Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ontario's drinking water standard for tritium is currently under review by the Ontario
Drinking Water Advisory Council (ODWAC). Members of the public are invited to tell
the Council what they think of Ontario's current standard (of 7,000 Bq/l). This is a
very important opportunity to have input into a policy decision that will
profoundly affect current and future generations of Ontarions. Please, if you
can possibly find a half hour in your schedule this week to this, send a short
message to the Council, stating that the current drinking water standard for tritium
is unacceptable.
For your information, a sample letter is pasted below, which you could use as is, or
modify. Further down, below the sample letter are points about tritium's health
hazards that could be added to the sample letter if you wish. The deadline for
submissions to reach the Council is this coming Friday, March 28, 2008. The
easiest way to submit your input is by email to Scott Barrett
<Scott.Barrett@ontario.ca>. If you would like to send your input by fax or regular
mail, please call Scott Barrett at 416-212-7596 for the necessary numbers/mailing
address.
More information about the tritium consultation is available at the ODWAC website
www.odwac.gov.on.ca/ ... Several background documents on tritium are posted at
www.odwac.gov.on.ca/standards_review/tritium/tritium.htm N.B. Please beware
of the document prepared by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission entitled
"Standards and Guidelines for Tritium in Drinking Water", a link to which is posted
twice on the ODWAC website. This document is very misleading and clearly
illustrates the CNSC's incompetence to protect the Canadian public from adverse
health effects of exposure to radiation. Dr. Rosalie Bertell's 13-page submission to
the ODWAC is largely a thorough critique of this CNSC document. Here is the
concluding statement from Dr. Bertell's submission:
--In conclusion, the document is both self-congratulatory and
deceptive, using WHO 2004 to appear to have considered public health while
adhering to its inappropriate 7000 Bq/L guideline for tritium in drinking
water, based only on ICRP philosophy. The document is neither honest nor
scientific from the point of view of public health. It is rather seriously
and likely deliberately deceptive! (emphasis added)
Please feel free to email me if you would like any additional information or if you
would like to see some of the submissions which have been sent in by others.
Thank you for your prayers and support!
Best wishes,
Lynn
SAMPLE LETTER
To: Ontario Drinking Water Advisory Council (ODWAC)
Attn: Scott Barrett, Secretary, e-mail: scott.barrett@ontario.ca
There are three broad issues I believe ODWAC should address in making its
recommendations to government on tritium standards:
As you are aware, the current Ontario Drinking Water Objective for tritium is
7,000 becquerels per litre (Bq/L). In 1994, ACES recommended immediate adoption
of a 100 Bq/L standard, reduced to 20 Bq/L within five years, but the government
of the day ignored the committee’s recommendations due to pressure from the
nuclear industry.
Third, Ontario should strive to eliminate risks to the environment and human
health. Therefore, ODWAC should recommend the goal of zero discharge of
radioactive tritium.
Yours truly,
• Carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen are the basic building blocks of organic matter
– what all living things are made of.
• Most jurisdictions have gone beyond current international standards, and are
tightening standards for acceptable levels of tritium based on scientific
evidence of its risks. For example, the European Union standard for tritium in
drinking water is 100 becquerels per liter, and in California a limit of 15
becquerels per liter is being considered.
• Toronto City Council, at the urging of the city’s Medical Officer of Health,
passed a resolution in July 2006, endorsing this (ACES) recommendation to
dramatically tighten the tritium standards for drinking water.