You are on page 1of 28

I.

PERFORMANCE PLANNING & RATING


NAME : Mr. J.K.PUNDIR
OBJECTIVES WEIGHTAGE OUT OF 100

YEAR 2010 - 2011


ROLE/ Designation : MANAGER- HR
INDEX OF PERFORMANCE ACHIEVEMENT Self RATING ON SCALE OF 1 TO 4 Reporting Officer Reviewing Officer

FINANCIAL
10 10

1.1 Cost Saving 2 CUSTOMER

As per Bduget

2.1 Timely Recruitment & Selection 3 INTERNAL PROCESS

10

Vaccancy should be filled within 45 days

3.1 Implementation Of PMS 3.2 IR Issues 3.3 Safety 3.4 Down Time dcx`ue to Manpower 4 LEARNING & GROWTH

10 15 45 10 10

No deviation No production loss due to IR Issue Zero accident No line stoppage due to manpower

4.1 Trg. As per PMS 4.2 Suggestion Scheme 4.3 Line Captain 4.4 Grievance Handling Total:
ANY CHANGE IN OBJECTIVES DURING THE YEAR

10 5 10 15

100% adherance of Training plan as per PMS As per suggestion scheme 90% performance on all lines Grievance redressal with in 15 days

35

95

FINAL PERFORMANCE POINTS Out Of 100

Rating Scale 4321SIGNATURE OF APPRAISEE Date

Good: Above average Performance Adequate: Satisfactory Performance. Below Average: Scope for Improvement. Poor: Unacceptable Performance.

SIGNATURE OF REPORTING OFFICER

SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICER

Rating Scale of HR Head


Objectives Cost Saving Timely recruitment & Selection Implemention of PMS IR Issue more than 165 days More than two three days Three minor accident and three near miss 20-25 Within 60 Days Two deviation Two Days One major & two minor accident and two near miss 15-20 Within 55 Days One reported deviation One days One major & one minor accident and one near miss 15-Oct 1 2 3 4 As per Plan Within 45 Days No deviation NO Unrest

Safety
DOWN TIME DUE TO MANPOWER

0 accident no near miss 0-10 Hrs

Trg.as per PMS Suggestion Scheme delay by one week

94%

95% Delay by four days Delay by two days

100% Adherence of 98% schedule As per plan More Than 90 % Performance redressal within 15 days

Line Captain Grievance handling

60% within 60 Days within 45 Days

70% within 30 Days

80%

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND RATING Unit: Omax-Manesar


s. No. E.C.N: S. No.
1 1.1 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 FINANCE

PMS 2010-2011
ROLE / DESIGNATION: DEPTT.: SO SECURITY
Achievement Self Rating Scale of 1 - 4 Reporting Officer Reviewing Officer
Final Score (Final Rating x Weightage)

SUJIT MITRA

Objectives

Weightage

Index of Performance
Reduce of Vechile running cost by 2%

COST SAVING
INTERNAL PROCESS MONITORING MI ROOM & HORTICULURE WASTE DISPOSAL SAFETY

15

15

10 15 15

80

REDUCING TREND OF DISEASE AS PER PLAN ZERO ACCIDENT

3.4

VISITOR HANDLING & CONTROLLING

10

NO COMPLAINT

3.5

5'S OF COMPANY

15

AS PER AUDIT SCORE

3.6 4 4.1

MAINTAING & SENSING IR ISSUE LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT

15

AS & WHEN DIRECTIONS IN HR HEAD

SAP Total

90%

100 100
FINAL PERFORMANCE POINTS OUT OF 100

ANY CHANGE IN OBJECTIVES DURING THE YEAR Rating Measurement 4 3 2 1 Good: Above average Performance Adequate: Satisfactory Performance. Below Average: Scope for Improvement. Poor: Unacceptable Performance.

Signature of Appraisee: Date:

Signature of Reporting Officer:

Date:

Signature of Reviewing Officer DATE:

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND RATING


NAME: E.C.N: S. No.
1 1.1 2 2.1 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 4 4.1 4.2 FINANCE DOWN TIME DUE TO MANPOWER CUSTOMER GRIEVANCE HANDLING INTERNAL PROCESS
IR ISSUES

PMS 2010-2011
ROLE / DESIGNATION: DEPTT.: ASST. EXECUTIVE HR
Achievement Self Rating Scale of 1 - 4 Reporting Officer Reviewing Officer
Final Score (Final Rating x Weightage)

SUNIL JHA

Objectives

Weightage

Index of Performance

20

20

0-25 Hrs P/M

15

15

Grievance of PA should be closed as per policy /agreement ( fuly recorded)and grievance of other associates within 72 hrs .Logging of all grievance necessary.No trade union activities

15 15 20 50

No Plant stopage/issues due to IR ( 0 days) ZERO ACCIDENT 100%

SAFETY MULTI SKILLING OF ASSOCIATE & SKILL MATRIX LEARNING & GROWTH LINE CAPTAIN SAP

10 5

10 5

90% performance on all lines 90%

Total
ANY CHANGE IN OBJECTIVES DURING THE YEAR Rating Measurement 4 3 2 1 Good: Above average Performance Adequate: Satisfactory Performance. Below Average: Scope for Improvement. Poor: Unacceptable Performance.

100 100
FINAL PERFORMANCE POINTS OUT OF 100

Signature of Appraisee: Date:

Signature of Reporting Officer: Date:

Signature of Reviewing Officer DATE:

SCALING OF PERFORMANCE INDEX INDEX


1

1
20-25
Grievance of PA should be closed as per policy /agreement ( fuly recorded)and grievance of other associates within 144 hrs .Logging of all grievance necessary.No trade union activities

2
15-20
Grievance of PA should be closed as per policy /agreement ( fuly recorded)and grievance of other associates within 120 hrs .Logging of all grievance necessary.No trade union activities

3
15-Oct
Grievance of PA should be closed as per policy /agreement ( fuly recorded)and grievance of other associates within 96 hrs .Logging of all grievance necessary.No trade union activities

DOWN TIME DUE TO MANPOWER

GRIEVANCE HANDLING

IR ISSUES

No Plant stopage/issues due to IR ( 3 No Plant stopage/issues due to IR ( 2 No Plant stopage/issues due to IR ( 1 days) days) days)

SAFETY

1 Major

2 Minor

1 Minor

MULTI SKILLING OF ASSOCIATE & SKILL MATRIX LINE CAPTAIN

90%

95%

98%

75%

80%

85%

SAP

Less than 80%

80%

85%

4
0-10 Hrs

Grievance of PA should be closed as per policy /agreement ( fuly recorded)and grievance of other associates within 72 hrs .Logging of all grievance necessary.No trade union activities

No Plant stopage/issues due to IR ( 0 days)

ZERO ACCIDENT

100%

90%

+90%

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND RATING Unit:


NAME: E.C.N: S. No.
1 1.1 2 2.1 2.2

PMS 2010-2011
ROLE / DESIGNATION: Sr.Assistant HR
Achievement Self Rating Scale of 1 - 4 Reporting Officer Reviewing Officer

Omax-Manesar
Manoj Gupta 2201
Objectives
FINANCIAL Utilization of manpower i.e. No losses due to manpower CUSTOMER Grievance handling For all employees Pay roll Processing & Submission of Bill to Ho on due date (with copy of Deposit Challan) PROCESS To control leave without information & Late comers Statutory Compliance Shift Monitoring & Generations of reports (MIS, Cost Summary) LEARNING & GROWTH Line Captain
SAP

DEPTT.:
Weightage Index of Performance

20

20

No losses due to manpower

10 20

10 20

Grevance redressal with in 15 days Monthly Submission due dates

3 3.1 3.2 3.3 4 4.1


4.2

10 15 15

10 15 15

1.5%

As per check list


No down time in the shift

10
10

10
10

As per Plan
90%

Total
ANY CHANGE IN OBJECTIVES DURING THE YEAR Rating Measurement 4 3 2 1 Good: Above average Performance Adequate: Satisfactory Performance. Below Average: Scope for Improvement. Poor: Unacceptable Performance.

100 100
FINAL PERFORMANCE POINTS OUT OF 100

Signature of Appraisee: Date:

Signature of Reporting Officer: Date:

Signature of Reviewing Officer DATE:

Final Score (Final Rating x Weightage)

SCALING OF PERFORMANCE INDEX INDEX


1 2 Utilization of manpower i.e. No losses due to manpower Grievance handling For all employees Pay roll Processing & Submission of Bill to Ho on due date (with copy of Deposit Challan) To control leave without information & Late comers Statutory Compliance OF contractor DELAY BY 3 DAYS DELAY BY 2 DAYS DELAY BY 1 DAYS On time

1
20-25 `less than 20 days delay

2
15-20 25 days delay

3
15-Oct 20 days delay

4
0-10 Hrs Grevance redressal with in 15 days

4 5 6 7 8

1.8% of total manpower DELAY BY 3 DAYS DELAY BY 3 DAYS DELAY BY 3 DAYS

1.7% of total manpower DELAY BY 2 DAYS DELAY BY 2 DAYS DELAY BY 2 DAYS

1.6% of total manpower DELAY BY 1 DAYS DELAY BY 1 DAYS DELAY BY 1 DAYS

1.5% of total manpower 100% On Time On Time On Time

Shift Monitoring & Genrations of reports (MIS ,Cost Summary) Line Captin /CR SAP

Less than 80%

80%

85%

+90%

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND RATING Unit: Omax-Manesar


NAME: E.C.N: S. No.
1 1.1 2 2.1 2.2 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4 4.1 FINANCE SUGGESTION SCHEME CUSTOMER RECRUITEMENT & SELECTION PMS INTERNAL PROCESS EVENT MANAGEMENT TRAINING 10 15 10 10 80 AS AND WHEN REQURIED 100% AS PER PMS SHEDULE AS PER PLAN Half Yearly 20 15 WITH IN 45 DAYS OCTOBER & APRIL 10 10 NO Of Sugg ON TIME

PMS 2010-2011
ROLE / DESIGNATION: DEPTT.: EXECUTIVE HR
Achievement Self Rating Scale of 1 - 4 Reporting Officer Reviewing Officer

ARUNA HARJAI 1739


Objectives Weightage

Index of Performance

Maintaining & Celebrating birthday of all staff members & Nanhi Chhhan Competency Mapping
LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT SAP

10

10

90%

Total
ANY CHANGE IN OBJECTIVES DURING THE YEAR Rating Measurement 4 3 2 1 Good: Above average Performance Adequate: Satisfactory Performance. Below Average: Scope for Improvement. Poor: Unacceptable Performance.

100 100
FINAL PERFORMANCE POINTS OUT OF 100

Signature of Appraisee: Date:

Signature of Reporting Officer: Date:

Signature of Reviewing Officer DATE:

Final Score (Final Rating x Weightage)

SCALING OF PERFORMANCE INDEX INDEX


1
2

Cost Saving TRAINING 90% As perPMS Shedule 95% As per PMS Shedule 98% As per PMS Shedule

RECRUITEMENT & SELECTION 3


4

More than 60 days

With in 60 days

With in 55 days

EVENT MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE STAISFACTION SURVEY PMS Maintaining & Celebrating birthday of all staff members & Nanhi Chhhan SAP SUGGESTION (QUTARLY)

DELAY BY 25 DAYS

DELAY BY 20 DAYS

DELAY BY 15 DAYS

5
6

DELAY BY 15 DAYS

DELAY BY 10 DAYS

DELAY BY 7 DAYS

DELAY BY 3 DAYS Less than 80% DELAY BY 15 DAYS

DELAY BY 2 DAYS 80% DELAY BY 10 DAYS

DELAY BY 1 DAYS 85% DELAY BY 7 DAYS

7
8

4
As per Plan 100% As per PMS Shedule

With in 45 days

AS AND WHEN REQURIED

HAS TO BE DONE

OCT & APRAIL (AS PER SHEDULE)

100% Adherence +90% QUTARLY

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND RATING Unit: Omax-anesar


NAME: E.C.N: S. No.
1 1.1 1.2 2 2.1 FINANCE ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES SALARY AND WAGES EXPENSES CUSTOMER 10 20 10

PMS 2010-2011
ROLE / DESIGNATION: DEPTT.: SR. EXECUTIVE HR
Achievement Self Rating Scale of 1 - 4 Reporting Officer Reviewing Officer

SAPAN YADAV 4556


Objectives Weightage

Index of Performance
To be 2% of existing expense 100% As per Bduget

STATUTORY COMPLIANCE
GRIEVANCE HANDLING INTERNAL PROCESS

15

15

No show cause notice( financial penalty ) by any govt dept


Grievance of PA should be closed as per policy /agreement ( fuly recorded)and grievance of other associates within 72 hrs .Logging of all grievance necessary.No trade union activities

2.2 3 3.1 3.2 4 4.1

15

15

IR ISSUES
SAFETY LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT LINE CAPTAIN

15 30 15

No Plant stopage/issues due to IR ( 0 days) ZERO ACCIDENT

10 20

90%

4.2

SAP

10

90%

Total
ANY CHANGE IN OBJECTIVES DURING THE YEAR Rating Measurement 4 3 2 1 Good: Above average Performance Adequate: Satisfactory Performance. Below Average: Scope for Improvement. Poor: Unacceptable Performance.

100 100
FINAL PERFORMANCE POINTS OUT OF 100

Signature of Appraisee: Date:

Signature of Reporting Officer: Date:

Signature of Reviewing Officer DATE:

Final Score (Final Rating x Weightage)

SCALING OF PERFORMANCE INDEX INDEX


1 2

1
To be 5% of existing expense 90% As per Bduget

2
To be 4% of existing expense 95% As per Bduget

3
To be 3% of existing expense 98% As per Bduget

VALUE ADDITION SALARY AND WAGES EXPENSES

STATUTORY COMPLIANCE

2 show cause notice( financial penalty 2 show cause notice( financial penalty 1 show cause notice( financial penalty ) by any govt dept ) by any govt dept ) by any govt dept

GRIEVANCE HANDLING SCHEME

Grievance of PA should be closed as per policy /agreement ( fuly recorded)and grievance of other associates within 144 hrs .Logging of all grievance necessary.No trade union activities

Grievance of PA should be closed as per policy /agreement ( fuly recorded)and grievance of other associates within 120 hrs .Logging of all grievance necessary.No trade union activities

Grievance of PA should be closed as per policy /agreement ( fuly recorded)and grievance of other associates within 96 hrs .Logging of all grievance necessary.No trade union activities

IR ISSUES

No Plant stopage/issues due to IR ( 3 No Plant stopage/issues due to IR ( 2 No Plant stopage/issues due to IR ( 1 days) days) days) 1 Major 75% 2 Minor 80% 1 Minor 85%

6 7 8

SAFETY LINE CAPTAIN

SAP

Less than 80%

80%

85%

4
To be 2% of existing expense 100% As per Bduget No show cause notice( financial penalty ) by any govt dept

Grievance of PA should be closed as per policy /agreement ( fuly recorded)and grievance of other associates within 72 hrs .Logging of all grievance necessary.No trade union activities

No Plant stopage/issues due to IR ( 0 days)

ZERO ACCIDENT 90%

+90%

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND RATING Unit: Omax-Manesar


s. No. E.C.N: S. No.
1 1.1 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 FINANCE

PMS 2010-2011
ROLE / DESIGNATION: DEPTT.: SO SECURITY
Achievement Self Rating Scale of 1 - 4 Reporting Officer Reviewing Officer
Final Score (Final Rating x Weightage)

SUJIT MITRA

Objectives

Weightage

Index of Performance
Reduce of Vechile running cost by 2%

COST SAVING
INTERNAL PROCESS MONITORING MI ROOM & HORTICULURE WASTE DISPOSAL SAFETY

15

15

10 15 80 15

REDUCING TREND OF DISEASE AS PER PLAN ZERO ACCIDENT

3.4

VISITOR HANDLING & CONTROLLING

10

NO COMPLAINT

3.5

5'S OF COMPANY

15

AS PER AUDIT SCORE

3.6 4 4.1

MAINTAING & SENSING IR ISSUE LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT

15

AS & WHEN DIRECTIONS IN HR HEAD

SAP Total

90%

100 100
FINAL PERFORMANCE POINTS OUT OF 100

ANY CHANGE IN OBJECTIVES DURING THE YEAR Rating Measurement 4 3 2 1 Good: Above average Performance Adequate: Satisfactory Performance. Below Average: Scope for Improvement. Poor: Unacceptable Performance.

Signature of Appraisee: Date:

Signature of Reporting Officer:

Date:

Signature of Reviewing Officer DATE:

1
Cost saving through Vehicle control Monitoring MI Room & Preparation Health Health & Safety WASTE DISPOSAL Safety Visitor Handling & Controlling 5's of company peripheral Mainteing & Sensing IR SAP 0 THREE Below 65% As per back of HR Head 75% 0 1 Minor Reduce of Vechile running cost by 5%

2
Reduce of Vechile running cost by 4%

3
Reduce of Vechile running cost by 3%

2 Near Miss

1 Minor

1 Near Miss

0 TWO 65%

one ONE 70%

80%

85%

4
Reduce of Vechile running cost by 2% Reducing trend of disease 0 Accident 0 Near Miss AS PER PLAN zero major accident NO COMLIANT 75%

90%

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND RATING Unit: Omax-Manesar


s. No. E.C.N:
OBJECTIVES 1 1.1 2 3 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 4 4.2 FINANCIAL Theft/Pilferage CUSTOMER PROCESS Ensuring Security Drill Strengthen safety & fire prevention & fire drill Vehicle movements & checks Visitor Handling & controlling Ensuring Correctness of all security records Different Report generation LEARNING & GROWTH SAP Total: 5 100 100 5 15 15 15 80 10 15 10 No complaint No complaint As & when required As per plan 100% Ready ness as per Procedure /fire policy As & when required 15 15 Max No of theft/ pilferage caught WEIGHTAGE OUT OF 100

PMS 2010-2011
ROLE / DESIGNATION: DEPTT.:
INDEX OF PERFORMANCE

BHARAM PARKASH

SO SECURITY
Rating Scale of 1 - 4

ACHIEVEMENT

RATING ON SCALE OF 1 TO 4 Self Reporting Reviewing Officer Officer

ANY CHANGE IN OBJECTIVES DURING THE YEAR Rating 4 3 2 1 Measurement Good: Above average Performance Adequate: Satisfactory Performance. Below Average: Scope for Improvement. Poor: Unacceptable Performance.

FINAL PERFORMANCE POINTS OUT OF 100

Signature of Appraisee:

Date:

Signature of Reporting Officer: Date:

Signature of Reviewing Officer DATE:

ANY CHANGE IN OBJECTIVES DURING THE YEAR

NAME:BRAHM PARKASH S.NO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Theft/Pilferage Ensuring Security Drill Strengthen safety & fire drill Vehicle movements & checks Visitor Handling & controlling Ensuring Correctness of all security records Report generation SAP OBJECTIVES 1 0 0 95% 0 THREE Not more then 2 THREE DAY DELAY 75% 2 0 0 96% 0 TWO 2 Chance TWO DAY DELAY 80% 3 0 0 98% 0 ONE One Chance ONE DAY DELAY 85%

4 0 100% As per Plan 100% Readyness No misuse NO COMLIANT No Mistake DAILY 90%

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND RATING Unit: Omax-Manesar


s. No. E.C.N: Jitender Chauan DEPTT.:

PMS 2010-2011
Superviouser ROLE / DESIGNATION: SECURITY
Rating Scale of 1 - 4

OBJECTIVES 1 1.1 2 3 3.2 FINANCIAL Theft/Pilferage

WEIGHTAGE OUT OF 100

INDEX OF PERFORMANCE

ACHIEVEMENT Self

RATING ON SCALE OF 1 TO 4 Reporting Officer Reviewing Officer

20 CUSTOMER PROCESS MRR related to discrepancy pendency beyond 49 hrs House keeping,in the plant Record maintaining and up keeping Up keeping of water coolers & fire ext. Monitoring visitor Security Drill LEARNING & GROWTH SAP 5 100 100

Max No of theft/ pilferage caught

10 15 15 10 15 10 As required Daily 100% As required

3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 4 4.2

ANY CHANGE IN OBJECTIVES DURING THE YEAR Rating 4 3 2 1 Measurement Good: Above average Performance Adequate: Satisfactory Performance. Below Average: Scope for Improvement. Poor: Unacceptable Performance.

FINAL PERFORMANCE POINTS OUT OF 100

Signature of Appraisee:

Date:

Signature of Reporting Officer: Date:

Signature of Reviewing Officer DATE:

NAME:JITENDER CHOUHAN S.NO 1 2 4 5 11 8 10 12 OBJECTIVES Theft/Pilferage MRR related to discrepancy House keeping,5's & Horticulture 1 0 Above 2 Below 60% 2 0 2 60% TWO DAY DELAY TWO 97% TWO DAY DELAY 80% 3 ONE 1 70% ONE DAY DELAY ONE 98% ONE DAY DELAY 85%

Record maintaining and up keeping THREE DAY DELAY Monitoring visitor THREE

Upkeeping of water coolers & fire 95% Security drill SAP THREE DAY DELAY 75%

4 NO THEFT No pendency at any time Audit score more then 80% As per plan (Daily) NO COMLIANT 100% As per plan (Daily) 90%

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND RATING Unit: Omax-Manesar


NAME: RENU E.C.N: KRAs: 1. FINANCE S. No. 1 FINANCE
Cost Saving (Cost Analyisis &

PMS 2010-2011
ROLE / DESIGNATION: DEPTT.: RECEPTIONIST GEN. ADM 3. INTERNAL PROCESSES
Index of Performance Achievement Self Reporting Officer Rating Scale of 1 - 4

2. CUSTOMER
Weightage

4. LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT


Reviewing Officer
Final Score (Final Rating x Weightage)

Objectives

1.1 corrective action & Cost Control of


calls/Bils
2 CUSTOMER

25

25

Satisfaction of internal & External Customer, Communication

2.1 3

Controlling of Visitor & managing interview


INTERNAL PROCESS

20

20 Daily

3.1
3.2

Smooth function of EPBX system & EXT Nos Maintenance of reception & visitor area

15
10

No Break down more than 2 Hrs. Beautification & Look of Reception 55

Misc Support (Mail Handling, Ladies 3.3 Toilet)


3..4

20

Daily & Timely Dispatched Daily 100 FINAL PERFORMANCE POINTS OUT OF 100

Controlling of Visitor & managing interview Total

10

100

ANY CHANGE IN OBJECTIVES DURING THE YEAR

4 3 2 1

Good: Above average Performance Adequate: Satisfactory Performance. Below Average: Scope for Improvement. Poor: Unacceptable Performance.

Signature of Appraisee: Date:

Signature of Reporting Officer:

Date:

Signature of Reviewing Officer: Date:

SCALING Performance Index 1 1 major 5% Delayed by 3 Days 1 Major 1 Major 3 Hours break down In a month

2 2 minor 6% Delayed by 2 Days 2 Minor 2 Minor

3 1 Minor 8% Delayed by 1 Days 1 minor 1 Minor

4 No Complaints 10% Same Day No Complaints No NC in a year No break down in a month

1 2 3 4 5 6

Satisfaction of Internal & External Customer, through Telecommunication Cost saving in tele communication Postal Services (Courier/DAK) Misc. Support(Upkeeping of Reception Area, Cordination of Interviews & attending visitors) No NC in internal/ external audit Maintaining water cooler & Tea/Coffee vending Machine

2 Hours break down 1 Hours break down In In a month a month

You might also like