Professional Documents
Culture Documents
...
2008
,
.
, . ,
(
1:10)
. ,
.
. ,
, ,
.
, ,
.
.
, ,
.
,
,
,
,
.
,
.
..
,
. ,
. ,
.
[2]
1: .7
1.1 ...7
1.2 ..8
1.3 ..8
1.4 ..9
1.5 10
1.6 .11
1.7 .13
1.8 .......................14
2: .15
2.1 .15
2.2 - ..15
2.3 .16
2.4 16
2.5 .17
2.6 ..19
2.7 20
2.8 ..21
2.9 I 22
3: 24
3.1 ..24
3.2 24
3.2.1 .24
3.2.2 .26
[3]
4: 29
4.1 - 29
4.2 - .30
4.2.1 Lachman (Ritchie, Trillat Lachman-Trillat).31
4.2.2 (Drawer Sign)32
4.2.3 ().34
4.3 - .35
4.3.1 (Gravity drawer test)..35
4.3.2 Lachman (reverse Lachman test).36
4.3.3
..36
4.3.4 (Godfrey test)..36
4.4 .36
4.5 38
5: ..39
5.1 .39
5.2 ()40
5.3
41
5.3.1 .44
5.3.2 .46
5.3.2.1 .47
5.3.3 ..48
6:
50
[4]
6.1 ..............50
6.2 ..51
6.3 52
7: ..55
8: .57
8.1 .57
8.1.1 (Cryocuff)57
8.2 58
8.3 .58
8.4 .58
8.5 59
9: (CPM).61
9.1 .61
9.2 CPM..61
9.3 CPM .62
10: (CYBEX)63
10.1 .63
10.2 64
10.3 ..65
11: .67
11.1 .67
11.2 67
11.3 .68
11.4 .68
[5]
11.5 68
12: 70
12.1 ..70
12.2 - .71
12.2.1 ..71
12.2.2 .72
12.2.3 73
12.2.4 ..74
12.2.5 ..76
12.2.6 .80
12.2.7 .80
12.2.8 81
12.3
..82
13:
84
13.1 .84
13.2 .85
13.3 .85
13.4 ..86
14: 88
.105
..106
[6]
1:
1.1
.
,
,
. .
.
1. ,
.
() ().
( )
( ).
[7]
1.2
.
.
.
.
.
. ,
.
.
.
1.3
, .
, .
()
, ,
.
()
, ,
.
.
,
.
[8]
1.4
.
.
.
.
[9]
1.5
.
.
.
.
.
. ,
,
.
.
.
[10]
.
.
1.6
,
.
,
.
:
, .
,
.
. ,
, Gerdy .
,
, ,
30 ,
pivot shift.
, o
.
.
.
.
(, )
.
.
.
,
, .
.
, ,
, .
[11]
.
.
.
.
.
,
,
. .
[12]
1.7
.
.
,
.
. ,
[13]
,
, .
1.8
. ,
.
, ,
. ,
,
,
.
,
,
.
,
, ,
.
[14]
2:
2.1
:
,
.
.
.
, -
- .
.
,
.
2.2 -
:
(
,
). ' ,
.
:
. "
", . ,
, (5 10) .
,
, .
, ,
,
.
.
.
. ( )
( ).
[15]
.
140
120 .
160
.
2.3
.
. .
.
.
.
Fick, 40
30. .
. ,
.
, ,
.
. , , (
). , ,
( ).
(
).
2.4
.
.
,
[16]
,
.
,
.
, .
2.5
.
.
.
.
'
, - .
:
- , ,
.
-
,
.
1,85 3,35 cm.
.
,
. ,
. ,
[17]
' , ,
- .
:
- ,
,
- ,
,
Humphrey, ,
-- - Wrisberg,
, ()
.
,
.
.
[18]
2.6
,
. ,
.
1.7 cm.
. ,
.
,
:
.
( - -).
.
.
:
.
,
, ,
60 ,
.
[19]
2.7
.
. ( )
(ab cd) .
, ,
. a b c d
.
,
. ,
.
.
.
.
ab
cd
[20]
2.8
().
,
().
, 75%
85% 30
90 .
/
.
2.
2200
.
[21]
2.9 I
,
.
.
.
,
,
.
( ),
(
), .
.
.
.
,
2000.
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
. ,
,
.
(, , ).
.
, ,
.
[22]
.
.
.
.
,
, .
.
.
,
.
.
[23]
3:
3.1
.
250.000 .
.
.
15 44 .
. ,
.
. ,
() .
, , , ,
, .
.
25% 30% .
.
3.2
3.2.1
:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
[24]
i.
.
.
Q
.
3.
.
.
.
ii.
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
iii.
,
, ,
3
. U,H A.
U .
[25]
.
,
.
,
. .
,
.
iv.
. ,
( ).
.
.
3.2.2
1/10.
. ,
.
, ,
,
. ,
.
. ,
.
.
.
[26]
. ,
.
.
.
.
.
,
. , .
.
:
i.
.
.
,
.
ii.
.
.
. ,
.
iii.
,
. ,
( ).
.
iv. .
. ,
. ,
.
[27]
[28]
4:
(
), ,
.
4.1 -
. ,
(pop)
.
.
.
4 12 .
.
,
70%. .
.
:
:
:
,
, ,
(pop);
:
;
:
;
[29]
:
: ,
,
4.2 -
.
.
,
.
.
.
,, .
()
. ,
,
.
.
[30]
: 1-5mm
: 6-10mm
:
>10mm
,
-.
:
) .
30 .
) Lachman.
.
.
)
25.
.
(
).
)
.
20 30.
[31]
) .
.
.
) .
. (
).
)
30.
.
.
.
.
Lachman
6 .
:
( )
-
,
(,
) . ,
,
. ,
,
.
.
,
.
9090. .
90
. ,
,
.
,
.
(
), .
:
-
[33]
.
- ,
.
,
,
(acruate spin test).
Feagin.
.
,
.
.
.
4.2.3 ()
.
,
( ).
[34]
,
.
, .
(),
.
.
4.3 -
4.3.1 (Gravity drawer test)
.
45
90.
, ,
.
90-110 .
1
90. ,
.
:
-
,
, 90-100.
,
,
( ).
.
[35]
4.3.3
.
4.4
(
[36]
). ,
(MRI)
95% .
.
.
[37]
4.5
. -1000
( 20-30 Lachman).
KT-1000
[38]
5:
5.1
- -
.
,
. .
,
.
.
, ,
, ,
,
.
,
,
.
,
. ,
.
80%
,
, . ,
,
. ,
.
.
[39]
5.2 ()
. 100.000
. :
5
3
5mm
:
. .
:
( )
.
[40]
5.3
:
( )
( -)
-
, ,
, , ,
.
.
.
--
.
,
.
[41]
-
- :
.
.
:
,
,
.
.
( )
1725-2195
242-306 /mm. ,
[42]
70kg
823
. ,
,
.
.
,
138-170% 125% .
,
200% 300%
.
.
,
. ,
(
).
.
[43]
5.3.1
:
.
: ,
, , .
.
[44]
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
, 15-41%
.
. ,
2-10%.
,
.
(Lyscholm Knee score, Tegner Activity Scale, Kujala test, International
Knee Documentetion Committee Scale, Cincinnati Sports Activity Score).
, ,
, , ,
..
( ) ,
.
1 24o
.
,
( ).
Avery ,
3-4 ,
. ,
, 1218 . (Yunes et al.)
, 18%
[45]
.
:
. ,
,
.
, ,
, , ,
.
. . ,
18%.
.
,
.4
. ,
-
-
-
- .
, ,
,
.
5.3.2
80
4
-1000.
[46]
. - .
,
, ,,
.
, ,
.
.
(revised
operation) .
. ,
.
.
(
)
5.3.2.1
,
, .
:
.
(HIV) AIDS. 1989
1:1.600.000.
,
.
[47]
:
,
. Clostiridium
sordelli
.
(
).
:
. ,
.
5.
,
2
. , fresh-frozen
freeze-dried
.
6
.
,
18 2-3,5 . ,
,
.
:
.
.
5.3.3
70.
5
4 : 1) 2)
( ) 3)
4) .
[48]
, ,
.
,
(, ).
855 (
) 4078% .
[49]
6:
6.1.
(1982)
6-8
.
9 12 . 1983
(CPM).
,
-
-
.
. ,
:
(
)
.
.
, 1986
,
4-6 .
4 .
. 5 6
[50]
.
.
6.2
:
:
4-6
9-12 .
6,
(R)
.
- :
,
.
:
7
.
DeCarlo et al
(
80% ).
6
76,81% (0.5)
6
,
.
7
[51]
( DeCarlo).
, 3 6
,
.
3 ,
92% ,
.
12 ,
(98,7%) (95,1%).
(>80%).
10 .
.
, (70-90%
).
.
6.3
:
,
. 1) , 2)
, 3) 4)
.
.
6
.
6
. , 46 ,
[52]
. ,
.
- 3 -
.
. ,
.
,
. ,
.
:
( ).
.
24 (6 )8. ,
.
( 4,4%)
.
:
.
(
).
8
3 .
[53]
McDonald et al.
20-33
.
.
,
5
, ,
.
, ,
.
[54]
7:
()
().
()
: )
'
, )
)
.
, ,
.
,
,
.
(in vivo,
)
.
(, )
.
(
, , )
.
. ,
,
.
. .
( )
.
[55]
,
.
. ,
,
.
,
.
( ). ,
,
.
,
.
,
,
,
.
.
. ,
.
[56]
8:
. ,
70.
8.1
sprays,
, , ,
,
(Cryocuff) .
8.1.1 (Cryocuff)
.
.
. 9
.
.
Cryocuff
[57]
8.2
: 3
7 . 5-12
.
3 : ,
(
).
,
. . ,
. ,
. ,
(contractility).
8.3
,
(.
)
(
).
8.4
.
,
.
.
,
. ,
,
.
[58]
()
.
.
.
.
().
. ,
Ruffini
().
Ib
-
.
.
,
.
8.5
.
, .
.
.
( ).
.
crepe (dressings)
[59]
.
.
.
.
placebo
.
30 (
0 C
- 3,9 oC).
0 C.
30
.
.
.
.
(.
).
(. 40 ).
.
. .
[60]
9:
(CPM)
9.1
(CPM),
,
. ,
,
24 7
. ,
.
.
Robert Salter.
9.2 CPM
,
, ,
.
CPM :
,
[61]
9.3 CPM
.
CPM
.
,
. CPM
- 6 / 4
.
CPM
[62]
10: (CYBEX)
10.1
.
,
. ,
.
.
[63]
10.2
James Perrine
1960.
,
. .
,
:
:
,
,
.
:
.
:
,
.
: Bernouli,
( ) ( )
.
.
.
:
,
, ,
,
. ,
. ,
.
[64]
10.3
()
( )
.
( ),
.
. ,
.
[65]
Cybex
[66]
11:
.
.
:
1)
, 2) , 3)
, 4) 5)
. 1 2
.
11.1 -
.
(, ,
, , ).
,
(, , pivoting)
.
11.2
Cryocuff ( ).
[67]
11.3
.
.
(Cyclops lesion)
. ,
.
11.4
()
-.
.
11.5
.
.
.
,
.
.
, .
.
[68]
( , , ).
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
[69]
12:
12.1
(, ,
)
. , -
-
, ,
.
.
,
.
.
. ,
, ,
.
. , ,
,
. ,
.
,
,
.
[70]
12.2 -
.
. ()
2
.
.
-wrap 6
.
.
.
,
2
. ,
.
, ,
(2-3 )
(8 ). , ,
2 (10-14 ).
(12-16 ) ,
(4-6 ).
12.2.1
.
, .
45-
-
. ,
0
.
.
,
[71]
. , ,
,
,
.
, 5 kg.
, .
.
,
.
.
12.2.2
.
.
.
.
.
[72]
12.2.3
.
,
. .
(, , ).
.
.
.
,
2
.
.
10
2 .
2
.
2
.
.
, .
[73]
,
.
. ,
,
. ,
0-90 7
7-10 .
2-4
.
,
.
.
12.2.4
.
. ,
,
. ,
,
( ). ,
.
,
(Straight Leg Raising SLR), SLR
.
.
. ,
.
.
[74]
[75]
12.2.5
,
.
.
2
,
.
,
.
(
) .
.
.
2 ,
. 2030 2-5
. ,
30.
,
( )
.
,
.
2-3
,
, .
(, ),
,
. ,
,
(). ,
.
,
.
(, ) (
) .
[76]
-.
deep walk
.
. .
, 1-2
.
: , ,
, .
,
.
,
.
- -
, , ,
-,
.
. ,
, () .
,
.
.
2-3
.
. ,
(
30o).
1,5-2,5kg.
,
,
.
( , ) ,
.
(deep walking)
.
[77]
.
,
().
,
,
.
, ,
.
- ,
.
,
. ,
. ,
.
8
. ,
. , ,
,
,
. ,
, ,
, ,
. ,
.
.
. ,
.
, ,
slide boards
.
,
.
[78]
[79]
12.2.6
. ,
.
,
.
,
.
.
,
,
,
.
12.2.7
.
. ,
.
,
.
.
,
.
, , ,
.
.
[80]
12.2.8
.
,
.
,
,
, , , ,
, 45 90 ,
.
.
(
)
.
,
.
.
[81]
12.3
.
.
.
,
.
.
91%
39% .
.
.
-- ()
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6
[82]
, .
4
, 2
, 2 (6-8),
. 8
.
6 ,
6-12 .
12 ,
12-14 , 16
5,5-6 .
.
85%-93%
.
glietti
.
. ,
.
,
. ,
(
)
.
, , .
,
.
.
[83]
13:
:
1.
2.
3.
13.1
13% ,
.
.
3
,
.
1 2 ,
.
,
.
,
. ,
.
,
, .
[84]
,
. ,
. ,
.
,
.
13.2
.
1% .
. ,
.
,
( 14
). ,
.
,
.
13.3
.
,
, .
.
[85]
,
,
.
.
: 0-65 5 , 0-75 7
, 0-100 2 , 115 6
125 7 .
50% .. 1 , 75% 2
4 . 7-8
.
()
3
, 4
.
12
16 5
.
13.4
,
, 64-77%. Shelbourne
,
.
,
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
,
[86]
, .
.
8-10
. 8
, 60
16 .
,
. ,
,
: 90-100 2 ,
105-115 3 120-135 4 .
: 90 -100 2 , 105-115 3 120-135
4 .
()
1-2 .
Barber Click.
(24-72 ), 92%
, 67%
67%
.
.
[87]
14:
,
()
. ,
. ,
, ,
.
, ,
.
.
:
:
1.
2.
3.
4. ()
5.
6.
[88]
SLRs ,
( , lunges, step-ups)
(4-6 ).
20 .
( ).
.
.
(1 7 )
:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1
-Wrap
. .
:
(90
)
SLRs ,
[89]
: ,
(4-6 ).
0-45 ( ).
20 . (
).
2 3
-Wrap
.
2 .
-
4-6 .
90 60
90-40
SLRs ,
: ,
(4-6 ).
(CPM) 0-90.
20 .
( ).
4 7
EZ Wrap
...
2 .
4-6 ,
[90]
90 5 100 7 .
:
90 60
90 40
SLRs ,
: ,
(4-6 ).
(CPM) 0-90.
20 .
( ).
(2-4 )
(
SLRs)
0-90
:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
[91]
2
2 3 .
(
10 ).
(4-5 )
.
-1000 ( 15lbs).
:
SLRs 4
90 40
0-50
-
1 lb 1 lb
,
[92]
0-115
( )
40 100 (
)
step-ups
step-ups
( 4-10 )
0-115
>60%
( 60 )
-1000 (+1 )
:
1. 0-125
2.
3. ,
4.
5.
6. .
7. (4-5 )
8. -2000 4 20 lbs
[93]
4
:
90-40
Stepper
6
-2000, 20lbs 30lbs
:
8
-2000, 20lbs 30lbs
:
[94]
10
-2000, 20lb 30lb test
180 300 /sec
:
(10-16 )
0-125
79% ,
/ 70-75%
-1000
( 180/sec)
75%
1
/ 66-75%
Hop test (80% )
( Noyes) 80
:
1.
2.
[95]
3.
4.
(16-22 )
5
-2000
80%
110%
70%
100%
85%
90
-2000,
[96]
-2000
12
-2000
****************
(1 7 )
(CPM) 0-90
(10-15Kg)
0. 0-90
( ,
)
( )
(2 4 )
0-105
90 40 1Kgr
0-40
[97]
4 6
0-115
Leg press (0 60o)
Stairmaster
7 9
0-130
Step-ups
9 14
(step-ups, squats, leg
press)
( )
( )
( anti-shear 240 /sec 300 /sec 450 /sec)
(3 4 )
[98]
(5 6 )
****************
0 115
60 %
test 70%
test 80%
****************
[99]
(Shelbourne and Nitz, 1990)
10 , CPM
2 3
SLRs ,
0-90, , ,
5 6
, CPM
, 10
, 60
90 , . :
0-90.
( )
0 - 110,
,
8 10
,
0-110 ,
, SLRs ,
, 90 45,
, , ()
.
:
0,5 Kgr
12 14
0 120, ,
, , step-ups ,
0 - 130,
,
,
[100]
7 8
Cybex, KT-1000, , /
/ jogging
/
() / /
9 12
80% ,
,
****************
(Shelbourne and Nitz, 1990)
CPM,
,
2 3
CPM, 0 90 (
),
2 4
/ CPM .
: 1)
2)
( ) 3)
SLRs 4)
[101]
7 10
, 1kg
, ,
, ,
,
step-ups,
/ /
2 3
0-110 ,
, step-ups, ,
StairMaster 4000, / leg
press, quarter squats
in squat rack, (), ,
(
4 )
5 6
0 - 130,
20 block 180 240 deg/sec.
70% ,
,
cariocas, jogging, ,
, , ,
. :
(
)
10
,
60,180 240 deg/sec, KT-1000,
,
16
4 6
(
,
,
[102]
KT-1000,
Step-ups
[103]
Cariocas
****************
[104]
,
. ,
, , .
,
,
.
.
,
.
.
.
: H
.
[105]
. . . 5
. , 1996.
, .
. , 1999.
. . . d.K.S, 2004.
. . . .
. . . 2 . University Studio
Press, 1997.
Carolyn Kisner, Lynn Allen. ,
. 3 . , 2003.
Frank H. Netter, M.D. . 2 .
.. , 1999.
Harry B. Skinner. Current Diagnosis and Treatment in Orthopedics.
4th Edition, 2006.
Mark D. Miller. Review of Orthopedics. Fourth edition. Elsevier Health
Sciences, 2004.
W. Kahle, H.Leonhardt, W.Platzer.
. , 1985.
.. Kapandji. .5 .
. , 2000.
Ahmad CS, Stein BE, Jeshuran W, et al: Anterior cruciate ligament function
after tibial eminence fracture in skeletally mature patients. Am J Sports Med
2001 May-Jun; 29(3): 339-45.
Arnold, T., Shelbourne, K.D. (2000). A Perioperative Rehabilitation Program
for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery. The Physician and Sportsmedicine.
[On-line].Available:
http://www.physsportsmed.com/issues/200/01_00/shelbourne.htm
Barberie JE, Carson BW, Finnegan M, Wong AD: Oblique sagittal view of the
anterior cruciate ligament: comparison of coronal vs. axial planes as localizing
sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001 Sep; 14(3): 203-6.
Belanger MJ, Moore DC, Crisco JJ: Knee laxity does not yary with the menstrual
cycle, before or after exercise. Am J Sports Med 2004 Jul-Aug; 32(5): 1150-7.
Boeree NR, Ackroyd CE: Magnetic resonance imaging of anterior cruciate
ligament rupture. A new diagnostic sign. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992 Jul; 74(4):
614-6.
Bollen SR. BASK Instructional lecture 3: Rehabilitation after ACL
reconstruction. Knee. 2001;8:75-77.
Bonamo JJ, Fay C, Firestone T. The conservative treatment of the anterior
cruciate deficient knee. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:618-623.
Brandser EA, Riley MA, Berbaum KS, et al: MR imaging of anterior cruciate
ligament injury: independent value of primary and secondary signs. AJR Am J
[106]
DeVita, P., Hortobagyi, T., Barrier, J. (1998). Gait biomechanics are not normal
after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and accelerated rehabilitation.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30(10), 1481- 1488.
Dickey, Patrice. Young Wrestler Competes to Win After Arthroscopic Knee
Repair. Retrieved December 2, 2001 from Advanced Surgery center of
Georgia
http://www.advancedsurgerycenter.com/specialties/articles/podiatryarts2.ht
m
Dimond PM, Fadale PD, Hulstyn MJ, et al: A comparison of MRI findings in
patients with acute and chronic CAL tears. Am J Knee Surg 1998 Summer;
11(3): 153-9.
Draper, V., Ladd, C. (1993). Subjective evaluation of function following
moderately accelerated rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament
reconstructed knees. Journal of Athletic Training, 28(1), 38-41, & 86-87.
Dye SF, Wojtys EM, Fu FH, et al: Factors contributing to function of the knee
joint after injury or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Instr
Course Lect 1999; 48: 185-98.
Fu, F. H., Woo, S. L-Y., Irrgang, J.J. (1992). Current Concepts for Rehabilitation
following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Journal of Orthopaedic
and Sports Physical Therapy, 15(6), 270- 278.
Gardner E, O'Rahilly R: The early development of the knee joint in staged
human embryos. J Anat 1968 Jan; 102(2): 289-99.
Geteleman MH, Friedman MD: Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Reconstruction. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
1999; 7:189-198.
Glasgow, S. G., Gabriel, J.P., Sapega, A.A., Glasgow, M.T., Torg, J.S. (1993).
The effect of early versus late return to vigorous activities on the outcome of
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. American Journal of Sports
Medicine, 21(2), 243- 248.
Hardin, J.A., Voight, M.L., Blackburn, T.A., Canner, G.C., Soffer, S.R. (1997).
The Effects of Decelerated Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate
Ligament Reconstruction on a Hyperelastic Female Adolescent: A Case Study.
Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 26(1), 29-34.
Herrington L, Wrapson C, Matthews M, Matthews H. Anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction, hamstring versus bone-patella tendon-bone grafts:
a systematic literature review of outcome from surgery. Knee. 2005; 12:4150.
Hewson GF Jr, Mendini RA, Wang JB: Prophylactic knee bracing in college
football. Am J Sports Med 1986 Jul-Aug; 14(4): 262-6.
Johnson DL, Harner CD, Maday MG: Revision anterior cruciate ligament
surgery. Knee Surgery 1994; 1: 877-895.
Larson RL, Tailon M: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency: Principles of
Treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 1994;
2: 26-35.
[108]