Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Syllabus
Introduction
It is fairly uncontroversial to claim that the past is relevant to the present, if for no other
reason than (as is well known) if we fail to take heed of the past, we may be doomed to repeat it.
However, the claim that the present is relevant for the past is a considerably more controversial
claim to make, particularly for some present-day archaeologists. This course addresses a broad
set of issues that center around, but are not restricted to, the use of ethnographic information and
analogies for interpreting the archaeological record. During the semester, we will address such
questions as the following. Does archaeology need the insights of ethnography in formulating
explanations of the archaeological record? If so, how are ethnographic inferences to be
formulated and brought into relationship with archaeological data? If the archaeologist rejects
the use of archaeological analogies in developing interpretations of his/her field material, upon
what body or bodies of knowledge can he/she draw in analyzing and interpreting the
archaeological record? And what does archaeology, with its focus on the study of material
objects excavated from the ground, have to offer to the practice of ethnography, especially in the
postmodern era when social anthropology has largely traded in its earlier focus on local,
community-based studies for studies of fluid, contested identities continually reformulated in the
context of shifting, transcultural and global “communities?” This course will explore these and
other issues in the long and often productive -- but just as often strained -- relationship between
Ethnography and Archaeology.
Texts: The following are the required texts for the course and are available at the COOP:
Appadurai, Arjun (ed.), The Social Life of Things (1988).
Edgeworth, Matt (ed.), Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice (2006).
Gosden, Chris, Anthropology and Archaeology (2005).
Herzfeld, Michael, The Body Impolitic (2004)
Salomon, Frank, The Cord Keepers (2004)
Fowler, Chris, The Archaeology of Personhood (2004)
Additional readings that appear throughout the syllabus (next pg.) will be found in digital
format on the course website.
Grades
One-half (50%) of your grade will be determined on the basis of class participation; the other
half will be determined on the basis of a research paper (minimum 15pp for undergraduates;
minimum 20 pp. for graduate students). One-fourth of the grade for the research paper will be
determined on the basis of my evaluation of your presentation to the class of your research
results.
The schedule of topics and readings for the course begins on the next page.
2
Sept. 26 - Steward, “The Direct Historical Approach to Archaeology” (1942); pp. 337-341.
- Binford, “Smudge Pits and Hide Smoking: The Use of Analogy in Archaeological
Reasoning” (1967); pp. 1-10.
- van Gijn & Raemaekers, “Tool Use and Society in the Dutch Neolithic: The
Inevitability of Ethnographic Analogies” (1999); pp. 43-50.
Oct. 10 - Salomon, The Cord Keepers (text); pp. 3-22, 41-76, 137-167, 185-236
Oct. 17 - Kamp, “From Village to Tell: Household Ethnoarchaeology in Syria” (200); pp. 84-92.
- Watson & Fotiadis, “The Razor’s Edge: Symbolic-Structuralist Archeology and the
Expansion of Archeological Inference” (1990); pp. 613-626.
Oct. 31 - Kopytoff, in Appadurai, The Social Life of Things (text); pp. 64-90.
- Gilchrist, “Archaeology and the Life Course: A Time and Age for Gender” ( );
pp. 142-156
Nov. 21 - Fotiadis, “Modernity and the Past-Still-Present: Politics of Time in the Birth of
Regional Archaeological Projects in Greece” (1995); pp. 59-78.
Nov. 28 - Murray, “Archaeology and the Threat of the Past: Sir Henry Rider Haggard and the
Acquisition of Time” (1993); pp. 175-184
Dec. 12 - Hodder, “An Archaeology of the Four-Field Approach in Anthropology in the United
States,” from I. Hodder, Archaeology beyond Dialogue (2003); pp. 93-98.