Professional Documents
Culture Documents
uk
Email: sia@sts-se.co.uk
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
Site: Job: 63 Elderfield Road, London E5 0LF New Rear Extension and Lightwell Alterations
63 Elderfield Road, London E5 0LF New Rear Extension and Lightwell Alterations 1110-630
Design Philosophy
1. Overview The existing building is a Victorian dwelling house. It is of masonry construction with timber framed floors and roof. The property features an existing rear extension which may be original to the property and which is to be demolished and replaced with a new extension. The new extension is to be timber framed above ground floor level in order to minimise the wall thickness whereas the basement will be of solid construction. The ground floor slab is to be cast in-situ to cantiliver out and provide a new external garden access. The basement walls are to be retaining and constructed using hollow concrete blocks (Stepoc or similar) which are to be reinforced and infilled with structural concrete. A new basement raft is to be cast to support the new extension and to form the floor of the llightwell which is to be made deeper than existing. There will be a need to underpin the section of the existing boundary/retaining wall, and further details are to be confirmed upon further investigation. Please see drawings for further information. 2. Loading and the Structural Model The structure is subject to dead, imposed and wind loading. All loading is listed and also graphically shown in the analysis. All steel sizing was done in accordance with BS5950, all concrete sizing to BS8110. The relevant load combination for sizing was 1.4*Dead+1.6*Imposed load. The deflections were checked for unfactored combinations of loading. The typical loading data is listed below: Flat and Pitched Roofs: DL, 1.00 kN/m2 LL, 0.75 kN/m2 Floors: DL, 0.9 kN/m2 (incl. of sound insulation) LL, 1.5 kN/m2 - residential Stud partition: DL, 0.40 kN/m2 (of the actual partition) DL, 1.10 kN/m2 - for externally clad walls.
Page 2/10
63 Elderfield Road, London E5 0LF New Rear Extension and Lightwell Alterations 1110-630
Design Philosophy
3. Preliminary risk assessment The contractor must provide a method statement and submit it to all relevant authorities and the designer for checking. The method statement must provide a full risk assessment, indicating all hazards and provide adequate measures to ensure a safe construction environment. In addition to standard H&S measures associated with steel, concrete, excavation and other types of work, care must be taken to ensure all risks associated with a renovation project like this must also be considered. These include: - Working in a confined environment, and safe delivery and installation of steelwork to minimise disruption to the existing house. -Temporary propping of the existing walls and other structural elements must be done to a high standard to ensure the stability of the structure at all stages of the construction. The contractor must provide temporary works design and submit it to the engineer for approval. -To minimise the disruption to the neighbourhood all refuse must be delicately handled. The noise pollution must be kept to a minimum at all times, and particularly if the construction is carried out outside of the normal working hours and at weekends.
Page 3/10
63 Elderfield Road, London E5 0LF New Rear Extension and Lightwell Alterations 1110-630
Check MKR1 Ridge Purlins Try 2No.150x50 timber purlins Member Properties:
b= d= l= w= 100 150 2.95 1.66 mm breadth mm depth m length kN/m udl
Grade Properties:
Timber Grade: Bending parallel to grain: Tension parallel to grain: Compression parallel to grain: Comp. perpendicular to grain: Shear parallel to grain: Emean: Emin: C16 5.3 3.2 6.8 2.2 0.67 8800 N/mm N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2
2
2 5800 N/mm
K Factors:
Service class k1 = Duration of loading (Table 14) k3 = Shear of notched members k5 = Load Shearing member k8 = Members of several pieces (Table 17) k9 = 1 1 1 1 1.1 1.81 kNm 5.83 N/mm2
Maximum applied moment (at mid-span): wl2/8 = Permissible bending stress = grade bending stress x k2xk3xk8xk9= 2 N/mm Zreqd = M/ = 310204 Zav.= bd /6 = 375000 Member has adequate bending capacity
2
N/mm
Deflection check: Permissible deflection is: 0.003 xl Permissible deflection 0.003 x l = 0.003 x 2950 = 8.85 mm 4 I = bd3/12 = 28.13E+06 mm Use Emean because this is a load bearing member, E = 8800 N/mm2 Actual Bending Deflection = 5wl4/384EL = 6.62 mm Adjust deflection for shear: Tot. defl. = Defl. due to bending x (1+15.36(d/l)2) Total Deflection = 6.89 mm Deflection of the member is acceptable
Page 4/10
63 Elderfield Road, London E5 0LF New Rear Extension and Lightwell Alterations 1110-630
Bearing Strength: The Length of bearing is: 100 mm The reaction at each end is: 2.45 kN Permissible bearing stress = comp. to grain stress x k2xk3xk8xk9= 2.42 N/mm2 Actual Bearing stress is 2.4521875*1000/(100x100) = 0.2 N/mm2 Bearing stress is permissible Lateral Support: Depth to breadth ratio: Support condition is: No lateral support
1.50
Page 5/10
63 Elderfield Road, London E5 0LF New Rear Extension and Lightwell Alterations 1110-630 Load Analysis for the upper ground floor slab N.B. All beam selfweights assigned automatically The slab is to be analyisted using a FE software package. Selfweight of the slab shall be assigned automatically. Only direct loading is to be inputed. Direct Live Loading Analysis in accordance w BS6399-1-1996 Residential 1.5kN/m2 n.b. also allow for a dead UDL=1.0kN/m2 for the finishes Reaction from the extension walls Imposed: Roof First Floor
1.4*0.75 = 1.4*1.5 =
Dead:
Page 6/10
63 Elderfield Road, London E5 0LF New Rear Extension and Lightwell Alterations 1110-630
Page 7/10
63 Elderfield Road, London E5 0LF New Rear Extension and Lightwell Alterations 1110-630 Load Analysis for the lower basement slab/raft N.B. All beam selfweights assigned automatically The slab is to be analyisted using a FE software package. Selfweight of the slab shall be assigned automatically. Only direct loading is to be inputed. A spring area support shall be assinged to the raft to simulate the soil behaviour and establish the forces within the raft and the soil reaction. An assumed soil stiffness coefficient calculated for an assumed 20mm settlement for 100kN/m2 load giving cz=100/0.02=5000kN/m2/m Direct Live Loading Analysis in accordance w BS6399-1-1996 Residential 1.5kN/m2 n.b. also allow for a dead UDL=1.0kN/m2 for the finishes Reactions from the extension walls taken from the upper ground floor slab analysis augmented by the selfweight of the walls = 2.3x0.2x24=11kN/m' giving the total UDL load from the walls of 36kN/m' and 29kN/m'
Page 8/10
63 Elderfield Road, London E5 0LF New Rear Extension and Lightwell Alterations 1110-630
Page 9/10
63 Elderfield Road, London E5 0LF New Rear Extension and Lightwell Alterations 1110-630
RC Sizing to BS8110 - Upper and Lower Slabs Upper Ground Floor Concrete slab:
Nominal cover 40mm all around, total slab thickness 150mm
3.4.4.4
Table 25
0.0374 K = M/bd2fcu = z = d {0.5+(0.25-K/0.9)} (and <=0.95d) 82 mm x = (d-z)/0.45 = 10 mm As = M/0.95fyz = 232 mm2/m Compression reinforcement not required Min. reinforc. For slabs 0.1%Ac = 86 mm2/m Use T10/150mm bars top and bottom (As = 523mm2/m) in both directions
3.4.4.4
Table 25
K = M/bd2fcu = 0.0248 z = d {0.5+(0.25-K/0.9)} (and <=0.95d) 195 mm x = (d-z)/0.45 = 23 mm As = M/0.95fyz = 368 mm2/m Compression reinforcement not required Min. reinforc. For slabs 0.1%Ac = 205 mm2/m Use A393 mesh (T10/200mm) bars top and bottom (As = 393mm2/m)
Page 10/10