Name(s): _______________________________ Number(s) : _______________________ Rec: _______ Date: _______________

The Brooklyn Latin School

Math Exposition (Board Work) 4
Annotation - Demonstrates an understanding of all aspects of task by underlining key terms, identifying the given information and the unknown information to be determined, and writing the appropriate formula to be used. - Work is explained clearly using conventional modes of mathematical expression. - Uses appropriate mathematical techniques logically and accurately. - Has no mathematical errors. - Speaks clearly and articulately. - Uses appropriate mathematical language. - Uses an appropriately loud voice. -Makes effective eye contact with the group

3
- Demonstrates a general understanding of the task with minor omissions or misunderstandings.

2
- Demonstrates an insufficient understanding of the task with serious omissions or misunderstandings.

1
- Demonstrates no understanding of the requirements of the task.

Written Presentatio n

Accuracy of Calculations

Oral Presentatio n

- Work is explained relatively clearly using conventional modes of mathematical expression, with few errors of expression. - Uses appropriate mathematical techniques logically and accurately most of the time. - Has few mathematical errors. - Speaks clearly and articulately. - Uses a loud voice. - Makes eye contact with the group. - Addresses majority of questions in a meaningful way.

- Work is not well organized and is difficult follow.

- Work is incoherent.

- Has serious - Has too many errors deficiencies in the use of or omissions to deliver mathematical useful results. techniques.

- Comment is unclear; may be vague, rambling, or insufficiently explained. - Volume is too low. - Words are mumbled. - Does not make eye contact with the group.

- Comment is so unclear as to make it incomprehensible. - Comment is irrelevant and/or inappropriate to the discussion. - Language is inappropriate and/ or

Name(s): _______________________________ Number(s) : _______________________ Rec: _______ Date: _______________ - Thoughtfully answers - Addresses some offensive. questions from the class. questions in a - Does not address meaningful way. questions in a meaningful way.

Name(s): _______________________________ Number(s) : _______________________ Rec: _______ Date: _______________

The Brooklyn Latin School

Math Problem Sets (Math Projects) 4
Written Presentation - Work is explained clearly using conventional modes of mathematical expression. - Chooses and uses the correct methods, formulae, and instruments all the time.

3
- Work is explained relatively clearly using conventional modes of mathematical expression, with few errors of expression. - Chooses and uses the correct methods, formulae, and instruments most of the time.

2
- Work is not well organized and is difficult follow.

1
- Work is incoherent.

Math Modeling: choice and use of methods, formulae, instruments Accuracy of Calculations

- Chooses and uses the correct methods, formulae, and instruments sometimes.

- Does not choose and use the correct methods, formulae, and instruments.

- Uses appropriate mathematical techniques logically and accurately. - Has no mathematical errors.

Rationale

- Uses appropriate mathematical techniques logically and accurately most of the time. - Has few mathematical errors. - Provides complete, - Provides adequate coherent explanations or coherent explanations arguments about the or arguments about the choice of methods, choice of methods, formulae, instruments. formulae, instruments.

- Has serious - Has too many deficiencies in the use of errors or omissions mathematical to deliver useful techniques. results.

- Attempts to provide an explanation or uses some appropriate arguments about the choice of methods, formulae, instruments.

- Doesnt provide or use appropriate arguments about the choice of methods, formulae, instruments.

Name(s): _______________________________ Number(s) : _______________________ Rec: _______ Date: _______________

The Brooklyn Latin School

Seminar 4
Annotation - Demonstrates an understanding of all aspects of task by underlining key terms, identifying the given information and the unknown information to be determined, and writing the appropriate formula to be used. - Provides a complete, coherent explanations or arguments about the choice of methods, formulae, instruments.

3
- Demonstrates a general understanding of the task with minor omissions or misunderstandings.

2
- Demonstrates an insufficient understanding of the task with serious omissions or misunderstandings.

1
- Demonstrates no understanding of the requirements of the task.

Rationale

- Provides an adequate coherent explanations or arguments about the choice of methods, formulae, instruments. - Moves conversation forward by summarizing, linking, questioning and/or clarifying - Listens to others and reflects upon their ideas

Leadership to - Effectively moves aid conversation forward by collaboration summarizing, linking, questioning and/or clarifying discipuli ideas. - Listens closely and reflects upon what others have said. - Brings out a key idea missed by the group.

- Attempts to provide an explanation or uses some appropriate arguments about the choice of methods, formulae, instruments. - Does not effectively move conversation forward. - Comments do not connect to the ideas previously discussed. - Does not actively listen and/or take notes.

- Doesnt provide or use appropriate arguments about the choice of methods, formulae, instruments. - Takes no responsibility for the seminar. - May not speak at all, or comment may reflect a lack of interest/ respect for the group. - Body language shows disinterest during seminar. - Comes to seminar unprepared and/or late.

Name(s): _______________________________ Number(s) : _______________________ Rec: _______ Date: _______________ Oral - Speaks clearly and - Speaks clearly and - Comment is unclear; - Comment is so Presentation articulately. articulately. may be vague, unclear as to make it - Uses appropriate - Uses a loud voice. rambling, or incomprehensible. mathematical language. - Makes eye contact insufficiently explained. - Comment is irrelevant - Uses an appropriately with the group. - Volume is too low. and/or inappropriate to loud voice. - Addresses majority of - Words are mumbled. the discussion. -Makes effective eye questions in a - Does not make eye - Language is contact with the group meaningful way. contact with the group. inappropriate and/ or - Thoughtfully answers - Addresses some offensive. questions from the class. questions in a - Does not address meaningful way. questions in a meaningful way.