Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Notes
Kalam, A.
Victoria University, 2010 No part of this material may be reproduced without permission. For enquiries and requests to access resources, contact the API University Representative on the Australian Power Institute website: www.api.edu.au - Collaborative Power Engineering Centres of Excellence.
2010
Kalam, A.
Table of Contents
Introduction: Setting the Scene Assumed Knowledge Objectives Teaching and Learning Approaches Module Resources Course Notes Presentation Packs Activities Acknowledgment Author/s and Contact Details 1. Conventional Generation 1.1 Growth of Power Systems in Australia 1.2 Conventional Sources of Electrical Energy Worldwide [1-4] 1.2.1 Fossil Fuel 1.2.2 NucLear Fuel 1.3 Power Plants 1.3.1 Fossil Fuel Power Plants 1.3.2 Cogeneration 1.3.3 Gas Turbines 1.3.4 Hydrolectric Power Generation 1.3.5 Nuclear Power Stations 1.3.6 Magnetohydrodynamic (Mhd) Generation 1.3.7 Geothermal Power Plants 2. Non-Conventional Source 2.1 Renewable and Non-Conventional Energy Sources [1] 2.1.1 Wind Power 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 5 7 8 11 13 14 16 18 19 20 21 23 24 27 27 28
2010
ii
Kalam, A.
2.1.2 Solar Energy 2.1.3 Wave Energy 2.1.4 Biofuels 2.2 Energy Storage 2.2.1 Secondary Batteries 2.2.2 Fuel Cells 2.2.3 Hydrogen Energy Systems 2.3 Cogeneration and Distributed Resources 2.3.1 The Technology 2.3.2 Electrical and Mechanical Measurements 2.3.3 Thermal Energy 2.3.4 Heat and Power Production - A Brief History 2.3.5 Why Cogeneration Now? 2.3.6 Cogeneration in Australia 2.3.7 Cogeneration Commercial Viability 2.3.8 Cogeneration - The Competition 2.3.9 Cogeneration - The Barriers 2.3.10 Conclusion Future References
29 47 49 52 52 52 68 68 69 73 74 78 79 80 87 88 89 89 90 90
2010
iii
A SSUMED K NOWLEDGE
It is assumed that you will have a basic knowledge of: Basic Circuit theory and Electricity Supply Structure. Fundamental knowledge or first two year engineering in traditional Electrical & electronic Engineering program.
O BJECTIVES
On completion of this module you should be able to: 1. Describe the physical aspects of generation systems. 2. Explain the various options used to generate electricity including advantages and disadvantages 3. Explain the generation system fundamentals
2010
Kalam, A.
Group lectures presented by the instructor using the PowerPoint Slides which are part of the module material, Group lecture discussions coordinated by the instructor, Individual study of the notes provided to review lectures and learn details required to perform activities, Individual efficiency reporting and renewable energy implementation assignments using industry templates, and Power plant visit (or viewing video of the field visit).
A set of presentation packs and activities are available in addition to the course notes as a suite of resources for this module. These are listed below and can be downloaded by visiting www.api.edu.au Collaborative Power Engineering Centres of Excellence.
M ODULE R ESOURCES
COURSE NOTES
PRESENTATION PACKS
Overview and Introduction (2 hrs) Renewable Technologies - Solar (2 hrs) Wind energy (2 hrs) Energy Storage Fuel Cells (2 hrs) Cogeneration and Distributed Resources (2 hrs) Nuclear Energy (2 hrs)
ACTIVITIES
Tutorial 1: Distribution Performance Analysis (1.5 hrs) Tutorial 2: Implementation of PV Renewable Energy for a Green Building Site (1.5 hrs)
A CKNOWLEDGMENT
The author wishes to thank Mr Chris Bailey from Delta Electricity. Also, this material has been developed with the support of API.
2010
Kalam, A.
2010
COURSE NOTES
1. C ONVENTIONAL G ENERATION
The power engineers have made maximum use of innovations (starting from a humble beginning, as shown in Figure 1.1) to deliver electricity safely, reliably and at a minimum cost to residential homes, commercial buildings and factories. The main components of an electric power system are the generating stations, transmission lines and the distribution systems. TAKE SOME TIME TO REVIEW Before you read on, think of the electricity generation and provision cycle in Australia today. List as many Australian electricity companies as you can against each of the supply phases below:
Phases Generations
Transmission
Distribution
Retail
Figure 1.2 shows a sketch of a typical power system. With the increase in demand for electricity more larger and economical generating units are being built with further transmission of large chunk of power from the generating plants to major load centres.
2010
Kalam, A.
The generation system includes the main parts of the power plants such as turbines and generators. The energy resources used to generate electricity in most power plants are combustible, nuclear, or hydropower. The burning of fossil fuels or a nuclear reaction generates heat that is converted into mechanical motion by the thermal turbines. In hydroelectric systems, the flow of water through the turbine converts the kinetic energy of the water into rotating mechanical energy. These turbines rotate the electromechanical generators that convert the mechanical energy into electric energy.
2010
Kalam, A.
The power system is extensively monitored and controlled. It has several levels of protections to minimize the effect of any damaged component on the system ability to provide safe and reliable electricity to all customers.
1.1 GROWTH OF POWER SYSTEMS IN AUSTRALIA
With the tremendous growth in the Australian power system industry, there has been a substantial employer demand for people with education and training in power systems and renewable energy integration. Manufacturing industries, mining sectors and power generation, transmission and distribution companies are among the employers continually seeking skilful power system engineers. Electricity Gas Australia (EGA) 2009 reports comprehensive capacity and performance data for the electricity and gas industries in 2007-08. EGA 2009 data shows that over 1,900 MW of electricity generation capacity has been commissioned in the period since June 2008, including the 640 MW Uranquinty and 435 MW Tallawarra gas-fired power stations in NSW and the 320 MW Kwinana power station in WA. A further 5,100 MW of capacity is under construction, mostly comprising gas-fired peaking plant and wind capacity, and another 2,000 MW of capacity is also under advanced planning to meet growing demand over the next five years. In terms of gas supply, in 2007-08 there was approximately 110,000 kilometres of gas transmission and distribution pipelines in Australia, with a further 467 kilometres of pipeline commissioned since June 2008. An additional 1,900 kilometres of new pipeline infrastructure was also under development.
Other highlights from Electri city Gas Australia 2009 include: in 2007-08, the electricity supply industry contributed $13.8 billion to Australias GDP of $1,037 billion, a 2.7% increase in the gross value added by the industry on 2006-07; in 2007-08, the downstream gas industry contributed $1.6 billion to GDP, an increase of 3.1% in the gross value added compared to 2006-07; an 18% reduction in the system average minutes without supply (SAIDI) to 231 minutes across Australia and a decrease in the number of interruptions per customer (SAIFI) from 2.28 in 2006-07 to 2.04 in 2007-08; and an improvement in the safety performance of the electricity generation sector.
Australia is heavily dependent on coal for electricity, more so than any other developed country except Denmark and Greece. About 80% is derived from coal. Australia's electricity is low-cost by world standards. Natural gas is increasingly used for electricity, especially in South Australia (SA) and Western Australia (WA).
2010
Kalam, A.
Electricity consumption in Australia has been growing at nearly double the rate of energy use overall. Electricity generation takes 44% of Australia's primary energy, and in terms of final energy consumption, electricity provides 24% of the total.
1.2 CONVENTIONAL SOURCES OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY WORLDWIDE [1-4]
WHICH DO YOU THINK TOPS THE LIST? Try and have a go at ranking each energy source from highest usage (1) to lowest usage (11) at todays rates.
As shown in Figure 1.3, worldwide conventional energy resources are often divided into three loosely defined categories: 1. Fossil fuel 2. Nuclear fuel 3. Renewable resources Fossil fuels include oil, coal, and natural gas. Renewable energy resources include hydropower, wind, solar, hydrogen, biomass, tidal, and geothermal. All these resources can also be classified as primary and secondary resources. The primary resources are: 1. Fossil fuel 2. Nuclear fuel 3. Hydropower The secondary resources include all renewable energy minus hydro power. Over 99% of all electric energy worldwide is generated from primary resources. The secondary resources, although increasing rapidly, have not yet achieved a level comparable to the primary resources.
2010
Kalam, A.
The worldwide generation capacity from 2005-2030 is shown in Figure 1.4. As can be seen from Figure 1.5, most electrical energy is generated by oil, coal, and natural gas. Hydroelectric energy is limited to about 6% of the world's electrical energy because of the limited water resources suitable for generating electricity. Nuclear energy is only 6% of the total electrical energy because of the public resistance to building new nuclear facilities in the past 20 years.
2010
Kalam, A.
Figure 1.4: World Electricity Generation by fuel, 2005-2030. (Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA), International Energy Annual 2005; http://www.eia.doe.gov/iea)
2010
10
Kalam, A.
As can be seen from Figure 1.6, there is a tremendous increase in the Asian capacity is due to the accelerated installation of power plants to support the societal needs and the rapid industrial developments in the region, particularly in China and India. This tremendous increase in energy consumption in China and India is due to its recent industrial developments and the enhancement in its standard of living.
Fossil fuels are formed from fossils (dead plants and animals) buried in the earth's crust for millions of years under pressure and heat. They are composed of high carbon and hydrogen elements such as oil, natural gas, and coal. Further, because the formation of fossil fuels takes millions of years, they are considered non-renewable. Since the start of the Industrial Revolution in the nineteenth century, the world is dependent on fossil fuels for its energy needs. The bulk of fossil fuels are used in transportation, industrial processes, generating electricity as well as residential and commercial heating. The use of fossil fuel to generate electricity is always a subject of hot debate. Burning fossil fuels causes a wide range of pollution that includes the release of carbon dioxide, sulphur oxides, and the formation of nitrogen oxides. These are harmful gases that cause some health and environmental problems. Also, the availability and prices of fossil fuels are vulnerable to world politics. Oil production and distribution are often interrupted during wartimes and due to political tensions between nations. Natural Gas According to Oil and Gas Journal, Australia had 30 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of proven natural gas reserves as of January 2009. Around 69% of those natural gas reserves are located off the western coast in the Carnarvon Basin. Other important fields are the Cooper/Eromanga Basin (8%) in central
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 11
Kalam, A.
Australia and the Bass/Gippsland Basin (20%) offshore southern Australia. The remainder comes from scattered small fields off the southern coast and in the central regions. Oil Oil (also referred to as petroleum) is the most widely used fossil fuel worldwide. Petroleum is extracted from fields with layers of porous rocks filled with oil. According to Oil and Gas Journal (OGJ), Australia had 1.5 billion barrels of proven oil reserves as of January 1, 2009. The majority of these reserves are located off the coasts of Western Australia, the Northern Territory, and Victoria. The Carnarvon Basin accounts for 62% of Australia's production of crude oil, condensate and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Coal Coal is a combustible rock of organic origin composed mainly of carbon (50-98%), hydrogen (3-13%) and oxygen with lesser amounts of nitrogen, sulphur and other elements. Some water is always present, as are grains of inorganic matter that form an incombustible residue known as ash. Black coal is so called because of its black colour. It varies from having a bright, shiny lustre to being very dull and from being relatively hard to soft. It has higher energy and lower moisture content than brown coal. Most are of Permian age (about 250 million years old), but lower-rank, younger deposits of Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous ages also are important. Permian black coal from New South Wales and Queensland is exported in large quantities to Japan, Europe, South-East Asia, and the Americas. The major use of black coal is for generating electricity in power stations where it is pulverised and burnt to heat steam-generating boilers. Coal used for this process is called steaming coal. In 2006, 77% of the electricity generated in Australia was produced by coal fired power stations (includes black and brown coals). Brown coal, sometimes called lignite, is a relatively soft material which has a heating value only about one-quarter of that for black coal. It has much lower carbon content than black coal and higher moisture content. When found near the surface in thick seams, it can be mined economically on a large scale by open-cut methods. In Victoria, almost all of the brown coal extracted is burnt to heat steam-generating boilers in electrical power stations located near the coal mines. It is also made into briquettes, which are used for industrial and domestic heating in Australia and are exported. Brown coal can be used also to produce water gas, which is used in the production of ammonia, solvents and liquid fuels. Water gas also can be a source of industrial carbon which is used to decolourise and purify solutions and (as char) in iron, glass, and cement manufacture. As of 2008, Australia contained 84 billion short tons (Bst) of recoverable coal reserves. Australia is the world's fourth largest coal producer, after China, the United States, and India, but it is the largest net exporter.
2010
12
Kalam, A.
Nuclear fuel is heavy nuclear material that releases energy when its atoms are forced to split and in the process, some of its mass is lost. The nuclear fuel used to generate electricity is mostly uranium (U), but plutonium (Pu) is also used. Uranium is found in nature and contains several isotopes. Natural uranium is almost entirely a mixture of three isotopes: 234U, 235U, and 238U, where the left superscripts indicate the atomic mass of the isotopes. The concentration of these isotopes in natural uranium is 99.2% for 238U and 0.7% for 235U. However, only 235U can fission in nuclear reactors. Since the concentration of 235U in uranium ores is very low (0.7%), an enrichment process is used to increase its concentration in nuclear fuel. For nuclear power plants, 235U concentration is about 35%, and for nuclear weapons, it is over 90%. The world consumption of nuclear fuel in 2006 is shown in Figure 7. Europe and the United States led the world in the amount of nuclear fuel used to generate electricity. The United States alone consumed about one-third of nuclear fuel in 2006.
2010
13
Kalam, A.
WHICH ONE REALLY TIPS THE SCALE? Australia is a large scale economy which relies heavily on its natural coal resource in terms of its GDP. Despite this, which fuel source discussed above would be ideal in light of the economic, environmental and social benefits that its usage may bring? Think of the justifications for your choice. Note down your answer here
At the power plant, energy resources such as coal, oil, gas, hydropower, or nuclear power are converted into electricity. The main parts of the power plant are the burner (in fossil plants), the reactor (in nuclear power plants), the dam (in a hydroelectric plant), the turbine, and the generator. Power plants can be huge in size and capacity. Although power plants are enormous in mass, they are delicately controlled. A slight imbalance between the input power of the turbine and the output electric power of the generator may cause a blackout unless rapidly corrected. To avoid blackouts, the massive amount of water or steam inside the plant must be tightly controlled at all times, which is an enormous challenge to mechanical and structural engineers. The largest single-block power station in Australia is a 750MW supercritical-steam coal-fired power station at Kogan Creek, near Chinchilla in Queensland (Figure 1.8). The A$1.1bn project started up in 2007. The plant was built by an international consortium that included Babcock-Hitachi and was led by Siemens Power Generation (PG). Kogan Creek delivers its electricity to the National Grid by joining into the Queensland to New South Wales Interconnector at Braemar Creek substation. The plant operates as a base load station, generating electricity continuously.
2010
14
Kalam, A.
Turbines The function of the turbine is to rotate the electrical generator by converting the thermal energy of the steam or the kinetic energy of the water into rotating mechanical energy. There are two types of turbines: thermal and hydroelectric. Figure 1.9 shows a model of a hydroelectric turbine commissioned at Wellington Dam near Collie. It consists of blades mounted on a rotating shaft and curved to capture the maximum kinetic energy from the water. The angle of the blade can be adjusted in some types of turbines for better control on its output mechanical power.
In thermal power plants, fossil fuels or nuclear reactions are used to produce steam at high temperatures and pressures. The steam is passed through the blades of the thermal turbine, and causes the turbine to rotate. The steam flow is controlled by several valves at critical locations to ensure that the turbine is rotating at precise speed.
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 15
Kalam, A.
Generators There are two distinct types of construction of power station synchronous generators: salient pole rotor and cylindrical rotor machines. Hydro-generators usually have salient pole rotors with vertical shafts and rotate slower than the other generators. The thermal generators typically have cylindrical rotors supported horizontally. The prime mover of a hydro-generator is a water turbine. The turbogenerators in most of the large thermal power stations supplying the base load for the power grid are driven by steam turbines. Other generators may be driven by gas turbines, diesel motors or other turbines/motors. Conventional Sources of Electric Energy - Australia Thermal (coal, oil, nuclear) and hydro generations are the main conventional sources of electric energy. The necessity to conserve fossil fuels has forced scientists and technologists across the world to search for unconventional sources of electric energy. Some of the sources being explored are solar, wind and tidal sources. The conventional and some of the unconventional sources and techniques of energy generation are briefly surveyed here with a stress on future trends, particularly with reference to the Australian electric energy scenario. A table of various power plants according to the type (i.e. fossil fuel, nuclear, gas turbines, etc. is shown in Table 1. Table 1: Examples of Power Plants According to Type
Generation Type Fossil fuel power plants Generator Company Tarong Power Corporation, Queensland, Australia Stanwell Corporation, Queensland, Australia CS Energy, Queensland, Australia Indian Petrochemicals, Gandhar, India Tallawarra power station, NSW Australia Barron Gorge - Stanwell Corporation, Queensland, Australia Gordon River - Hydro Tasmania, Australia Tricastin Nuclear Power Plant, France U-25 MHD Power Plant, Moscow Institute of High Temperature, Russia Birsdville Cycle Plant, Queensland, Australia Mammoth Pacific binary geothermal power plants at the Casa Diablo geothermal field, USA CalEnergy Navy I flash geothermal power plant at the Coso geothermal field, USA Coopers Basin - is a sedimentary geological basin located mainly in the north-east part of South Australia and extends into south-west Queensland.
Cogeneration Gas turbines Hydorelectric power generation Nuclear Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) generation Geothermal power plants
Fossil power plants (coal, oil, or natural gas) utilize the thermal cycle described by the laws of thermodynamics to convert heat energy into mechanical energy. This conversion, however, is highly
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 16
Kalam, A.
inefficient as described by the second law of thermodynamics where a large amount of the heat energy must be wasted to convert the rest into mechanical energy. The heat released during the combustion of coal, oil or gas is used in a boiler to raise steam. In Australia, heat generation is mostly coal (black or brown) based. Hence, discussion is confined to coal-fired boilers for raising steam to be used in a turbine for electric generation. The chemical energy stored in coal is transformed into electric energy in thermal power plants. The heat released by the combustion of coal produces steam in a boiler at high pressure and temperature, which when passed through a steam turbine, gives off some of its internal energy as mechanical energy. The axial-flow type of turbine is normally used with several cylinders on the same shaft. The steam turbine acts as a prime mover and drives the electric generator (alternator). A detailed diagram of a coal fired thermal plant is shown in Figure 1.10. The efficiency of the overall conversion process is poor and its maximum value is about 40% because of high heat losses in the combustion gases and the large quantity of heat rejected to the condenser which has to be given off in cooling towers or into a stream/lake in the case of direct condenser cooling. The steam power station operates on the Rankine cycle, modified to include superheating, feed-water heating, and steam reheating. The thermal efficiency (conversion of heat to mechanical energy) can be increased by using steam at the highest possible pressure and temperature. With steam turbines of this size, additional increase in efficiency is obtained by reheating the steam after it has been partially expanded by an external heater. The reheated steam is then returned to the turbine where it is expanded through the final states of bleeding.
To take advantage of the principle of economy of scale (which applies to units of all sizes), the trend has always been to go for larger sizes of units. Larger units can be installed at much lower cost per
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 17
Kalam, A.
kilowatt. They are also cheaper to operate because of higher efficiency. They require lower labour and maintenance expenditure. There may be a saving of as high as 15% in capital cost per kilowatt by going up from a 100 to 250 MW unit size and an additional saving in fuel cost of about 8% per kWh. Since larger units consume less fuel per kWh, they produce less air, thermal and waste pollution, and this is a significant advantage in our concern for environment. The only trouble in the case of a large unit is the tremendous shock to the system when outage of such a large capacity unit occurs. This shock can be tolerated so long as this unit size does not exceed 10% of the online capacity of a large grid. Although coal-fired power plants are simple in design and easy to maintain, they are major producers of pollution. Carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrous oxides (NOx), soot, and ashes are some of the by-products of coal combustion. In fact, coal burning by power plants and industries is responsible for 30%-40% of the total C02 in the air. In older and unregulated plants, most of these pollutants are vented through the stack. However, with newer technologies, large amounts of the pollutants are trapped by filters or removed from the coal before it is burned. Examples of the pollution reduction measures that are taken in most coal-fired plants include the following (see http://www.acarp.com.au/abstracts.aspx?repId=C19007): Coal is chemically treated to remove most of its sulphur before it is burned. Filters are used to remove the particulate (primarily fly ash) and some of the exhaust gases from the boilers. There are various types of filters; among them are the wet scrubber system and the fabric filter system (example: http://www.tri-mer.com/fabric-filters.html). With the wet scrubber, the exhaust gas passes through liquid, which traps flying particulate and SO2 before the gas is vented through the stacks. The fabric filter system works like a vacuum cleaner where the particulates are trapped in bags. Collected fly ash can be processed into other industrial products: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxXx3fkE5h4&feature=related. SO2 is removed by its own scrubber system. NOx are reduced by upgrading the boilers to low NOx burners. CO2 removal is too expensive to implement and not all power plants use a CO2 scrubber system.
Air and thermal pollution is always present in a coal fired steam plant. The air polluting agents (consisting of particulates and gases such as NOx, CO, CO2, SO2, etc.) are emitted via the exhaust gases and thermal pollution is due to the rejected heat transferred from the condenser to cooling water. Cooling towers are used in situations where the stream/lake cannot withstand the thermal burden without excessive temperature rise. The problem of air pollution can be minimized through scrubbers and electro-static precipitators and by resorting to minimum emission dispatch.
1.3.2 COGENERATION
Considering the tremendous amount of waste heat generated in thermal power generation, it is advisable to save fuel by the simultaneous generation of electricity and steam (or hot water) for industrial use or space heating. Now called trigeneration/ecogeneration, such systems have long been common. Currently, there is renewed interest in these because of the overall increase in energy efficiencies which are claimed to be as high as 70%.
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 18
Kalam, A.
Cogeneration of steam and power is highly energy efficient and is particularly suitable for chemicals, paper, textiles, food, fertilizer and petroleum refining industries. Thus these industries can solve energy shortage problem in a big way. Further, they will not have to depend on the grid power. One advantage with the restructure of the electricity supply industry is that extra power can be sold. There are two possible ways of cogeneration of heat and electricity: (i) Topping cycle, (ii) Bottoming cycle. In the topping cycle, fuel is burnt to produce electrical or mechanical power and the waste heat from the power generation provides the process heat. In the bottoming cycle, fuel first produces process heat and the waste heat from the processes is then used to produce power. Coal-fired plants share environmental problems with some other types of fossil-fuel plants; these include "acid rain" and the "greenhouse" effect. Figure 1.11 illustrates an example of a cogeneration plant producing electricity and heat.
Figure 1.11: Example of a KMW Energy cogeneration plant for the production of electricity and district heating, with corresponding environmental systems (Source: http://www.kmwenergi.se/english/page.asp?PageId=156).
With increasing availability of natural gas (methane) prime-movers based on gas turbines have been developed on the lines similar to those used in aircraft. Gas combustion generates high temperatures and pressures, so that the efficiency of the gas turbine is comparable to that of steam turbine. Additional advantage is that exhaust gas from the turbine still has sufficient heat content, which is used to raise steam to run a conventional steam turbine coupled to a generator. This is called
2010
19
Kalam, A.
combined-cycle gas-turbine (CCGT) plant. The schematic diagram of such a plant is drawn in Figure 1.12.
The $A350 million Tallawarra power station, located near Wollongong, uses the combined cycle principle. This station is built on a 16 hectare parcel of land that was previously the site of a 320 MW coal plant. This is one of Australias most environmentally efficient fossil fuel-fired power stations, producing 70% less carbon dioxide emissions than some coal-fired power stations.
1.3.4 HYDROLECTRIC POWER GENERA TION
The oldest and cheapest method of power generation is that of utilizing the potential energy of water. The energy is obtained almost free of running cost and is completely pollution free. Of course, it involves high capital cost because of the heavy civil engineering construction works involved. Also it requires a long gestation period of about 5-8 years as compared to 4-6 years for steam plants. Hydroelectric stations are designed, mostly, as multipurpose projects such as river flood control, storage of irrigation and drinking water, and navigation. A simple schematic diagram of a hydro plant is shown in Figure 1.13. The vertical difference between the upper reservoir and tail race is called the head.
2010
20
Kalam, A.
Figure 1.13: Schematic for a storage type hydro plant (Source: Tennessee Valley Authority).
Hydro plants are of different types such as run-of-river (use of water as it comes), pondage (medium head) type, and reservoir (high head) type. The reservoir type plants are the ones which are employed for bulk power generation. Often, cascaded plants are also constructed, i.e., on the same water stream where the discharge of one plant becomes the inflow of a downstream plant.
1.3.5 NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS
From the availability point of view, nuclear fuel is the most abundant source of energy. The common fuel for nuclear power plants is uranium; an atom of uranium produces about 107 times the energy produced by an atom of coal. In the United States, there are over hundreds of commercial nuclear power plants in operation generating about 20% of the total electric energy. Worldwide, there are about 400 power plants generating as much as 70% of the energy demand in nations such as France. However, because of public concern, few new nuclear power plants have been constructed in the United States, and several are expected to be retired in the near future. However, with the demand of electricity, public support for nuclear power is growing and the new trend may be to have more nuclear fired power stations. Just as many conventional thermal power stations generate electricity by harnessing the thermal energy released from burning fossil fuels, nuclear power plants convert the thermal energy released from nuclear fission. The reactor is used to convert nuclear (also known as 'atomic') energy into heat. A reactor could also be one in which heat is produced by fusion or radioactive decay. Nuclear power plants can generate electricity by one of two methods: "Fission" is the splitting of heavy nuclei element such as uranium, plutonium, or thorium into many lighter elements. By this process, mass is converted into energy. Fission power plants have two main designs: boiling water reactor (BWR) and pressurized water reactor (PWR). About two
2010
21
Kalam, A.
third of the nuclear reactors are pressurized water reactors (Figure 1.14), and almost all of the commercial nuclear power plants worldwide are fission reactors. "Fusion" is a process by which two lighter elements are combined into a heavier element. The fusion technique is in the research stages and not yet fully developed for commercial power plants.
Figure 1.14: Nuclear power plant-pressurized water reactor (Source: Steffen Kuntoff http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/File:Nuclear_power_plant-pressurized_water_reactor-PWR.png).
The associated merits and problems of nuclear power plants as compared to conventional thermal plants are mentioned below: Merits 1. A nuclear power plant is totally free of air pollution. 2. It requires little fuel in terms of volume and weight, and therefore poses no transportation problems and may be sited, independently of nuclear fuel supplies, close to load centres. However, safety considerations require that they be normally located away from populated areas. Demerits 1. Nuclear reactors produce radioactive fuel waste, the disposal of which poses serious environmental hazards.
2010
22
Kalam, A.
2. The rate of nuclear reaction can be lowered only by a small margin, so that the load on a nuclear power plant can only be permitted to be marginally reduced below its full load value. Nuclear power stations must, therefore, be reliably connected to a power network, as tripping of the lines connecting the station can be quite serious and may required shutting down of the reactor with all its consequences. 3. Because of relatively high capital cost as against running cost, the nuclear plant should operate continuously as the base load station. Wherever possible, it is preferable to support such a station with a pumped storage scheme. 4. The greatest danger in a fission reactor is in the case of loss of coolant in an accident. Even with the control rods fully lowered quickly called scram operation, the fission does continue and its after-heat may cause vaporizing and dispersal of radioactive material.
In thermal generation of electric energy, the heat released by the fuel is converted to rotational mechanical energy by means of a thermocycle. The mechanical energy is then used to rotate the electric generator. Thus two stages of energy conversion are involved in which the heat to mechanical energy conversion has inherently low efficiency. Also, the rotating machine has its associated losses and maintenance problems. In MHD technology, electric energy is directly generated by the hot gases produced by the combustion of fuel without the need for mechanical moving parts. In a MHD generator, electrically conducting gas at a very high temperature is passed in a strong magnetic field, thereby generating electricity. High temperature is needed to ionize the gas, so that it has good electrical conductivity. The conducting gas is obtained by burning a fuel and injecting seeding materials such as potassium carbonate in the products of combustion. The principle of MHD power generation is illustrated in Figure 1.15. About 50% efficiency can be achieved if the MHD generator is operated in tandem with a conventional steam plant.
2010
23
Kalam, A.
Though the technological feasibility of MHD generation has been established, its economic feasibility is yet to be demonstrated. In 1986, Professor Messerle at The University of Sydney researched coalfueled MHD. This resulted in a 28 MWe topping facility that was operated outside Sydney. Although many countries like US, Italy, Japan and China have researched on MHD power generators, but only India and Russia have kept up their interest on MHD development.
1.3.7 GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANTS
(Source: http://www.ga.gov.au/image_cache/GA10663.pdf) Geothermal energy is the heat contained within the Earth and it can be used to generate electricity by utilising two main types of geothermal resources (Figure 1.16). Hydrothermal resources use naturally-occurring hot water or steam circulating through permeable rock, and Hot Rock resources produce super-heated water or steam by artificially circulating fluid through the rock. Electricity generation from geothermal energy in Australia is currently limited to an 80kW net power plant at Birdsville in south west Queensland. However, this is likely to change in the future as Hot Rock power plants become increasingly commercially viable. Worldwide there has been some use of geothermal energy in the form of steam coming from underground in the USA, Italy, New Zealand, Mexico, Japan, Philippines and some other countries. The present installed geothermal plant capacity in the world is about 500 MW and the total estimated capacity is immense provided heat generated in the volcanic regions can be utilized. Since the pressure and temperatures are low, the efficiency is even less than the conventional fossil fuelled plants, but the capital costs are less and the fuel is available free of cost. Potential Advantages of Geothermal Power Generation in Australia Baseload and peaking capability: Geothermal power-plants can operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year and are unaffected by climatic factors. Low CO2 emissions: Binary geothermal power plants could be zero-emission (no CO2 or oxides of nitrogen and sulphur). High availability factors: Binary power plants can usually produce electricity for 95% of the time. Low environmental impacts: No acid rain, mine spoils, open pits, oil spills, radioactive wastes, or damming of rivers. Binary power plants occupy small land areas. Increased energy security: Geothermal is an indigenous supply of energy, providing energy supply and pricing security.
Existing Geothermal Power in Australia The only existing geothermal power generation in Australia is a small, 80kW net binary-cycle plant at Birdsville in south west Queensland. This power plant utilises a low-temperature hydrothermal-type geothermal resource, accessing 98C groundwater from a 1,230 metre deep artesian bore that taps a confined aquifer in the underlying Great Artesian Basin. The Great Artesian Basin spans 22% of the Australian continent and has groundwater temperatures ranging from 30C to 100C at well heads.
2010
24
Kalam, A.
Figure 1.16: Geological settings of hydrothermal and Hot Rock geothermal systems in Australia.
Future Electricity Generation in Australia using Geothermal Energy Australia has an abundance of high-heat producing basement rocks buried under sediments. In 2007, 29 companies had applied for geothermal exploration licenses in Australia, and five companies had begun drilling potential sites in South Australia. These are: Geodynamics Limited (Habanero project near Innamincka); Petratherm (Paralana and Callabonna projects); Green Rock Energy Limited (Blanche project); Geothermal Resources (Lake Frome project); and Scopenergy Limited (project near Millicent and Beachport).
2010
25
Kalam, A.
Geodynamics Limited is aiming to have a 40MW commercial-scale demonstration plant providing electricity to the National Electricity Grid by the end of 2010.
2010
26
Kalam, A.
2. N ON -C ONVENTIONAL S OURCE
With rising concerns regarding global warming and the associated impacts upon climate changes and sea levels, the increasingly rapid depletion of fossil fuel resources and the desire to maximize security of fossil supply, the clean, non-polluting and sustainable nature of renewable energy is assuming increasing importance. Governments, utilities, financial institutions and industry are taking a growing interest in promoting the integration of renewable energy (like solar, wind etc.) into their generating systems and investment portfolio. Throughout Australia, government policies are in place requiring to minimise energy consumption by 15% and purchase 5% of their total consumption from Green Power supplies. In order to assess the range of renewable energy options that can be integrated in any potential site the following actions are required: Identify and propose potential energy systems that can be integrated. Provide sufficient detail that the project may proceed with detailed design of proposed system. Ensure the final proposal is visible, innovative and promotes the project credentials.
The key project parameters for any sustainable energy proposal are: The renewable energy system should be designed to generate electricity. A total budget for entire project (investigation, detailed design, construction and commissioning) should be specified. The system should comprise of proven technology. The system should be visible and marketable. Potential to be used as a demonstrative project and educational tool for the public.
To protect environment and for sustainable development, the importance of renewable energy sources cannot be overemphasized. It is an established and accepted fact that renewable and nonconventional forms of energy will play an increasingly important role in the future as they are cleaner and easier to use and environmentally benign and are bound to become economically more viable with increased use. Because of the limited availability of coal, there is considerable international effort into the development of alternative/new/non-conventional/renewable/clean sources of energy. Most of the new sources (some of them in fact have been known and used for centuries now!) are nothing but the manifestation of solar energy, e.g., wind, sea waves, ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) etc.
2010
27
Kalam, A.
In this section, we shall discuss the possibilities and potentialities of various methods of using solar energy. THINK BEFORE YOU READ How familiar are you with the various types of non-conventional or emerging sources of energy? Which ones do you think have the most promise in Australia? Why?
Winds are essentially created by the solar heating of the atmosphere. Several attempts have been made since 1940 to use wind to generate electric energy and development is still going on. However, techno-economic feasibility has yet to be satisfactorily established. Wind as a power source is attractive because it is plentiful, inexhaustible and non-polluting. Further, it does not impose extra heat burden on the environment. Unfortunately, it is non-steady and undependable. Control equipment has been devised to start the wind power plant whenever the wind speed reaches 30 km/h. Methods have also been found to generate constant frequency power with varying wind speeds and consequently varying speeds of wind mill propellers. Wind power may prove practical for small power needs in isolated sites. But for maximum flexibility, it should be used in conjunction with other methods of power generation to ensure continuity. For wind power generation, there are three types of operations: 1. Small, 0.5-10 kW for isolated single premises 2. Medium, 10-100 kW for communities 3. Large, 1.5 MW for connection to the grid (Figure 2.1).
2010
28
Kalam, A.
Wind power in Australia is a proven and reliable technology that can be and is readily deployed. At the close of 2008, there were 50 wind farms in Australia, with a total of 756 operating wind turbines. The total operating wind generating capacity at the end of 2008 was 1,300 MW providing 1.3% of Australia's national electricity demand. South Australia has more than half of the nation's wind power capacity, whilst Victoria also has a sizeable system, with large proposals for expansion. Australia's total wind generation capacity in 2009 is 1.494 GW. By comparison Germany has 22 GW, US 16 GW, Spain 15 GW, India 8 GW and China 6 GW. While Australia produces about 1.3% of its electricity from wind power, it accounts for approximately 19% of electricity production in Denmark, 9% in Spain and Portugal, and 6% in Germany and the Republic of Ireland.
2.1.2 SOLAR ENERGY
The average incident solar energy received on earth's surface is about 600 W/m2 but the actual value varies considerably. It has the advantage of being free of cost, non-exhaustible and completely pollution-free. On the other hand, it has several drawbacks-energy density per unit area is very low, it is available for only a part of the day, and cloudy and hazy atmospheric conditions greatly reduce the energy received. Therefore, harnessing solar energy (Figures 2.2 and 2.3) for electricity generation, challenging technological problems exist, the most important being that of the collection and
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 29
Kalam, A.
concentration of solar energy and its conversion to the electrical form through efficient and comparatively economical means.
Australia has an estimated 115 MW of installed PV power (July 2009), contributing an estimated 0.1 to 0.2% of total electricity production despite the hot, dry, and sunny climate that would make it ideal for utilisation. This unreached grid parity is mainly due to the higher cost per kW than other power sources because of the cost of solar panels. Feed-in tariffs and mandatory renewable energy targets are designed to assist renewable energy commercialisation in Australia. Solar power potential is unlimited; a 154 MW photovoltaic (PV) solar power station in Victoria is planned and is expected to cost $420 million. It is expected to be the biggest and most efficient solar photovoltaic power station in the world. The power station is expected to concentrate the sun by 500
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 30
Kalam, A.
times onto the solar cells for ultra high power output. The Victorian power station will generate electricity directly from the sun to meet the annual needs of over 45,000 homes with on-going zero greenhouse gas emissions.
2.1.2.1 HISTORY OF SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY
Photovoltaic (PV) cells directly convert solar energy into electricity and were initially developed in the 1950s for use on satellites and the space program. PV cells have been the exclusive power source for satellites orbiting the earth since the 1960s [1-3]. PV systems have been used for remote stand-alone systems throughout the world since the 1970s. In the 1980s, commercial and consumer product manufacturers began incorporating PV into every commercial product. In the 1990s, many utilities are finding PV to be the best choice for thousands of small power needs. Silicon is the main semiconductor used in commercial cells. Panels marketed are mostly made from mono-crystalline, poly-crystalline or amorphous silicon cells. Many other materials are being developed but have not yet achieved the production level of silicon cells. A series of cells is inter-connected on a panel, with electrical output ranging from 10 to 100 Wp typically. The junction of the panel or module allows building integration and to protect the cells from the weather. Multiple panels may then be interconnected to form a string, and several strings may be used in parallel to form an array. Contrary to popular belief, instead of Europe, China has made aggressive and well-timed moves in the solar race. In only five years, it has gone from being a negligible player to the world's top producer of solar PV cells, according to a new report from the European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy (Figure 2.4). Worldwide solar module production increased by 80% in 2008 alone, with Asia and Europe taking the largest share while the U.S. share barely budged.
Figure 2.4: The big players in the world of PV production. (Source: JRC PV Status Report 2009. "In 2008, China became the global leading producer of solar cells with an annual production of about 2.4 GW, followed by Europe with 1.9 GW, Japan with 1.2 GW and Taiwan with 0.8 GW. If this trend continues, China might have about 32% of the world-wide production capacity by 2012.")
2010
31
Kalam, A.
Two major types of PV systems available in the marketplace today are flat plate and concentrators. As the most prevalent type of PV systems, flat plate systems build the PV modules on a rigid and flat surface to capture sunlight. This section provides a detailed explanation on different flat plate PV technologies that can be considered and proposed for a typical BIPV (Building Integrated PV) project. Concentrator systems use lenses to concentrate sunlight on the PV cells and increase the cell power output as described in the next section. Comparing the two systems, flat plate systems are typically less complicated but employ a larger number of cells while the concentrator systems use smaller areas of cells but require more sophisticated and expensive tracking systems. Unable to focus diffuse sunlight, concentrator systems do not work under cloudy conditions. The value of solar cell flat plate technology and their efficiency in the generation of electricity can vary widely between the different technologies and material. For the purpose of any BIPV project the following types of materials and installation arrangement can be proposed.
BIPV cells are solar cells integrated into the building whereby displacing conventional building materials as the BIPV cells can be applied as window glazing. BIPV systems generally have the cells fixed between two layers of glass (Figure 2.5). Although no light can be transmitted through the actual PV cell, the coordination and the spacing between the cells can be adjusted to control the amount of ambient light penetrating through the system, allowing the architect to balance the daylight/shading required. BP Solar have a range of commercial grade BIPV cells that are currently available on the market (Figure 2.6). They currently offer two types; Saturn Technology 2.5Wp per cell and SiN Polycrystalline 2.2Wp per cell. Both types are 125mm x 125mm in size and can be supplied in any size glass up to 3.3m x 2.2m.
A single-crystal silicon has a uniform molecular structure (Figure 2.7). Compared to noncrystalline materials, its high uniformity results in higher energy conversion efficiency - the ratio of electric power produced by the cell to
2010
the amount of available sunlight power, i.e. power-out divided by power-in. The conversion efficiency for single-silicon commercial modules ranges between 15-20%. Not only are they energy efficient, single32
Kalam, A.
silicon modules are highly reliable for outdoor power applications. Single crystal wafers are sliced (approx. 1/3 to 1/2 of a millimetre thick), from a large single crystal ingot, grown at around 1400C. The silicon must be of a Figure 2.7: Single-crystal very high purity and silicon. have a near perfect crystal structure.
POLYCRYSTALLINE SILICON
much higher energy conversion efficiency than crystal silicon, reaching about 25 - 30%. GaAs is popular in space applications where strong resistance radiation damage and high cell efficiency are required. The biggest drawback of GaAs PV cells is the high cost of the singlecrystal substrate that GaAs is grown on. Therefore, this PV cell has only been considered for use in concentrator systems where only a small area of GaAs cells is needed.
Consisting of small grains of single-crystal silicon, polycrystalline PV cells are less energy efficient than single-crystalline silicon PV cells (Figure 2.8). The grain boundaries in
polycrystalline silicon hinder the flow of electrons and reduce the power output of the cell. The energy conversion efficiency for a commercial module made of polycrystalline silicon ranges between 10 -15%. Since no sawing is needed, the manufacturing cost is lower. Compared to single-crystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon material is stronger and the average price for a polycrystalline module made from cast and ribbon is slightly lower than that of a single-crystal module.
GALLIUM ARSENIDE (GaAS)
In a thin-film PV cell (Figure 2.10), a thin semiconductor layer of PV materials is deposited on supporting low-cost layer such as glass, metal or plastic foil. Since thin-film materials have higher light absorptivity than crystalline materials, the deposited layer of PV materials is extremely thin. Thinner layers of
A compound semiconductor made of two elements: gallium (Ga) and arsenic (As), GaAs has a crystal structure similar to that of silicon (Figure 2.9). An advantage of GaAs is that it has a high level of light absorptivity. GaAs has
2010
Kalam, A.
material yield significant cost saving. However, thin film PV cells suffer from poor cell conversion efficiency due to non-single crystal structure; average thin film cell solar module has an efficiency between 6% - 10%, requiring larger array areas and increasing area-related costs such as mountings. Materials used for thin film PV modules are Amorphous Silicon (a-Si), a non-crystalline form of silicon. The silicon is called amorphous because it has a non-crystalline structure. Amorphous silicon can absorb 90% of the usable light energy shining on it. Other advantages are that it can be produced at lower temperatures and can be deposited on low-cost substrates such as plastic, glass, and metal. This makes amorphous silicon ideal for BIPV products, and the leading thin-film PV material. The electrical output of amorphous silicon cells decreases up to 20% over a period of time when first exposed to sunlight, before the material stabilises.
HYBRID
These panels utilize a combination of monocrystalline PV cells, surrounded by amorphous silicon PV cells. These have excellent sensitivity
to lower light levels and indirect light. These panels have the world's highest power generation per installation area, for their conversion efficiency for sunlight to electricity. It can be as high as to 22%. These Hybrid Sanyo panel (Figure 2.11) also have a lowtemperature manufacturing process which means fewer materials are used, which minimises the panel's impact on the environment.
TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE Use the diagram below to fill in the details of each branch of the map according to: 1) material composition, 2) advantages, and 3) disadvantages. Then check your answers against the detailed descriptions above or use it to query your lecturer in class. Print more pages if you require more space.
2 3
Polycrystalline Silicon
1 2 3
PV Module Materials
Thin Film Materials
1 2 3 GaAS
1 2 3
2010
34
Kalam, A.
Solar panels can be mounted on top of an existing roof system in a wide variety of situations such as: Installed in a static position facing North with a minimum tilt of 15 from horizontal (important to allow rain to wash dust from the array) any tilt between vertical and 15 could be used, but the optimal angle is latitude minus 10 (Figure 2.12). The tilt should be somewhat lower to maximise performance in summer and higher to maximise performance in winter. In most BIP projects, the PV systems can be designed to achieve the maximum power output in summer. The optimum tilt angle () for the modules for these applications is to be: opt = - 10 (where is the latitude which is 37 in Melbourne)
Installed in trackers, which are used to keep PV panels directly facing the sun, thereby increasing the output from the panels. Trackers can nearly double the output of an array (Figure 2.13) but also increase cost and mechanical complexity.
2010
35
Kalam, A.
Combined with the roof material into a single integrated solar roofing product consisting of thin film amorphous PV cells laminated onto roofing panels to make a single structure (Figure 2.14).
Figure 2.14: Thin film solar panel (Source: http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica).
By using reflectors to concentrate sunlight on the absorber of a solar collector, the size of the absorber can be dramatically reduced, which reduces heat losses and increases efficiency at high temperatures. Another advantage is that reflectors can cost substantially less per unit area than collectors. This class of collector is used for high-temperature applications such as steam production for the generation of electricity and thermal detoxification. The 3 basic types of concentrating collectors are Parabolic dish, Parabolic trough and Power tower. At this stage only Parabolic dish have normally been considered as an option for the BIPV project as it is the only proven technology in Australia which could be offered for small sizes (even at times they can be beyond the project budget) due to the modularity advantage, as dishes generate electricity independently. Minimum commercially available size for each technology are estimated to be as follows: Parabolic dish: modular systems have been realised with total capacities up to 5 MWe. The modules have maximum sizes of 50 kWe (minimum dish size commercially available in Australia is 35 kW) (Figure 2.15).
2010
36
Kalam, A.
Individual Power tower: commercial plants could be sized to produce anywhere from 50 to 200 MW of electricity (Figure 2.16).
Individual Parabolic trough systems (Figure 2.17): currently can generate from 10 to 400 MWe. (Parabolic though first project in Australia John Marcheff Solar project: 36 MW Concentrating Line Focus Receiver (CLFR) was offered by the New South Wales State Government loan funding in December 2002 for first-stage testing of a commercial 20,000 m compact linear fresnel reflector array which can supply thermal energy at 285C/70 bar to a conventional coal-fired steam-turbine cycle preheater).
A parabolic dish collector is similar in appearance to a large satellite dish, but has mirror-like reflectors and an absorber at the focal point. It uses a dual axis sun tracker. A parabolic dish system (Figure 2.18) uses a computer to track the sun and concentrate the sun's rays onto a receiver located at the focal point in front of the dish. Different technologies exist: the receiver could be a thermal receiver which absorbs the concentrated beam of solar energy, converts it to heat, and transfers the heat to the engine/generator to generate electricity or the proposed technology in this project comprises in the heart of the system of an array of close-packed PV cells that are located
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 37
Kalam, A.
in the solar receiver, suspended above the focus of the mirrors. The cells are mounted in a way that allows efficient dissipation of thermal energy as well as extraction of electricity. The sunlight is concentrated 500x, and effective cooling is critical to achieve efficient performance.
In addition to PV cells, most systems require additional components, which are generally produced by specialist commercial suppliers. These include: inverters; batteries; tracking systems; arrays to carry modules; regulators, controllers and other electronic components.
SYSTEM CONTROL
All stand-alone PV systems normally require some form of control or power conditioning. The complexity of the control function depends on system user requirements, the type of system and the number of power sources included. In simple systems, battery-charge controllers interface between the PV array and the battery while the inverter interfaces between the battery and the AC load.
THE BATTERY
For the applications requiring energy at night or during periods of low sunlight, a storage medium must be used to ensure the autonomy of the system. Most stand-alone systems require storage. The usual storage equipment used with stand-alone PV systems is rechargeable batteries. The most important feature of a battery's operation is cycling. During the daily cycle, the battery is charged during the day and discharged by the night-time load. Superimposed onto the daily cycle is
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 38
Kalam, A.
the seasonal cycle, which is associated with periods of reduced radiation availability. This, together with other operating parameters (such as ambient temperature, current, voltages) affects the battery life and maintenance requirements.
THE POWER-CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT
The electrical output of an array is usually modified or regulated in some way to ensure that it meets the requirements of the other components. There are three main power-conditioning devices that are commonly found in stand-alone PV systems: the charge regulator, the power point conditioner and the inverter. The charge regulator is the most common type of power-conditioning device. It is normally found in all systems using rechargeable batteries. Its primary function is to manage the use of the batter by cutting back current from the PV array when the battery is sufficiently charged. A maximum power point tracker (MPPT) is a device that operates the PV array at the voltage that provides the maximum power and then converts this to the output voltage required by the battery or the load. The device allows use of a greater fraction of the energy available from the PV array and map be integrated as a function in the charge controller. An inverter is required in systems that must supply power to the loads. This equipment converts DC output from the battery or the array to standard AC power similar to that supplied by the utilities. Sophisticated inverters often integrate control functions, and bidirectional units are available. The latter can also rectify AC input to produce DC, enabling batteries to he charged from fossil-fuel generators.
ENERGY AND POWER REQUIREMENT ASSESSMENT
An important step in the design of a stand-alone PV system is the load assessment. This step is too often not carried out carefully enough, leading to a poor operation of the PV system. Overestimating the load will ensure a reliable supply of electricity, but the cost of the system will be unnecessarily high. On the other hand, underestimating the load can lead to an unreliable power supply, increased aging of the batteries and unexpected use of a back-up diesel generator. In some cases, the system may fail to supply a critical load. Consequently, all loads must be properly evaluated, both in terms of power and duty cycle. This indicates the daily energy need. The maximum-demand assessment is also important, as the system must be sized to have the capacity to power the load. This requires an evaluation of the maximum power that might be required at any time. Since high values will result in a more expensive system (more storage and possibly a larger inverter would be required), it is wise to consider. In order to choose an optimum size of the components such as storage units, inverters and so on for optimum performance and minimum costs we have to manage the loads either by reducing the demand peaks or by matching demand peaks to renewable energy input peak.
If power demand curves match well with the availability of solar irradiation, the system can be considerably smaller (and cheaper) than if this is not the case.
2010
39
Kalam, A.
The daily average energy production of a PV panel (or array) can easily be evaluated by multiplying its rated output by the average number of peak sun hour. PSH is an equivalent measure of one hour of sunlight with at 1000 W/m2 rate of energy absorption by the earth. The number of peak sun hours can usually be obtained from national radiation data books or can be read on solar radiation maps.
2.1.2.5 FACTORS AFFECTING PERFORMANCE
When designing a system, one must account for a number of factors that may reduce this performance. Correction for not operating the PV panel at its maximum power point (panels are rated at this point) if a maximum power point tracker is not used (typically up to 10%); battery efficiency, losses of the power-conditioning system for an AC supply (inverter), from 10 to 20% losses; the array tilt and position; this is more important for tropical circumstances than temperate areas; temperature effects, shading, even partial, which greatly affects the performance of a panel; dust, snow or ice accumulation, which is strongly dependent on the climatic conditions. When sizing the system, one should take into account the seasonal variations both in demand for and in availability of energy. On the other hand, the solar energy also varies with the seasons. The size of the battery in a stand-alone system more dependent on the autonomy desired. This is the number of days the battery could provide the loads without ally input from the PV array. This factor is directly dependent on storage capacity required. This is usually a function of climate and user requirements.
DEPTH OF DISCHARGE (DOD)
DOD indicates how much of the total capacity of the battery is used. Too deep cycling of limited batteries reduces their life expectancy. The DOD strongly depends on the application, and can vary from a few percent to as much as 70% the operational temperature of battery. Low temperatures reduce the storage capacity of batteries. High temperatures are detrimental to battery longevity. The ideal operational temperature is in the 20 to 25C range. The battery capacity decreases with increasing discharge current. Thus, applications requiring high powers will need larger battery capacity than low power applications, even if the total energy consumption is the same.
SIZE OF INVERTER
In selecting the inverter, two ratings are of particular importance: the rating in the continuous mode and the rating in the surge mode. The inverter must be able to meet the maximum power demand including the surge produced by loads such as motors. The inverter is inefficient when the load is typically less than 10% of its nominal power rating.
BALANCING COST AND PERFORMANCE
The cost of PV electricity depends on the purchase price of the array plus balance of system costs; the type of technology; the panel efficiency available insolation levels;
UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 40
2010
Kalam, A.
the climatic conditions (including, temperature) mounting and integration costs the cost of maintenance.
An indicator for selecting a power system is the life-cycle cost. A PV/diesel hybrid system could use more PV and less diesel fuel or less PV (less PV means saving capital costs and more diesel means higher maintenance costs) against more diesel and higher maintenance. The life-cycle cost can be evaluated for different options and the choice can then be made. A PV-battery system can have more batteries and less PV, or more PV and fewer batteries, and still meet the same requirements. In any case there is always a trade-off between the cost and the performance of a system.
2.1.2.6 ENERGY MANAGEMENT
The storage of energy in a battery results in some loss of energy. That is, for every unit of energy taken from a battery, more than one unit will have to be supplied to the battery. It follows that losses can be reduced by limiting the need to draw energy from the battery. This is achieved by matching demand and supply peaks, that is, planning high-energy-use tasks for times when renewable energy production is high, thereby minimizing the need for storage capacity. In the case of a community (mini-grid) system, cheaper daytime rates may he charged in order to stimulate daytime consumption of large loads.
SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
Stand-alone PV systems are almost by definition located in remote areas and thus maintenance requirements must be minimal and predictable, For unattended systems, such as telecommunication repeaters, a maintenance schedule of not more than one visit a year is feasible and should be pursued. For attended systems, such as those in remote buildings, a maintenance schedule with weekly, monthly and semi-annual maintenance procedures is reasonable. In all cases, proper planning is required.
MAINTENANCE OF THE ARRAY
Maintenance needs of the array vary according to the climate. In most temperate climates, these needs are zero, but in dusty or snow conditions, regular cleaning can become crucial for proper junctions.
MAINTENANCE OF THE BATTERIES
Batteries are the components that require most maintenance. For open lead-acid batteries, some means of keeping sufficient electrolyte in the cell is necessary for their optimal operation.
2.1.2.7 PEAK SUN HOUR
The number of Peak Sun Hours for the day is defined as the number of hours for which energy at the rate of 1000 W/m2 would give an amount of energy equivalent to the total energy for that day. If the solar radiation (Figure 2.19) on a horizontal surface for the whole day is 25 MJ/m2, then we must work out the number of hours for which radiation at the rate of 1000 W/m2 would result in the same overall energy gained for that day. (1 kWh = 3.6 MJ). Then 25 MJ/m 2 would be 6.94 kWh (25 MJ/m2
2010
41
Kalam, A.
divided by conversion factor 3.6). In one hour radiation at 1000 W/m 2 delivers 1 kWh of energy per m2. Therefore to produce 6.94 kWh of energy per one square meter the radiation would have to continue at the rate of 1000 W/m2 for 6.94 hours. Then the number of Peak Sun Hours is 6.94.
The number of PV-modules, size of batteries is shown in Table 2. In our calculations we have used the average electricity consumption of a four family house which is 18 kWh per day. According to World Bank a four family house consumes 2952 kWh per year. A daily average of this figure is around 8 kWh per day which is 45% of the house we have under investigation. There are two sets of diodes used in the interconnection of the modules. One set has the task to block the current flowing back from battery to PV panel (blocking diode), the other set is for bypassing the PV cell.
2010
42
Kalam, A.
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
A cost calculation for the PV/wind hybrid system consists of first determining capital cost for the hybrid system and conventional alternative and the calculation of the payback period. The capital cost of a hybrid consists of subsystem costs such as costs of photovoltaic panels, panel structure, wind generator, batteries, inverter, power conditioning unit, system controller and miscellaneous items such as wiring, site preparation, etc. Determination of the optimum number of PV modules, wind generators, diesel generators and batteries in our study was not based on the economic approach but on the quality of supply. The cost function of the system can be defined as:
C K1 N PV K 2 N Batt Co
Where:
C is the total capital cost of the grid-connected system
K 1 is cost of a PV module K 2 is cost of a battery
N PV is number of PV modules
N Batt is number of batteries
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 43
Kalam, A.
C o is the total constant costs including the cost of design, and installation. The number of batteries is
a non-linear function of PV modules. Formula used for calculations are given in Figure 2.20.
This equation has been written based on energy balance where the radiation incident on the panel in peak sun hour (PSH), equal to the number of hours of the standard irradiance (1kWh/m 2) which would produce the same irradiation. PSH is numerically equal to the irradiance in 1kWh/m2 day.
BEFORE YOU READ ON By now, you can probably confidently list the benefits of solar energy - just Google benefits of solar energy and see if you can list as many as others. With so many benefits, why is the utility and infrastructure development of solar energy generation limited? Who are the most that can benefit from this? Write your response here
2010
44
Kalam, A.
The main factors favouring photovoltaic technologies in remote areas result from: the high costs of conventional power sources, which are strongly affected by remote locations; the loss of the scale-economy effect; the relatively high price of fuel transportation and of the supply of spare parts.
The barriers to market development of PV technology are: technological barriers; economic barriers; financial barriers; social barriers; cultural barriers; institutional and regulatory barriers; and the most important barrier: lack of public awareness and information about potential and specific advantages of PV technology.
Some technological lessons learned from past experience are: PV modules have reached a considerable reliability and higher lifetime expectations (currently they exceed 25 years and more). Some PV experts believe that research is not so much required to further improve quality and reliability, but to reduce cost and to improve efficiencies; In stand-alone systems, the battery is known to be the weakest link in the chain. Today batteries in PV installations present a typical lifetime between 2 to 5 years; Electronic devices such as inverters, and charge regulators have, during the first years of use, revealed many problems, frequently less than adequate designs and low reliability, but today performances are rapidly improving; System design is in many cases also a reason for poor performance. This is because of lack of appropriate quality and reference standards; Standardization is an extremely important issue for market penetration of PV technology products; User friendliness is an important issue. Appropriate designs must be orientated not so much towards technical issues, but to match social, cultural, administrative and organisational needs of users.
CURRENT MARKETS
Overall, the 42% increase between 1996 and 1997 was split equally between:
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 45
Kalam, A.
Off-grid PV markets such as: telecommunications and signals; consumer systems for homes; farms; boats; campers; commercial applications; and
the on-grid PV market such as subsidized Building Integrated PV (BIPV) market including Japanese shipments, and adding those of Germany, Switzerland, Norway and the US.
Building Integrated PV (BIPV) Architects around the world are beginning to integrate a whole host of BIPV products into their designs, such as BIPV modules integral roof modules roofing tiles modules for vertical curtain wall facades sloped glazing systems and skylights. International Trends The primary reason for phenomenal PV growth in 1997 was increased Japanese demand for PV, as result of government programs to promote solar homes through tax incentives and subsidies. In 1997, 9,400 PV systems were installed on Japanese homes. As a result of this strong national PV demand, Japanese shipments increased 65% to 35 MW during 1997. More than 70,000 PV-powered homes were already available by the year 2000. The key to the success of PV with the Japanese has been strong national government support, including generous subsidies and forward-looking energy policies. Europe The European PV industry increased its production by 5% from 18.8 to 30.4 MW during 1997. United States As a result of increased world demand for PV, especially from Japan, US companies also increased their shipments by 36% from 38.9 MW to 51 MW. Currently, US PV shipments account for 41.8% of total world production. Million Solar Roofs is an initiative to install solar energy systems on one million U.S. buildings by 2010. This was announced by the United States president on June 26, 1997, before the United Nations Session on Environment and Development. The initiative includes two types of solar technology, namely photovoltaics that produce electricity from sunlight and solar thermal panels that produce heat for domestic hot water, space heating, or heating swimming pools. The Developing World Outside the USA, Europe and OECD countries there are some regions that have a proven PV market or have had very high growth in using PV systems. These regions are:
2010
46
Kalam, A.
The developing world, for example, is perhaps the largest potential market for PV in the near term. The success of renewable energy projects in these nations is highly dependent on the development of micro-lending practices and financing initiatives by foreign investors and bilateral development agencies. The path that electricity sector reform takes in these nations is also important.
2.1.3 WAVE ENERGY
The energy content of sea waves is very high. In Australia, with several thousands of kilometers of coast line, a vast source of energy is available. The power in the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude and to the period of the motion. Therefore, the long period (~10s), large amplitude (~2m) waves are of considerable interest for power generation, with energy fluxes commonly averaging between 50 and 70 kW/m width of oncoming wave. Though the engineering problems associated with wave-power are formidable, the amount of energy that can be harnessed is large and development work is in progress. Australias estimated near-shore wave energy resources (171,000 MW) can provide approximately four times the current national power needs. By using just 10% of this resource (the amount of power which conservative estimates indicate can be practicably extracted), around 35% of Australias current power demand could be produced. Wave energy is an ideal source of base-load power it is highly predictable and reliable, particularly along the southern coastline of Australia where regular storms in the Southern Ocean deliver constant swells to the shoreline. Analysis indicates that waves from which electricity can be generated exist over 97.5% of the time, making it a base-load resource (Figure 2.21). Carnegie anticipates installing 1,500 MW of CETO wave energy capacity by 2020 with projected expansion to be 12,000MW by 2050 (Figure 2.22).
2010
47
Kalam, A.
Figure 2.21: CETO Technology Power and Water Schematic. Source: Carnegie Corporation Ltd.
Figure 2.22: CETO Forecast Installed Capacity Source: Carnegie Corporation Ltd.
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) The ocean is the world's largest solar collector. Temperature difference of 20C between warm, solar absorbing surface water and cooler 'bottom' water can occur. This can provide a continually replenished store of thermal energy which is in principle available for conversion to other energy forms. OTEC refers to the conversion of some of this thermal energy into work and thence into
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 48
Kalam, A.
electricity. A proposed plant using sea temperature difference would be situated 25 km east of Miami (USA), where the temperature difference is 17.5C (Figure 2.23).
Figure 2.23: Closed Cycle OTEC (Image adapted from National Energy Laboratory of Hawaii Authority (NEHLA)).
Australia and its territories do not have significant 'reserves' of OTEC, although the ocean temperature difference in the tropical regions of Australia is between 20 and 22C. The high solar insolation of these regions and the profile of energy users (mainly inland, isolated communities and users) mean that OTEC is unlikely to be used in Australia in the near future. However, it has potential applications for Australia's neighbours in the Western Pacific region. Although there were proposals to consider Townsville to become an international centre for the development of OTEC technology, however the significant capital and running costs of current OTEC technologies combined with the technological immaturity of the industry make this technology uncompetitive with conventional sources and the many other renewable energy sources at the present time.
2.1.4 BIOFUELS
The material of plants and animals is called biomass, which may be transformed by chemical and biological processes (Figure 2.24) to produce intermediate biofuels such as methane gas, ethanol
2010
49
Kalam, A.
liquid or charcoal solid. Biomass is burnt to provide heat for cooking, comfort heat (space heat), crop drying, factory processes and raising steam for electricity production and transport. Renewable energy programmes are specially designed to meet the growing energy needs in the rural areas for promoting decentralized and hybrid development so as to stem growing migration of rural population to urban areas in search of better living conditions. It would be through this integration of energy conservation efforts with renewable energy programmes that Australia would be able to achieve a smooth transition from fossil fuel economy to sustainable renewable energy based economy and bring "Energy for all" for equitable and environmental friendly sustainable development. Biofuels have been promoted internationally as a major response to offer the potential for improved fuel security, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and health benefits in cities. There are also potential benefits to rural communities in Australia (Figure 2.25). The benefits are, however, very sensitive to the particular production system, and are not universal. The biofuels industry is in its infancy in Australia. Future development of this industry is subject to some critical uncertainties most importantly, energy prices, consumer preference, Australian and international government policy, and technology shifts. If domestically produced biofuels were to move beyond being relevant at the margins (25% of transport fuel requirements) to become part of the main game (1020% of transport fuel requirements), there could be some major shifts in the agricultural and forestry value chains through to vehicle manufacture, fuel distribution and retail and the consumer.
2010
50
Kalam, A.
Figure 2.25: New South Wales Sugar Milling Co-operative Limited, Australia (Source: Godat - Sugar Research Institute, QUT).
TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE AGAIN You know the drill Use the diagram below to fill in the details of each branch of the map according to: 1) how energy is created, 2) advantages, and 3) disadvantages. Then check your answers against the detailed descriptions above or use it to query your lecturer in class. Print more pages if you require more space.
Solar energy
2 3
Wind power
1 2 3
PV Module Materials
Wave energy
1 2 3
1 Biofuels 2 3
2010
51
Kalam, A.
There are problems in storing electricity in large quantities. Energy which can be converted into electricity can be stored in a number of ways. Storage of any nature is however very costly and its economics must be worked out properly. Various options available are: pumped storage, compressed air, heat, hydrogen gas, secondary batteries, flywheels and super conducting coils. Gas turbines are normally used for meeting peak loads but are very expensive. A significant amount of storage capable of instantaneous use would be better way of meeting such peak loads, and so far the most important way is to have a pumped storage plant. Other methods are discussed below briefly.
2.2.1 SECONDARY BAT TERIES
Large scale battery use is almost ruled out and they will be used for battery powered vehicles and local fluctuating energy sources such as wind mills or solar. The most widely used storage battery is the lead acid battery, invented by Plante in 1860. Sodium-sulphur battery (200 Wh/kg) and other combinations of materials are also being developed to get more output and storage per unit weight.
2.2.2 FUEL CELLS
Fuel Cells are not energy sources but energy conversion devices. Fuel cells have demonstrated high efficiencies of energy conversion, low pollution emissions, reliable and quiet operation. Fuel cells offer immense potential opportunities in the stationary power generator market (from residential systems to MW size) and in the transport sector (engines and auxiliary power for cars, busses, trucks, locomotives, ships). Their principle was discovered over 150 years ago and they have been used in space and military applications for the past 40 years. However, fuel cell development for civil applications stationary and mobile - has accelerated in particular during the past 10 years, and economically competitive products are expected to enter the market from 2002 onwards. This chapter mainly covers the stationary power applications, but references to transport applications is made as the may provide solutions to cost-effective dispersed power generators. Fuel cell was first demonstrated by William Grove (barrister-cum-inventor) in 1839. However, the application of fuel cells was accelerated by its utilisation in the US space programme to produce useful power, in 1960s. Currently most other application of fuel cell is in the research stage, but with recent debates on environmental concerns, pollution and energy conservation, future of fuel cells is very promising. Electricity from fuel cell is produced without rotating machines, and at efficiencies considerably higher than those obtained from conventional fuel-burning engines and power stations. Fuel cells have the added benefit that it has silent operation. One area where fuel cells are set to make a big impact is in the area of cogeneration. In the past energy was cheap, systems utilising technologies like cogeneration could not compete directly with traditional form of electricity generation, on economic grounds. However, with restructuring in the electricity supply industries in many of the industrialised countries and constrained put on them through international agencies to reduce consumption of fossil fuels and CO2 production, technologies like cogeneration will be used more widely acceptable.
2010
52
Kalam, A.
Fuel cells, with their high efficiencies (even at low powers), silent operation, simplicity, reliability, produces low concentrations of NOx, and utilise gas feedstocks (viz. natural gas, CH4, CO and H2) can be the best type of energy converter, provided the cost could be reduced. Fuel cells boost has been given recently with the Californian law of zero emission on their new cars. It states 2% of the new car sales will be required to have zero emission by 1998 rising to 5% in 2000. Other North American states have similar directives. Fuel cells will be preferred to storage batteries as the latter requires difficult charging regimes and low power densities. The dc output from fuel cells can be converted to ac via power conditioning systems known as invertors, which means they can supply electrical power comparable to that from the electricity grid. Hence the main likely users of fuel cells will therefore be electric vehicles and cogeneration. Other broad potential application ranges from small remote area power systems and telecommunication installations through to commercial buildings and ultimately to multi-megawatt power stations. In general fuel cells convert hydrogen-containing fuels directly via an electrochemical process into electricity and thermal energy. The electrochemical fuel conversion potentially leads to a highly efficient and low polluting process for conversion of fuel energy to electric energy. Fuel cells can also be viewed as complementary to renewable energy technologies, and have the potential to play a critical role in the transition from a fossil fuel dominated world as well as in a future renewable energy scene. This section discusses the fuel cell energy conversion process, different types of fuel cells and their characteristics, status of development of different fuel cells and projected market entry products. In Australia, Ceramic Fuel Cells Ltd has been developing solid oxide fuel cell technology primarily for the stationary power market. The company located in Melbournes suburb of Noble Park anticipates has launched its first product for the small commercial sector in 2003. A fuel cell converts chemical energy of a fuel into electricity directly, with no intermediate combustion cycle. In the fuel cell, hydrogen is supplied to the negative electrode and oxygen (or air) to the positive. Hydrogen and oxygen are combined to give water and electricity. The porous electrodes allow hydrogen ions to pass. The main reason why fuel cells are not in wide use is their cost (> $ 2000/kW). Global electricity generating capacity from full cells will grow from just 75 MW in 2001 to 15000 MW by 2010. US, Germany and Japan may take lead for this. Australia's first operational fuel cell was installed at the Australian Technology Park, Sydney in 1998 Figure 2.26). A phosphoric acid fuel cell, it uses natural gas which is passed through a steam reformer to produce hydrogen produces up to 200 kW of electricity and hot water (see Figure 18).
2010
53
Kalam, A.
As electrochemical devices, fuel cells are not controlled by the Carnot cycle principles of heat engines. The open circuit voltage or ideal voltage (Er) of a fuel cell is given by the free energy of the fuel conversion reaction, and is typically between 1 to 1.2 V for a single cell. Er =G/nF) where, F is the Faraday constant and n is the number of electrons transferred.
Hydrogen is the most common fuel but in some fuel cell types conversion of CO and CH4 is also possible: H2 + O2 H2O n=2
E = Eo + (RT/2F)ln(PH2/PH2O) + (RT/2F)ln(PO21/2)
Kalam, A.
E = Eo + (RT/2F)ln(PCH4/P2H2OPCO2) + (RT/2F)ln(PO22)
The efficiency of the fuel cell is the product of the fuel efficiency and the electric efficiency. (FC) = (f) + (e)
Fuel efficiencies thus increase or decrease with temperature (Figure 2.27) depending whether entropies of the fuel conversion reactions are positive or negative. For example, (f) for hydrogen decreases from 0.94 at ambient temperature to 0.71 at 1000oC, for CO from 0.91 to 0.69 and for methane remains 1.00, and for methanol increase from 1.02 to 1.10. Practical fuel utilisations are restricted to 80-85%.
CH4
H2
CO
CH3OH
Fuel Efficiency /%
Temperature /C
Figure 2.27: Fuel efficiencies for H2, CO, CH4 and CH3OH.
The electri
) losses:
(e) = Er IR -
Ohmic losses are varying directly with current density. Overpotential losses can be split into activation polarisation (act), and concentration polarisation losses (conc). A low current densities activation polarisation losses dominate and at high current densities concentration polarisation losses (diffusion limitations) refer to Figure 2.28.
2010
55
Kalam, A.
If electric losses are minimised, fuel cells have the potential for very high conversion efficiencies. Fuel cells do not involve thermal combustion processes, the fuel conversion is an electrochemical oxidation. In addition, the electrolyte membrane separates the oxidant (air) and the fuel. This ensures very low NOx emissions. As fuel cells are sensitive to sulfur, compounds containing sulfur need to be removed from the fuel before entering the fuel cell. Thus, sulfur emissions are also very low. Calculation of fuel and oxidant required in a fuel cell: Example: (i) Fuel flow: Current (I) = Power/voltage = 1.43x105 A 100 kW fuel cell operated on hydrogen (H2 2H+ + 2e) at 0.7V and 80% fuel utilisation and 50% oxygen utilisation.
mH2 = (1.43x105)(3600/96487x2) = (1.43x105)(0.018655) [g-mol H2/h] = 5.34 kg H2/h Uf = 80% 5.34/0.8 = 6.675 kg H2/h (75m3) fuel flow is required.
(ii) Oxidant flow: of fuel flow: 1.335x103 g-mol x 5 (air) = 6.675x103 g-mol air = 192 kg air/hr UOx = 50%
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 56
Kalam, A.
A single cell delivers about 0.5 to 0.7V under load. To achieve useful devices cells need to be stacked in series and parallel to a fuel cell stack. A number of these stacks will form the fuel cell module. This module needs a life-support system and an output control. On the input side the fuel cell requires the fuel supply system and the air supply system. The fuel supply consists of the fuel flow control, fuel cleaning (e.g. desulfurising), fuel processing (reformer) and if required fuel inlet heat exchangers. The air supply system consists of a filter a blower or compressor and an air inlet heat exchanger. On the output side the fuel cell requires a power conditioning system (fast load response unit, inverter, control system) and a heat management system to recover heat for internal (parasitic) use and for export.
BASIC FUEL CELL SYSTEM
Figure 2.29, shows the principle of fuel-cell operation. A fuel (nearly always H2) reacts with water and the overall reaction is: 2H2 + O2 = 2H2O
LOAD
--
+
air or O2
a
l
c a
n H2 o d e
e c t r o
However, this reaction does not readily take place, and unless special materials are used for the l e electrodes and the electrolyte, the current produced per square centimetre is extremely small and y the ohmic losses in the electrolyte very large. To overcome these problems, various types of fuel cell t have been developed, and the most successful and promising types are shown in Table 3. The e different varieties are distinguished by the electrolyte used, also the construction of the electrodes in each case is different. However, in all types there are separate reactions at the anode and cathode, and charged ions move through the electrolyte while electrons move round an external circuit. Another common feature is that the electrodes must be porous, because the gases must be in contact with the electrode and the electrolyte at the same time.
2010
57
Kalam, A.
In order to see the movements of ions and electrons, let us consider the actions of simple fuel cells: The reaction in the alkali fuel cell shows that OH- ions move through the electrolyte, and water forms at the anode. Cathode (where the cations are formed) is electrically positive terminal (EE engineers find this phenomenon very surprising!). Anode Alkali electrolyte Cathode 2H2 + 4OH- = 4H2O + 4ethrough electrolyte
Water forms at the anode through external circuit. In case of solid polymer and phosphoric-acid fuel cells, H+ ions are free to move, and water forms at the cathode. Anode Acid electrolyte Cathode 2H2 = 4H+ + 4ethrough electrolyte
Water forms at the cathode through external circuit. The operating voltage of each working cell is about 0.7V, so in order to get useful power one has to have stack of cells. The cathode of one of the cell is joined to the anode of the other and so on, with lowest possible resistance. It is not sufficient to join the electrodes at the edges; instead a conductive plate is put between each cell, which should have the best possible electrical contact with the faces of the electrodes. The plate in the same instant has to separate the air fed over the cathode and the H2 fed over the anode. Design of such bipolar separators is difficult. A major problem with fuel cell application is that H2 fuel is not readily available, so that more accessible fuels such as natural gas has to be converted into H2 and CO2. This adds to the size and cost of the unit. Table 3: Data for various fuel cell types
Type Alkali Operating temperature 50-100oC Power density 80kW/m3 100W/kg Approximate cost Very high Applications Space vehicles, e.g. Gemini, Apollo, Shuttle; > 70% Buses and cars Medium scale cogeneration systems Medium to large scaled cogeneration systems; coal gasification plants All cogeneration systems (2kW to multi MW) early 58
50-100oC ~200oC
Molten carbonate
~600oC
35kW/m3 70W/kg
Solid oxide
500-1000oC
>100kW/m3
N/A
2010
COURSE NOTES: GENERATION SYSTEM FUNDAMENTALS Type Operating temperature Power density Approximate cost
Diesel generator
$150-250/kW
20-750kW (Diesel storage tanks not included in cost) Peak power from engine only (no electricity generated)
$40-100/kW
In the case of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), methane can be converted internally, without a separate unit. The materials consist of zirconia-based electrolyte covered on each side with specialised electrode materials. At around 1000oC zirconia is an excellent O2 ion conductor, hence when a fuel gas like H2 is passed over one surface and an oxidant (usually air) is passed over the electrode, a potential difference is created and a flow of negatively charged O2 moves across the electrolyte to oxidise the fuel. Electrons generated at the fuel electrode then migrate through any external load to complete the circuit. Electrical power is available as long as fuel and air flows are maintained to the cell. Because of its efficiency and waste heat quality Westinghouse (USA) has produced 25kW units and Sulzer (Germany) has developed 2 kW units. Molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) operates at 650oC and use gases like natural gas and coal gas. At the cathode O2 and CO2 react to form carbonate ions, which pass through the molten carbonate electrolyte. These react with H2 or CO at the anode to produce H2O and CO2 and release two electrons. Main problem of MCFC is the design of the electrodes (uses Ni catalyst). They have to work longer in the electrolytes (mixture of Li and K2CO3), which is hot and corrosive. A plant in Santa Clara, USA of 2MW capacity is being built. Phosphoric acid fuel cell runs at 200oC. A 200kW unit runs on natural gas and is commercially produced in USA. Cost of about $3,000/kW is not competitive, but due to government environmental package incentives the cost is about $2,000/kW. They have good track record, as it has now been running for about a year, has no maintenance requirements. Their disadvantage being the temperature is not high enough to internally convert methane, as such it requires an extra unit adding to the cost and size. Amongst the low temperature cells alkali cell has gained commercial success. It is used to supply power in space vehicles. It is superior to other power sources, as it has high power density and produces water as a byproduct. The problems with this are that very high Pt loadings on the electrodes is required to get the high power (high cost) and KOH reacts with CO2 to form K2CO3, which degrades the electrolytes and clogs up the pores of the electrodes. The solid polymer fuel cell (SPFC) are being used in vehicles. Research in UK has produced high performance electrodes using very low Pt loadings. Costs are involved in the electrolytes utilising proton exchange membrane (PEM) and bipolar plates. In Vancouver fuel cell powered buses are being used. This has zero exhaust emissions and many transit authorities are showing interest in this type of vehicles. SPFC is very competitive with petrol engine in terms of power density, and if mass produced costs can become competitive. A problem with these vehicles is that cells have to be
2010
59
Kalam, A.
fuelled with H2 from cylinders. However, small, safe and efficient converter for converting liquid fuel to H2 is going well.
2.2.2.2 TYPES OF FUEL CELLS
A number of fuel cells have been developed. Table 4 lists the most common types and Table 5 describes the electrochemical reactions. Table 4: Most common types of fuel cells
Fuel Cell Alkaline Fuel Cell (AFC) Proton exchange membrane FC (PEMFC) Direct Methanol FC (DMFC) Phosphoric acid FC (PAFC) Molten carbonate FC (MCFC) Methanol 70-100 (>100) 190-220 40 50+ 35-40
1
Fuel Pure H2
T(op) O C 70-200
Efficiency% 30-45
1
Electrolyte KOH/matrix
Pure H2
60-90
30
Sulfon-F-polymer
H2
650
50+ 2 (65)
750-1000
1 2 related to natural gas combined cycle system
50-60 2 (70)
Yttria-zirconia
O2 + H2O + 2e 2OH
+ +
CO + CO3 2CO2 + 2e
2-
SOFC
H2 + O H2O + 2e
2-
CO + O CO2 + 2e
2-
2010
60
Kalam, A.
Alkaline Fuel Cells have primarily been used by NASA on space missions, but recently have attracted renewed interest for mobile applications, as potentially they can achieve higher electric efficiencies than other low temperature fuel cells and dont use noble metal catalysts, but are poisoned readily by CO2. Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells operate at temperatures below 90oC. They exhibit high power density, fast start-up and fast load response. They require pure hydrogen as fuel. Carbon monoxide is a strong poison for PEM and therefore extensive gas cleaning for hydrogen produced from hydrocarbon reforming is necessary. They are primarily considered mobile applications, but microCHP (<10kW) for domestic applications and CHP systems (up to 300 kW) are under development. Due to the high manufacturing volumes required for mobile applications, low capital costs are expected, but, if the fuel hydrogen is produced from hydrocarbon fuels such as natural gas, the efficiency of PEMFCs is only about 35%. Direct Methanol Fuel Cells use a polymer membrane as the electrolyte similar to PEMFC, but the anode in DMFC converts the methanol fuel directly, and thus eliminates the need for a fuel reformer. Efficiencies of about 40% are expected for the low temperature version, and efficiencies of about 50% for operating temperatures above 100oC. They are in an early stage of development and are predominantly considered for mobile applications. Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cells are the most commercially developed type of fuel cell. Several hundred cogeneration systems (50-200kW) have been tested, some up to 40000 hours. With an operating temperature of 200oC, the fuel cell still operates only with clean hydrogen as fuel, but is more carbon monoxide tolerant than PEMFC. Their efficiency related to Natural Gas as fuel is 40%. IFC has been marketing 200kW systems (PC25), but appears to be slowly withdrawing from the business and is concentrating their effort on PEM systems. The high temperature fuel cells Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFC) and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC) promise the highest fuel-to-electricity efficiencies in particular for carbon based fuels. The operating temperatures for MCFC and SOFC are 650oC and >750oC respectively. This allows a better integration of fuel processors and fuel cell. Efficiencies on carbon based fuels are predicted to be around 50-60% for a single cycle and above 65% for a combined cycle (Fuel Cell + gas turbine, steam turbine or Stirling engine).
2.2.2.3 FUEL PROCESSING
The preferred fuel for fuel cells is hydrogen. Currently, the most common route for hydrogen production is by reforming of carbon based fuels (natural gas, higher hydrocarbons and alcohols) in a steam reforming or partial oxidation process. Natural gas is considered the fuel of choice for stationary applications and hydrogen and methanol for mobile applications. Steam reforming of natural gas is performed at 700-900oC and is therefore easier to couple with the high temperature fuel cells MCFC and SOFC. In the longer term, hydrogen production may be possible by renewable means, e.g. solar energy. CH4 + H2O CO + 3H2 CO + H2O CO2 + H2 (watergas shift) CH4 + 2H2O CO2 + 4H2
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 61
Kalam, A.
Three approaches are possible for reforming of hydrocarbon fuels, external reforming (the only option for low and intermediate temperature fuel cells), integrated reforming (close thermal integration of reformer and fuel cell stack) and internal reforming inside the fuel cell stack. Efficiencies and operational flexibilities increase as fuel reforming is closely thermally integrated with the fuel cell stack, but integrated and internal reforming options are only possible with high the temperature fuel cells MCFC and SOFC. Partial oxidation allows faster start-up but in general leads to a fuel with lower heating value, and in particular if air is used as oxidant, substantial fuel stream dilution by nitrogen occurs. CH4 + O2 (air) CO + H2O CH4 + O2 (air) + H2O CO + 2H2 + (N2) CO2 + H2 CO2 + 3H2 + (N2) .
The tight volume and weight limitations in the automotive applications have forced innovations related to compact fuel processor technologies. Technologies such as microchannel reactors which enable very high heat exchange and high reaction rates, are also applicable to stationary systems. Gas cleaning is an integrated part of fuel processing, and the degree needed is strongly dependent on the type of fuel cell: i) sulfur removal from fuel source (NG, LPG, Diesel, biofuels) is essential for all fuel cells, but some fuel cells tolerate somewhat higher levels;
ii) removal of particulates and other poisons from some bio-fuels is necessary for all fuel cells; iii) CO removal is essential for PEMFC and PAFC; iv) CO2 cleaning from air and fuel side is necessary for AFC.
2.2.2.4 STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT STATIONARY AND TRANSPORT
Substantial investments in fuel cell R&D and a significant number of technology demonstration projects during the past 10 years have sparked significant advances in fuel cell technology. First commercial products are expected in the stationary energy market from 2002/2003 onwards and in mobile applications from 2004.
STATIONARY APPLICATIONS
The future trend in stationary power generation appears to focus on advanced distributed energy products, and a number of distributed generation (DG) products have entered the market or are close to market introduction. For example, residential and commercial buildings are responsible for 32% of natural gas on-site consumption in the USA (space and water heating). The building sector consumes about two-thirds of all electricity generated. Highly efficient on-site co-generation systems using fuel cells are expected to become products for improving building energy efficiency. Distributed Generation is driven by: Market pull: deregulation, environmental concerns, electricity price volatility; differentiation. Technology push: emergence of new small generating technologies, advances in power electronics, smart metering;
UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 62
2010
Kalam, A.
Commercial and regulatory facilitation: DG interconnection standards, lowering of transaction costs, utilities growth strategies and market protection.
PAFCs are the only fuel cells available on a semi-commercial scale. IFC/ONSI Corporation is selling its P25C co-gen unit (total systems efficiency over 80%; 35 - 40% electric efficiency) with an output of 200kW of electric energy. After a number of years attempting to reduce the capital costs, IFC is abandoning PAFC and has recently increased its price to over US$ 5000/kW. Figure 30 shows the P25C PAFC system (Courtesy IFC/ONSI Corp). Over 200 of such Figure 30 systems have been installed for diverse applications such as hospitals, hotels, office Figure 30. P25C PAFC system (Courtesy IFC/ONSI Corp). buildings, schools, utility power plants, airports, computer centres. Combined, the units have clocked up operating times of close to 3 million hours and the best systems showed availabilities of >90%, but on average availabilities were around 80%. A P25C unit also is operating at the Sydney Technology Park. PAFCs have been scaled into the MW range 1MW plants have been operated in US, Europe and Japan, and 5 and 11 MW plants in Japan during the past 10 years. Most systems operate on Natural Gas as fuel but fuel processors have been developed for Diesel fuel and biogas (anaerobic digester gas). Considering these are only demonstration systems, the units proved reliable and successfully demonstrated the potential of fuel cells. However the high installed costs make the PAFCs uneconomical, and interest in this technology is declining rapidly. PEMFCs (Figure 31) of varying designs have been developed by Ballard Power Systems, International Fuel Cells, Plug Power, Siemens, H-Power, Analytical Power, Honeywell, Toyota, Fuji, Mitsubishi Electric and a host of smaller players. Their efficiencies related to carbon fuels (natural gas) of 35% makes them less attractive for stationary applications in particular in a scenario of rising fuel prices, where efficiency becomes a dominant driver. However, the developers of PEMFCs hope that their fast start-up and the anticipated low price due to large manufacturing volumes associated from their use in mobile applications, may counteract the efficiency penalty. In addition, the fast start-up makes PEMFCs ideal peaker and stand-by systems. Ballard/Alstom is currently operating three 250kW systems in Europe, and a similar number has been installed in the US very limited information on the performance of the systems is available. Over the past 2 years micro co-gen systems (for domestic applications) have attracted significant attention. For example, Plug Power and its partners GEMicrogen and Vaillant are developing and demonstrating 5-7kW units for domestic applications (Figure 5). Market entry for late 2002 has been predicted and Vaillant estimates annual European installations of 250000 units by 2010. The drivers for such an application are somewhat uncertain, considering the large load variations in a household and the high gas prices paid by the domestic Figure 31. PEMFCs. consumer.
2010
63
Kalam, A.
MCFCs: A number of demonstration system failures in sizes up to 2 MW, seriously damaged the reputation of this technology, leading to the demise of a number of the development programs (ECN in the Netherlands and MC-Power in the US). However, Fuel Cell Energy (US) in conjunction with its German partner MTU found solutions to a number of the problems surrounding the technology (corrosion, electrolyte seepage, CO2 recycle), and have now successfully demonstrated a 250kW unit for over 1 year. The unit takes up a footprint of 20m2, weighs 15 tons and delivered an electric efficiency of 52%. Fuel Cell Energy is now designing and constructing a 1.5 and 3MW unit, including constructing a combined cycle system consisting of a MCFC and a gas turbine which is anticipated to reach electric efficiencies of 65-70%. Fuel Cell Energy has planned a number of additional demo systems in 2001, and has established a 6500m2 pre-production facility with a capacity of 50 MW per year in 2001 and planned expansions to 400MW per year in 2004. Other MCFC developers include Ansaldo in Italy and IHI and Hitachi in Japan. IHI and Hitachi are currently operating a 1 MW MCFC plant at the Kawagoe thermal power station in Japan. The support systems (BoP) are still very bulky, and require substantial miniaturisation to achieve a viable DG technology. Otherwise the technology will be confined to multi MW sizes. SOFCs promise to become the most efficient and most flexible stationary power units. A number of design configurations are being developed. The most extensively tested configuration is the tubular technology developed by Siemens-Westinghouse (SW). Westinghouse has continuously worked on this design since its conception in the 1960s and has scaled up the technology to 200kW. Figure 32 shows a cell tube bundle (Courtesy S-W). Cells are 22mm in diameter and have an active length of 1500mm with Figure 32. Cell tube bundle (Courtesy S-W). an output of about 300W. The operating temperature is above 1000oC. S-W started system demonstrations in 1986 with a 0.4kW system. Table 6 summarises the field test units carried out by S-W: Table 6: Field test units carried out by S-W
Year 1986 1987 1987 1987 1992 1992 1992 1993 1994 1995 1995 2010 Size kW 0.4 3 3 3 20 20 20 20 20 27 25 Fuel H2 + CO H2 + CO H2 + CO H2 + CO PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG PNG Cell type PST PST PST PST PST PST PST PST PST AES AES Cell length 30 (cm) 36 36 36 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Cell number 24 144 144 144 576 576 576 576 576 576 576 Oper. hours 1760 3012 3683 4882 817 2601 1575 7000 6000 5600 13000 64
COURSE NOTES: GENERATION SYSTEM FUNDAMENTALS Year 1998 1997 1999 2000 Size kW 27 100 100 200 Fuel PNG PNG PNG PNG Cell type AES AES AES AES Cell length 50 150 150 150 Cell number 576 1152 1152 1152 Oper. hours >4000 4035 >14000 254
Kalam, A.
Siemens-Westinghouse recently installed a 200kW pressurised hybrid (SOFC + MTG) in California. These hybrids are projected to become the most efficient electric generators. S/W aims to deliver products (300kW to MWs) into the market place in 2004. Similar to MCFCs, the S-W technology needs to shrink substantially for a viable DG product. Other developers of tubular SOFC systems include Mitsubishi HI and TOTO Corporation in Japan. A number of developers are pursuing planar type stack designs, a geometry similar to other types of fuel cells. These configurations are predicted to achieve lower costs and higher volume power densities. Effort is also under way to reduce the operating temperatures to 700- 800oC. Stationary power products under development by various developers span the capacity range 1-5kW (domestic) to several hundred kW (commercial), open cycle as well as hybrid systems. The main developers include: Ceramic Fuel Cells Ltd. (Australia), Sulzer Hexis (Switzerland), Global Thermoelectrics (Canada), McDermott (US), Honeywell (US) and a number of research institutes. Sulzer Hexis and Global Thermoelectrics are developing domestic size systems Sulzer operates currently 8 field test systems in Europe and Japan, and plans to enter the market with a micro co-generation unit in 2002/3. Ceramic Fuel Cells Ltd. (CFCL) is developing a 40 kW co-gen system operated on natural gas or LPG for small commercial applications as market entry product for 2003. CFCLs system approach is to tightly integrate BoP (balance of plant) and stack and minimise fuel processing. The company has been successful in developing internal reforming cells, and has also developed a fuel processor for LPG. CFCL has constructed and tested stacks and systems up to 25 kW.
TRANSPORT APPLICATIONS
PEMFCs have attracted most interest for transport applications with the leaders being XCELLSIS (joint venture between Ballard Power Systems, Daimler Chrysler and Ford), but most car manufacturers are involved in fuel cell developments. Initially, due to their size, fuel cells were fitted to buses, and a number operated in Vancouver, Chicago, California and Germany during the past 5 years. As fuel cells became more compact - the newest stack technology from Ballard features a stack power density of 1.3kW/l - fuel cell engines for passenger cars were demonstrated. The requirements for transport applications constitute tough goals to meet: 5000 hours of operation, over 10000 thermal cycles and fast start-up and cool-down. Fuel processing is another formidable challenge - hydrogen storage is difficult and costly, on board reforming of liquid fuels (methanol, petrol) requires complete removal of CO to ppm levels.
2010
65
Kalam, A.
An interesting application - a fuel cell auxiliary power unit (APU) delivering 3-5kW of electric power to replace the alternator - was suggested by BMW 2 years ago, and a number of developers are now considering to develop a product for this application. For gasoline and Diesel powered cars, trucks and buses, an SOFC APU would be the ideal solution. BMW has contracted Delphi Automotive to develop this product. The market potential of such a product for long haul transport (buses, trucks), for military applications as well as cars is substantial, and the US Department of Energy recently launched the SECA program a 350 million US$ initiative (over 10 years) to develop this product. However, substantial technical challenges (10000 thermal cycles, mechanical vibration resistance, fast start-up and cool-down) need to be solved.
FUEL CELLS IN A RENEWABLE WORLD
Fuel cells have the potential to become an integral part of a future sustainable energy chain. To date, fuel cells have been trialed in a number of hybrid configurations involving renewable fuels. Demonstration examples include: A solar hydrogen project - hydrogen produced by water hydrolysis using PV electricity (360 kW) involving fuel cells operated in Bavaria (Bayernwerk, BMW, Linde and Siemens) for 13 years. CSIRO is working on a solar thermal sustainable energy project. In high temperature fuel cells, the separation of spent air and fuel streams makes CO2 sequestration feasible (Shell/Siemens-Westinghouse). A number of demonstration projects in USA and Europe demonstrated the operation of fuel cells (ONSI/IFC P25C 200 kWe PAFC) on biogas, for example anaerobic digester gas. Gas cleaning (sulfur compounds, halogens, unsaturated hydrocarbons and solid matter) proved the major technical challenge.
2.2.2.5 FUEL CELL PROJECTS IN AUSTRALIA
Ceramic Fuel Cells Ltd (CFCL) was established in 1992 with the objective to develop and commercialise products based on SOFC technology. The technology base originated in CSIRO (Figure 2.33). The company is a leading developer in planar SOFC technology, and has development facilities (about 5000m2) in the Melbourne suburb of Noble Park. CFCL employs over 100 staff, primarily engineers and scientists. CFCL has demonstrated SOFC stacks and systems to 25kW in size, and is currently working on its first commercial product, which it plans to launch in 2003.
2010
66
Kalam, A.
An ONSI P25C 200kWe PAFC CHP system has been operating in the Australian Technology Park since early 1999. The objective of the project is to gain experience with fuel cell co-generation systems. Over the past 10 years fuel cells have made immense progress, and their market entry appears imminent (2002 onwards). Invented in the 1830s and considered for the past 50 years as the new electricity generation technology, products are expected to appear during the next 2-3 years. A number of the technical capabilities of fuel cells such as high efficiency, low pollution, low noise and flexible operation have been successfully demonstrated. Hurdles for commercialisation include: development of cost effective products from the various fuel cell technologies, and regulatory issues related DG technologies in general: safe plant operation (gas equipment standards) grid interconnection standards (import/export, power quality); grid control: difficulties envisaged with current hierarchical grid (smart grid required); new grid control technology (hardware and software); net metering technology.
Major developments in fuel cells are in: (1) Japan - demonstration fuel cell units have been developed, (2) USA, UK and Canada - pioneers in this area. Other small demonstration units are now available, e.g. a small methanol fuel cell producing enough power to drive small motors and it costs around $30. This is an alkali fuel cell, but instead of H2 it uses alcohol as the fuel. Fuel cells are now proving to be an emerging energy option and very soon will be used in cogeneration systems and in zero emission vehicles.
2010
67
Kalam, A.
2.2.2.6 REFERENCES
The following websites contain extensive information on fuel cells. In addition, most developers listed in the paper operate web sites: World Fuel Cell Council: Fuel Cells 2000: US Fuel Cell Council: NETL Fuel Cells: American H2 Assoc.: Energy Web Directory: Ceramic Fuel Cells Ltd: www.fuelcellworld.org/ www.fuelcells.org/ www.usfcc.com/ www.fetc.doe.gov/products/power/ www.clean-air.org www.energy.ca.gov/links/hydrogen.htm www.cfcl.com.au
Hydrogen can be used as a medium for energy transmission and storage. Electrolysis is a wellestablished commercial process yielding pure hydrogen. H2 can be converted very efficiently back to electricity by means of fuel cells. Also the use of hydrogen as fuel for aircraft and automobiles could encourage its large scale production, storage and distribution.
2.3 COGENERATION AND DISTRIBUTED RESOURCES
Distributed Generation (DG) entails using many small generators of 2-50 MW output, installed at various strategic points throughout the area, so that each provides power to a small number of consumers nearby. These may be solar, mini/micro hydel or wind turbine units, highly efficient gas turbines, small combined cycle plants, since these are the most economical choices. Dispersed generation refers to use of still smaller generating units, of less than 500 kW output and often sized to serve individual homes or businesses. Micro gas turbines, fuel cells, diesel, and small wind and solar PV generators make up this category. Dispersed generation has been used for decades as an emergency backup power source. Most of these units are used only for reliability reinforcement. Now-a-days inverters are being increasingly used in domestic sector as an emergency supply during black outs. The distributed/ dispersed generators can be stand alone/autonomous or grid connected depending upon the requirement. In many businesses, the purchase of electricity and fuel for use of boiler plant is often regarded as a fairly unglamorous subject. The boiler house, transformers and switchgear are seen as a necessary evil, which merely detracts from an organisation mainstream activity; whether that be brewing beer, making cars, paper or chemicals. Heat and power are the life-blood of any industry; essential for the operation of everything from the lowly light bulb and radiator to the most complex process technology. A secure supply of power and heat is therefore of paramount importance, and it must be provided at the lowest possible cost.
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 68
Kalam, A.
Obtaining these vital commodities at the lowest cost is traditionally the duty of the management. The privatisation of the electricity supply industry has brought competition in to the market place for electricity supply and buyers (Figure 2.34).
As well as the institutional changes in the electricity supply industry, there is also now an opportunity of reducing overall costs of energy supply by using cogeneration technology.
2.3.1 THE TECHNOLOG Y
Cogeneration - is essentially a philosophy. It describes the use of technology that combines the generation of heat and electricity in a single unit in a way that is more efficient than producing heat and electricity separately in boiler plant and at the power station. In other words, cogeneration is the energy process whereby waste heat, produced during the generation of electricity, is utilised for steam raising or heating. Cogeneration plants produce both electrical or mechanical energy and thermal energy from the same fuel source. The mechanical energy can be used for any mechanical application such as driving motors, compressors, extruders, etc. The electrical energy can be used to meet in-house demand and any surplus sold back to the electricity grid. The thermal energy can be converted to steam or hot water for process application, or for drying purposes. The engineering principles behind integrating electricity and heat supply have long been understood, and the technology has been refined and developed over the years, so that now, modern cogeneration systems can achieve very high fuel utilisation efficiencies. When fuel is burned in a
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 69
Kalam, A.
conventional power station, much of the energy in the fuel is converted to heat, only a fraction of which is converted to electricity. In brown coal and gas-fired power stations, 28% to 35% of the energy in the fuel is converted to electricity; the other 65% to 72% becomes heat that must be disposed of (Figure 2.35).
In cogeneration, both the recovered heat and the electricity or mechanical energy are used, so efficiency increases to 70% to 82% depending on the prime mover used. This utilisation is well over twice that of a large conventional power station (Figure 2.36).
The economics of cogeneration schemes are most compelling for organisations with a high heat requirement. Units range from as little as 20 kW to hundreds of MW and can be linked to public and commercial buildings, industrial sites and community heating schemes. Cogeneration has a very wide application in the industrial and commercial sectors, and also in public institutions. In the industrial sector potential exist in manufacturing (petroleum, chemical, food and beverage, textiles, paper, iron and steel, motor vehicles, glass and clay), mining and forestry. In the commercial sector potential exist in office buildings, supermarkets, hotels, restaurants, health clubs, computer centres and laundries. In public institutions, cogeneration is suitable for hospitals, nursing homes, schools, libraries and prisons.
2010
70
Kalam, A.
There are two obvious times to consider investing in cogeneration: first, when existing boiler capacity needs to be replaced and second, when new buildings are being planned. Hospitals, for example are already being designed to include a cogeneration system from inception. Once the economics have been worked out and the investment has been made, financial savings quickly offset the initial additional costs incurred, giving a payback in as little as two or three years. The life of a cogeneration system can exceed fifteen years, so the savings accrue long after the initial capital costs have been recouped.
2.3.1.1 FUELS
Cogeneration can run on virtually any fuel: solid, liquid, or gaseous. It also uses a wide variety of generating plant types. The other fuels include - wood/wood waste, landfill gas, municipal solid waste, industrial waste and agricultural waste. This offers terrific flexibility when choosing the scheme that best suits an organisation's individual circumstances. The fact that so many combinations of fuel and plant type can be employed means that there can be a scheme to match most installations. The fuels which one would normally associate with on-site generation schemes are oil, briquettes, LPG and natural gas. It must be remembered, however, that the price, availability and suitability of the fuel will govern its choice in any on-site generation scheme. Therefore if the site is known where the plant will be installed and it has been decided whether turbines or engines will be used, the gas supply authority may be approached for costs of making gas available. The gas supply authority is responsible for works required up to and including the meter/regulator assembly. There may be costs associated with this work. The consumer is responsible for the concrete base and chainwire mesh enclosure for the meter/regulator assembly and all works from the meter outlet to the appliance/s. Also any water-cooling facility for the interstage gas compression to provide the gas at the desired firing pressure should be considered. The metering pressures available to consumers are dependent upon the pressure in the supply main and the minimum pressure that the appliance will operate. Pressures above the standard pressures are by special arrangement. Just about all engines and turbines require pressures above standard. e.g. Gas Engines Gas Turbines = = 40-400 kilopascals 1750 kilopascals
It is most likely that the large engines and all turbines will require the supply gas pressure available at the meter to be boosted to that specified by the equipment supplier. All costs associated with boosting equipment are the customer's responsibility and supply/installation should be arranged with the equipment suppliers.
2.3.1.2 COGENERATION CYCLES
A cogeneration plant basically comprises of a prime mover (gas or steam turbine or internal combustion engine) and a waste heat recovery boiler or steam generator. Electricity (or mechanical power) and thermal energy can be achieved through cogeneration by either a topping or a
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 71
Kalam, A.
bottoming-cycle system (Figures 2.37 and 2.38). In a topping-cycle system, fuel is burned to generate electricity; the thermal energy exhausted from this process is then used either in an industrial application or for space heating. In a bottoming-cycle system, the waste heat is recovered from an industrial process application and used to generate electricity. Combined-cycle systems generally use a topping-cycle gas turbine; the exhaust gases are then used in a bottoming-cycle steam turbine to generate more electricity and process thermal energy. Heat pumps may also be used with a cogeneration system to upgrade low-temperature heat for process use. In a topping-cycle system, fuel is burned to generate electricity and the thermal energy exhausted is used in a process application. This is the most common form of cogeneration. This process is applicable to any operation that uses boilers to produce steam or heat. Topping cycle cogeneration involves converting the boiler to produce steam of higher pressure and temperature. This steam is then piped to a turbine that runs a generator to produce electricity. The heat is then used in the manufacturing process, or for heating or cooling. Bottoming cycle cogeneration is generally used where an industry process produces waste heat at high temperatures (above 300C). In the bottoming cycle, (shown in Figure 5), waste heat from a manufacturing process, generally with the addition of more fuel, is fed into a boiler to make steam. The steam is then sent to a turbine, which operates a generator to produce electricity. Alternatively, other industrial plants or large institutions may operate a gas turbine to drive a generator for the production of electricity. Under ordinary operation, waste heat from the gas turbine is simply discharged. With cogeneration, the heat discharged from the turbine goes into a waste heat exchanger, which would be used to produce the heat or steam needed in the factory or institution. In bottoming-cycle system waste heat is recovered from a process application and used to generate electricity. Prime movers can also be combined to produce compound, or "combined cycle" cogeneration. Bottoming cycle cogeneration is likely to be used in the metals, glass refractory and cement industries but are generally less wide-spread than topping cycle systems. The turbines used in cogeneration process can also be linked to equipment to provide mechanical power instead of to a generator to provide electricity. Topping cycle cogeneration has wide application in the food, pulp and paper, and chemical industries, and in hospitals and other large institutions. Cogeneration plants vary widely in size and packaged micro-cogen units in the size range 20 kW to 60 kW are commercially available for suitable office buildings, restaurants, hotels, etc. For units below 800 kW, diesel and gas engines is the most common type of prime motor. From approximately 800 kW to 10 MW, gas turbines or large reciprocating engines can be used. Steam cycles (steam turbines) can also be used especially in coal, waste gas or biomass fired cogeneration systems. For applications above 10 MW, gas and steam turbines are generally used.
2010
72
Kalam, A.
Work done or energy possessed in an electrical circuit, mechanical or thermal system is measured in the same units viz. JOULES. This is expected because mechanical, electrical and thermal energies are interchangeable. E.g. When mechanical work is converted to heat or heat to work, the quantity of work in Joules is equal to the quantity of heat in Joules (in the past the unit of heat energy was calorie, however 1 Calorie = 4.186 Joules. Hence thermal unit Calorie is obsolete and it is common to express heat as Joules).
2.3.2.1 ELECTRICAL ENERGY
One joule of energy is expended electrically when one Coulomb is moved through a potential difference of 1 Volt. Suppose a charge of Q Coulomb moves through a potential difference of V Volts Then electrical energy expended is = VQ.
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 73
Kalam, A.
Joule is also known as Watt-second i.e. 1 Joule = 1 Watt-second. Hen we are dealing with large amount of electrical energy, it is often convenient to express it in kilowatt hours (kWh). 1 kWh = 1000 Watt-hours = 1000 x 3600 Watt-second or Joules 1 kWh = 3600 x 10 Joules or Watt-second.
Although this practical unit of electrical energy is kWh, from the above relationship it is easy to convert this to Joules. KWh is the commercial unit of electrical energy because electricity supply industries charge consumers for the kilo watt hours of energy consumed.
2.3.3 THERMAL ENERGY
The thermal energy was originally Calorie. One Calorie is the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of 1 gram of water through 1C. If S is the specific heat of a body, then amount of heat required to raise the temperature of m gram of body through C is given by: Heat gained = mS Calories Experimentally it has been found that 1 Calorie = 4.186 Joules, so that heat in Calories can be expressed in Joules. Heat gained = (mS ) x 4.186 Joules.
2.3.3.1 TARIFFS
The rate at which energy is supplied to a consumer is known as tariff. Tariff normally includes the total cost of producing and supplying energy plus profit. The cost of producing energy depends on the magnitude of energy consumed by the user and the load condition. Therefore consideration has to be given to the different types of consumers (e.g. industrial, domestic and commercial) while fixing the tariff. This makes the problem of suitable rate making highly complicated. Tariffs may be divided into the following groups: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Domestic premises Off-peak Combined premises Commercial Agricultural Industrial
2010
74
Kalam, A.
Other tariffs may be imposed due to special circumstances. (a) applies to electrical energy used for domestic purposes in a private residence. The tariff usually consists of a kWh charge plus a fixed quarterly charged based on the number of rooms, floor areas, number of outlets etc. applies to electrical energy supplied to any premises usually between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.. This tariff consists of a kWh charge lower than that of (a) plus a fixed quarterly charge. Applies to electrical energy used for trade, business, or professional purposes as well as for domestic purposes. For example, a shop with house or flat combined or a doctors surgery. This tariff does not apply to premises in which items are manufactured or grown for sale. This tariff is similar to (a) but the fixed quarterly charge is higher. Applies to electrical energy supplied to premises used solely for commercial purposes, but not to premises in which items are manufactured or grown for sale. The tariff is similar to (a) except that there is an additional fixed quarterly charge based on the maximum kVA required. Applies to electrical energy supplied o a farm, market garden or agricultural holding. This tariff is similar to (d). Applies to electrical energy supplied to industrial premises. This tariff is a monthly maximum demand tariff.
(b) (c)
(d)
(e) (f)
Maximum demand is defined as twice the number of kVAh supplied during any thirty consecutive minutes during the account month. This maximum demand is divided into blocks of units and a decreasing scale of charges is applied to successive blocks. In addition a kWh charge is made. The energy supplied during the account month is divided into blocks of kWh and a decreasing scale of charges is applied to successive blocks. These blocks are linked to the kVA of maximum demand. The overall effect of his tariff is that the lower the power factor, the greater the average cost to the consumer of each kWh. For loads exceeding 100kVA, consumers are encouraged to take their supply at 11kV or above. The substation is then the property and responsibility of the consumers, the supply being metered on the HV side. Otherwise an additional charge per kWh is made to cover the interest and depreciation charges on the initial cost of the substation and the cost of transformer losses.
2.3.3.2 OTHER DEFINITIONS
(i)
Demand load requirement averaged over a suitable and specified interval of time of short definition. Load is averaged over an interval of time, there is no such thing as instantaneous demand. Average Demand average power requirement during some specified period of time of considerable duration such as day, month or year giving daily, monthly or yearly average demand. kWh consume in the period Average power = ----------------------------------Hours in the period
(ii)
2010
75
Kalam, A.
(iii)
Maximum Demand greatest of all demands, which have occurred during a given period. This interval is during a certain period such as day, month or year. This is not instantaneous demand but the greatest average power demand occurring during any of the relatively short intervals (usually 1 minute, 15 minute or 30 minute duration) within the period. Demand Factor ratio of the actual maximum demand made by the load to the rating of the connected load. Maximum demand Demand Factor = ----------------------Connected load
(iv)
(v)
Diversity Factor ratio of the sum of the individual demands of different elements of a load during a specified period to the simultaneous (or coincident) maximum demands of all these elements of load during the same period. The value of the demand factor is always greater than 1. Sum of individual maximum demands Diversity Factor = -------------------------------------------------Maximum demand of the whole year
(vi)
Load Factor can be either operating load factor or connected load factor. Average power Operating load factor = ----------------------Maximum demand
Each time interval over which the maximum demand is based and the period over which the power is averaged must be definitely specified. For example, the maximum demand is based on a 30-minute interval and he power is averaged over a month, then it is known as half hour monthly load factor. Average power input Connected load factor = -------------------------Connected load Average power = ----------------------- x maximum demand (vii) maximum demand ---------------------connected load
Plant Factor applied to generating plant only. Ratio of actual energy produced to the maximum possible energy that the plant could produce during the same period. Average demand on the plant Plant factor = ---------------------------------Rated capacity of the plant
2010
76
Kalam, A.
It is customary to quote efficiencies for power plants on a higher heating value (HHV) basis than a lower heating value (LHV) basis. These values differ by the way in which energy measurements are conducted. The HHV takes into account the latent heat of condensation of water vapour in the combustion exhaust gases, while the LHV excludes this energy. Normally boiler efficiencies are also quoted on an HHV basis. In Australia it is conventional to use the HHV for fuels and for calculating efficiencies. In Europe the convention is to use the LHV. Gas turbine performance is also usually quoted on the LHV basis overseas. Heating values at constant pressure or constant volume are also slightly different. It is normal to assume constant pressure heating values, unless extremely rigorous analysis is being conducted. Thermal efficiencies of electricity generation plants calculated on the basis of the fuel LHV result in numerical values approximately 10% higher than when calculated on the basis of the HHV. Fuel is commonly sold on an HHV basis Gas turbines in particular, and usually reciprocating engines as well, are frequently quoted on an LHV basis. The difference between the two bases is significant. The HHV (also referred to as the higher calorific value (HCV) or gross calorific value (GCF)) of a fuel is the amount of heat released if a fuel is combusted at nominally standard atmospheric conditions and the products of combustion are returned to this temperature and pressure, assuming the water content of the exhaust constituents is in liquid form. The HV calculates the heat release assuming the exhaust water content is in vapour form. For natural gas, the difference between the two is that HHV = LHV + 11%. This difference flows through to efficiency calculations and the calculation of fuel costs. Foe oil, coal, etc. he difference, although less, is still significant.
2.3.3.5 COGENERATION EFFICIENCY
There is no universal standard for quoting the efficiencies. When comparing the efficiencies of cogeneration plants with the case with no cogeneration, remember that the no cogeneration comprises the efficiencies and losses of both a site based thermal heat raising facility (steam or hot water) and imported electricity (which might be generated with coal, for example, then transported to the site via a transmission system).
2010
77
Kalam, A.
In calculating annual average efficiencies, the averages include the times during the year when N-1 units are operating, and allow for imported electricity (and the emissions created from the production of this electricity) in the calculations. The following measures are applied:
[Cogen gross elec O/P] + [imported elec] [parasitic elec] Net electricity = -------------------------------------------------------------------------[Fuel to cogen unit] + [fuel used for imported electricity]
[Cogen gross elec O/P] + [imported elec] [parasitic elec] Electrical = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------[Fuel to cogen unit] + [fuel used for imported elec] [fuel for steam]
where [fuel for steam] is the fuel, which would have been used to raise the site steam (or hot water) at the auxiliary boiler efficiency. [Cogen gross elec O/P] + [imported elec] [parasitic elec] Overall thermal = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[Fuel to cogen unit] + [fuel used for imported elec] + [fuel to aux boiler]
Before considering the potential for heat and power, it is useful to reflect briefly on the history of heat and power supply and why cogeneration is so little used today.
2.3.4.1 60 YEARS AGO
Before the development of the Australian's electricity grid system, power stations were sited close to centres of demand. This provided the opportunity, where appropriate, to utilise the waste heat from the power station.
2.3.4.2 GROWING ELECTRICITY DEMAND
As the demand for electricity grew, the high cost of moving coal, the dominant fuel for generation, made it economically attractive to build large power stations on, or close to, coal fields. In response, the Grid grew to allow bulk transfers of electricity from the power stations to the demand centres often referred to as coal by wire.
2010
78
Kalam, A.
The generating companies inherited an asset base predominantly centres upon coal-fired power stations remote from demand centres and unable to use about two thirds of their heat input. Gas is becoming established as a fuel for power generation and the traditional reservations about using it in this role are defeated by the efficiencies achieved with cogeneration.
2.3.4.4 THE FUTURE
In total contrast to coal, gas can be moved relatively easily and without impacting on the environment. Therefore, the engineering case for gas-fired cogeneration meeting local heat and power needs is very strong. There might well be seen a reversal of the trends of the last 60 years, with the use of the Grid declining and heat and power production being combined close to the point of need.
2.3.5 WHY COGENERATION NOW ?
Regardless of the engineering case for cogeneration, it will not "take off" unless it is economically attractive. The two fundamental parameters that dominate commercial viability are:(a) (b) primary fuel costs; the capital costs of cogeneration schemes.
Most cogeneration schemes currently being developed are fuelled by gas. Until comparatively recently the pricing policy, did not encourage the development of gas-fired electricity generation. It was argued that gas was a premium fuel, too valuable for this application. This view has now changed. Gas and Fuel Corporation (GFC) and other independent gas suppliers saw the opportunity to expand the gas market by fuelling electricity generation. The development of combined cycle plant, achieving efficiencies of around 50% and, of course, cogeneration schemes achieving up to 90% plus, weakened the arguments against using gas for power generation. Such has been the success of gas entering this market that Gas and Fuel Corporation have started reviewing the prices for large long term contracts. Small to medium sized cogeneration schemes are usually supplied under medium term (up to ten years) gas contracts. The economics of such schemes are sensitive to the future gas price.
2.3.5.2 CAPITAL COST
Industrial cogeneration schemes in general utilise either reciprocating engines or, more commonly now for larger installations, gas turbines. Concentration here is on gas turbines because they are generally preferred for schemes of several megawatts. Gas turbine technology has been improving rapidly in recent years producing more efficient machines. The market is developing with more players offering a greater range of machines. Most importantly, the specific capital cost of manufacture of gas turbine plant (in terms of $ per kW) has been falling in real terms and could continue to do so. However, the recent weakness of the dollar could have a serious effect on the price of equipment manufactured overseas.
2010
79
Kalam, A.
There have, therefore, been developments favourable to cogeneration in the two key areas determining commercial viability. However, other factors are also seen to encourage the development of cogeneration in the 1990's, and beyond.
2.3.5.3 ESI PRIVATISATLON
There is little argument that when the ESI was in the public sector it was dominated by the actions of large utilities and municipal electricity authorities. The utilities designed and built one of the best integrated electricity supply systems in the world. However, its preference for large power stations and its control over electricity prices worked against small scale generation. Further, the surplus capacity within the utilities, experienced through the 1980's, meant that new plant had little capacity value and this was reflected in the prices offered for privately generated electricity. One immediate effect of the privatisation of the ESI is anticipated to be the fall in prices to many larger customers - a force acting against cogeneration. However, a more enduring effect is that a true competitive market for electricity will be established, encouraging new players to enter and more innovative approaches being applied. It is inevitable that supply and demand will come closer into balance and in the medium term this should produce a more favourable commercial environment for the development of cogeneration.
2.3.5.4 THE "GREEN" TICKET
Cogeneration can genuinely be labelled a "Green" technology. The overall thermodynamic efficiency of cogeneration is very high. Further, when gas fired, no sulphur dioxide is produced and NOx can be effectively controlled either by steam injection or dry NOx control through the design of burners. Finally, the application of cogeneration reduces the production of CO2 compared with the grid/boiler approach. Although it is difficult to put a value on "green" benefits in money terms, it can do no company any harm to be associated with environmentally friendly technology.
2.3.5.5 AGEING BOILER PLANT
In the fifties and sixties falling electricity prices, in real terms, encouraged industry to import electricity and produce steam and hot water in conventional boiler plant. Significant amounts of low cost, efficient package boilers were installed in the 1960's. Much of this plant is now reaching the end of its useful life.
2.3.5.6 SECURITY OF SUPPLY
Security of supply can be of paramount importance in industrial environments. An on-site cogeneration scheme can enhance the security of both heat and electricity supplies. In particular, it is possible to design the electrical connections to ensure continuity of supply for the complete failure of the Grid. Such arrangements can prove most beneficial from both commercial and, in certain situations, safety viewpoints.
2.3.6 COGENERATION IN AUSTRALIA
Cogeneration has existed in Australia since the introduction of electricity. In the early days of electricity, industry often provided its own power (cogeneration where the balance of heat and
2010
80
Kalam, A.
power was right) and the public system provided domestic and public power. As public utility power became more available and reliable generation on-site reduced. The 1980's saw an upturn in cogeneration for environmental and economic reasons particularly in Victoria and South Australia. In 1987 the Victorian State Government and State Electricity Commission (SEC) of Victoria introduced a Cogeneration Incentives Package and about the same time in South Australia SAGASCO established a cogeneration division. The 1990's presents an era of great opportunities and challenges for the cogeneration industry as the energy supply industry is transformed by the break-up of vertically integrated utilities (in Victoria) and the introduction of competition between energy supplier and the Grid. At the end of 1999, cogeneration and distributed generation represented 8.3% of installed generation capacity in Australia. In the 12 months leading up to 31 December 1999, nine cogeneration projects (86.3 MW capacity) and four non-cogeneration, distributed generation projects (205 MW capacity) were commissioned. In addition, seven cogeneration projects (234 MW capacity) and 10 non-cogeneration projects (294.9 MW capacity) were committed and were under construction. Cogeneration is not just a smart technical solution to provide heat and power to industry and commerce in a cost effective and environmentally sound manner. Cogeneration exists in a complex competitive and regulatory environment that has capacity to prevent the full development of its contribution to the economy and environment.
2.3.6.1 COGENERATION DATA
No authoritative information is available on the extent of non-utility cogeneration and power production. The best available estimate puts cogeneration capacity in Australia at about 2,200 MW, made up as follows by industry:
Industry Alumina Sugar Paper Nickel Chemical Misc Manufact Oil Refining Steel Mineral Process Health Water Food Building Education Recreation Capacity (MW) 498.5 332.1 271 261 215.7 189.7 183 73.8 66.9 60 20 13.2 7.8 7.6 2.9 No. of projects 6 30 9 6 6 4 4 3 3 25 6 10 7 3 11
2010
81
COURSE NOTES: GENERATION SYSTEM FUNDAMENTALS Industry TOTAL Capacity (MW) 2203.2 No. of projects 133
Kalam, A.
The alumina industry is the most significant industry sector, accounting for 23% of operational capacity, 38% of electricity generation and 36% of thermal production. Western Australia is the greatest user of cogeneration by State/Territory accounting for 35% of operational capacity, 39% of electricity generation capacity and 32% of thermal production.
State ACT NSW NT QLD SA TAS VIC WA TOTAL Capacity (MW) 0.1 281.9 105 413.5 215 15.5 409.7 762.5 2203.2 No. of projects 1 18 1 35 25 2 34 17 133
Steam turbine projects accounted for 58% of operational capacity by prime mover technology, 57% of electricity generation and 95% of thermal production.
Type CCGT GT RCP FCELL ST TOTAL Capacity (MW) 538 285.9 77 0.2 1302 2203.2 No. of projects 4 19 53 1 56 133
Natural gas projects accounted for 56% of operational capacity by primary fuel, 66% of electricity generation and 38% of thermal production. Renewable generation capacity accounted for 360.3 MW of capacity, representing 16.4% of total generation capacity.
Fuel Type Natural Gas Bagasse Coal Waste Gas Oil Capacity (MW) 1224.5 332.1 363.5 144.3 109 No. of projects 71 30 8 6 2
2010
82
COURSE NOTES: GENERATION SYSTEM FUNDAMENTALS Fuel Type Digester Gas Landfill Gas Waste Biomass LPG TOTAL Capacity (MW) 19.1 7.1 2 1.6 2203.2 No. of projects 6 2 1 7 133
Kalam, A.
40 93 133
The following charts by State/Territorty, Prime Mover Technology and Primary Fuel demonstrate key aspects of the non-cogeneration, grid connecteds, distributed generation industry in Australia at 31 December 1999 and are based on informal survey.
State ACT NSW NT QLD SA TAS VIC WA TOTAL Capacity (MW) 2 162.1 65.4 501.5 74.5 10 75.2 569.3 1460 No. of projects 2 8 3 5 6 1 13 9 47
No. of projects 4 19 53 1 3 47
No. of projects 12 21
2010
83
COURSE NOTES: GENERATION SYSTEM FUNDAMENTALS Fuel Type Water Hydro Coal Steam Meth Waste Gas Oil TOTAL Capacity (MW) 75 96.8 60 10 1460.1 No. of projects 10 2 1 1 47
Kalam, A.
31 16 47
At 31 December 1999, seven cogeneration projects totalling 234 MW and ten non-cogeneration, grid connected, distributed generation projects totalling 295 MW were committed and were under construction. Renewable projects amounted to 13% of the overall total.
Plant COGENERATON FOSSIL FUEL Worsley Alumina Worsley Alumina Bulwer Island QLD Phophate Macquarie Uni
Location
Type/Fuel
MW Capacity
Worsley, WA Worsley, WA Bulwer Is., QLD Mount Isa, QLD Nth Ryde, NSW
GT/natural gas ST/natural gas CCGT/natural gas ST/natural gas RCP/natural gas
120 34 37 20 1 212
RENEWABLE Visy Paper Energy Developments Tumut, NSW Wollongong, NSW ST/woodwaste RCP/munic.waste 17 5 22 TOTAL COGEN 1460.1 47 234
NON-COGENERATON FOSSIL FUEL Redbank Power Plant Ladbroke Grove Power Plant East Coast Power Plant
GRID CONNECTED
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION
120 84 42 246
2010
84
COURSE NOTES: GENERATION SYSTEM FUNDAMENTALS RENEWABLE Pacific Power Stanwell Corporation Pacific Power Stanwell Corporation Melbourne Water Water Corporation Energy Developments Burrinjuck, NSW Ravenhoe, QLD Blayney, NSW Koomboloomba, QLD Werribee, VIC Subiaco, WA Jacks Gully, NSW HT/water WT/wind WT/wind HT/water RCP/digester gas RCP/effluent sludge RCP/landfill gas 15 12 10 7 2.4 1.5 1 48.9 TOTAL COGEN 294.9
Kalam, A.
Technology Types CCGT: GT: RCP: ST: HT: WT: Combined cycle gas turbine Gas turbine Reciprocating gas engine Steam turbine Hydro turbine Wind turbine
Victoria has traditionally relied on its plentiful brown coal resources as a source of base load electricity and on natural gas and hydro for its peak load. It is clear, however, that great potential exists for industry and commerce to contribute economically to electricity production through cogeneration. The Victorian Government has given cogeneration a high profile and its support for the development of the technology was outlined in the Government Economic Strategy Paper - "Victoria The Next Decade" released in 1984. This was followed by the Government's paper in June 1989 on the Greenhouse Challenge outlined Cogeneration as one of the vehicles to minimise atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases. The SEC has adopted the Government's policies in its Cogeneration and Renewable Energy Strategy. This strategy includes: encouraging the efficient use of fuel and helping its customers gain the benefits of energy efficiency from cogeneration and renewable energy projects; promoting ways of reducing levels of CO2 emission into the atmosphere by encouraging technology such as cogeneration;
2010
85
Kalam, A.
considering opportunities for joint ventures in potential cogeneration and renewable energy schemes; encouraging and promoting commercially viable projects by introducing incentives to stimulate interest in cogeneration and renewable energy projects; encouraging the development of a professional and effective cogeneration and renewable energy industry.
To further the commitment in promoting cogeneration in Victoria the following measures are taken: Providing a market for cogenerated power by enacting a statutory commitment to purchase the power. Providing reasonable buyback rates for cogenerated power that reward cogenerators but are not subsidised by other customers. This can be done by buying excess power at the SEC's avoided cost, that is, the amount the SEC saves by not generating the power itself. Making payments to cogenerators who guarantee the availability of future capacity. These payments reflect the amount the SEC saves by the deferral or elimination of the need for some future power stations. Adopting a new approach to standby supplies to remove current discrimination against cogenerators. Examination of wheeling policies to encourage worthwhile cogeneration projects to proceed.
In recognition that a high proportion of potential cogenerators are now burning natural gas to produce process heat or steam, users should be encouraged to convert to cogeneration as a small addition amount of gas burned can yield an overall energy saving. Encourage the use of coal in cogeneration systems. Examining the pricing structure of natural gas for cogeneration. Evaluation of the merits of a separate cogeneration gas tariff and its effect on the existing Government gas pricing policy. Encourage the use of renewable fuels and residues through provision of Government financial incentives. Provide financial assistance for feasibility studies for projects that on initial assessment look technically feasible and economically viable. Encourage projects to serve as local models and using early studies to evaluate effectiveness of efforts to promote cogeneration.
The key elements of the SEC incentives package for projects smaller than 10 megawatts are: for sites which take SEC power in addition to cogeneration, the standby demand charge is waived for three years, SEC interconnection costs are repayable over the contract period, SEC buyback rates up to 10 MW are tied to the SEC's tariff rate and are linked to CPI increases,
UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 86
2010
Kalam, A.
financial assistance is available for feasibility studies for special projects, a 10 year contract period that allows for escalation in buyback rates.
In 1987, the SEC in conjunction with the Victorian Government took the initiative by launching the "Cogeneration & Renewable Energy Incentive Package" to further encourage the smaller potential cogenerators.
ENCOURAGING COGENERATION IN THE PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTORS
Carrying out a detailed examination of cogeneration potential into public facilities e.g. hospitals, universities, libraries, nursing homes etc. Installing and promoting the installation of cogeneration plants instead of constructing additional new central power stations. Encouraging financing of Private and Public sector projects by outside investors.
Developing a marketing plan to promote the development and wider use of cogeneration. Developing publications to promote the awareness of the opportunities arising from cogeneration in the community, particularly the industrial and commercial sectors. Establishing a Cogeneration Advisory Group to help potential congenerators and provide a consultative service.
Some people are still surprised that the SEC synonymous with what they believe is a power monopoly, should be promoting alternative production. The reasons are not only economically and environmentally sound, but also ensure efficient utilisation of the State's resources. It costs the Commission about $1.3 million to produce one megawatt of power. Therefore 500 MW of cogeneration power will save it $650 million in capital expenditure. The SEC benefits directly by avoiding capital borrowings, particularly for the construction of new power stations. Cogeneration also creates new electricity supplies much faster than the Commission could plan and build new power stations, which take many years from inception to production. Small generation plants whether cogeneration or renewable also meet environmental licensing requirements more easily than a new central power station. They can also introduce power into the system near to the point of use and reduce system losses.
2.3.7 COGENERATION COMMERCIAL VIABILITY
It would be irresponsible to give the impression that cogeneration offers a panacea to all energy problems. Commercially viable opportunities are still small in number. The main factors influencing commercial viability are dependant on site's heat to power ratio and equipment utilisation.
2.3.7.1 HEAT/POWER RATIO
The balance of heat and power should be compatible with the cogeneration plant - of the order of 3:1 for a gas turbine based scheme. This ratio should ideally be constant, not changing drastically either
2010
87
Kalam, A.
seasonally or daily. Schemes with a heat to power ratio greater or less than 3:1 would need to consider carefully the commercial implications of exporting or importing electricity.
2.3.7.2 UTILISATION
Although the cost of cogeneration is falling in real terms, it is still relatively expensive compared with large generating plant and shell boilers. It is, therefore, important that the plant is fully utilised. The most viable schemes are, therefore, those that run continuously for 8000 hours/year or more.
2.3.7.3 AVOIDABLE COSTS
Where capital expenditure is required to:(a) (b) (c) replace existing boiler plant; provide extra boiler plant; increase electricity supply capacity.
The expenditure saved by employing a cogeneration scheme can be set against its capital cost. Any savings in maintenance, manpower or even plant outage times can also be credited to the scheme.
2.3.7.4 FUEL SUPPLY/ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS
It is helpful if a gas supply is available at the site with sufficient capacity to connect the gas turbine without reinforcement. If the delivery gas pressure is such that gas compression is not required, further capital and running costs are saved. At the electrical end of the cogeneration plant, it is almost inevitable that the scheme will be run in parallel with Grid system. Ideally, connection should be achieved without the need to reinforce the local distribution system, and without the need of expensive modifications to the site electrical system.
2.3.7.5 SCHEME VIABILITY
Although it is dangerous to generalise about the type of schemes that are viable, however the authors are confident that schemes of around 5 MW and upwards, can be shown to be commercially viable. In contrast, small schemes of up to 1 MW based on reciprocating engines and connected at low voltage, can also be shown to be attractive as electricity prices in the franchise market can still be relatively high. Between these two limits commercial viability can still be achieved, but certainly cannot be taken for granted.
2.3.8 COGENERATION - THE COMPETITION
The most valuable product of a cogeneration scheme is the electricity it produces. The real competition for cogeneration is, therefore, going to be Pool delivered electricity. The establishment of a competitive market for electricity in the "above 1 MW" sector will have reduced prices to these customers. There is a continuous debate about what will happen to electricity prices in the next few years. The market is currently over-supplied. As supply and demand come more into balance, it is possible that prices will rise, enhancing the economic attractions of an investment in cogeneration.
2010
88
Kalam, A.
It could be argued that one downside to the ESI privatisation is the institutional complexity of the restructured industry: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) the licences; Pool membership and rules; Council connection agreements and power plant operating agreements; Use of System agreements; the Grid and Distribution codes.
The behaviour and attitude of the municipal Council's are a key factor. Some of them may see cogeneration, developed by other parties, as a threat to their business whilst other actively encourage its use. It is, therefore, somewhat perverse that they maintain a position where they have a direct input to the viability of a scheme by means of charging connection costs where they consider reinforcement work to be necessary on their distribution system. Although it is accepted that costs may be required to reinforce the network it is often difficult for the lay-person to establish whether such costs are fair and reasonable.
2.3.9.3 POOLING AND SETTLEMENT
Selling excess of electricity is not just a matter of choosing a buyer. An owner of plant wishing to export power into the distribution or transmission system generally has to follow established guidelines.
2.3.10 CONCLUSION
Cogeneration has been demonstrated worldwide as a cost effective means of meeting industrial heat and power demands. It also can reduce external costs of power generation activities. Cogeneration is recognised as one of the measures which governments should be promoting and supporting in order to improve efficiency and reduce CO2 emissions. The trend in Australia until now has been heavily biased towards large scale thermal generation. The future of small scale generation is very much dependant on the policies of the government. If cogeneration prices are lower than the conventional mode prices, then the future is bright. However at present, indications are that this is not the case. Investigations have revealed that the potential for cogeneration in Australia is very sensitive to: (i) (ii) electricity prices, and types of contract that may be written by cogenerators for sale of surplus power.
The future of cogeneration very much depends on the incentives that local utilities can provide. Buybacks and levy of some sort may be more attractive to the cogenerators if they are to survive.
2010
89
Kalam, A.
FUTURE
In the future, civilization will be forced to research and develop alternative energy sources. Our current rate of fossil fuel usage will lead to an energy crisis this century. In order to survive the energy crisis many companies in the energy industry are inventing new ways to extract energy from renewable sources. While the rate of development is slow, mainstream awareness and government pressures are growing. While renewable energy is generally more expensive than conventionally produced supplies, alternative power helps to reduce pollution and to conserve fossil fuels. Green is the rage these days, but as the market gets flooded with everything from hybrid cars to reusable shopping bags, the ability to do something truly innovative will be paramount.
REFERENCES
Kothari, D.P. and Nagrath I.J, 2008, Power System Engineering, 2nd edition, Tata McGraw Hill. El-Sharkawi, M., 2009, Electric Energy An introduction, 2nd edition, CRC Press. Glover, J.D. Sarma, M.S. and Overbye T.J., 2010, Power System Analysis and Design, 4th edition, Cengage Learning. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_resources_and_consumption. http://www.power-technology.com/projects/kogan/. http://www.worldofenergy.com.au/factsheet_water/07_fact_water_hydro_wa.html. http://www.papundits.files.wordpress.com. http://www.edison.it/edison/export/sites/default/en/activities/energy/combined/centrale_EN G.gif.
[9]
Kothari, D.P. and Nagrath I.J, 2008, Power System Engineering, 2nd edition, Tata McGraw Hill.
[10] El-Sharkawi, M., 2009, Electric Energy An introduction, 2nd edition, CRC Press. [11] Glover, J.D. Sarma, M.S. and Overbye T.J., 2010, Power System Analysis and Design, 4th edition, Cengage Learning. [12] RISE Information Portal - Information regarding renewable energy resources, technologies, applications, systems designs and case studies. [13] Zahedi, A., 2001, Photovoltaic Hybrid Power System, ESAA REidential School in Power Engineering, Monash University. [14] CHP & Combined Cycle Modern Power Systems, IBC Technical Services, Manchester, UK, 1992. [15] Cogeneration and Independent Power Production; IBC Conferences, Sydney, 1994. [16] Guide to Cogeneration in Victoria; SECV Report. [17] Cogeneration: Helping the Customer, The State and the Environment; J. Ball; SECV Report. [18] Cogeneration Handbook; California Energy Commission; California.
2010 UGSE1_Generation System Fundamentals Course Notes_Final 2010 90
Kalam, A.
[19] Guide to Natural Gas Cogeneration; N. E. Hay; American Gas Association. [20] Planning Cogeneration Systems; D. R. Limaye; The Fairmont Press; Atlanta, USA. [21] Cogeneration in Victoria; Greene, D, SECV Report, 1984. [22] Environment Protection Authority; State Environment Protection Policy, Ministry for Planning & Environment, Victoria. [23] Special Report on Independent Power; Power, 1994. [24] Power System Analysis; Grainger, J J and Stevenson, W W, McGraw-Hill, 1994. [25] Cogeneration and Gas Turbine Operation; Kalam, A, Bennett, B, Broadbent, D, Clark, G, Coulter, R, Klebanowski, A, Smith, R and Skidmore, K, ESAA and VU, 2000. [26] Cogeneration Ready Reckoner; Australian Cogeneration Association, 1997. [27] Whos Who in Australian Cogeneration 2000; Australian Cogeneration Association, 2000. [28] Gas for Electricity Generation, ESAA.
2010
91