Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Faculty Disclosures
Presentation Outline
Discuss the treatment options and appropriate monitoring parameters for challenging cancer pain patients
Describe available risk assessment tools used to stratify opioid abuse potential Describe future variables that may influence current pain management strategies
Learning Objective
Discuss the treatment options and appropriate monitoring parameters for challenging cancer pain patients
Patient Case
JW is a 37 y/o male with hx of SCC* of the glottis Received XRT and chemotherapy in 2009 followed by total laryngectomy in Jan 2011 Patient was also given a g-tube for meds/feeds Referred to outpatient Palliative Care Clinic for pain management Social hx
Adjuvants
+ smoking 1-2 pack per day x ? years + social alcohol use + Heroin abuse in past, no recent per patient Completed rehab program for heroin addiction
QTc while on methadone 499, 482, 472 msec Other lab values normal
3/4/2011
Pain/Symptom Assessment
Patient reporting pain 9/10 in neck, not controlled with current regimen Describes pain as sharp, stabbing, burning and constant Patient reports some benefit from methadone but requesting oxycodone CR Mild nausea/vomiting controlled with oral antiemetics (metoclopramide)
My Recommendations
Use methadone in place of oxycodone CR
Pregabalin 50mg po 12 hrs Tricyclic antidepressants another option +/ NSAID and/or APAP likely to be helpful Could consider dexamethasone
Methadone Pearls
ECG recommended in following cases
COMM
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)
17 item questionnaire, 5-point Likert scale A quick and easy to administer patient-self assessment Validated in approximately 500 patients Ideal for documenting decisions about the level of monitoring planned for a particular patient or justifying referrals to specialty pain clinic Evaluates behaviors within the past 30 days Scored by adding sum of responses of patients reponses to questions (0 =never to 4 = very often) Score of 9 or higher is considered a positive
Found at http://www.painedu.org, Accessed on Feb 2, 2011. 2011 Inflexxion, Inc, Used with permission
Family history of substance abuse (M>F) Personal history of substance abuse Age (16-45), younger more predictive History of preadolescent sexual abuse (F only) Psychological disease
3/4/2011
SOAPP-R
Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with PainRevised (SOAPP-R) 24 item questionnaire, 5-point Likert scale A quick and easy to administer patient-self assessment Validated in approximately 500 patients Scored by adding sum of responses of patients reponses to questions (0 =never to 4 = very often) Score of 18 or higher is considered positive (high risk) Moderate risk = 10 to 21 Low risk < 9
Age 16 45 (1 point)
COMM and SOAPP-R not conducted, but likely also positive/high risk
Found at http://www.painedu.org, Accessed on Feb 2, 2011. 2011 Inflexxion, Inc. Used with permission
Now What?
Screening tools are just that Potential strategies for high risk patients Frequent office visits Random urine drug screening Patient-provider agreements Less abusable formulations should be considered May require addictionologist/specialist consultation Family members can be helpful Maximize adjuvants/co-analgesics Lower quantities of rxs dispensed
Monitoring Parameters
Opioids
Constipation, sedation, lethargy Monitor AST/ALT
Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, Methadone, Fentanyl, Buprenorphine
ECG (QT/QTc)
Methadone, Buprenorphine, Propoxyphene
Monitoring Parameters
Other analgesics
NSAID/Corticosteroids
GI bleeding, renal, cardiovascular risks
Available Resources
Opioid REMS Likely to be finalized in early 2011 Cancer Pain Management American Pain Society (www.ampainsoc.org)
Guideline for the Management of Cancer Pain in Adults and Children NCCN (www.nccn.org) NCI (www.cancer.gov)
Antiepileptics
AST/ALT and Scr where appropriate
Tricyclic antidepressants
Anticholinergic side effects, QT prolongation, suicide risk CYP 2D6 d/d interactions
3/4/2011
REMS
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies To ensure benefits outweigh the risks Elements
Opioid REMS
Currently approved
Abstral (fentanyl) Butrans (buprenorphine) Darvocet (propoxyphene/apap) Exalgo (hydromorphone ER) Morphine solution (10mg/5mL, 20mg/mL) Onsolis (fentanyl) Oxycodone solution (20mg/mL) Oxycontin (oxycodone CR) Suboxone (buprenorphine/naloxone) Tapentadol
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm111350.htm
Similar Guidelines
States with similar policies in place Utah Clinical Guidelines on Prescribing Opioids
http://health.utah.gov/prescription/pdf/Utah_guidelines_pdfs.pdf
In addition
Having one physician prescribe opioids Use of a single pharmacy for a patient to fill his prescriptions Use of opioid treatment agreements between the physician
and patient to clearly define patient and physician responsibilities Assessment of risks of developing addiction by conducting a thorough history including any history of substance abuse before starting treatment
http://www.agencymeddirectors.wa.gov/Files/AGReportFinal.pdf *MEDD = Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose
Canadian Guidelines for Safe and Effective Use of Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain
http://nationalpaincentre.mcmaster.ca/opioid/index.html
Conclusions
Cancer patients with pain have risks too! Risk stratification and risk minimization should be employed for all patients Dont be fooled by patients with cancer pain and its treatments Always remember adjuvants, other alternatives, outcomes, treatment plans Although opioids remain mainstay, think outside the box when necessary
Questions
1. Is this patient at risk of opioid abuse/misuse? 2. How could you stratify patient abuse risk?
a) ORT b) COMM c) SOAPP
3. Is methadone the best analgesic? 4. What are the appropriate monitoring parameters for this patient?
3/4/2011
Faculty Disclosures
Objective
Identify treatment options and appropriate monitoring parameters for radiationinduced toxicities in an outpatient setting
Photographic image of
the human hand
Lawrence TS et al. In: DeVita VT et al., eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 8th ed. 2008:307. http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/kaniol/f2000_lect_nuclphys/lect1/roentgen.htm
Administration
External beam radiation most widely used
3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy Intensity-modulated radiation therapy Stereotactic radiation therapy/surgery Proton therapy
Internal radiation
Brachytherapy
Systemic radiation therapy
Radiopharmaceuticals
Choice depends upon multiple variables
Radiation Therapy Principles. American Cancer Society website. http://www.cancer.org http://www.chesapeakepotomaccancer.com Radiation Therapy Principles. American Cancer Society website. http://www.cancer.org Radiation Therapy for Cancer Fact Sheet. National Cancer Institute website. http://www.cancer.gov
3/4/2011
Eye and orbit Nasopharynx Nasal/paranasal Salivary gland Oral cavity Oropharynx Hypopharynx Larynx Thyroid
Kidney Bladder
Male GU
Prostate Testicular
Gynecologic
In: Halperin EC et al eds. Perez and Bradys Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. 5th ed. 2008
In: Halperin EC et al eds. Perez and Bradys Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. 5th ed. 2008
Radiation Toxicity
Development is multi-factorial
Radiation-Induced Toxicity
Acute
Area of body treated Dose given per day Total dose given Patients performance status Concomitant therapy
Radiation Therapy for Cancer Fact Sheet. National Cancer Institute website. http://www.cancer.gov
Radiation Therapy for Cancer Fact Sheet. National Cancer Institute website. http://www.cancer.gov Lawrence TS et al. In: DeVita VT et al., eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 8th ed. 2008:307.
Grade 3
Moist desquamation other than skin folds and creases; bleeding induced by minor trauma or abrasion
Grade 4
Skin necrosis or ulceration of full thickness of dermis; spontaneous bleeding from involved site; skin graft indicated
http://www.omicsonline.org/ArchiveJCST/2009/December/03/JCST1.28.php http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/911711-overview http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/powerpoint/jacc;44/11/2259/FIG1?view=true&filename=jaccv44i11p2259FIG1.ppt National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 http://www.thefullwiki.org/Peeling_skin
3/4/2011
Radiation Dermatitis
Toxicity Treatment Nonionic moisturizers TID (Cetaphil, Aveeno, Lubriderm)
Grade 1
Nicolaou N. Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 10th ed. 2007. National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0
Hydrogels
Rehydrates necrotic and sloughy wounds and provides a moist wound healing environment
Generally are clear, viscous gels that protect the wound from desiccating
Radiation Dermatitis
Toxicity Treatment
Exclude and treat infection Normal saline or modified Burow s solution compresses Grade 4 Debridement of tissue Flexible hydroactive hydrocolloid dressings Vitamin E 300 to 1000 units PO per day and pentoxifylline 400 mg PO BID - TID
Should be used as a primary wound dressing choice in wounds that are substantially or fully granulated
Multiple products available from multiple manufacturers Tegagel, DuoDERM
SAF-Gel, NU-GEL, DermaSyn
Chronic changes
Moisturizers, sunblock/sunscreen
http://www.medicaledu.com/hydroghp.htm
Nicolaou N. Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 10th ed. 2007. National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0
Hydrocolloid Dressings
Help the wound to autolytically debride itself Removed without tearing the granulation tissue underneath Best applied to wounds that produce light to medium exudate or transudate. May remain in place for 3 to 4 days, sometimes longer
http://www.medicaledu.com/hydrochp.htm
Disadvantages Not to be applied over infected wounds Can develop a foul odor after having been applied for 2-4 days
3/4/2011
Oropharynx
Side Effect Treatment Saline/bicarbonate, other electrolyte solution QID (Caphosol) Mucositis Lidocaine/diphenhydramine/simethicone 5-10 mL QID PRN Systemic analgesics PRN Antifungals Protective barriers (sulcralfate, Gelclair ) Time (may take up to 4 months for regeneration) Dysgeusia Zinc sulfate 45 mg PO TID Amifostine 500 mg IV weekly (H&N only)
Hovan AJ. Supp Care Cancer. 2010;18:1081-97. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1079570-overview Nicolaou N. Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 10th ed. 2007.
Caphosol
(supersaturated calcium phosphate rinse)
Electrolyte solution that resembles human saliva Moisten, lubricate and clean the oral cavity, loosen mucus Mix two ampules together, swish with the solution for 1 minute, spit out and repeat with other of solution Use 4 to 10 times daily
http://www.caphosol.com
Oropharynx
Side Effect Caries Treatment Prevention is key dental oncology Extractions of potential problem teeth in radiation field Fluoride gels (tray application)
http://ocw.tufts.edu/Content/51/lecturenotes/551485/551662 Nicolaou N. Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 10th ed. 2007. http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/OralHealth/Topics/CancerTreatment/ReferenceGuideforOncologyPatients.htm
Esophagus
Side Effect Treatment Lidocaine/diphenhydramine/simethicone 5-10 mL QID Esophagitis Systemic analgesics PRN Nutritional support Protective barrier sucralfate Acid suppressants PPIs, H1 blockers, H2 blockers Xerostomia Side Effect Parotitis/Siladenitis
Salivary Glands
Treatment Aspirin or NSAIDs
3/4/2011
Genitourinary
Treatment Phenazopyridine 100 -200 mg PO TID PRN dysurea Acute cystitis Oxybutynin 5 mg PO TID PRN frequency/urgency Oxybutynin 5 mg PO TID PRN Obstructive urinary symptoms Tamsulosin 0.4 mg PO daily Finasteride 5 mg PO daily Terazosin or doxazosin 1-2 mg PO daily
Bowel
Side Effect Treatment Low-residue diet Loperamide or diphenoxylate 1-2 tabs PO QID PRN diarrhea Diarrhea Exclude Clostridium difficile infection Cholestyramine 4-8 gram PO QID Octreotide 0.1 mg SQ TID Hemorrhoidal preparations with hydrocortisone TID prn (ointment or suppositories) Glucocorticoid retention enemas Mesalamine suppositories
Nicolaou N. Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 10th ed. 2007.
Case
A 64 yr-old male with H&N cancer is two weeks into his 7 week course of radiation therapy. He comes to clinic for an interval check, and upon examination has grade 1 radiation dermatitis (dry desquamation).
Proctitis