Audit Analysis

TS 16949 Section Name
Instructions: `00000
Up to 9 audit matrices in each quarter. Leave unused matrices
with impact on product

blank to ensure proper charting.
Systemic or recurring
dysfunction between
Fully Documented &
Gap in procedure or
Implemented
departments
To enter audit results:
or liability
1. Enter the name of the audit area in Row 2.
2. Enter the audit number in Row 3.
3. Enter the number in the appropriate empty
cells pertaining to the element audited and
your evaluation of compliance.
Element Weight ==> 100 -100 -60

4 Quality Management System
4.1 General Requirements
4.2.1 General
4.2.2 Quality Manual
4.2.3 Control of Documents
4.2.4 Control of Records
5 Management Responsibility
Enteritle5.1
h re Management Commitment
5.2 Customer Focus
5.3 Quality Policy
5.4.1 Quality Objectives
Number
5.4.2 Quality Management System Planning

5.5.1 Responsibility & Authority
Row15.5.2 Management Representative
5.5.3 Internal Communication
5.6.1 General
5.6.2 Review Input
5.6.3 Review Output
6 Resource Management
6.1 Provision of Resources
6.2.1 General
6.2.2 Competence, Awareness, and Training
6.3 Infrastructure
6.4 Work Environment
6.4.2S Cleanliness of premises (Supplemental)
7 Product Realization
7.1 Planning of Product Realization
7.2.1 Determination of Requirements Related to the Product
7.2.2 Review of Requirements Related to the Product
Ent eryou tilehr
7.2.3 Customer Communication
7.3.1 Design and Development Planning
7.3.2 Design and Development Inputs
7.3.3 Design and Development Outputs
7.3.4 Design and Development Review
7.3.5 Design and Development Verification
7.3.6 Design and Development Validation
7.3.7 Control of Design and Development Changes
Inecidn otuc nts
7.4.1 Purchasing Process

7.4.2 Purchasing Information
7.4.3 Verification of Purchased Product
7.5.1 Control of Production and Service Provision
7.5.1.5S Management of Production Tooling (Supplemental)
7.5.2 Validation of Processes for Production & Service Provision
7.5.3 Identification and Traceability
Team1j ob lraetdinjuries for02
7.5.3S Identification and Traceability (Supplemental)

7.5.4 Customer Property
7.5.4S Customer Property
7.5.5 Preservation of Product
7.6 Control of Monitoring and Measuring Devices
7.6S Control of Monitoring and Measuring Devices (Supplemental)
8 Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement
8.1 General
8.2.1 Customer Satisfaction
8.2.2 Internal Audit
Numberofijnures
lu 8.2.2S Internal Audit of handling, clean room and ESD reqt's (Supp.)
m 8.2.3 Monitoring and Measurement of Processes
8.2.4 Monitoring and Measurement of Product
8.3 Control of Nonconforming Product
8.3.1 Control of Nonconforming Product --TS Supplemental
8.3.2 Control of Reworked Product
8.3.2S Control of Product
8.3.3 Customer information
8.3.4 Customer waiver
8.4 Analysis of Data
8.5.1 Continual Improvement
8.5.2 Corrective Action
8.5.2S Corrective Action (Supplemental)
8.5.3 Preventive Action
Results, analysis and reporting Results, analy

`00000 `00000 `00000
Number of elements audited and number
of DIS by area
Do not enter any data in these cells!
Name
Name
Name
This table processes results from the audit matrices and
sends it to the line graph below.
Number of elements audited

Pizapock etsale abyd ,firystc le
Number DIS
Percent DIS
Overall (avg) score
`00000 `00000 `00000
Row 1
Day

4.2 Documentation Requirements
5.4 Planning
5.5 Responsibility, Authority, and Communication
5.6 Management Review
6.2 Human Resources
Pizapock etsale abyd e,sc ondcyle
7.2 Customer-Related Processes
7.3 Design and Development
7.4 Purchasing
Pizapock etsale abyd e,sc ondcyle
7.5 Production and Service Provision

8.2 Monitoring and Measurement
8.5 Improvement
These
These pie charts compare each quarter's total of DIS bar
among all 5 element areas. Their data is automatically
Row 1
Da y
charts
drawn from tables in rows 80-84. compare
each
To show only the DIS in a single audit: quarter's 45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Manage
M
RR
audit
1. Left-click on the chart.
scores by
2. Find the colored box surrounding the data (see "Number of element
DIS") and drag it to the desired column. group.
3. Select and cut any unused Data Label(s). Their
4. Left click on a blank cell to close the chart. data is
5. Copy and paste the chart in a document or slide for reporting. drawn
6. Return the chart to its normal state before closing the from
spreadsheet. rows 89-
93.
To
properly
align the
Tot alsofeach jobperfomance factor,May 5 Data
Labels:
Scores by elem
C 1. Left
100%
ol click on
90%
the
These bar charts compare each quarter's audit scores desired
80%
by element group. Their data is drawn from rows 89-93. label.
70%
2. Left
60%
Scor efor jsbperfomed, aMy 5
To properly align the Data Labels: click

again 50%to
"open"
40%
1. Left click on the desired label. the
2. Left click again to "open" the label's text box. 30%
label's
3. Drag the label's text box to the desired position. text20%box.
4. Click on an empty cell to close the chart. 3. 10%
Drag
the
0%
label's
Co
text box
to the
desired
position.
4. Click
on an
empty
cell to
close the
chart.
Reporting WEIGHTED SCORES and percent of elements "all clear" (earning 100 points)

The area and bar values compare weighted audit scores against "Fully Documented & Implemente
If there were fewer than 9 audits in the quarter you can adjust the chart:
1. Left click on any of the chart's bars.
2. Drag the corner of the colored lines to include proper cell values.
3. Close and copy; change the chart back to original before you close the spreadsheet.

Fully Documented &
Implemented
or liability
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Row 1
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
All clear Level 4
Totals for quarter 0 0

3. Close and copy; change the chart back to original before closing the spreadsheet.
Fully Documented &
product or liability
with impact on
Implemented
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
All clear Level 4


Fully Documented &
Implemented
or liability
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
All clear Level 4
Total for quarter 0 0

Systemic or recurring with impact on product or

Fully Documented & Implemented
liability
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
All clear Level 4
Audit analysis and planning The line chart records wei
100%
98%
95%
93%
90%
88%
85%
83%
100%
98%
95%
93%
90%
88%
85%
83%
80%
78%
75%
73%
70%
68%
65%
63%
60%
58%
55%
53%
50%
Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Num- N Name Name Name Name Name Name
ber of um-
ele- ber of
Per
4.2 Documentation Re-
Wekof_ _ _:Efectof_ _ _ onjbperfomance quirements
5.4 Planning
Do not enter any data in the table below! 5.5 Responsibility, Authority,
and Communication
These bar charts compare the total weighted scores for 5.6 Management Review
all audits in the year.
6.2 Human Resources
The top chart breaks down the performance by element 7.2 Customer-Related
Processes
subgroups. The bottom chart shows the same
performance data in a more condensed version.
7.4 Purchasing
Use this comparison to plan the management system's
areas of focus in upcoming audit schedules. 8.2 Monitoring and Meas-
urement
8.5 Improvement
0% 5% 10% 15
4 Quality Management System #DIV/0!

5 Management Responsibility #DIV/0! Scores
6 Resource Management #DIV/0!
7 Product Realization #DIV/0!
8 Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement #DIV/0!
4.2 Documentation Requirements #DIV/0!
Column B
Scores
5.4 Planning #DIV/0!

5.5 Responsibility, Authority, and Communication #DIV/0!
5.6 Management Review #DIV/0! Column B
6.2 Human Resources #DIV/0!
7.2 Customer-Related Processes #DIV/0!
7.3 Design and Development #DIV/0!
7.4 Purchasing #DIV/0!
7.5 Production and Service Provision #DIV/0!
8.2 Monitoring and Measurement #DIV/0!
8.5 Improvement #DIV/0! 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 5
Process disconnect or
-30
performance issue
Name
Audit readiness `00000
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
First quarter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Results, analysis and reporting Results, a

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q1 results `00000 `00000 `00000
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
Err:508 Err:508
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q1 results `00000 `00000 `00000
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System 45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Managem
Man
Rea
Re
8 Measurement, Analysis
Scores by element area, Q1 Scores by elemen

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Column L Colum
clear" (earning 100 points) Q1 audit scores
Weighted score
Documented & Implemented." 100.0%
95.0%
90.0%
85.0%
80.0%
eet.
75.0%
70.0%
dysfunction between
Gap in procedure or
performance issue
65.0%
Audit readiness
departments
60.0%
Weighted
Percent DIS
score 55.0%
50.0%
45.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 40.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 35.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 30.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 25.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
20.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
15.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
10.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 5.0%
Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 0.0%
0 0 0 Name Name Name Name Name
Weighted score
Documented & Implemented."
100%
90%
80%
.
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
90%
80%
70%
or performance issue
dysfunction between
Gap in procedure or
Process disconnect
Audit readiness
departments
Weighted 60%
score Percent DIS
50%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 40%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 30%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
20%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
10%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Level 3 Level 2 Level 1
0%
Name Name Name Name Name
0 0 0
Weighted score
100%
90%
80%
.
70%
dysfunction between
Gap in procedure or
performance issue
Audit readiness
departments
Weighted
60%
score Percent DIS
50%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 40%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 30%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 20%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
10%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0%
Name Name Name Name Nam
0 0 0
Weighted score
100%
95%
90%
. 85%
80%
75%
Process disconnect or performance issue
Gap in procedure or dysfunction between
70%
65%
Audit readiness
60%
departments
Weighted
score
Percent DIS 55%
50%
45%
40%
35%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 30%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 25%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
20%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 15%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
10%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 5%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0%
0 0 0
The line chart records weighted scores by element group for each audit. Low scoring areas and element groups m
Year to date weighted results

e Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Num- N Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Num- N
ber of um- ber of u
ele- ber of ele- b
Performance (average) for the year

entation Re-
5.4 Planning
sibility, Authority,
cation
agement Review
uman Resources
mer-Related
nd Development
7.4 Purchasing
ng and Meas-
Improvement
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%
Scores (averaged) for year
4 Quality
Management
5 Management
Responsibility
6 Resource
mn B Management
7 Product Real-
ization
8 Measurement,
4 Quality
Management
5 Management
Responsibility
6 Resource
mn B Management
7 Product Real-
ization
8 Measurement,
Analysis, and Im-
provement
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
First quarter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q2 results `00000 `00000 `00000
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
0
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q2 results `00000 `00000 `00000
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System 45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System
Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement 8 Measurement, Analysis, and Impro
Scores by element area, Q1 Scores by element area, Q1

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Column W Column AH
Q1 audit scores and % DIS
Weighted score Percent DIS
1
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Name Name Name Name Name Name
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
and element groups may justify greater focus in these areas.
results
4 Quality Management
results
5 Management Respon
6 Resource Manageme
8 Measurement, Analys
ame Name Name Num- N Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name
ber of um-
ele- ber of
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
First quarter
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q3 results `00000 `00000 `00000
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
0
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q3 results `00000 `00000 `00000
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System 45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System
ement, Analysis, and Improvement 8 Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement
cores by element area, Q1 Scores by element area, Q1

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Column AH Column AS
Quality Management System
Management Responsibility
Resource Management
Product Realization
Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement
-100
or liability First quarter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Results, analysis and reporting

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q4 results
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
0
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q4 results
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
nagement
ent
ct
e Management
Realization
Responsibility
System
nalysis, and Improvement
ement area, Q1
Column AS
e
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
`0
N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Secon
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
Second quarter
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-30
performance issue
Name
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Second quarter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
Second quarter
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
Third quarter
-100
or liability
`0
N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
rter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Third qua
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
Third quarter
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-30
performance issue
Name
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
Third quarter

-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
Fourth quarter
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
Fourth quarter

-100
or liability
`0
N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
arter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Fourth quar
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
Fourth quarter
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-30
performance issue
Name
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Count of coverage
They take a running count of the e
audited over the year
Do not enter anything in the
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Do not enter anything in these cells!
They take a running count of the elements being
audited over the year.
TS 16949 elements coverage

4.2.1 General
5.1 Management Commitment
5.2 Customer Focus
5.3 Quality Policy
5.5.2 Management Representative
5.6.1 General
5.6.2 Review Input
5.6.3 Review Output
6.2.1 General
6.3 Infrastructure
8.1 General
8.2.2S Internal Audit of handling, clean room and ESD reqt's (Supp.)
8.2.3 Monitoring and Measurement of Processes
TS 16949 Section Name
Instructions: `00000
Up to 9 audit matrices in each quarter. Leave unused matrices

blank to ensure proper charting.
dysfunction between
Fully Documented &
Gap in procedure or
Implemented
departments
or liability
Element Weight ==> 100 -100 -60

4.2.1 General
5.2 Customer Focus
5.3 Quality Policy
5.6.1 General
5.6.2 Review Input
5.6.3 Review Output
6.2.1 General
6.3 Infrastructure
8.1 General
Results, analysis and reporting Results, analy

`00000 `00000 `00000
of DIS by area
Name
Name
Name

Number DIS
Percent DIS
Overall (avg) score
`00000 `00000 `00000
5.4 Planning
6.2 Human Resources
7.4 Purchasing
8.5 Improvement
These
These pie charts compare each quarter's total of DIS bar
among all 5 element areas. Their data is automatically charts
drawn from tables in rows 80-84. compare
each
To show only the DIS in a single audit: quarter's 45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Manage
M
RR
audit
scores by
2. Find the colored box surrounding the data (see "Number of element
DIS") and drag it to the desired column. group.
3. Select and cut any unused Data Label(s). Their
4. Left click on a blank cell to close the chart. data is
5. Copy and paste the chart in a document or slide for reporting. drawn
6. Return the chart to its normal state before closing the from
spreadsheet. rows 89-
93.
To
properly
align the
Data
Labels:
Scores by elem
1. Left
100%
click on
90%
the
These bar charts compare each quarter's audit scores desired
80%
by element group. Their data is drawn from rows 89-93. label.
70%
2. Left
60%
To properly align the Data Labels: click
again 50%to
"open"
40%
2. Left click again to "open" the label's text box. 30%
label's
4. Click on an empty cell to close the chart. 3. 10%
Drag
the
0%
label's
Co
text box
to the
desired
position.
4. Click
on an
empty
cell to
close the
chart.


Fully Documented &
Implemented
or liability
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
All clear Level 4

Fully Documented &
with impact on
Implemented
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
All clear Level 4


Fully Documented &
Implemented
or liability
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
All clear Level 4


liability
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
Name `00000 0 0
All clear Level 4
Audit analysis and planning The line chart records wei
100%
98%
95%
93%
90%
88%
85%
83%
100%
98%
95%
93%
90%
88%
85%
83%
80%
78%
75%
73%
70%
68%
65%
63%
60%
58%
55%
53%
50%
Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Num- N Name Name Name Name Name Name
ber of um-
ele- ber of
Per
4.2 Documentation Re-
quirements
5.4 Planning
Do not enter any data in the table below! 5.5 Responsibility, Authority,
and Communication
These bar charts compare the total weighted scores for 5.6 Management Review
all audits in the year.
6.2 Human Resources
The top chart breaks down the performance by element 7.2 Customer-Related
Processes
subgroups. The bottom chart shows the same
performance data in a more condensed version.
7.4 Purchasing
Use this comparison to plan the management system's
areas of focus in upcoming audit schedules. 8.2 Monitoring and Meas-
urement
8.5 Improvement
0% 5% 10% 15

5 Management Responsibility #DIV/0! Scores
Column B
Scores

8.5 Improvement #DIV/0! 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 5
-30
performance issue
Name
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
First quarter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q1 results `00000 `00000 `00000
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
Err:508 Err:508
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q1 results `00000 `00000 `00000
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System 45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Managem
Man
Rea
Re
8 Measurement, Analysis
Scores by element area, Q1 Scores by elemen

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Column L Colum
Weighted score
Documented & Implemented." 100.0%
95.0%
90.0%
85.0%
80.0%
eet.
75.0%
70.0%
dysfunction between
Gap in procedure or
performance issue
65.0%
Audit readiness
departments
60.0%
Weighted
Percent DIS
score 55.0%
50.0%
45.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 40.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 35.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 30.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 25.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
20.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
15.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
10.0%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 5.0%
Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 0.0%
0 0 0 Name Name Name Name Name
Weighted score
100%
90%
80%
.
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
90%
80%
70%
dysfunction between
Gap in procedure or
Process disconnect
Audit readiness
departments
Weighted 60%
score Percent DIS
50%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 40%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 30%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
20%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
10%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0%
0 0 0
Weighted score
100%
90%
80%
.
70%
dysfunction between
Gap in procedure or
performance issue
Audit readiness
departments
Weighted
60%
score Percent DIS
50%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 40%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 30%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 20%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
10%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0%
Name Name Name Name Nam
0 0 0
Weighted score
100%
95%
90%
. 85%
80%
75%
70%
65%
Audit readiness
60%
departments
Weighted
score
Percent DIS 55%
50%
45%
40%
35%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 30%
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 25%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
20%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 15%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
10%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0! 5%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0%
0 0 0
The line chart records weighted scores by element group for each audit. Low scoring areas and element groups m

e Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Num- N Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Num- N
ber of um- ber of u
ele- ber of ele- b

entation Re-
5.4 Planning
sibility, Authority,
cation
agement Review
uman Resources
mer-Related
nd Development
7.4 Purchasing
ng and Meas-
Improvement
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%
4 Quality
Management
5 Management
Responsibility
6 Resource
mn B Management
7 Product Real-
ization
8 Measurement,
4 Quality
Management
5 Management
Responsibility
6 Resource
mn B Management
7 Product Real-
ization
8 Measurement,
Analysis, and Im-
provement
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
First quarter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q2 results `00000 `00000 `00000
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
0
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q2 results `00000 `00000 `00000
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System 45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System
Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement 8 Measurement, Analysis, and Impro

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Column W Column AH
1
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
and element groups may justify greater focus in these areas.
results
results
5 Management Respon
6 Resource Manageme
8 Measurement, Analys
ame Name Name Num- N Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name
ber of um-
ele- ber of
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
First quarter
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q3 results `00000 `00000 `00000
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
0
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q3 results `00000 `00000 `00000
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System 45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System
ement, Analysis, and Improvement 8 Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement
cores by element area, Q1 Scores by element area, Q1

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Column AH Column AS
Management Responsibility
Resource Management
Product Realization
Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement
-100
or liability First quarter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Results, analysis and reporting

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q4 results
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
0
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q4 results
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
nagement
ent
ct
e Management
Realization
Responsibility
System
nalysis, and Improvement
ement area, Q1
Column AS
e
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
`0
N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Secon
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
Second quarter
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-30
performance issue
Name
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Second quarter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
Second quarter
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
Third quarter
-100
or liability
`0
N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
rter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Third qua
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
Third quarter
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-30
performance issue
Name
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
Third quarter

-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
Fourth quarter
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
Fourth quarter

-100
or liability
`0
N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
arter
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Fourth quar
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
Fourth quarter
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-30
performance issue
Name
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fully Documented &

100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Fully Documented &
100
Implemented
-100
or liability
Gap in procedure or
dysfunction between
-60
departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Count of coverage
They take a running count of the e
audited over the year
Do not enter anything in the
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

4.2.1 General
5.2 Customer Focus
5.3 Quality Policy
5.6.1 General
5.6.2 Review Input
5.6.3 Review Output
6.2.1 General
6.3 Infrastructure
8.1 General
Name
TS 16949 Section `00000
Systemic or recurring with impact

Instructions:
Gap in procedure or dysfunction

Up to 9 audit matrices in each quarter. Leave unused
between departments
matrices blank to ensure proper charting.
on product or liability
performance issue
Element Weight ==> 100 -100 -60 -30

4.1 General Requirements .
4.2.1 General
5.2 Customer Focus
5.3 Quality Policy
5.6.1 General
5.6.2 Review Input
5.6.3 Review Output
6.2.1 General
6.3 Infrastructure
8.1 General
8.2.2S Internal Audit of handling, clean room and ESD reqt's
(Supp.)
Results, analysis and reporting Results, analysis

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000
of DIS by area

Name
Name
Name
Name

Number DIS
Percent DIS
Overall (avg) score
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000
5.4 Planning
6.2 Human Resources
7.4 Purchasing
8.5 Improvement
These pie charts compare each quarter's total of DIS

among all 5 element areas. Their data is automatically
drawn from tables in rows 80-84.
To show only the DIS in a single audit: 45 6Quality

Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Managem
Realizatio
ResponsS
2. Find the colored box surrounding the data (see "Number of
DIS") and drag it to the desired column.
3. Select and cut any unused Data Label(s).
4. Left click on a blank cell to close the chart.
5. Copy and paste the chart in a document or slide for
reporting.
6. Return the chart to its normal state before closing the
spreadsheet.
Q1 scores and % DIS
Overall (avg) score Pe

These area & bar charts compare each quarter's audit
scores with the percent DIS for every audit. Their 100.0%
data is drawn from rows 86 and 87.
90.0%
If there were fewer than 9 audits in the quarter you can 80.0%
adjust the chart:
70.0%
1. Right click on the chart to open it.
2. Select "Source Data." 60.0%
3. Select "Series." 50.0%
4. In each of the series' "Values" field, change the cell set to
include only columns being used. 40.0%
5. For each Category X labels field, change the cell set to
include the same columns as in #4. 30.0%
6. Copy and paste the chart into a document or slide for
reporting. 20.0%
7. Change the Series back to their original values before 10.0%
closing the spreadsheet.
adjust the chart: compare
70.0%
each
1. Right click on the chart to open it. quarter's
2. Select "Source Data." 60.0%
audit
3. Select "Series." scores by
50.0%
element
4. In each of the series' "Values" field, change the cell set to
group.
include only columns being used. 40.0%
Their
5. For each Category X labels field, change the cell set to data is
include the same columns as in #4. 30.0%
drawn
6. Copy and paste the chart into a document or slide for from
reporting. 20.0%
rows 89-
7. Change the Series back to their original values before 93.
10.0%
closing the spreadsheet.
To0.0%
properly
align the
Data
Labels:
Scores by element area
1.100%
Left
click on
90%
These bar charts compare each quarter's audit scores the
by element group. Their data is drawn from rows 89- desired
80%
93. label.
70%
2. Left
60%
click
To properly align the Data Labels: again 50%to
"open"
40%
30%
2. Left click again to "open" the label's text box. label's
4. Click on an empty cell to close the chart. 3. Drag
10%
the
0%
label's
Column L
text box
to the
desired
Reporting WEIGHTED SCORES and percent of elements position. "all clear" (earning 100 points)
4. Click
on an
Do not enter any data in these cells! empty
cell to
The area and bar values compare weighted audit scoresclose
against
the "Fully Documented & Implemented."
chart.
dysfunction between
Fully Documented &
Gap in procedure or
Implemented
departments
or liability
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
All clear Level 4 Level 3
Totals for quarter 0 0 0

The area and bar values compare weighted audit scores against "Fully Documented & Implemented."
dysfunction between
Fully Documented &
Gap in procedure or
with impact on
Implemented
departments
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Totals for quarter 0 0 0


dysfunction between
Fully Documented &
Gap in procedure or
Implemented
departments
or liability
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Total for quarter 0 0 0


departments
liability
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Name `00000 0 0 0
Total for quarter 0 0 0
Audit analysis and planning The line chart records weighted
100%
98%
95%
93%
90%
88%
85%
83%
80%
78%
75%
73%
70%
68%
65%
63%
60%
58%
55%
53%
50%
Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name N N Name Name Name Name Name Name Nam
um- um-
ber of ber of
73%
70%
68%
65%
63%
60%
58%
55%
53%
50%
Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name N N Name Name Name Name Name Name Nam
um- um-
ber of ber of
Perform
Ro
w
25
Do not enter any data in the table below! Ro
w
These bar charts compare the total weighted scores 25
for all audits in the year. Ro
w
26
The top chart breaks down the performance by
element subgroups. The bottom chart shows the Ro
w
same performance data in a more condensed version. 26
Ro
Use this comparison to plan the management w
system's areas of focus in upcoming audit schedules. 26
Ro
w
26
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 4

5 Management Responsibility #DIV/0! Scores (ave
8.5 Improvement #DIV/0! 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
-100
First quarter
-60
between departments
-30 Process disconnect or

performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
sults, analysis and reporting Results, analysis

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q1 results `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
Err:508 Err:508
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q1 results `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System 45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System
8 Measurement, Analysis, and Improve
Q1 scores and % DIS by area Q2 scores and % DIS by area
Overall (avg) score Percent DIS Overall (avg) score Percent DIS
1 100.0%
0.9 90.0%
0.8 80.0%
0.7 70.0%
0.6 60.0%
0.5 50.0%
0.4 40.0%
0.3 30.0%
0.2 20.0%
0.1 10.0%
0.7 70.0%
0.6 60.0%
0.5 50.0%
0.4 40.0%
0.3 30.0%
0.2 20.0%
0.1 10.0%
0 0.0%
me Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Column L Column W
arning 100 points) Audit scores: 1st Quarter
Weighted score Percent all c

nted & Implemented."
100.0%
97.5%
95.0%
92.5%
90.0%
87.5%
85.0%
82.5%
performance issue
Audit readiness
80.0%
Weighted Percent all 77.5%
score clear
75.0%
72.5%
70.0%
0 0 #DIV/0!
67.5%
0 0 #DIV/0!
65.0%
0 0 #DIV/0!
62.5%
0 0 #DIV/0!
60.0%
57.5%
55.0%
52.5%
50.0%
e
e
e
72.5%
70.0%
67.5%
65.0%
62.5%
60.0%
0 0 #DIV/0!
57.5%
0 0 #DIV/0!
55.0%
0 0 #DIV/0!
52.5%
0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! 50.0%
e
Level 2 Level 1
am
am
am
am
am
a
0 0
N
arning 100 points) Audit scores: 2nd Quarte
Weighted score Percent all c

100%
98%
95%
93%
90%
88%
85%
Process disconnect
83%
Audit readiness
80%
Weighted Percent all
score clear 78%
75%
73%
70%
0 0 #DIV/0!
68%
0 0 #DIV/0!
65%
0 0 #DIV/0!
63%
0 0 #DIV/0!
60%
0 0 #DIV/0!
58%
0 0 #DIV/0!
55%
0 0 #DIV/0!
53%
0 0 #DIV/0!
50%
0 0 #DIV/0!
e
e
e
Level 2 Level 1
am
am
am
am
am
am
N
N
0 0
arning 100 points) Audit scores: 3rd Quarte
Weighted score
100%
98%
95%
93%
90%
88%
85%
83%
performance issue
Audit readiness
80%
Weighted Percent all 78%
score clear 75%
73%
70%
0 0 #DIV/0! 68%
0 0 #DIV/0! 65%
0 0 #DIV/0! 63%
0 0 #DIV/0! 60%
0 0 #DIV/0! 58%
0 0 #DIV/0! 55%
0 0 #DIV/0! 53%
0 0 #DIV/0! 50%
0 0 #DIV/0!
3
7
17
17
17
17
17
Level 2 Level 1
ow
ow
ow
ow
ow
R
R
0 0
arning 100 points) Audit scores: 4th Quarte
Weighted score Percent all

100%
98%
95%
93%
90%
88%
85%
83%
80%
78%
75%
73%
100%
98%
95%
93%
90%
88%
85%
83%
Audit readiness
80%
Weighted Percent all 78%
score clear
75%
73%
70%
68%
65%
0 0 #DIV/0!
63%
0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! 60%
0 0 #DIV/0! 58%
0 0 #DIV/0!
55%
0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! 53%
0 0 #DIV/0! 50%
0 0 #DIV/0!
e
e
e
am
am
am
am
am
Level 2 Level 1
a
N
N
0 0
chart records weighted scores by element group for each audit. Low scoring areas and element groups may justify gr
me Name Name Name Name Name Name N N Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name N N Name N
um- um- um- um-
ber of ber of ber of ber of
me Name Name Name Name Name Name N N Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name N N Name N
um- um- um- um-
ber of ber of ber of ber of
0% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%
Row 252
Row 253
Row 254
Row 255
Row 256
% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

-100
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100

-100
First quarter

-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q2 results `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
0
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q2 results `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Product
agement
ty
source
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System 45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System
nt, Analysis, and Improvement 8 Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement
es and % DIS by area Q3 scores and % DIS by area
(avg) score Percent DIS Overall (avg) score Percent DIS
1 100.0%
0.9 90.0%
0.8 80.0%
0.7 70.0%
0.6 60.0%
0.5 50.0%
0.4 40.0%
0.3 30.0%
0.2 20.0%
0.1 10.0%
0.7 70.0%
0.6 60.0%
0.5 50.0%
0.4 40.0%
0.3 30.0%
0.2 20.0%
0.1 10.0%
0 0.0%
ame Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name
s by element area, Q1 Scores by element area, Q1

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Column W Column AH
cores: 1st Quarter
score Percent all clear

e
e
e
e
am
am
am
am
am
N
N
cores: 2nd Quarter

e
e
e
am
am
am
am
am
N
N
cores: 3rd Quarter
Weighted score
0
6
17
17
18
17
17
ow
w
ow
ow
ow
R
cores: 4th Quarter

e
e
e
am
am
am
am
am
N
t groups may justify greater focus in these areas.

8 Measurement, Analysis, and Imp
ame N N Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name
um- um-
ber of ber of
8 Measurement, Analysis, and Imp
ame N N Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name
um- um-
ber of ber of
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
-100
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
-10
0 Audit readiness
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100

-100
First quarter
`0000
Name
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q3 results `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
0
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q3 results `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Responsibility
anagement
ment
alization
System 45 6Quality
Management
7Resource
Product
Management
Management
Realization
Responsibility
System
s, and Improvement 8 Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement
% DIS by area Q4 scores and % DIS by area
e Percent DIS Overall (avg) score Percent DIS
1 100.0%
0.9 90.0%
0.8 80.0%
0.7 70.0%
0.6 60.0%
0.5 50.0%
0.4 40.0%
0.3 30.0%
0.2 20.0%
0.1 10.0%
80.0%
0.7 70.0%
0.6 60.0%
0.5 50.0%
0.4 40.0%
0.3 30.0%
0.2 20.0%
0.1 10.0%
0 0.0%
me Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name
nt area, Q1 Scores by element area, Q1

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
mn AH Column AS
nagement System
nt Responsibility
Management
alization
ent, Analysis, and Improvement
Management
alization
ent, Analysis, and Improvement
arter
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
-100 Systemic or recurring with impact

-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
sults, analysis and reporting

`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q4 results
Number of
Name
Name
Name
Name
Name
Number
elements
audited of DIS
0 ê
0
0
0
0
0
è 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
`00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 `00000 Q4 results
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
em
ity
rovement
area
nt DIS
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
me Name Name Name
1
Audit
Score
100
-100
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100

-100

-60
between departments
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
-100
-60 Gap in procedure or dysfunction

between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Second quarte
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
100
-100
Second quarter
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100

-100

-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
-100
Second quarter
-60
between departments

performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-100
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
Second quarter

-100

-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
-100
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
-10
0 Audit readiness
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100

-100
`0000
Name
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-60
between departments
-30
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100

-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Audit
Score
100
-100
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100
Third quarter

-100

-60
between departments
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
-100

between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Third quarter
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
100
hird quarter
-100
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100

-100

-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
Third quarter
-100
-60
between departments

performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-100
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100

-100

-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
-100
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
-10
0 Audit readiness
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100

-100
`0000
Name
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
-60
between departments
-30
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
Fourth quarter

-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Audit
Score
100
-100
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100

Fourth quarter
-100

-60
between departments
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
-100

between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
Fourth quarter
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
100
th quarter
-100
-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100

-100

-60
between departments
-30
performance issue
Name
`00000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score
100
-100
-60
between departments

performance issue
Name
`00000
Audit readiness
-10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sum
Audit
Score

100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Do not enter anything in these cells
Name They take a running count of the elements be
`00000 audited over the year.
Count of coverage
between departments
performance issue
Audit readiness
Audit
Sum
Score
-100 -60 -30 -10 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

4.2.1 General
5.2 Customer Focus
5.3 Quality Policy
5.6.1 General
5.6.2 Review Input
5.6.3 Review Output
6.2.1 General
6.3 Infrastructure
8.1 General

Audit Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Audit Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TS 16949 Section Name

with impact on product

Element Weight ==> 100 -100 -60

5.4.2 Quality Management System Planning

7.4.1 Purchasing Process

7.5.3S Identification and Traceability (Supplemental)

Results, analysis and reporting Results, analy

Do not enter any data in these cells!

Number of elements audited

8 Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement

7.5 Production and Service Provision

To properly align the Data Labels: click

Do not enter any data in these cells!

with impact on product

Do not enter any data in these cells!

Do not enter any data in these cells!

with impact on product

Do not enter any data in these cells!

Systemic or recurring with impact on product or

Audit analysis and planning The line chart records wei

4 Quality Management System #DIV/0!

5.4 Planning #DIV/0!

Fully Documented &

Results, analysis and reporting Results, a

Scores by element area, Q1 Scores by elemen

clear" (earning 100 points) Q2 audit scores

clear" (earning 100 points) Q3 audit scores

Year to date weighted results

Performance (average) for the year

Scores (averaged) for year

Fully Documented &

Results, analysis and reporting Results, a

Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement 8 Measurement, Analysis, and Impro

Scores by element area, Q1 Scores by element area, Q1

Weighted score Percent DIS

Q2 audit scores and % DIS

Weighted score Percent DIS

Q3 audit scores and % DIS

Weighted score Percent DIS

Weighted score Percent DIS

and element groups may justify greater focus in these areas.

Fully Documented &

Results, analysis and reporting Results, a

ement, Analysis, and Improvement 8 Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement

cores by element area, Q1 Scores by element area, Q1

Fully Documented &

Results, analysis and reporting

nalysis, and Improvement

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

with impact on product

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &

Fully Documented &