Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Emeritus Professor Carl Thayer Security Studies (Regional) y ( g ) Australian Command and Staff College September 29 2011 29,
Collective Security
Alternative to balance of power and spheres of influence
League of Nations
Collective Security
Three conditions: 1. No state can be so powerful that even the strongest opposing coalition would be unable to apply preponderant force j p 2. All major powers must share a common view of what constitutes a stable and acceptable international order 3. Major powers must share a minimum of political solidarity and moral community
Collective Security
United Nations
Korean War Vietnam War i
SEATO, 1954-76
South East Asia Collective Security Treaty Manila Charter South East Asia Treaty Organisation US, UK F US UK, France, Australia, New Zealand, A li N Z l d Pakistan, Thailand and the Philippines COIN internal focus
Collective Defence
Alli Alliances are one f form of collective d f f ll i defence
coalitions, mutual assistance agreements
Alliances are formal agreements that pledge states to cooperate in using their military resources against a specific state or states. Alliances usually obligate one or more of the signatories to use force or to consider the use of force - unilaterally or in consultation - i specified f il t ll i lt ti in ifi d circumstances.
Functions of Alliances
1) increase the power of the states which
subscribe to them, and allow for an ; international division of labour; 2) assist the signatories in maintaining their y; internal security; 3) serve to restrain the behaviour of other states; 4) help maintain international order in an anarchical international system (eg. by drawing , g g ) a line, or aligning nations)
South Korea
USA
Thailand
Taiwan
Philippines
Security Regime
A group of states cooperate to manage their p y g disputes and avoid war by seeking to mute their security dilemma Principles, Principles rules and norms regulate state behaviour Regime = sum of the rules
Security Community
A group of states attained a sense of community or collective identity y adopted formal or informal institutions and practices become integrated h ld dependable expectations of peaceful hold d d bl t ti f f l change, rule out the use of force to solve disputes
Founding members:
Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand h il d
*sectoral partner
Post-Ministerial Conference
Dialogue Partners
Australia A t li
New Zealand
Japan
Military Medicine M di i
Integrated Air Defence System (IADS) Confidence building measure between Malaysia and Singapore
FPDA
Integrated Area Defence System (2000) Expanding role in addressing asymmetric p g g y threats (2003) Only effective multilateral military structure y y with an operational dimension in Southeast Asia Facilitates cooperation in other areas
Malaysia in East Timor Singapore and NZ in Afghanistan
Established 1984
Established 1991
Epistemic Community
Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Australian National University, Australia. University of T U i it f Toronto-York University J i t C t f A i P ifi Studies, t Y kU i it Joint Center for Asia Pacific St di Canada. Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Indonesia. Japan Institute of International Affairs Japan. Affairs, Japan The Seoul Forum for International Affairs, Republic of Korea. Institute of Strategic and International Studies, Malaysia. Institute for Strategic and Development Studies, Philippines. Studies Philippines Singapore Institute of International Affairs, Singapore (replaced by Institute for Defence and Strategic Studies). Institute for Security and International Studies, Thailand. Studies Thailand Pacific Forum/CSIS, United States of America.
CSCAP and the ARF T k 1 activities i fi t h lf of year Track ti iti in first half f Track 2 activities in second half of year ARF Chair and CSCAP
Informal to formal relationship? p Possible editor of annual Asia Pacific Security Outlook
Membership Expansion p p
Brunei Indonesia Malaysia Philippines Singapore Thailand Vietnam Australia Canada C d China European Union Japan South Korea New Zealand PNG Russia United States Laos L Myanmar y Cambodia Mongolia North Korea India Pakistan East Timor Bangladesh Sri Lanka S iL k
2001 SCO (Shanghai Five plus Uzbekistan) Address security problems along borders Hi hl structured inter-governmental Highly t t d i t t l organisation
Dialogue platform
9. Shangri-La Dialogue
Initiated by International Institute of Strategic Studies (IISS) in 2002 Participation by defence ministers from 15 countries
Plus 6 deputy ministers or senior officials
2003 Chiefs of Defence Staff National Security Advisors and Permanent Under Secretaries for Defence (2004-05)
PatternsofSecurityCooperation
Sub-regional middle power multilateralism FPDA US PACOM Theatre Engagement
Hierarchical
Conclusion
No single security architecture [multilateral institution] effectively covers the Asia-Pacific Region Multiple overlapping architectures deal with hard d ft h d and soft security challenges it h ll The ASEAN Way embedded in ARF and EAS No enforcement structures
Conclusion
Spread of cooperative security norms Emergence of ad hoc institutions
Six Party Talks Proliferation Security Initiative Shangri-la Dialogue
Emeritus Professor Carl Thayer Australian Command and Staff College g Security Studies (Regional) September 29 2011 29,