IA.342 O.S.

5/11 This petition is filed for getting ad -interm andinjunction restairing the defendants to meke any distrubunes in the plaintif's over the suit property. The petitioner is stated in his petitiion is that the suit properties origanaly are belonged to the plaintiff and having patta in his name and paid taxes to the government and are in his possession. The first defendan is the wife of Vetha suresh who is the sone of the plaintiff. The first defandent made dispute against her husband with the inducement of the second defendant and residing in the house of the second defandant. The son of the plaintiff said Vetha suresh was died on 16.02.2011 and after some days of the funeral function of the said Vetha Suresh one settlement was made between the plaintiff and the first defendantin peresence of the mediateres for giving some binifits to the first defendant and her daughter mortina and the process is pending in his stage defendants proclaimed that they having right over the suit properties and to make distrubunce to the plaintiff possession from 23.8.11. and for getting injunction restraining the defendants this suit and this petition are filed. The respondents objected that the properties were purchased by the funds of the husband of the first defendant Vetha Suresh and the petitioner awarements are falls. The alleged settlement was made only for the maintainces of the first defendant and her daughter. No any settlement was made about the suit properties. After the death of the husband of the first defendant she took over the possession of the suit properties and the plaintiff have not any right or possession over the suit property. The first defendant having knowledge that the plaintiff made some someentent infavour of the daughters in the plaintiff and for the said reason the plaintiff have notlocus- standy and this petition is to be dismissed in ni-liminy. The point for consederation is whether the plaintiff is entitled to get a interim injunction in this suit? It is not dibuted that the suit property were purchased in the name of the plaintiff and revenue documents were also made in his favour. The respondants objection is the properties were purchased by the plaintiff with the function of the hundand of the first defendant and after his death the first plaintiff having possession over the suit property. The facts put by the defendants is to be desided in the trial only. He will notbe decided in the priliminary stage. The documents shows that the plaintiff having prima cia case and the parents convenient in favour the plaintiff. The responant not filed any documents prooving their stand and its may be filed in that trial. In the result the petition is allowed. No cost.