http://www.youtube.com/watch?

v=NNZS9ZuZcrg Ron paul knows his History and lays Hannity out by saying what I have always sai d about George W. Bush and that is that the Neo-Cons are Liberal Democrats that have infiltrated the Republican Party. The Republicans traditionally have been about small Government, they have been against the department of education and w ars unless America was attacked. What sean hannity has said is that suicide bom bers were all iraqi's funded by Iran. This we know unequivocally is an untrue s tatement. Here are the facts so lets quit seeing this brought up as an objection once and gfor all because it simply wastes time re-hashing arguments that had already bee n proven are wrong by George W. Bush himself and he is on record answering this question by Journalists on more than one occasion: CNN:"Mr President, what did Iraq do to that was a part of the attacks on 911?" President: Nothing. When it was the Taliban fighting the russians, we funded them and called them "f reedom fighters". This is called "spin" because spin is anything the Government tells the media to play. The taliban were trained how to fight by our CIA and CIA Operative, Osama Bin Laden acted as leader after he struck a deal between th e taliban and CIA he would play the bad guy and be the scapegoat in just another one of the CIA's rip off scams using an endless loop funding battles that have ambiguous enemies and calling them "Wars" requiring urgently needed money that s eems to get lost or stolen while American soldiers,all our police and tax payers get stuck for cleaning up the mess and paying the price. To this day, Osama bi n Laden has never been a suspect much less charged for the 911 attacks. The FBI later came on record after the 911 truth movement insisted they explain why. The FBI said, "their was no evidence to charge him". Oh their IS evidence of Osama that you have never seen before, but it is the kind CIA agents do when installed in groups and are asked to play a part. This is one of the reasons, the FBI ha s no further comment about videos like this. They are used to convict others in the video where Osama bin laden is clearely having a discussion about the event s of 911 too but the FBI doesn't use it as evidence to chARGE BIN LADEN? The war on drugs? CIA involvement on drugs being brought in from every place they have been involv ed is legendary and they have been caught numerous times never facing charges mu ch less arrests. Afganistan, Heroine has become a major export since CIA has be en implanted there. Vietnam was the same thing and everyone should remember the Air America CIA fiasco. The military had been busted many times using our military men in experiments us ing everything from LSD to methamphetamines. I mean seriously, does anyone beli eve that crack cocaine was invented by some militant black gang banger who came up with it the same way the reeses candy bar was discovered? That this crips or blood gang guy, was about to snort a big line of coke and tripped spilling all his cocaine in some beaker of baking soda and JUST enough water that after some gentle heating by a bunson burner and some shaking of the beaker, a nice hard ro ck of the now super cocaine would form? That he sat there and said Hmmm,, wonde r what would happen if I smoked it? Yeah, riiight. No, CIA Scientsists came up with this stuff the same way they came up with Meth and introduced it as an alternative to crack in white neighborhoods. Crack was spilling over into these white areas after they got all the blacks hooked on it. It is why they call meth the white mans crack and ALL of it was to make money t

o fund illegal wars. The blow back has been a drug addicted populace who are villified and imprisoned so much we have more in prison than any country in the world. Those that think it is so simple to blame the drug users are usually the same people that later f ind out just how easy it is to fall for propaganda when anti drug proponents lik e Rush Limbaugh, learn the lesson the hard way. Now Rush doesn't speak so pompo us anymore. At least not about addiction to drugs. The war on Cancer, Another war we are kept frieghtened by it spending more in the billions funding research and scientists who keep telling us "we are getting closer to a cure eve ryday" yet nothing can be further from the truth and people are dying of cancer caused by these same scientists and the garbage they have put in our food, in ou r weapons that take our veterans lives moreover the hypocrisy of a Government Ta xing Ciggarettes to the point the tobbacco company gets only four cents of every pack of smokes sold makes you wonder. Why do they arrest people for smoking Po t as a more egregious offense when they KNOWE drunk drivers are more dangerous k illing more people in one year than Vietnam and korean wars combined. Why do th ey villify smokers of tobbacco who they KNOW are putting themselves at risk for cancer and ask for more funding to get a cure for it when THIS one is a no brain er? Don't tell us you care Uncle sam, just make it illegal to smoke? The guilt this Government has shows up in ways you may not have considered becau se it is so pathetic an excuse as an answer. The truth is, they know they got Am ericans addicted to tobbacco so that is why they take this approach, they know t hey got Americans addicted to heroine and is why they treat heroine drug use as a disease and offer Goverment grade heroine called methadone. After the CIA was caught bringing tons and tons of cocaine into this country and consorting with gangs selling it, we saw Cocain addiction decriminalized and re habs were springing up all over the place. Same with alchohol, the Americans, o nce they got a taste of it prohibition wasn't gonna stop it. When it comes to n aturally derived drug highs like weed, the American indians were enjoying peyote and hemp or pot long ago without a mishap. Anyone could grow it so they can't make money on it like they can the ones chemi sts invent in a lab. That is until they need a scapegoat after a CIA member get s busted. Oh then they just leak the formula and how to make it to some minorit y group of blacks or latinos who start making it, so they can say THEY invented it. This is like the guy who has a piece of chocolate and trips dropping his ca ndybar into a open jar of peanut butter and wha la! A new candy bar is born the same way they expect us to believe a new designer dr ug is born. Whats even more ironic is the example for the candy bar is to be considered a jo ke as if it is funny they invented the reeses cup that way. Yeah I can find it funny they would expect us to believe that but it is possible but the invention of crack cocaine? or a recipe for meth? Not believable and ceratinly NO JOKE. Think about it, if the war on drugs were to be fought with any real intention of winning, let me give you two scenarios where their could be a sure victory. No t a painless one but a survivable one which is econimically feasible and unregre table. As with any addiction you are trying to quit, their would be some hard d ays for those addicted to them. I guarantee you they would not be death threatening, in fact they would most lik ely extend the lives of many millions of Americans hooked on these two drugs. I have put a considerable amount of time researching this where of all those I can

cite Americans are addicted to, of those drugs legal and illegal I know of two I have not been able to find arguments against my hypothesis for a clear cut vic tory getting Americans OFF of them once and for all. Tobbacco and Methamphetamines. Their are only two labs in the world that make pseudo ephedrine the main ingredi ent in meth. It is a very complicated and expensive process to make so all we d o is shut down these two factories. No more meth. What about the commone cold? We already have a cure for the common cold, our bodies immune systems handle it eventually else you would still be sneezing and couging. These drugs made by dr ug companies are to lessen the symptoms but they don't kill the cold. We surviv ed thousands of years without Pseudofed and actifed, I am pretty sure we would s urvive using alternatives to those two medicines. I have never met a prisoner o f a jail system in Az run by Sherrif Arpaio that died because he had to give up smoking. Most had said by the fourth or fifth day, their cravings were gone. S o that too is a no brainer. Close them down and with the exception of meth which would require a lot more care as it is a LOT harder on the system getting off m eth, it is in the most practical sense the best way to win those two battles on the war on drugs AND a major battle front on the war on cancer. Yes their would be some struggle but this is an example of TWO MAJOR players in both wars on ca ncer and drugs that we CAN win eliminating the increased costs of health care la ter that BOTH are sure to be at central cause for. Both victims or users of the se drugs will complain but thank us later when they get their lives back and are healthy after years of using they will think with a clear head. No we would rather let Big Pharma lobbyists win and continue selling mexican dru g cartels ten times the pseudo ephdrine allowed by law, resulting in job losses and broken families from meth costing us more and more dying in drug wars and th e illegal arms sales that are spawned when we try to attack this problem by tryi ng to keep it contained. Their is nothing more stupid as a controlled war that isn't more an asinine idea than if we just cut off the supply you automatically end the demand as the addicted have nothing to feed the addiction starving it to its ultimate death. A death of addcition in-lieu of one of mortality is a death they will thank us for when they are healthy again to celebrate its demise. No, what does the Government do? Now bear in mind I have been addicted to some o f the most debilitating and hard to quit drugs, including but not limited to, co caine and tobbacco so don't think I am being insensitive. I am using what I bel ieve is the most common sense rationale for the victory of two major battle fron ts but the Government who insists they control our lives because they know whats best for us, would have more credibilty of such a claim if they actually DID TH AT once in a while in a way none of us can argue against. At least not if you'r e honest about it and anyone telling me they think meth and tobbacco is their ri ght. Then I say they are correct. Let them grow their own tobbacco and as far as the meth goes,, hehe good luck sy nthesizing your own ephedra leaves into ephedrine, the Government won't be compl icit in it anymore. No the Government would rather add sin taxes to the tobbacco addicted by making it harder for them to buy. This is the logical choice they think the addicted w ill make I guess. What I know is, anyone who would spend money on cancer sticks is gical in the first place and while they were MORE logical BEFORE ed, keep in mind, THE decision to try drugs is usually made by a nd is not yet affected by them and alleged to using MORE logical cisions than those already using drugs. not thinking lo they got addict person whose mi clear headed de

So now we have a person who smokes ten bucks a day that has to choose between lu nch that day or smokes. Most smokers are already agreeing to which one of these I will refer to as the o ne they will most likely pick. Then suffer even further the mal-nutrition of a s kipped lunch in favor of the lunch of carcinogenic chemicals devoid of the very nutritional benefits they need to fight the odds of getting the very cancer the tax just made that more likely to happen. Get real, this does't stop smoking and the idea is to WIN, not find a way to all egedly finace the morphine this poor guy is going to end up paying for when he g ets cancer. This tax gets tobbacco in bed with Government so Government can't make growing t obbacco illegal. So they say this would be used politically to accuse Governmen t of being a Hypocrite. As if THAT has ever stopped them from doing anything be fore. How about doing something RIGHT for a change making distribution illegal but not personal use then? I mean, if you want to smoke then grow your own tobbacco if you must and many w ould but the majority of Americans would be off smokes in a week. Or at least b efore what they grew on their own would be ready to harvest and snmoke. by that time, hopefully they would realize, they haven't had a ciggarette in weeks or m onths, why start again. If you 're like most of us, Common sense is a lot easie r to obey when the addiction is not their making you stupid again. The war on Global warming The war on poverty The war on terrorism All of them have Government legislation that has bilked literally trillions of d ollars fighting ambiguously identifiable enemies the media has put on television and passed off as truth in fact and have shown only to keep these wars going be cause they are making people in power RICH. Dick Cheney is one example of that I will go more into detail about later in this editorial. The slippery slope, I m ention in my editorial about Bush being a liberal is a prediction I make about t he next election that came true and one I see coming true. That if we didn't wa tch out, Americans would regret using these terms so interchangeably that Americ ans themsleves would be called the "terrorists". We are aleady seeing this occu r and more Americans are waking up to what the truthers who support Ron Paul, ha ve been saying all along. Dick Morris educates Sean Hannity on this very fact i n the following video We know for a fact by FBI whistle blowers that had known Osama Bin Laden was a C IA asset and had been working with them up to the day 911 attacks were committed and had been seen in a US military hospital by nurses and staff are facts that are undeniable. That a Van filled with C4 explosives and a team of Israeli Moss ad agents who had been seen celebrating as the towers were falling, high fiving each other, were questioned and released without further investigation. That sta tements later leaked by the FBI were factual and that they knew much more about who was responsible for the attacks but are not at liberty to say for reasons of "national security" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh2sBKpLxpQ