estimates is the Zcommunity, social and personal services[ sector. While in its advance estimate, indicated a growth of 5.7 percent for this sector, in the revised estimates this figure has CSO had been moved up to 7.0 percent. This revision comes on the back of a larger increase in total expenditure of the central government than anticipated earlier. dZAu}]}vA]vAZAAA}(Av]}vA} (AZAZu]v]vP[AvAZuv(]vP[A}AvAA as well as hardening of the interest rates in related to certain adverse policy developments the }v}uXA&ZUAA(}uvA}(AZAZ(]vv ]vPUA]vvUAoAAvA]vA][A}A is closely related to performance of the manufacturing sector, this sector too has seen a slippage in growth between advance and revised estimates.
Table 1 Growth in GDP at factor cost by economic activity (2004-05 prices)
2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2010 -11 (RE) (QE) (AE) 1 Agriculture, forestry and fishing -0.1 6.6 0.4 5.4 2 Mining and quarrying 1.3 6.9 6.2 5.8 3 Manufacturing 4.2 8.8 8.8 8.3 4 Electricity, gas and water supply 4.9 6.4 5.1 5.7 5 Construction 5.4 7.0 8.0 8.1 6 Trade, hotels, transport and communication 7.6 9.7 11.0 10.3 7 Financing, insurance, real estate and business services 12.5 9.2 10.6 9.9 8 Community, social and personal services 12.7 11.8 5.7 7.0 9 GDP at factor cost 6.8 8.5 8.0 8.6 QE: Quick Estimates Advance Estimates RE: Revised Estimates AE: Source t CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India Page | 7

Moving on to the quarterly estimates for GDP growth for the fourth quarter of 2010-11, we see that oZ}PZAZA}v}u[A(}uvA]A]ooAdecent at 7.8 percent, an unmistakable downward trend is visible. Quarterly growth estimates show that GDP growth has come down from 9.3 percent in Q1, 8.9 percent in Q2, 2010-11 to 8.3 percent in Q3, 2010-11 and further down to 7.8 percent in 2010-1 1 to Q4, 2010-11. Amongst sectors, the ones that have seen a considerable erosion of growth momentum over the last one AAZu]v]vPAvA]vP[AvAZuv(]vP[XAtZ]oA]vAA} (AZA(}uUAZAP}ZA(]PA in Q1, 2010-11 to 1.7 percent in Q4, 2010-11, in case of the latter, have come down from 7.1 percent growth has moderated from 12.7 percent in Q1, 2010-11 to 5.5 percent in Q4, 2010-11. dZA(}uvA} (AZAZP]oAvAoo]A]]][A}A]vAZA(}ZAAZAvA particularly strong at 7.5 percent. The other sectors that have registered strong growth in Q4, 201011 AZo ] vA}uuv]]}v[AXAvAvAZ(]vv ]UAP ]vPUA]vvUAoAAvA]vA][AXA percent]. AvA Table 2 Growth in GDP at factor cost by economic activity (2004-05 prices) Quarterly numbers A Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 o[A 2010 11 2010 -11 -11 2010 -11 2010 XA Agriculture, forestry and fishing 1 2.4 7.5 5.4 9.9 vMining and quarrying 2 7.1 8.2 6.9 1.7 UA Manufacturing 3 12.7 10.0 6.0 5.5 4 5.6 2.8 6.4 7.8 }v Electricity, gas and water supply 5 Construction 7.7 6.7 9.7 8.2 ]}vA 6 Trade, hotels, transport and communication 12.6 10.9 8.6 9.3 XA 7 Financing, insurance, real estate and business services9.8 10.0 10.8 9.0 vCommunity, social and personal services 8 8.2 7.9 5.1 7.0 UAZ GDP at factor cost 9 9.3 7.8 8.9 8.3 UAZ} Source t CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India oUA A v at quarterly GDP figures by expenditure class shows that growth in private final look consumption is maintained at a robust 8 percent even in the fourth quarter of the fiscal 2010} expenditure A 11. However, what is worrisome is the trend in the growth numbers for gross fixed capital formation, which shows that year on year growth has tapered from 17.4 percent in Q1, 2010-11 to just about 0.4 percent in Q4, 2010-11. This is a clear indication of weakness in the investment activity level in the economy and does not bode well for growth in the current year.
Table 3 Growth in GDP at market prices by expenditure (2004-05 prices) Quarterly numbers
Q1 2010- Q2 2010- Q3 2010- Q4 201011 11 11 11 Private Final Consumption Expenditure 8.9 8.9 8.0 8.6 Government Final Consumption Expenditure 6.7 6.4 1.9 4.9 Gross Fixed Capital Formation 17.4 11.9 7.8 0.4 Change in Stocks 11.7 9.0 5.1 4.6 Valuables 28.0 21.2 18.5 32.3 Exports 10.0 10.7 24.8 25.0 Imports 15.5 11.6 0.4 10.3 GDP at Market Prices 9.4 9.1 7.7 9.2 Source t FICCI computations based on data provided by CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Page | 8

With regard to GDP growth in the year 2011-12, it was noted even in our earlier report that the initial guidance provided by Ministry of Finance of 9 percent growth is looking increasingly difficult to achieve. even the government has come around this view and growth projection for the year 2011With time 12 has been lowered to 8 to 8.5 percent. It iA]v]vPA}Av}AZA]vA&/CC/[Au}AvA}v}u]AKo}}lA^UAoA} (AZ]ZAA in May 2011, the median forecast for GDP growth in the current year comes to 8 released percent. The inputs and projections provided by various participating economists in this survey show that while agriculture and allied activities sector is projected to grow by 3.7 percent this year, industry the and services sector are poised to grow by 8 percent and 9.2 percent respectively. The key risks to growth in India in the current year are the negative impact of continuous tightening of monetary policy by RBI and a slowdown in global growth due to high international oil prices. Further, although the Indian Meteorological Department has projected a normal monsoon this year, we will have to wait for more updates to get a clearer picture on the spatial distribution of the monsoon.
Projected GDP growth [India] in 2011-12 Projection in % 7.7 7.8 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.1 8.7 8.8 8.8 Projected growth [Sectors] in 2011-12 8 3.7 8 9.2 Organisation Morgan Stanley IMF FICCI Nomura DBS CARE Standard Chartered Indicus Dun and Bradstreet ADB 10 8 6 4 2 0
GDP AgricultureIndustry Services and allied activities

Source t FICCI Economic Outlook Survey, May 2011 Source t FICCI Compilation

Industrial Production
The Central Statistical Organisation (CSO) has revised the base year for the industrial production 2 data series from 1993-94 to 2004-05. The new series also incorporates a much larger set of items that reflect the contemporary production activity in the country and is expected to offer a better gauge of the }v[A]v]oA]]XAdZA]PZ]vPA]PuA}(AZAZAmajor sectors under two digit level indices and four different goods sectors under use t based classification has also changed to capture thehanging structure of economy effectively. The new set of weights that would now be followed is c given the following table. in

Some of the items included in the new series are mobile phones, digital cameras, fruit juices, laptops, new chemical items and processed food.

Page | 9

Table 4 Comparison of weights assigned in the Old and New series of IIP Indices
Sectors Old series New series 1993 Base Year -94 2004 Base Year -05 Two-digit level Indices 10.47 14.16 79.36 75.53 10.17 10.32 100.00 100.00 Use- based Index 35.57 45.68 9.26 8.83 26.51 15.69 28.66 29.81 5.37 8.46 23.30 21.35 100.00 100.00 Source t CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

Mining Manufacturing Electricity General Index Basic goods Capital goods Intermediate goods Consumer goods Durables Non durables General Index

As the above table shows, in the new series, while the weight of the mining sector has gone up that of he manufacturing sector has gone down. Amongst the use based segments, while basic goods t have seen their weight go up substantially, intermediate goods have seen a reduction in the weight assigned construction of the for index. Even before data as per the new series for industrial production was brought out by CSO, economic analysts had predicted that data as per the new series would provide an upward bias to growth as it }oA]v}}AZvA(AP}]vPA}[A}(AZA }v}uXA The new numbers have confirmed this and we see a substantial change in growth performance in 2010- 11 when we compare the results of the new series with the results based on the old series. It is also interesting to note that the adverse impact on industrial production in the period following the global slowdown is also accentuated as per the new series and this is reflected in the numbers for 200910. As the data given in the next table shows, overall industrial production [as per the new series] registered a growth of 8.2 percent in 2010-11. And this is much better than the 5.3 percent growth clocked in 2009-1 0. Further, a good part of industrial growth in 2010-11 was driven by the manufacturing sector, which recorded a growth of 8.9 percent compared to a growth of 4.8 percent in 2009-10. The other two sectors, mining and manufacturing, however saw their performance going down in 2010-11 compared to 2009-10. Coming to the use-based classification, we see that all sectors, barring consumer durables, saw an improvement in performance in 2010-11 over 2009-10. And among the sectors that saw an improvement in performance, the capital goods sector stands out as its growth improved from 1ercent in 2009-10 to 15 percent in 2010-11. p As mentioned earlier, these numbers, based on the new industrial production series, reflect a much different and improved performance compared to results based on the old series.

Page | 10

Table 5 Trends in Industrial Production YOY growth in percent

2009 -10 Old Series 10.5 9.9 11.0 6.0 7.2 20.9 13.6 6.2 24.6 0.4 New Series 5.3 7.9 4.8 6.1 4.7 1.0 6.0 7.7 17.0 1.4 2010 -11 2010 -Apr 2011 Apr-

General Index Mining Manufacturing Electricity Basic goods Capital goods Intermediate goods Consumer goods Durables Non-durables

Old New Old New Old New Series Series Series Series Series Series 7.8 8.2 16.6 13.1 4.4 6.3 5.9 5.2 12.0 9.2 2.1 2.2 8.2 8.9 18.0 14.5 4.4 6.9 5.6 5.5 6.9 6.5 6.4 6.4 Use-based industrial groups 6.3 6.0 9.1 6.7 5.6 7.3 9.5 15.0 64.1 35.5 2.5 14.5 8.8 7.2 10.8 11.9 2.4 3.4 7.5 8.3 11.9 13.8 5.9 2.9 21.0 14.1 32.1 23.3 9.2 3.8 2.2 3.9 4.8 6.8 4.5 2.1 Source t CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

Coming now to the growth figures for the month of April 2011, we see that overall industrial production new series] registered a growth of 6.3 percent. This performance is much weaker [as per the compared to a growth of 13.1 percent registered in April 2010. Amongst other sectors a palpable slowdown is noticeable in sectors such as mining and manufacturing with growth slowing from 9.2 percent and 14.5 percent respectively in April 2010 to 2.2 percent and 6.9 percent respectively in April 2011. Amongst the use based industrial groups, a similar streak of weakness is seen with growth in the capital segment, intermediate goods segment and consumer goods segment slowing down from 35.5 goods percent, 11.9 percent and 13.8 percent respectively in April 2010 to 14.5 percent, 3.4 percent and 2.9 percent in April 2011.
Table 6 Trends in Industrial Production YOY growth in percent [Old Series]
Month/ Year Dec'09 Jan'10 Feb'10 Mar'10 Apr'10 Mining Mfg Electricity General IIP Month/ growth Year 5.42 5.57 7.33 8.33 6.87 17.95 16.78 15.13 15.55 16.64 Dec'10 Jan'11 Feb'11 Mar'11 Apr'11 Mining Mfg Electricity General IIP growth 5.99 2.58 10.47 4.03 6.75 3.65 7.19 7.78 6.43 4.38 CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

11.12 15.34 11.02 12.31 11.97

19.62 17.90 16.11 16.45 18.00

5.97 1.76 0.99 0.39 2.06

2.07 3.68 3.63 8.42 4.37 Source t

Table 7 Trends in Industrial Production YOY growth in percent [New Series]

Month/ Year Dec'09 Jan'10 Feb'10 Mar'10 Apr'10 Mining 7.52 11.61 8.17 11.07 9.20 Mfg 10.24 14.48 15.30 16.31 14.45 Electricity 5.45 5.55 7.35 8.33 6.53 General IIP growth 9.50 13.33 13.73 14.94 13.08 Month/ Year Mining Dec'10 Jan'11 Feb'11 Mar'11 Apr'11 5.93 1.69 0.95 0.27 2.15 Mfg 8.72 8.09 7.21 10.35 6.88 Electricity General IIP growth 5.97 8.17 10.49 7.52 6.76 6.44 7.18 8.87 6.44 6.30

Source t CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

The slow growth of the industrial sector seen in the month of April 2011 is part of a longer trend visible the close of 2010. As data given in the tables above show, industrial production numbers since have been weak for some time now and this trend is confirmed irrespective of the data series that one
Page | 11

chooses to evaluate. In fact, as per the old series, the slowdown in industrial growth is more accentuated with growth in IIP being under 5 percent in four of the last five months. If we look at the numbers for the industrial production as per the use based classification, we again seea loss of momentum in industrial production in recent months. The only point of departure between data based on the old and the new series is in the reported performance of the capital goods sector. Using the old series, we see that capital goods production has registered negative growth in three of the five months with growth in April 2011 still being an anemic 2.53 percent. However, as per the last new series, capital goods production registered a growth of 15.4 percent and 14.5 percent in the months of March and April 2011.These figures, which are not all that weak, will have to be monitored going ahead see if some trend is emerging to here.
Month/ Year Dec'09 Jan'10 Feb'10 Mar'10 Apr'10 Basic 8.35 11.47 8.53 10.79 9.12 Capital 42.89 57.93 46.68 36.00 64.10 Intermediate 23.50 22.23 15.85 13.54 10.82 Consumer Total Durable Non-durable 10.45 41.04 2.96 0.42 28.21 -7.02 6.27 29.09 -0.83 9.27 32.57 1.50 11.88 32.12 4.83 Source t CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

Table 8 Trends in Industrial Production Use Based / YOY growth in percent [Old Series]

Table 9 Trends in Industrial Production Use Based / YOY growth in percent [Old Series]
Month/ Year Dec'10 Jan'11 Feb'11 Mar'11 Apr'11 Basic 6.10 7.57 6.03 4.39 5.63 Capital -9.00 -18.06 -18.15 13.56 2.53 Intermediate 6.79 7.75 8.61 6.14 2.37 Consumer Total Durable Non-durable 3.50 19.48 -1.89 12.22 23.88 7.89 11.04 23.46 6.00 8.16 12.74 6.15 5.92 9.19 4.47 Source t CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

Table 10 Trends in Industrial Production Use Based / YOY growth in percent [New Series]
Month/ Year Basic Capital Dec'09 Jan'10 Feb'10 Mar'10 Apr'10 5.81 8.74 5.61 7.35 6.66 4.84 14.28 39.41 48.60 35.48 Intermediate 12.44 14.19 10.34 10.97 11.89 Total 15.08 18.61 16.61 12.62 13.82 Consumer goods Durable Non-durable 46.45 0.20 57.40 0.01 28.89 8.73 12.96 12.36 23.28 6.75 Source t CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India

Table 11 Trends in Industrial Production Use Based / YOY growth in percent [New Series]
Month/ Year Dec'10 Jan'11 Feb'11 Mar'11 Apr'11 Basic 7.80 7.68 5.58 6.26 7.31 Capital 20.16 5.35 -4.05 15.40 14.46 Intermediate 8.08 7.39 5.75 1.80 3.43 Total 3.57 8.23 12.13 11.67 2.87 Consumer Durable Non-durable 7.78 0.65 12.49 5.02 18.23 7.49 13.92 9.86 3.80 2.07 Source t CSO, MOSPI, Govt. of India Page | 12

It was mentioned even in our earlier report that the rising interest rates in the economy have started a bearing on industrial activity. Recent news reports indicating increase in inventories having with automobile dealers, decline in steel imports, slowdown in cement sales, fewer inquiries for purchase of commercial vehicles and build up of unsold stocks with real estate players are all symptomatic of alowdown and highlight how consumption and investment demand are responding to the evolving s interest rate scenario. Such developments have created a negative perception and depressed the confidence level of corporate India.
Table 12 Projects under implementation stalled and new projects announced
Under Implementation Stalled Nos Rs Crore 257 281384 293 337359 308 311214 330 318251 338 305545 376 272760 390 291816 389 274366 Nos 654 760 1047 1169 1178 993 982 989 New Projects Rs Crore 242061 382118 458435 572300 708103 356784 292872 252912 Source t CMIE

Qtr ending Jun 2009 Sep 2009 Dec 2009 Mar 2010 Jun 2010 Sep 2010 Dec 2010 Mar 2011

In this context it may be mentioned that once the pace of investments, which is crucial for overall growth of the economy, loses momentum, it is difficult to bring it back. Unfortunately, we may just be standing at the tipping point of such a situation. The data on projects under implementation stalled and new projects announced provided by the Centre for Monitoring the Indian Economy (CMIE) confirms pace of investments has taken a beating. As the table given above shows while the that the total number of projects under implementation stalled has been slowly inching up over the last one year, the total number of new projects announced in a quarter has been falling during the same time. When we view the trends in GDP growth and gross fixed capital formation presented in the earlier section along with the trends in industrial production and new investment intentions of corporate India, we reach the conclusion that the health of the economy is not in the best of states and that some urgent action is required to arrest this slowdown in investments. /vA(UA]vA&/CC/[Au}AvAB]vAC}v(]vA^UAuuA}(A}}A/v]AZA]v ]AZA five point strategy for the authorities to revitalize industrial and economic growth in following the country t Lower interest rates, particularly the cost of credit to SMEs. the pace of implementation of infrastructure Fasten projects. incessant rise in price of industrial inputs and raw Check the materials.with incentives offered to Continue exporters. Maintain fiscal discipline.

Core Sector
The composition of the core sector has also undergone a change with two new segments being added to the existing list of six industries. These two new segments are fertilizers and natural gas and with the addition of these segments the combined weight of core sector in IIP has increased from 27 percent to 37.9 percent. As part of this revision, weights of the existing sectors have also seen some change and
Page | 13

base year has also been revised to 2004-05. The new expanded list of sectors that now make up the core sector along with the weights attached is presented in the following table.
Table 13 Segments of the Core Sector
Segment Overall Index Coal Crude Oil Natural Gas Refinery Products Fertilizers Steel Cement Electricity Weight in the old series Weight in the new series 26.68 37.90 3.22 4.38 4.17 5.21 1.71 2.00 5.94 1.25 5.13 6.68 1.99 2.41 10.17 10.32 Source t Office of Economic Adviser, MOC&I, Govt of India

If we look at the numbers for the core sector as per the new series, we see that this sector registered a growth of 5.7 percent during the year 2010-11. This growth was lower than the growth of 6.6 percent was posted in the year 2009-10. At the disaggregated level, the sectors that saw a that weaker performance in the year 2010-11 vis--vis 2009-10 are coal, natural gas, fertilizers, cement and electricity. The remaining sectors namely crude oil, refinery products and steel saw an improvement in performance in 2010-11 over 2009-10.
Table 14 Growth in the core sector New series
2009 -10 (Apr-March) Overall Coal Crude Oil Natural Gas Refinery Products Fertilizers Steel Cement Electricity 6.64 8.12 0.55 44.59 -0.45 12.69 6.05 10.53 6.17 2010 -11 (Apr-March) April 2010 April 2011 4.62 2.84 10.97 -9.32 6.62 -1.33 4.80 -1.06 6.79 MOC&I, Govt of India

5.72 8.50 -0.30 -2.96 11.94 5.16 9.97 54.11 2.98 5.34 -0.02 7.83 8.89 12.91 4.52 8.76 5.48 6.89 Source t Office of Economic Adviser,

As the data given in the table above shows, performance of the coal sector nose-dived in 2010-11 with growth plummeting from 8.12 percent in 2009-10 to (t) 0.3 percent in 2010-11. The main reason why production in the coal sector remained almost flat in 2010-11 is the tough stance and stringent environmental norms with regard to coal mining adopted by the Ministry for Environment and Forests. Additionally, law and order problems in select mining areas of the country also had a bearing on overall coal production. Just like coal, performance of the natural gas sector also deteriorated with growth slipping from a high 44.6 percent in 2009-10 to just about 10 percent in 2010-11. This dip in growth of natural gas of production can be ascribed to the fall in natural gas production in the KG D6 basin operated by Reliance. The performance of the fertilizer sector has also been lackluster with growth slowing down dramatically percent in 2009-10 to a negative 0.02 percent in 2010-11. This poor state of affairs in the from 12.69
Page | 14

fertilizer sector can be attributed to reported shortages in availability and supply of both coal and natural gas. In case of the cement sector, the growth numbers show a drop from 10.53 percent in 2009-10 to 4.52 percent in 2010-11. As mentioned in our earlier report, this drop can be attributed to rising cost of raw materials (particularly coal) and difficulties in getting environmental clearances. Slowdown in the execution of government projects in recent months particularly in the five poll bound states has also had an impact on cement sector. Additionally, there are reports that the construction sector is facing shortages of labour and this has affected cement dispatches and production. The slowdown in growth in the electricity sector from 6.17 percent in 2009-10 to 5.48 percent in 2010- 1can mainly be attributed to poor performance in the thermal power generation segment 1 that accounts for nearly 65 percent of the total generation capacity in the country. Thermal power generation suffered a major setback during the last fiscal due to shortage of coal and delays in providing linkages to thermal plants. A considerable number of power projects were said to get fuel delayed because of uncertainty in the availability and supply of coal. The Ministry of Environment and Forest categorized 203 coal blocks as 'no go' mining zones and this has also contributed to (MoE&F) supply shortfalls. According to estimates given by Ministry of Coal, these 203 coal blocks could have generated 1.3 lakh MW of power annually, thus, helping attain the yearly target for the around year. Amongst the sectors that saw an improvement in performance in 2010-11 over the previous year, crude oil stands out as growth in this sector jumped from 0.55 percent in 2009-10 to 11.94 percent in 2010-11. This growth was driven by companies in the private sector and the joint sector and their share in domestic oil production improved from 15.6 percent in 2009-10 to 25.7 percent in 2010-11. Reliance Industries and Cairn India showed exemplary performance and contributed the maximum to this increase in oil output during the year. The latest numbers for the month of April 2011 show that there has been a perceptible decline in the performance of the core sector with growth dipping from 8.5 percent in April 2010 to 4.62 percent in April 2011. Sectors like natural gas, fertilizers, cement and steel are largely responsible for this poor performance. A positive take away from April 2011 numbers is the performance of the coal sector,grew by 2.84 percent. which

Inflation
The inflation situation in the economy continues to be a cause for concern. Despite large scale tightening of the monetary policy by the RBI and other steps taken by the government, inflation to remain close to the double digit continues mark. Data shows that WPI based headline inflation stood at 10 percent in the year 2010-11. This is not only much higher compared to the average inflation rate of 3.6 percent seen in 2009-10 but also way above ulA}v]AAZAZP}ZA the 5 percent }u}]vPA]v(o]}vAoo[A}AZAZv}uoA]v(o]}vAoo[Aby the RBI. Latest numbers on inflation are available for the month of May 2011 and these show that headline stood at 9.1 percent in May 2011. Although it is slightly lower than 10.5 percent inflation inflation P]A]vADAUA]A]A]ooA}}AZ]PZAAAZB/ [AvXAA}vAZAu}vZA}vAu}vZAP}ZA]vA WPI based inflation also shows that the underlying inflationary pressures in the economy are maintained. The month on month growth in inflation in May 2011 stood at 0.7 percent. In the previous two months t March and April t the corresponding figures stood at 0.9 percent and 0.7 percent respectively . Page | 15

(B) Non-food articles Raw cotton b. Oil seeds a. Metallic minerals (A) (B) (C) III Manufactured products (B) Beverages, tobacco (D) Wood and wood products (F) Leather and leather products (H) Chemicals and products (J) Basic metal, alloys (L) Transport, equpt and parts

81 1 . 62 1 . .5 3 . 64 1 . 7 1 . 3 .4 9 .8 1 . .4 5 08 4 .5 3 .8 2 .7

48 1 . 45 1 . .3 2 . 99 1 . 7 1 . 8 .9 7 .5 1 . .7 3 .0 4 .2 3 .4 2 .9

58 1 . 73 1 . .1 2 . 37 1 . 7 1 . 8 .6 6 .4 1 . .8 3 12 5 .2 2 .2 2 .9

53 1 . 32 2 . .2 3 . 33 1 . 7 1 . 8 .8 7 .3 1 . .9 4 .0 5 .4 3 .9 2 .8

58 1 . 31 2 . .5 2 . 98 1 . 7 1 . 5 .2 4 .8 1 . .7 5 .1 4 .3 2 .5 2 .9

08 3 . 53 4 . .7 2 . 51 1 . 7 1 . 5 .0 3 .3 9 .8 5 01 4 .6 1 .2 3 .9

57 4 . 37 3 . .5 2 . 42 1 . 3 1 . 5 .1 3 .4 1 . .4 5 14 6 .9 2 .7 3 .0

55 4 . 66 4 . .1 2 . 99 1 . 0 1 . 5 .0 1 .0 1 . .2 5 18 7 .2 2 .8 2 .7

54 4 . 75 4 . .3 3 . 37 1 . 0 1 . 5 .4 1 .7 1 . .1 4 14 7 .0 3 .2 3 .7

66 5 . 96 3 . .5 1 . 46 1 . 0 1 . 3 .3 - . .6 1 . .6 5 25 9 .5 2 .5 3 .9

44 8 . 0 .4 3 . .9 1 . 36 1 . 3 1 . 3 .3 0 .6 1 . .8 7 12 9 .6 2 11 3 .0

. 73 8 . 0 4 .0 3 . 02 9 1 . 51 8 1 . 1 . 1 . 3 .4 2 .8 1 . .6 8 15 1 . .4 3 17 3 .0 .6

1 . 73 8 . 0 .2 3 . 00 7 30 1 . 1 . 1 . 3 .2 5 .4 1 . .0 6 12 9 .0 3 .1 2 .2

1 . 2 5 . 8 4 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 1 . 1 . - . .3 7 .9 1 . .7 7 14 8 .1 3 .9 3

C}u]vPAv}A}AZAPuvA]Avo]UAAAZA ]A]vAZAZDv(A'}}[AP}A

vXA&ZUAAAZAoAA]ooUAZDv(A'}}[APuvA }AvA]v(o]}vA of 7.3 percent in May 2011. Looking at the sub-categories within this broad group, we see that sectorsfood products, beverages and tobacco, paper and paper products, rubber and plastic like products, chemical and chemical products, and basic metals and metal products are seeing significant inflation. As already mentioned, the buildup in prices in many of these industries is largely due to increasing cost pressures which manufacturers are now finding difficult to absorb. /vAA}(AZAZ&oAvAW}[UA}ooA]v(o]}vA]vA-11 stood at 12.2 percent. The corresponding figure in 2009-10 was (-) 2.1 percent. Further, as per the latest data available, this segment recorded an inflation of 12.3 percent in May 2011. Inflation in this segment is being driven by high and rising prices of items like coal and mineral oils. One may recall that petrol prices in the country are now being regularly aligned with international prices following decontrol of the price mechanism and this is having bearing on overall inflation in this broad a category. &]vooUA]vAA}(AZAZW]uA]o[APory overall inflation in 2010-11 stood at 17.7 percent. The corresponding figure in 2009-10 was 12.7 percent. Further, in the month of May 2011, this segment recorded an inflation of 11.3 percent. Although over time inflation in this segment has been showing signs of moderation and which have come on the back of inflation going down in case of food articles, the non-food articles segment has seen a trend of rising inflation. In fact, in May 2011, inflation in the non-food articles segment stood at a high 22.3 percent. High and rising prices of fibers like raw cotton raw jute are responsible for high inflation seen in case of non-food and articles. With regard to outlook for inflation in the months ahead, it may be mentioned that at least in the first half of the current year, overall inflation is likely to remain sticky at the present levels. In fact there are good chances that we may see a jump back to the double digit territory on a few occasions. And the factors that lie behind this prognosis are given below. First, international crude oil prices continue to remain high. With developments in the Middle East and North Africa region showing no signs of abatement and with OPEC countries in their most recent meeting [June 8, 2011] failing to reach a consensus on increasing their daily oil production quota, there limited chances of oil prices coming down in the near future. A slowdown in global growth in are 2011 that is widely anticipated could put a lid to international oil prices but any large scale downward revision ruled out at this moment. AAoUAAvAA]v(o]}vA is being A]vAZAZ&oAvA W}[AP}A}A}v]vXAD}}UAZ]AA }oA(ZAu}vA}vAZAP}vuvA announces decontrol of diesel and LPG prices. Second, ivAZA}vA}(A]v(o]}vA]vAZAZ&oAvAW}[APuvUA}vAuAo}AlAv}A} (AZA]]vPA coal. Recent media reports show that coal production target for 2011-12 has been cut prices of down primarily on account of rising concerns over environmental issues. Coal shortage of nearly 142 million tonnes is expected in 2011-12 and our imports this year could be as much as 114 million tonnes. Besides power generation, this situation of coal shortage does not augur well even for the price line in case of coal. Third, global food prices are likely to remain firm in the near term. According to recent reports broughtFAO, global food prices would continue to remain a concern in 2011. The FAO has warned out by that while the harvest this year would be critical, restoring market balances will take some time. Hence, we can expect upward pressures on food prices in the global markets to persist. As global food prices have a bearing on food prices in India, we have another element that is not likely to work in favour of bringing inflation down.
Page | 17

Fourth, the government has recently announced a hike in the Minimum Support Prices [MSP] for goods like paddy, soybean and corn for the upcoming agricultural season. This increase in MSP will also have a bearing on the trend in food prices in the near term. There are chances that food inflation may accelerate once the new crop comes into the market in October 2011. Given the above factors, we expect concerns on inflation to remain on the policy agenda through the year 2011. Further, with policy rate hikes by RBI having failed to deliver on the stated objective of reining in inflationary pressures and bringing down inflationary expectations, it is time that government pursues supply side measures to curtail inflation. actively

Foreign Trade
Financial year 2010-11 was exceptionally good for Indian exporters. With overall exports amounting to US$ 245.5 billion, the sector registered a growth of 37.7 percent in 2010-11 over the previous year. And this was a record growth witnessed in exports since independence. Further, when we look at the monthly data for exports for the year 2010-11 as given in the table below, see that growth in exports has been particularly strong since November 2010. While during we the period April to October 2010, exports grew at an average rate of 26.8 percent, overall growth was much in the remaining part of the year. In fact, during November 2010 and March 2011, /v] higher [Aexports at a whopping 44.3 percent on grew average. The onset of recovery in the global economy, which was led by the emerging economies, coupled with continuation of export sops announced by the government as part of the fiscal packages offered during the crisis period gave the sector the much needed impetus. The support provided by the government in the form of measures such as interest subvention of 2 percent on pre and post shipment export credit was instrumental in reviving the badly hit labor intensive export oriented industries.
Table 16 Exports and Imports in US$ billion / YOY growth in percent
Exports Imports Trade balance Petroleum Non-POL crude & items products imports imports 9.5 19.3 8.6 18.0 7.8 18.1 8.2 18.3 6.9 20.2 7.5 17.6 8.1 20.6 7.4 17.9 8.4 19.7 9.6 21.8 8.2 23.5 9.4 25.3 10.2 22.6 Export growth Import growth

20 -Apr 10 20 -May 10 20 -June 10 20 -July 10 20 -Aug 10 20 -Sep 10 20 -Oct 10 20 -Nov 10 20 -Dec 10 20 -Jan 11 20 -Feb 11 20 -Mar 11 20 -Apr 11

17.7 15.7 19.3 16.0 16.4 18.1 17.7 20.2 25.6 21.4 23.6 29.1 23.8

28.8 26.6 25.9 26.5 27.1 25.1 28.6 25.3 28.2 31.4 31.7 34.7 32.8

-11.0 -10.9 -6.7 -10.5 -10.6 -7.0 -11.0 -5.2 -2.6 -10.0 -8.1 -5.6 -9.0

ZA]]A /vA]]}vUAZAPA}(AZAP}vuvA}A}v]vAo}]vPAvAvA]AulA(}A/v] }]AAP [A }}A} exports proved to be truly rewarding. Destination wise data available for the period April}v] December a significant increase in exports to regions like Latin America, Africa and other 2010 shows A}A Asian }v]XA&}AAo}vPA]uA/v][A}AZAvA}vvA]vAh^AvAZA}vA o}AZ }v]AvA A}ZAul Page | 18 XA/v][A }A} A(]APA A

42.2 48.9 27.57 32.61 41.5 12.4 11.7 22.0 21.0 20.6 23.9 16.7 19.4 10.4 35.0 1.4 55.2 -0.3 37.5 24.4 49.7 21.1 43.9 17.3 34.4 14.1 Source t CMIE

percent, to Asia by 43 percent and to Middle East by 31 percent during April-December 2010 44.9 over the corresponding period in 2009-10. Given this exemplary performance in exports, Commerce Minister, Mr. Anand Sharma, recently indicated that India should be able to achieve exports of US$ 500 billion by the year 2013-14. He also pointed out that sectors like engineering goods, petroleum products, gems and jewellery, drugs and pharmaceuticals have done particularly well during the year 2010-11. Engineering go}AA/v] [A top exports in the year 2010-11 amounting to US$ 60 billion and registering a growth of over 80 percent vis--vis the previous year. Further, while readymade garments registered a growth of 42.9 percent in year 2010-11 over 2009-10, gems and jewellery and pharmaceuticals both witnessed a growth the of about 15 percent. Petroleum products recorded a growth of 50.5 percent in 201011. The strong momentum in exports, seen particularly during the second half of 2010-11, has continued in the year 2011-12 as well. Latest numbers available for the month of April 2011 show that exports in this month amounted to US$ 23.8 billion and represented a growth of 34.4 percent over the same month of the previous year when exports totaled US$ 17.7 billion. While this strong start in the year 2011-12 is encouraging, there are indications that this high growth not be sustained in the months ahead. And there are both domestic and external reasons may that ulAZAA(}Ao]loXA/vA(A]vA&/CC/[AoA^A}vA}UAZ]ZAA}u oA]vAZA month of May 2011, exporters indicated that going ahead their performance could weaken on account following factors of the t Firstly, the interest subvention of 2 percent on pre and post shipment credit announced to support the exporters during the slowdown owing to the crisis came to an end in March 2011. The exporters now have to pay a higher rate of interest to the banks for obtaining export credit. Further, this is happening when the lending rates are already going up following the increase in the base rates of at a time theanks and this would impact the production cost structure of the b exporters. Secondly, the DEPB scheme is finally coming to an end. As this is coming in quick succession following the withdrawal of interest subvention, the exporters are finding themselves under reasonable pressure to maintain competitiveness in the global market. Although most recent reports show that the government has agreed to an extension of the DEPB scheme by another three months i.e. till September3 UAAoPA]}vA}(AZA}]vPA}uuv]A(oAZA/v][A 2011 }AA]ooAv}A}Av}PZA and that such incentives should not be completely done away with. Exporters are hoping that during the intervening three month period, the government would evolve an alternate scheme that would support exporters. qua Thirdly, off late there has been a significant increase in exports from India to Asian countries. A} However, with inflation emerging as concern in other Asian countries as well and the central banks responding (AZA by raising interest rates, the demand in this region is likely to face some moderation. This will certainly ZA}uA]vPA}vA/v][A}Ato the Asian }vv market. A]vA&/C Fourthly, rising raw material costs and oil prices is also having a bearing on the exporters. Almost threeC/ [Ao raw material prices. The textile sector is facing the heat due to surging cotton and yarn prices, A the chemical sector is being impacted due to increasing polymer prices, processed foods segment is }A facing brunt of high fruit and vegetable prices and engineering goods are being affected by high steel the ^ Asaid 3 The DEPB scheme was to come to a close by end June 2011. However, the government has decided to extend it by another that three months. they are Page | 19 facing difficulty due to high

prices. It is also important to note that rising crude oil prices have increased the inland transportation cost and even the international ocean freight rates have moved up recently. While the aforementioned factors are likely to dampen the buoyancy seen in exports in recent times, one must also take note of the state of the global economy as this has a bearing on the performance ofv][A}XA>A]utes provided by the IMF show that global growth is expected to / moderate 2011. According to the IMF, the global economy is expected to grow by 4.4 percent in in the year the year 2011. In 2010, the global economy grew by 5.0 percent. The IMF has also indicated that the worldvolume is likely to grow by 7.4 percent in 2011 as against a growth of 12.4 percent seen in 2010. trade The general slowdown in the global economy and global trade volumes projected for 2011 is also a }v]A]lA}A/v][A}A(ormance in the current year. Coming to imports next, we see that in the year 2010-11 our imports totaled US$ 350.4 billion. This represents an increase of about 21.8 percent over ZA]}A[A]u}A}(A }Ah^AXA billion. During the year 2010-11, imports of both petroleum crude and products (POL) and nonpetroleum crude and products (Non POL) went up. While POL imports amounted to US$ 101.7 billion in 2010-1 posted a growth of 16.7 percent over the previous year, non-POL imports amounted to 1 and US$ 248.7 billion and registered a growth of 24.0 percent over the previous year. Latest data available shows that in the month of April 2011 our imports totaled US$ 32.8 billion and registered a growth of 14.1 percent over the same month of the previous year when imports amounted 28.8 billion. to US$ In the context of this rise in imports, it is important to take note of the rising international prices of oil, which have pushed our POL import bill upwardsXAKZ]A]vAuA} (A}ouAZAZv[AvAA significant increase in POL imports. Price of oil in the international market has been moving up over the year with the spot price for Brent crude ruling around US$ 113 a barrel t an increase of 45 last percent the previous year t in the last week of May over 2011. With developments in the Middle East and North Africa region showing no signs of a let up and with OPEC in its last meeting deciding not to hike the overall quota for oil production, oil prices are likely to u ]vA(]u regards non-oil imports, while a slowdown in the domestic economy could lead to some moderation in A]vAZA import bill, any large respite here can be ruled as prices of commodities other than oil the non-oil vAu are firming up. Another point to take note of is the likely increase in imports of LNG in 2011 due also XAdZ]A to Z}(ooA]vAZ/>[A<'AAo}lXAdZ]A}}A}oAoA}AvA]vA]vA/v][A]u}A]ll as imported gas ]ooA 3 times as costly compared to gas supplied by is nearly }v]vA Reliance. }AA With exports likely to come under pressure and imports showing little signs of easing in the coming the trade balance in 2011-12 could widen. months, A}vA/v ] Foreign Investments [A}o Data on total foreign investment flows into the country shows that in 2010-11, foreign investment oA}]oA]u flows India saw a dip of about 17 percent over the previous year. Further, when we look at the two into }A main]ooXAA of foreign investment, namely foreign direct investment and portfolio investment, we components see that the dip is largely on account of a slowdown seen in case of FDI. As the table below shows, FDI flowsIndia in 2009-10 were to the tune of US$ 37.7 billion and in 2010-11 this figure came down to US$ into billion. Portfolio flows, which were to the tune of US$ 32.4 billion in 2009-10, saw a marginal dip 27 to about US$ 31.5 billion in 2010-11.
Page | 20

Table 17 Foreign Investment Flows in US$ Million

Year FDI YoY Growth Portfolio Investments YoY Growth -26.8 -51.6 1,062.1 -18.1 34.1 -43.9 289.4 -150.8 -333.7 -2.8 FII* 1,847 1,505 377 10,918 8,686 9,926 3,225 20,328 -15,017 29,048 29,422 YoY Growth Total Investment YoY (FDI+ Portfolio) Growth 6,789 8,151 20.1 6,014 -26.2 15,699 161.0 15,366 -2.1 21,453 39.6 29,829 39.0 62,106 108.2 23,983 -61.4 70,139 192.5 58,495 16.6 t Reserve Bank of India

2000 -01 4,029 2,760 2001 -02 6,130 52.1 2,021 2002 -03 5,035 -17.9 979 2003 -04 4,322 -14.2 11,377 2004 -05 6,051 40.0 9,315 2005 -06 8,961 48.1 12,492 2006 -07 22,826 154.7 7,003 2007 -08 34,835 52.6 27,271 2008 -09 37,838 8.6 -13,855 2009 -10(P) 37,763 -0.2 32,376 2010 -11(P) 27,024 -28.4 31,471 * FII is included in Portfolio Investment

-18.5 -75.0 2,796.0 -20.4 14.3 -67.5 530.3 -173.9 -293.4 1.3 Source

If we look at the figures for FDI over the last few years, we see that the quantum received in 201011 the lowest in the last four years. Quarterly numbers further highlight that FDI flows in the was fourth quarter of 2010-11 were the lowest since the third quarter of 2007-08. This clear slowing down in theflow of FDI funds towards India should be a matter of concern for the authorities. Further, data on sector wise FDI flows into India for the period April to February 2010-11 shows that out of a total of top 25 sectors, 15 sectors saw a dip in FDI flows in 2010-11 compared to flows in the previous year. And out of these 15 sectors, it is sectors like services, construction activities, housing and real estate, telecommunication and agricultural services that have taken the biggest hit in terms of inflows compared to corresponding period of the previous year i.e. 200910.
Table 18 Sector Wise Foreign Direct Investment Flows in US$ Million
2010 -11 2009 -10 % change (Apr- Feb) (Apr- Feb) in 2010-11 US$ million US$ million vis--vis 2009 -10 4,184.64 2,495.34 1,009.34 1,335.70 2,703.50 2,810.18 372.83 872.88 33.64 223.43 246.27 560.23 467.39 346.19 707.93 275.21 340.65 129.49 210.39 497.91 262.71 -21.76 -43.49 30.82 -7.41 -58.97 -61.87 180.12 -12.22 1,706.12 151.70 124.75 -15.50 -13.06 10.83 -57.42 5.54 -30.17 78.88 0.54 -63.46 -36.67 Y Y Y Y Y Y % to total FDI Inflows (Apr- Feb 2010 -11) 17.84 7.68 7.19 6.74 6.04 5.84 5.69 4.18 3.31 3.06 3.02 2.58 2.21 2.09 1.64 1.58 1.30 1.26 1.15 0.99 0.91 % to total FDI Inflows (Apr- Feb 2009 10) 17.02 10.26 4.12 5.48 11.01 11.29 1.51 3.52 0.13 0.94 0.99 2.27 1.9 1.39 2.86 1.1 1.38 0.52 0.85 1.96 1.05 Y Sector

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Services sector 3,274.02 Telecommunications 1,410.14 Automobile 1,320.38 Power 1,236.76 Housing and real estate 1,109.33 Construction 1,071.64 Metallurgical industries 1,044.37 Computer software / hardware766.24 Cement and gypsum products 607.58 Petroleum and natural gas 562.38 Industrial machinery 553.49 Trading 473.39 Information and broadcasting 406.37 Chemicals other than fertilizers 83.69 3 Hotel and tourism 301.43 Sea transport 290.46 Consultancy services 237.87 Hospital and diagnostic centres 31.63 2 Drugs and pharmaceuticals 211.53 Non-conventional energy 181.94 Food processing 166.37

Y Y Y

Y Y Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Page | 21

22 23 24 25

Electrical equipments Textiles Agricultural services Miscellaneous industries

154.36 108.46 41.75 1,323.01

641.41 139.03 1,317.06 1,003.14

-75.93 -21.99 -96.83 31.89

Y Y Y

0.84 0.59 0.23 7.24 Source t SIA

2.61 Y 0.56 5.43 Y 4.03 Newsletter, DIPP

As this slowdown in FDI is happening at a time when the country is preparing plans to achieve a th target growth of 9 to 9.5 percent over the 12 Plan Period, it becomes important to get to the core of this issue and take corrective action. FDI flows are an important source of funds for us and have in the past supplemented domestic resources for meeting investment requirements in a whole host of sectors. &/CC/[s interaction with economists, policy experts and analysts shows that the emergence of other competing economies, particularly in the Asian region, could be one of the factors that lie behind this slowdown in FDI flows towards India. While this proposition requires further research, economists and policy experts concur with the view that there are tangible factors linked to India which could also be responsible for making foreign investors a little wary for committing more funds. And amongst these domestic factors, two issues stand out. First is the state of the macro-economy, which is far from comfortable. With inflation remaining high, growth slowing down due to aggressive monetary tightening by RBI and the stubbornly government throwing limited light on how the fiscal deficit target of 4.6 percent for the current year }oAAZ]UA]v}AuAZAvA}uA}APA]v}AAZ]AvAZ[Au}Abefore the domestic situation improves. Second set comprises factors such as environment sensitive policies being pursued with respect to certain sectors, slow movement on resolving the land acquisition problem and issues of governance and corruption that have been grabbing headlines and showing the country in poor light. As all of these have a bearing on the perception and confidence level of foreign investors, these may issues have FDI inflows into the limited country. In this context, it may be reiterated that completion of the much awaited FDI policy reforms in sectors insurance, defence and multi-brand retail would also give a boost to overall FDI flows into such as thecountry. Coming to portfolio investments, as already mentioned, in 2010-11 portfolio flows totaled US$ 31.5 billion and were only a tad below US$ 32.4 billion received in the previous year. FIIs, which form a major component of portfolio investments, were to the tune of US$ 29.4 billion in 2010-11 and saw little change from the figure for the previous year which was US$ 29 billion. While portfolio flows stood higher than FDI flows last year, the outlook for funds flows on portfolio account going ahead is also not too encouraging. Given continuous monetary policy tightening by the central bank, interest rates are on an upswing. Thisoupled with rising prices of raw materials is likely to have an adverse impact on the profit margins c of firms across sectors in the year ahead. As this would constrain the capacity of firms to distribute dividends, FIIs are likely to take a conservative view on India and Indian companies as they do their investment calculations. Signs of this are already emerging as in a recent survey [June return on 2011] onducted by the Bank of America Merrill Lynch amongst global fund managers, India was c placed the least favourite equity market by Asia-Pacific amongst investors. Additionally, with the RBI contemplating tightening of rules relating to exit of foreign investors and ]A]A(vAZ}AAZ]Au}vA]vA/v]vA(]uUA]v}[Av]uvAA A}A(ZA
Page | 22

weaken. The re-emergence and intensification of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe and the expected quantitative easing policy in the US by the end of June 2011 are also downside factors halt of for portfolio flows for emerging markets including India. It may be mentioned that the Finance Minister of India, Pranab Mukherjee, tried to allay fears of fund managers and foreign institutions investors focused on India at recent conference. He urged FIIs to beoptimistic about Indian growth story and to take a long term view on its performance rather getting disturbed with the short term developments and statistics. As a measure of assurance, the Finance Minister told fund managers that the government would continue to take investor friendly policies and has already started the next generation financial sector reforms such as widening and deepening of the Indian securities markets, liberalizing the policy on foreign capital flows, strengthening the regulatory and other institutional architecture and reducing transaction cost in the securities markets. These announcements however did little to reduce concerns amongst fund managers, who are looking for better management of the macro-economy and forward movement on crucial economic reforms.

Forex Reserves

/v][A(}]PvAZvPAA]vA we moved ahead in fiscal 2010-11. As data given ]vAZAoAo}AZ}UAZ]oA]vA]oAUA/v][A(} ]PvAZvPAA}oAh^ this figure had increased to US$ 292.9 billion. Most recent 279.6 billion, in September 2010 numbers show that the }v[A(}]PvAZvPAAZAZ}A A(ZA}]vPAZ US$ 300 billion mark. With this level of reserves, India is amongst the ten largest holders of foreign exchange reserves in the world.
Table 19 Foreign Exchange Reserves in US$ Million
Forex Reserves 279,633 273,544 275,710 284,183 283,142 292,870 297,956 292,389 297,334 299,224 301,592 305,486 13,671 3 Source t Reserve Bank of India

April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 Aug 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Nov 2010 Dec 2010 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 March 2011 April 2011

The increasing size of our foreign exchange reserves has drawn attention of the policymakers. As mentioned in our previous report, just some time back, Dr. Kaushik Basu, Chief Economic Advisor, Ministry of Finance, had raised the question of India to consider having a Sovereign Wealth Fund. Inmore recent times, a few independent analysts have opined that a part of these huge reserves be deployed to import commodities which are or could be in short supply in the economy. This last suggestion was made in context of managing the stubbornly high inflation by bridging the demandsupply mismatch.
Page | 23

Exchange Rate
Most recent trends in the movement of the INR vis--vis major vehicle currencies show that the Indian Rupee has depreciated against all the major global currencies. As the data given in the table below shows, the Rupee depreciated against the US$ by 1.2 percent between April 2011 and May 2011. During the same time period, while the value of the Rupee went down against the Pound Sterling by 1 percent, Z[A]]}vAP]vAZA:vAzvAA} (AA much larger magnitude t 3.8 percent. Against the Euro too we saw the Rupee becoming a little weak depreciating by about 0.4 percent between April 2011 and May 2011. and
Table 20 Rupees per unit of foreign currency (Yearly/monthly average basis)
March, 2008 March, 2009 March, 2010 2010 -11 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 Aug 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Nov 2010 Dec 2010 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 Mar 2011 April 2011 May 2011 MOM growth in May 2011 USD 40.3561 51.2287 45.4965 44.4995 45.7865 46.5443 46.8373 46.5679 46.0616 44.4583 45.0183 45.1568 45.3934 45.4538 44.9895 44.3681 44.9048 1.2 Pound Sterling 80.8054 72.9041 68.4360 68.2384 67.1747 68.6952 71.5150 72.9736 71.6578 70.3381 71.8498 70.4635 71.5394 73.2921 72.7033 72.7215 73.4310 1.0 Japanese Yen 0.4009 0.5251 0.5018 0.4763 0.4969 0.5122 0.5343 0.5465 0.5454 0.5428 0.5457 0.5425 0.5496 0.5503 0.5502 0.5334 0.5535 3.8 Euro 62.6272 66.9207 61.7653 59.6648 57.6553 56.9016 59.7636 59.9700 60.0592 61.7153 61.4981 59.6652 60.5178 62.0904 63.0314 64.2269 64.4829 0.4

Source t Reserve Bank of India

KvA}(AZA(}AZA((AZA}u]]vA}(A/v][A}A]--vis exports from other countries is the relative movement in the national exchange rates. In the following table, we provide the movement in the national currencies of select countries vis--vis the US$. The data shows that between April 2011 and May 2011, majority of the currencies analyzed have depreciated against the US$. The only exception is the Indonesian Rupiah, which has appreciated againstUS$ over the same time period. The Malaysian Ringgit did not see any movement against the the US$ during the period under study. Further, amongst all currencies that have weakened against the US$ during this period, it is the South Rand that lost the most t a depreciation of almost 2.1 percent. This is followed by the African Brazilian Real (depreciated by 1.3 percent) and the Indian Rupee (depreciated by 1.1 percent). Both the Pakistani Rupee and the Thai Baht have lost about 0.6 percent each against the US$ over the two month t pril/May 2011 t period. A

Page | 24

Table 21 - Exchange rate vis--vis USD for selected countries (monthly average basis)
Indian Brazilian Real Rupee 2010 -11 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 Aug 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Nov 2010 Dec 2010 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 Mar 2011 April 2011 May 2011 M-o-M growth in May 2011 1.76 1.80 1.81 1.77 1.76 1.72 1.68 1.71 1.70 1.67 1.67 1.66 1.59 1.61 1.3 44.50 45.77 46.56 46.87 46.57 46.04 44.42 44.88 45.17 45.38 45.46 44.99 44.39 44.90 1.1 Indonesian Rupiah 9027.33 9183.39 9148.36 9053.80 8971.76 8975.11 8928.05 8931.61 9024.20 9036.00 8916.53 8760.48 8651.30 8556.15 -1.1 Malaysian Ringgit 3.21 3.26 3.26 3.21 3.15 3.11 3.10 3.11 3.13 3.06 3.04 3.03 3.01 3.01 0.0 Pakistani Rupee 83.99 84.38 85.37 85.60 85.68 85.86 86.01 85.60 85.78 85.76 85.38 85.40 84.68 85.22 0.6 South African Rand Thai Baht 7.35 7.65 7.63 7.54 7.30 7.13 6.91 6.96 6.84 6.92 7.17 6.92 6.73 6.87 2.1 32.28 32.37 32.48 32.34 31.78 30.82 29.97 29.85 30.11 30.58 30.71 30.37 30.04 30.24 0.7

Source t International Monetary Fund

Regarding the outlook for the Indian Rupee against the US$ in the months ahead, the majority view amongst analysts and currency strategists is one of depreciation. This bearish view with regard to the Indian Rupee is based on two factors. First is the likely deterioration in the current account due to moderation in exports, continuous rise in imports and a possible slowdown in invisible receipts. Second expected slowdown in funds flows into India. While FDI flows into the Indian market are is the already slowdown mode, FII flows too are showing signs of anxiety over the evolving macroon a economicwith inflation remaining high and growth slowing down. situation

Money and Banking

Data on money supply growth shows that broad money (M3) registered a growth of 15.9 percent in the 2010-11. This growth was only a tad lower when compared to a growth of 16.9 percent year registered year 2009-10. However, it is important to note that growth in money supply in 2010-11 was in the considerably weak when compared to the growth of nominal GDP that stood at 19.1 percent. Money supply growth in 2010-11 was driven by growth seen in bank credit to the commercial sector [20.6 percent]. The other important component of money supply, net foreign exchange of assets of the banking sector, registered a moderate growth of just about 7.4 percent in 201011. Latest numbers available show that year on year growth in money supply in the period up to May 21, 2011 16.8 percent. Growth in the corresponding period [up to May 22, 2010] in the previous year was was 15.1 percent. Amongst sources of money supply, while bank credit to the commercial sector registered a growth of 21.3percent in the period up to May 21, 2011, net bank credit to the government went up by 17.9 percent. Net foreign exchange assets of the banking sector registered a growth of 7.6 percent during the same time period.

Page | 25

Table 22 - Sources of Money Supply (percentage change over previous year)

2009 -10 M3 16.9 Net Bank Credit to Government 30.7 Bank Credit to Commercial Sector 15.8 Net Foreign Exchange Assets of Banking -5.2 Sector Government's currency liabilities to the 12.1 public Banking sectors net non-monetary -1.1 liabilities other than time deposits 2010 -11 15.9 18.2 20.6 7.4 11.7 26 .9 9-Apr-11 17.0 15.2 21.1 8.5 11.7 17.9 23 -Apr-11 17.6 17.2 21.0 9.4 10.4 18.9 7-May-11 May-11 16.8 16.9 17.9 17.4 21.7 9.4 7.6 10.4 23.3 26.6 Source t CMIE 21 -

21.3

9.4

A look at the components of money supply reveals that the year on year growth in the period up to May2011 in both demand deposits with banks and other deposits with RBI has been negative. Currency , 21 with the public and time deposits with banks t the two main components of money supply t howeverseen a reasonable growth of 16.5 percent and 19.7 percent have respectively.
Table 23 - Components of Money Supply (percentage change over previous period)
2009 -10 Currency with the public 15.33 Demand deposits with banks 21.96 Time deposits with banks Other deposits with RBI 21.52 16.36 -31.08 2010 -11 19.11 -0.59 18.15 -2.58 09 -Apr-11 18.5 4.25 18.8 -55.25 23 -Apr-11 18.61 0.73 19.99 -6.92 07 -May-11 17.62 -0.32 19.47 -18.62 May-11 21 16.52 1.46 19.69 Source t CMIE

Coming now to trends in bank credit and deposit growth, we see that the year on year growth in nonfood credit in the period up to May 21, 2011 has been almost 22.1 percent. This is higher than the credit growth target of 19 percent set by the RBI for the current year. Growth in deposits in the period up to May 21, 2011 has been of the order of 17.4 percent and is in line with RBI target growth of 17 percentthe current year. These numbers indicate that the trend seen in the previous year t of for deposit growth lagging credit growth t continues in the current financial year. Of course the growth rate in deposits has picked up in recent months and to that extent eased some pressure on the banks as they worked hard to maintain their margins. Given the present credit and deposit situation, banks have been complaining of a tight liquidity situation. There has also been an evident increase in the borrowing of banks under the LAF repo facility the past few weeks. While the banks on average borrowed Rs. 20,742 crore everyday from over RBI during the month of April 2011, the average borrowing amount per day went up to almost Rs. 50,000 crore in the month of May 2011. With advance tax payments for corporates due for the first quarter of fiscal 2011-12 and further tightening of monetary policy looking likely, banks have stepped up their efforts to raise more funds. This is getting reflected in the higher borrowings seen under the LAF repo facility and higher interest rates being offered for issuance of certificate of deposits [CDs].
Table 24 Growth in Bank Credit and Deposits of SCBs (in percent)
2010 -11 21.4 32.6 21.2 15.9 9-Apr-11 21.97 3.69 22.24 17.2 23 -Apr-11 21.89 -9.07 22.36 17.9 7-May-11 22.5 12.16 22.67 17.1 21 -May-11 22.28 34.72 22.08 Source t CMIE Page | 26

Bank Credit Food Credit Non food credit Aggregate Deposits 17.4

The tightness in the loanable funds market however is expected to ease in the months ahead. And this is on account of both an expected slowdown in the credit growth rate and an improvement in the deposit growth rate. With RBI continuing with its tight monetary policy stance, interest rates in the economy have been going up and have reached a stage where these have started hurting both investment and consumption demand. Already many corporates have indicated that it is becoming difficult to fund investment plans current interest rates. Also, with demand for automobiles, commercial vehicles and at realty moderating, one can expect credit growth to taper off in the coming months. As regards deposits, in the year 2010-11 we saw that deposit growth was weak in the first half of the year and then it started going up as banks increased the card rates. Data available for the current year shows that the uptick in deposit growth continues and with deposit rates expected to remain at current levels and the outlook for the equity market being not too encouraging, banks should see greater mobilization of deposits.

Fiscal Situation
The provisional data for fiscal indicators of the central government for the year 2010-11 was released by the Controller General of Accounts during the first week of June 2011. These provisional estimates for various fiscal variables show a definite improvement over the revised estimates (RE), with a more than anticipated rise in revenue collection and reduction in expenditure during 2010-11. The striking feature new estimate is the reduction in fiscal deficit number compared to the revised estimate of the given during presentation of the union budget. This depicts the comfortable fiscal position the country in the previous enjoyed fiscal. A look at receipt trends of the central government shows that the total receipts increased by almost 37percent in 2010-11 over 2009-10. While revenue receipts, the major chunk under the receipts head, increased by 38.7 percent, non- debt capital receipts, the other component, showed only a marginal increase of 7 percent during 2010-11 over the previous year. Again, within revenue receipts, though non- tax revenue contributed less than tax revenue in absolute terms, the former showed a growth rate f a whopping 90.5 percent. This was due to the huge amount of money government raised through o auction of 3G and BWA spectrum.
Table 25 - Trends in Receipt and Expenditure of Central Government: 2010-11 (Rs. Crore)
Fiscal Indicators Revenue Receipts Tax Revenues (Net) Non Tax Non-Debt Capital Receipts Recovery of Loans Other Receipts Total Receipts Non-Plan Expenditure On Revenue Account Interest Payments On Capital Account Plan Expenditure On Revenue Account On Capital Account Total Expenditure BE RE Provisional Diff between Actuals Growth in 102010 -11 2010 -11 2010 -11 Provisional and RE 2009 11 over 09-10 -10 682212 783833 794277 10444 572811 38.66 534094 563685 572790 9105 456536 25.46 148118 220148 221487 1339 116275 90.49 45129 31745 35599 3854 33194 7.25 5129 9001 12752 3751 8613 48.06 40000 22744 22847 103 24581 7.05 727341 815578 829876 14298 606005 36.94 735657 821552 821569 17 721096 13.93 643599 726729 726767 38 657925 10.46 248664 240757 234739 -6018 213093 10.16 92058 94803 94802 -1 63171 50.07 373092 395024 377350 -17674 303391 24.38 315125 326928 312363 -14565 253884 23.03 57967 68096 64987 -3109 49507 31.27 1108749 1216576 1198919 -17657 1024487 17.03 Source t Budget Documents and Controller General of Accounts, Government of India Page | 27

Further, within tax revenue, it is the customs duty which showed a robust collection of 63.29 percent in 2010-1 2009-10 followed by excise duty (33.54), corporation tax (22.35) and service tax (22.06). 1 over
Table 26 Trends in Major Taxes of Central Government: 2010-11 (Rs. Crore)
Major Taxes Tax revenue (net) Excise duties Customs duty Corporation tax Taxes on income Service tax BE RE Provisional Actuals Growth in 2010-11 over 2010 -11 2010 -11 2010 -11 2009 -10 10 2009 534094 563685 572790 456536 25.46 132000 137778 138372 103621 33.54 115000 131800 136058 83324 63.29 301331 296377 299422 244725 22.35 128066 149066 139148 132315 5.16 68000 69400 71309 58422 22.06 Source t Budget Documents and Controller General of Accounts, Government of India

Coming next to the trend in expenditure of central government, it may be noted that the total expenditure has grown by 17 percent in 2010-11 over 2009-10, much less than the 37 percent growth in receipts. Within overall expenditure, while the plan expenditure grew at 24.4 percent, nonplan expenditure showed an increase of 13.9 percent. Excellent tax collection, buoyant non tax revenue and an effective cut down on expenditure growth helped the government to bring down the fiscal deficit for the year 2010-11 to 4.7 percent t a figure much lower than the revised estimate of 5.1 percent announced by the finance minister in his 201112 budget speech. This is again much lower than the budget estimate (BE) of 5.5 percent announced during the 2010-11 budget speech. The revenue deficit for the fiscal 2010-11 is 3.1 percent and the primary deficit for the same year is 1.7 percent. These are lower than the revised estimate of 3.4 percent and 2 percent respectively.
Table 27 Deficit Indicators of Central Government: 2010-11 (Rs. Crore)
BE 2010 -11 RE 2010 11 Provisional 2010 -11 Difference RE as % of GDP between Provisional and RE -31955 5.1 -24991 -25937 3.4 2.0 Provisional as % of GDP Deficit Indicators

Fiscal Deficit Revenue Deficit Primary Deficit

381408 276512 132744

400998 269844 160241

369043 244853 134304

4.7 3.1 1.7

Source t Budget Documents and Controller General of Accounts, Government of India

Though the deficit for 2010-11 gives a sense of relief as far as central government finance go, this moment of elation may just be short lived. Given the evolving economic situation, there is now a wide acceptance amongst economists and public finance experts that during the current year it will be toughatask for the government to rein in the fiscal deficit at the targeted budget estimate of 4.6 percent. And if the figures for central government finances for the month of April 2011 are any indication, thenprocess of fiscal deterioration may well have started already. To get a better sense of the the evolving situation we have compared the figures for April 2011 with the figures for April fiscal 2010. As the data given in the following table shows, total expenditure of the central government in the month of April 2011 stood at Rs. 87,130 crore. In April 2010, total government expenditure was to the tune of Rs. 67,226 crore. Further, under the expenditure head, we see that it is the nonplan expenditure that has ballooned from Rs. 48,206 crore in April 2010 to Rs. 70,123 crore in April 2011.
Page | 28

Table 28 Receipt and Expenditure of Central Government: April 2011 and April 2010 (Rs. Crore)
Fiscal Indicators Revenue Receipts Tax Revenues (Net) Non Tax Non-Debt Capital Receipts Total Receipts Non-Plan Expenditure On Revenue Account Interest Payments On Capital Account Plan Expenditure On Revenue Account On Capital Account Total Expenditure Apr-11 6880 3774 3106 5589 12469 70123 53087 15078 17036 17007 14408 2599 87130 Source - Controller Apr-10 12979 10062 2917 254 13233 Difference between Apr 2011 and Apr 2010 -6099 -6288 189 5335 -764

While the government has seen a surge in expenditure in April 2011, total receipts have shown a slipwith large scale moderation noticeable in (net) tax receipts.

48206 21917 47496 5591 14134 944 710 16326 19020 -2013 16121 -1713 2899 -300 67226 19904 General of Accounts, Government of India

The early trends seen in the revenue t expenditure mix also find a reflection in the deficit position of the central government for the month of April 2011. The fiscal deficit for the month of April 2011 has overshot the figure for fiscal deficit of April 2010 by a huge margin. The same trend is seen in other indicators also. It may also be noted that the fiscal deficit in April 2011 constituted about deficit 18 percent of the total estimated fiscal deficit for the year 2011-12. The situation was better during the corresponding period of the previous fiscal. A similar difference is seen in case of revenue deficit andrimary p deficit.
Deficit Indicators Fiscal Deficit Revenue Deficit Primary Deficit Apr-11 74661 60615 59583 BE 2011-12 Apr-11 as % Apr-10 BE 2010-11 Apr-10 as % of of BE BE 412817 18.09 53993 381408 14.16 160417 37.79 50638 276512 18.31 144831 41.14 39859 132744 30.03 Source- Controller General of Accounts, Government of India

Table 29 - Trends in Deficit Indicators of Central Government: April 2011 Vs April 2010 (Rs. Crore)

If the fiscal trend seen in April 2011 continues t a likely situation t then as mentioned earlier, the government will face difficulties in keeping the deficit figures under control. The fiscal target for the year 2011-1 pegged at 4.6 percent anticipating higher revenues and moderation in expenditure by 2 was the government. However, possibilities of higher receipts in 2011-12 look increasingly ambitious. All the main components under the receipts head - tax, non-tax and non-debt capital receipt - may show a moderation in the current fiscal. With no major tax changes announced in the budget for 2011-12, the government was banking on strong growth in the economy and industry, good corporate performance and a rise in wages and salaries to translate into high growth in tax collections. Now that there are clear indications of an economic and industrial slowdown and fiscal strains building up in the corporate sector, even senior government functionaries have started doubting the feasibility of sticking to the budgeted targets for revenues.
Page | 29

Union Finance Minister, Mr. Pranab Mukherjee, shared these concerns recently while addressing senior officials of the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC). He warned that the task of meeting the revenue target is very challenging and will require sustained and strategic efforts throughout the financial year. Further, CBEC Chairman, SD Majumdar, also hinted that they will have to see if a midcourse revision in revenue targets is required. Earlier, Finance Secretary, Sunil Mitra had indicated that amidst slowdown in tax collections, the Finance Ministry may go slow on disbursal of pending incomerefunds. tax While this is the case with tax collectionsUAP}vuv[A}ZAvA]]vPA}Ao]lA]}vAof the remaining 3G spectrum and disinvestment of select PSUs may also not fetch anticipated revenues as there may not be enough takers given the tough market conditions. On the expenditure front, government has estimated a very small increase of 3.4 percent in its overall expenditure for the year 2011-12. In all probability this estimate will be exceeded in the current year mainly because of expenditures under the heads of MGNREGA, food, petroleum and fertilizer subsidy. While increased wage rate will push up the MGNREGA expenditure, international price of oil and fertilizer will push up petroleum and fertilizer subsidy. Also, the food subsidy bill will see a rise with the introduction of Food Security Bill and the associated high cost that would have to be incurred for collecting and storing much larger amounts of foodgrains. Considering this mismatch in revenue t expenditures, some analysts fear that the fiscal deficit this year may eventually go up to anywhere between 6 to 7 percent. The only way to rectify the expected dent in revenue collections is to improve efficiency in tax collections. The tax departments of the government should leverage information technology tools and evolve a process wherein refunds become automatic. Further, steps should be taken to widen the tax base in the country. Today, just about 3 percent of the people in the country file tax returns. Efforts of the government should be geared towards increasing this base of tax payers and curbing tax evasion. This would automatically lead to a jump in tax revenues. Further, the government should go ahead with reforms like decontrolling diesel and LPG prices to augment revenue.

Page | 30

Performance of the Corporate Sector Q4, 2010-11

Data made available by CMIE on corporate sector performance shows that in the fourth quarter of fiscal 010-11, corporate India turned out a good performance both in terms of sales and profits. Such 2 a performance is particularly noteworthy as it came at a time when overall expenses are going up at a fast clip. AAP]vA]vAZA(}oo}]vPAoAZ}UAvAoA}(AZooA/v][A]vAZA(}ZAA}(A-11 registered a growth of 23.5 percent. This is the highest growth in net sales that we have seen in the last eight quarters. Further, while firms from the manufacturing sector saw an increase of 22.26 percent inet sales in the last quarter of 2010-11, companies from the services (other than financial) sector n sawsales going up by 27.46 percent. Further, within the manufacturing sector, growth in sales has been particularly strong in sectors such as textiles, cement, steel and transport equipment. Performance of the food and beverages sector and the chemicals sector lagged the average for the manufacturing sector as a whole with food and beverages seeing net sales going up by about 8.5 percent in Q4, 2010-11. sector
Table 1 Performance of the Corporate Sector Growth in Net Sales, Total Expenses and Profits (%)
2009 -10 Q1 All industries Manufacturing Food & beverages Chemicals Textiles Non-metallic mineral products Cement Metals & metal products Steel Transport equipment Services (other than financial) All industries Manufacturing Food & beverages Chemicals Textiles Non-metallic mineral products Cement Metals & metal products Steel Transport equipment Services (other than financial) All industries Food & beverages Chemicals Cement Metals & metal products Transport equipment 0.03 -8.83 6.83 13.6 8 15.9 4 5.96 8.00 -35.3 9 -39.7 6 16.9 6 10.7 5 2.98 -6.81 -2.14 7.61 13.7 1 -6.97 -3.12 -30.8 5 -35.4 2 21.4 5 11.7 4 4.04 2 23.4 55.9 46.1 3 60.5 8 18.0 13.7 Q4 Q2 -6.83 -14.8 9 -7.28 -5.15 13.5 1 2.54 -12.0 6 -31.6 2 -36.8 7 -1.81 3.25 6 -4.52 -13.0 2 -13. 9 0 -7.65 10.9 8 -3.53 -15.6 6 -25.7 9 -30.5 1 -3.90 3.05 9 -2.44 23.2 - 5.4 25.8 57.8 12.5 7 0 80.4 237. 7.92 Q3 5.14 7.25 -3.23 3.27 13.8 4 8.68 -11.2 3 -5.77 -14.0 5 50.2 6 3.70 3.89 3.75 -8.60 -0.34 10.3 7 1.93 -15.9 1 -2.49 -10.2 8 33.6 5 2.50 18.2 2 68.5 4.48 28.4 58.7 22.1 0 2 23.7 6 Q4 Q1 Net sales (%) 15.9 5 15.6 7 24.2 9 22.7 2 58.3 0 31. 9 7 19.8 5 14.7 7 17.6 1 13.3 9 6.66 21.1 2 -4.88 -6.51 17.4 4 19.3 4 10.5 3 16.7 0 86.0 2 61.5 2 3.67 10.4 4 Total expenses (%) 11.7 8 13.1 9 20.9 5 19.1 6 49.6 7 42. 2 3 5.16 15.0 2 18.5 8 18.5 1 0.40 39.0 8 -3.60 5.00 11.2 6 15.3 0 5.25 12.5 8 91.7 2 45.7 0 -1.60 12.1 5 PBDIT (%) 33.3 4 16.4 5 168. 45.0 8.79 149. 9.54 9.11 18.3 8.64 12.2 8.78 31.2 02 6 58 81 70 3.26 11 2010 Q2 17.7 6 19.3 9 41.16 17.4 8 7.05 32.3 8 0.54 13.4 1 15.4 7 35.2 5 19.5 1 18.0 6 18.6 3 36.8 5 30.8 7 11.9 0 40.2 0 8.79 6.82 3.83 26.0 1 21.3 9 6 130. 1. 3 30 6 2 7 44 85 60 0 Q3 17.8 1 15.6 67 23.5 9 17.2 68 22.7 8 26.8 55 26.6 3 11.5 85 13.6 1 22.7 48 21.8 0 16.5 6 14.4 88 23. 6 7 18.3 79 24.9 8 20.7 60 59.1 9 8.42 8 9.09 19.2 82 24.9 2 9 21.2 10. 64 9 39.4 34 19 3 0 23.5 0 22.2 8.49 17.8 24.6 5 30.7 43.5 4 28.8 25.2 8 22.9 27.4 23.5 2 21.6 8.55 21.2 23.4 6 42.3 48.1 2 32.6 30.0 6 17.8 31.2 8 23.1 1 1 31.7 35.3 32.5

Page | 31

Performance of the Textiles sector Q4, 2010-11

Textiles: Growth in Net Sales and Total Income
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 10 9 0 Q1 10 9 0 Q2 10 9 0 Q3 10 9 0 Q4 11 0 1 Q1 11 0 1 Q2 11 0 1 Q3 11 0 1 Q4

Net Sales Total income

Textiles: Growth in Total Expenses

40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 Total Raw material Salaries & Power & Fuel Interest Expenses Stores spares wages Expenses & purchase of finished goods Q409-10 Q410-11

Textiles: PAT / Total Income

14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 10 9 0 Q1

11.6 8.6 7.4 7.4 6.7 5.4 6.9 9.1

10 9 0 Q2

10 9 0 Q3

10 9 0 Q4

11 0 1 Q1

11 0 1 Q2

11 0 1 Q3

11 0 1 0 2 Q4 All industries Manufacturing Services (other than financial)

Textile park to come up in Punjab. A 1700 acre textile park Government for greater FDI in specialty textiles. is coming up in the Malwa region with world class facilties. Government is contemplating steps to enhance DEPB extended by three months. DEPB scheme has FDI flows in segments like technical textiles. been extended by three months and will now be availableGovernment allows additional cotton exports. till September 2011. In the interim government will work out Government has allowed exports of an an alternate duty neutralization scheme for exporters. additional one million bales of cotton in the current season.
Page | 33

Sector Updates

Performance of the Cement sector Q4, 2010-11

Cement: Growth in Net Sales and Total Income
50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 10 9 0 Q1 10 9 0 Q2 10 9 0 Q3 10 9 0 Q4 11 0 1 Q1 11 0 1 Q2 11 0 1 Q3 11 0 1 0 2 Q4

Net sales grew by 24.7 percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, growth in net sales was of the order of 17.6 percent. Export income to net sales ratio touched 5 percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, this figure was close to 2.7 percent.

Net Sales

Total income

Cement: Growth in Total Expenses

100 80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 Total Expenses Raw material Salaries & Power & Fuel Interest Stores spares wages Expenses & purchase of finished goods Q409-10 Q410-11

Cost pressures in the sector are building up. Total expenses went up by 23.5 percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, the increase in total expenses was of the order of 18.58 percent. The increasing pressure on costs is led by expenses on power and fuel and expenses on other raw materials. Outlays on interest cost and wages and salaries have also jumped in Q4, 201011.

Cement: PAT/Total Income

20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 10 9 0 Q1

PAT grew by 48.4 percent in Q4, 2010-11.

18.3 15.4 12.6 14.3 12.6 5.9 12.5

Margins have improved in the last quarter of 2010-11.

3.1
11 0 1 Q3 11 0 1 0 2 Q4

10 9 0 Q2

10 9 0 Q3

10 9 0 Q4

11 0 1 Q1

11 0 1 Q2

PAT /Total Income

Cement prices dip on weak demand, onset of monsoon. Top majors brace up for margin pressure. Cement dealers have reported a decline in prices across regions in increase in energy costs [coal] and higher Steep June 2011. Demand from infrastructure and realty sector to keep margin under pressure. freight costs expected to moderate.

Sector Updates

Page | 34

Performance of the Steel sector Q4, 2010-11

Steel: Growth in Net Sales and Total Income Net
40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 Net Sales Total income 10 9 0 Q1 10 9 0 Q2 10 9 0 Q3 10 9 0 Q4 11 0 1 Q1 11 0 1 Q2 11 0 1 Q3 11 0 1 0 2 Q4

sales have seen a strong performance in the second half of 201011 Net sales registered a growth of 43.5 percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, net sales had dipped by 4.9 percent.

Steel: Growth in Total Expenses (%)

60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 Total ExpensesRaw material & Salaries Power & Fuel nterest I Stores spareswages Expenses & purchase of finished goods

Overall expenses have shot up in Q4, 2010-11. The growth in total expenses in Q4, 2010-11 was to the tune of 48.1 percent. In Q4, 2009-10, total expenses had declined by 3.6 percent. Evident increase in expenses across all segments. Interest costs and raw material expenses are hitting the industry hard.

Q409-10 Q410-11

Steel: PAT /Total Income

15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 -5.0 -10.0 10 -2.8 10 10 -4.6 9 9 9 0 0 0 Q1 Q2 Q3 10 9 0 Q4 11 0 1 Q1 11 0 1 Q2 11 0 1 Q3 11 0 1 0 2 Q4

PAT registered a growth of 26 percent in Q4, 2010-11.

12.3 5.9

10.8 5.2

8.7

8.3

Profit margin has shown an improvement in Q4, 2010-11. However, at these levels, margins are still low compared to what was seen in 2009-10.

PAT/Total Income

Sector
Steel imports down 65 percent in April. Updates JPC to monitor prices of raw materials. Steel Steel imports are slowing down. The fall is most visible in sectors that ministry has asked the Joint Plant Committee to are hit by high interest costs t auto and construction. analyses prices of raw materials for steel Steel firms may have to pay more for coking coal imports. In manufacturing along with their impact on final the forthcoming renewal of quarterly contracts, prices for prices. steel imported coking coal could go up.
Page | 35

Performance of the Chemicals sector Q4, 2010-11

Chemical: Growth in Net Sales and Total Income
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10

Net sales registered a growth of 25.3 percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, net sales had shown a growth of 10.5 percent.

10 9 0 Q1

10 9 0 Q2

10 9 0 Q3

10 9 0 Q4

11 0 1 Q1

11 0 1 Q2

11 0 1 Q3

11 0 1 0 2 Q4

Net Sales

Total income

Chemical: Growth in Expenses (%)

40 30 20 10 0 -10 Total Expenses Raw material Salaries & Power & Fuel Interest Stores spares wages Expenses -20 & purchase of -30 finished goods -40 -50 Q409-10 Q410-11

Total expenses of companies from the steel sector registered a growth of 30.1 percent in Q4, 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, total expenses had gone up by a mere 5.25 percent. Amongst different heads under total expenses, firms from the steel sector are feeling maximum pressure on account of rising prices of raw materials. In fact, expenses on raw materials registered a growth of more than 50 percent in Q4, 2010-11.

Chemicals: PAT /Total Income

35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 10 9 0 Q1

31.3

PAT for firms belonging to the steel sector has gone up by 47.9 percent in Q4, 2010-11. Profit margin in Q4, 2010-11, has seen an improvement with a figure of 12.3 percent. In Q4, 2009-10, profit margin was to the tune of 10.8 percent.

9.5

10.7

8.4
10 9 0 Q4

11.4 10.7

10.9 11.7

10 9 0 Q2

10 9 0 Q3

11 0 1 Q1

11 0 1 Q2

11 0 1 Q3

PAT/Total Income

11 0 1 0 2 Q4

Sector
Central panel clears mega petrochemical hub in Tamil ministry supports gas price pool for fertilizers. Updates Oil Nadu. A PCPIR region has been cleared by an inter- The recommendation made by Saumitra ministerial group. It is expected to attract investments CZZ]AC}uu]A}A]uouvAZ]A worth Rs. 1 lakh crore. }}o]vP[A}(AvoAPs for fertilizer sector has (}vA}ouAu]v][A}XA
Page | 36

Performance of the Transport equipment sector Q4, 2010-11

Transport Equipment: Growth in Net Sales and Net Total Income
100 80 60 40 20 0 -20 10 9 0 Q1 10 9 0 Q2 10 9 0 Q3 10 9 0 Q4 11 0 1 Q1 11 0 1 Q2 11 0 1 Q3 11 0 1 0 2 Q4

sales registered a growth of 17.8 percent in Q4, 2010-11.In Q4, 2009-10, net sales had shown a growth of 19.9 percent. Ratio of exports to net sales has shown a decline from 7.2 percent in Q4, 2009-10 to 4.3 percent in Q4, 2010-11.

Net Sales

Total income

Transport Equipment: Growth in Total Expenses

700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 -100 Total Raw materialSalaries & Power & Fuel Interest Expenses Stores spares wages Expenses & purchase of finished goods Q409-10 Q410-11

Total expenses have shown a growth of 21.3percent in the fourth quarter of 2010-11. In Q4, 2009-10, total expenses had shown a growth of 5.1 percent. Expenses on interest costs and raw materials have seen a sizable jump during the quarter under review.

Transport Equipment: PAT /Total Income

8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 -2.0

7.2

6.9

7.1

7.2

7.1

PAT has increased by 20.9 percent in Q4, 2010-11. The margins continue to be under pressure and stood at 11.7 percent in Q4, 2010-11.

2.8 0.6
10 -1.1 10 9 0 Q1 9 0 Q2 10 9 0 Q3 10 9 0 Q4 11 0 1 Q1 11 0 1 Q2 11 0 1 Q3 11 0 1 0 2 Q4

PAT/ Total Income

Sector
Car sales grow slowest in 24 months. Passenger car sales sales slow as rising interest rates begin to Updates Truck witnessed a growth of 7 percent in May 2011, which bite. Truck fleet operators and financiers are is the slowest in 24 months. Rising interest rates and fuel costs reporting a decline in truck sales owing to rising are beginning to take a toll on the automotive sector. interest rates.

Page | 37

Performance of the Food and Beverages sector Q4, 2010-11

Food and Beverages: Growth in Net Sales and Growth Total Income
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20

in net sales has been on a downtrend over the last one year. In Q4, 2010-11, net sales registered a growth of 22.9 percent. In Q4, 2009-10, net sales had zoomed registering a growth of 86 percent on a year on year basis.

10 9 0 Q1

10 9 0 Q2

10 9 0 Q3

10 9 0 Q4

11 0 1 Q1

11 0 1 Q2

11 0 1 Q3

11 0 1 Q4

Total income

Net sales

140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 -20

Food and Beverages: Growth in Total Expenses

Growth in total expenses has moderated in Q4, 2010-11, compared to the growth seen in Q4, 2009-10. While total expenses registered a growth of 17.9 percent in the quarter ending March 2011, total expenses had grown by 91.7percent in the quarter ending March 2010.

Total expenses (%) Raw materials, stores, Salaries and wages (%)Power & fuel (%) spares & purchase of finished goods (%)

Interest expenses (%)

Q4 09-10 Q4 10-11

Food and Beverages : PAT / Total income

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 10 9 0 Q1

7.9

8.6 5.7 5.3 3.6 3.9 3.3

PAT has registered a growth of 19.4 percent in Q4, 2010-11. Not much change is seen in the profit margin levels over the last one year. These have been close to the 7 percent mark throughout 2010-11.

4.2

10 9 0 Q2

10 9 0 Q3

10 9 0 Q4

11 0 1 Q1

11 0 1 Q2

11 0 1 Q3

11 0 1 Q4

PAT /Total Income

J&K to encourage investment in establishing food and New safety law to cost India over 15,000 crore. horticulture processing units. J&K government said itThe implementation of the Food Safety and will encourage local as well as outside investments to set up Standards Rule, 2011 is likely to cost Rs. 15,000 food processing units in the state. to 17,000 crore to the exchequer.

Sector Updates

Page | 38

Growth in net sales has been on a decline over the last few quarters. In Q4, 2009-10, net sales had grown by 58.4percent. In Q4, 2010-11, growth in net sales was down to just about 8.5 percent.

Growth in total expenses has also come down over the last one year. In Q4, 2009-10, total expenses went up by 49.7percent. In Q4, 2010-11, total expenses showed a growth of 8.5 percent. The only segment where growth in expenses in Q4, 2010-11 was higher than growth seen in the corresponding period of the previous year is interest payments.

The margins of firms in this sector have been under pressure whole of last year. In Q4, 2009-10, profit margin was about 5.7percent. In Q4, 2010-11, this came down to 5.3 percent.

PAT / Total income

Charts Round up of key developments

Draft National Manufacturing Growth in IIP Growth in Manufacturing Sector Policy 25.0 20.0 A high level committee chaired by Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh has approved in principle 20.0 the 15.0 draft National Manufacturing Policy. The policy will be placed before the cabinet soon after 15.0 environment and labour concerns are resolved through inter-ministerial 10.0 discussions. 10.0 The salient features of the policy are:
5.0 5.0 0.0 To increase the share of manufacturing in the GDP from the current 16 percent to 25 percent 0.0 by 9 and in the 0process create1an additional 100 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2025 9 9 9 9 -5.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' g' 'jobs.' ' g' t , ' ' ' 'million t ' ' r 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 c p n u O ec eb r p n c ec eb r p n g t -5.0 r'create 'National Investment and Manufacturing Zones (NIMZs) with worldF class t A u A A D F A u u O D A J J p n g c p Top 'u 'u c 'ec 'eb r' 'u 'u , 'ec 'eb r' -10.0 A J A O D F A J A O D F A infrastructure facilities. The proposed zones will enjoy special policy regime, tax concessions, less stringent Old Series New Series New Series labour environment laws, Old Series and and flexible compliance norms. To set up a Manufacturing Industry Promotion Board (MIPB) at the level of Union Minister Growth in Ministries and of Commerce and Industry to Sector coordination amongst CentralElectricity Sector State Growth in Mining ensure Government and to ensure effective implementation of the policy. 12.0 18.0 To set up a Technology Acquisition and Development Fund to promote acquisition and 10.0 16.0 development of 14.0 appropriate (primarily green technologies) technologies. 8.0 12.0 To introduce policy measures to facilitate the expeditious redeployment of assets belonging to 10.0 non- iable units, while giving full protection to the6.0 v interests of employees. This will be done 8.0 through appropriate Insurance Instrument and/or Sinking Fund. 4.0 6.0

4.0 2.0 Financial 0.0

Stability Report by

2.0 0.0

RBI 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' ' ' ' ' , ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' , r r dZAZABvlA}(A/v]AvA]AuvA}(AZAZoZA}(A/v][A(]vv t ec eb r p n g t c ec eb r p n g c p p n g t c p n g t p c u u O ec eb r u u O ec eb r A u u O D F A u u O D F A A J A J A D F D F A A A A J J ]oA}A]vA]A Report, during second week of June. The highlights of the report are: Financial Stability
New Series Old Series

The global risk scenario has improved, though there are signs of a slowdown in growth during 2011in most countries, including some developing economies in Asia. Liquidity in the system remained in deficit mode given strong credit demand and high level of currency in circulation. Banks in India will face many challenges as they migrate to the advanced approaches under Basel II and prepare for Basel III. A series of stress testing in respect of credit, liquidity and interest rate risks showed that banks remained reasonably resilient though their profitability could be affected significantly.to remain vigilant to the headwinds from the prevailing inflation and interest Banks need rate situation which may affect their asset quality as changes in interest rate were found to have the most significant (negative) impact on slippage ratio of the banks. Greater access of domestic corporates to ECBs has resulted in increased currency mismatches. Many companies which have raised money through foreign currency convertible bonds could face severe funding problems in the next two years due to lackluster equity markets. According to RBI, a very large proportion of these FCCBs may not get converted into equity thus requiring their refinancing at the much higher interest rates prevalent today.

Page | 39 40

Charts
Growth : Basic Goods Segment
14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 9 0 r' p A 9 0 ' n u J 9 0 ' g u A 9 0 ' t c O 9 0 ' ec D 0 1 ' eb F 0 1 r' p A 0 1 ' n u J 0 1 ' g u A 0 1 ' t c O 0 1 ' ec D 1 1 ' eb F 1 1 r' p A 0.0 9 -5.0 0 ' r p A 9 0 ' n u J 9 0 ' g u A 9 0 ' t c O 9 0 ' ec D 0 1 ' b e F 0 1 ' r p A 0 1 ' n u J 0 1 ' g u A 0 1 ' t c O 0 1 ' ec D 1 1 ' b e F 1 1 ' r p A 15.0 10.0 5.0 25.0 20.0

Growth: Intermediate Goods Segment

New Series

Old Series

Old Series New Series

Growth: Capital Goods Segment

70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 -10.0 9 0 ' p -20.0 r A -30.0 9 0 ' n u J 9 0 ' g u A 9 0 ' t c O 9 0 ' ec D 0 1 ' eb F 0 1 ' r p A 0 1 ' n u J 0 1 ' g u A 0 1 ' t c O 0 1 ' ec D 1 1 ' eb F 1 1 ' r p A 0.0 9 0 ' -5.0 r p A -10.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 20.0

Growth: Consumer Goods Segment

9 0 ' n u J

9 0 ' g u A

9 0 ' t c O

9 0 0 0 1 1 ' ' ' ec eb r p D F A New Series

0 1 ' n u J

0 1 ' g u A

0 1 1 1 ' ' ec eb D F Old Series

0 1 ' t c O

1 1 ' r p A

New Series

Old Series

Page | 41

Charts
Growth : Headline & Core Inflation 12.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 10 r Ap 10 y Ma Core 10 n u J 10 l u J 10 g Au 10 p Se 10 Oct 10 v o N 10 c De 11 an J 11 b Fe 11 r Ma 11 r Ap 11 y Ma

Headline

Growth in Broad Segments of WPI 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 10 r Ap 10 y Ma 10 n u J 10 l u J 10 g Au 10 p Se 10 Oct 10 v o N 10 c De 11 an J 11 b Fe 11 r Ma 11 r Ap 11 y Ma
New Series Old Series

Page | 42

Charts
India's Trade (US$ billion) 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 -10.0 -20.0 Trade Balance Export Import 09 r Ap 09 09 - y n Ma u J 09 l u J 09 09 09 09 - - - g p Octv o Au Se N 09 10 - c an De J 10 b Fe 10 10 10 10 - - - r r May n Ma Ap u J 10 l u J 10 10 10 10 - - - g p Octv o Au Se N 10 11 - c an De J 11 b Fe 11 11 - r r Ma Ap

Foreign Investment Inflows (USS million) 32,000 22,000 12,000 2,000 09 -8,000 r Ap -18,000 -28,000 09 09 - y n Ma u J 09 l u J 09 09 09 09 - - - g p Octv o Au Se N 09 10 10 - - c an b De J Fe 10 10 - r r Ma Ap 10 10 - y n Ma u J 10 l u J 10 10 10 10 - - - g p Octv o Au Se N 10 11 11 - - c an b De J Fe 11 r Ma

Primary Articles

Fuel & Power

Manufactured Products

Page | 43

Direct Investment Portfolio Investment Total