Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development of an ecologically
1995;115:1349 –1352. valid, computerized, driving assessment program: The Neurocog-
16. Goodwill CJ. Mobility for the disabled patient. International nitive Driving Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1999;14:794 –795.
Rehabilitation Medicine 1984;6:1. 26. Johnson BT. DSTAT: software for the meta-analytic review of
17. Hauser SL, Dawson DM, Lehrich JR, et al. Intensive immuno- research literatures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associ-
suppression in progressive multiple sclerosis. A randomized, ates; 1989.
three-arm study of high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide, 27. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
plasma exchange, and ACTH. N Engl J Med 1983;308:173–180. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
18. Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dys- 28. Mazer BL, Korner-Bitensky NA, Sofer S. Predicting ability to
function in multiple sclerosis: frequency, patterns, and predic- drive after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:743–750.
tion. Neurology 1991;41:685– 691. 29. Rao SM, St. Aubin-Faubert P, Leo GJ. Information processing
19. Rudick R, Antel J, Confavreux C, et al. Clinical outcomes assess- speed in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuro-
psychol 1989;11:471– 477.
ment in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1996;40:469 – 479.
30. Demaree HA, DeLuca J, Gaudino EA, Diamond BJ. Speed of
20. Bates B. A guide to physical examination and history taking.
information processing as a key deficit in multiple sclerosis:
4th ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott; 1987.
implications for rehabilitation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychia-
21. Ball KK, Roenker DL. UFOV: Useful Field of View. San Anto- try 1999;67:661– 663.
nio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; Harcourt Brace & 31. Arnett PA, Higginson CI, Voss WD, Randolph JJ, Freske PJ.
Company; 1998. Speed of presentation influences story recall in MS patients.
22. Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ, Mamelak M. Effects of aging on the Presented at the 19th annual meeting of the National Acad-
useful field of view. Exp Aging Res 2000;26:103–120. emy of Neuropsychology; San Antonio, TX; 1999.
23. Owsley C, Ball K, McGwin G Jr, et al. Visual processing 32. Damian MS, Schilling G, Bachman G, Simon C, Stoppler S,
impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older Dorndorf W. White matter lesions and cognitive deficits: rele-
adults. JAMA 1998;279:1083–1088. vance of lesion pattern? Acta Neurol Scand 1994;90:430 – 436.
24. Michon JA. A critical view of driver behavior models: what we 33. Johnson SC, Bigler ED, Burr RB, Blatter DD. White matter
know, what should we do? In: Evans L, Schwing R, eds. Hu- atrophy, ventricular dilation, and intellectual functioning fol-
man behavior and traffic safety. New York, NY: Plenum lowing traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 1994;8:307–
Press; 1985. 315.
From the Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC) (Drs. Peskind and Raskind) and Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical
Center (GRECC) (Drs. Wilkinson and Schellenberg), VA Puget Sound Health Care System; and Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Drs.
Peskind, Wilkinson, Petrie, and Raskind) and Medicine (Dr. Schellenberg), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
Supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institute on Aging (NIA AGO5136 and AGO8419), and the Joan Alhadeff Research Foundation.
Received August 14, 2000. Accepted in final form January 6, 2001.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. E.R. Peskind, Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (116MIRECC), VA Puget Sound
Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108; e-mail: peskind.elaine@seattle.va.gov