Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMENT
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF ORIX LEASING COMPANY 2010
GROUP MEMBERS: Muntazir Hussain Nasab Hussain Mohammad Siddique Asfandiyar Jan
Page1
INTRODUCTION: We take the annual report of ORIX Leasing Company which is Japanese Company and tried to analyze its Balance sheet and Income Statement. But for best analyzation industry average ratio as in this case leasing companies average ratio are extremely important but as we do not have their industry average ratio, so for this purpose we make the internal analyzation or comparison by finding the financial ratios of 2009 and 2010 and then we compare them.
Page1
Page1
Page1
ANALYSIS:
LIQUIDITY RATIO:
For 2010:
In 2009 the Current Ratio of ORIX Leasing Company was 1.86 which means that if company have 1 Rupee of current liabilities then it have 1.86 Rupees of current assets to fulfill or cover those liabilities. Where as in 2010 it become 1.348, a slight decrease in companys current ratio. Which is not a good sign for the company.
For 2009:
Page1
It have the same meanings and tells the same thing as the current ratio but it is a more conservative approach. In 2009 the companys Quick ratio was 1.85, similar to current
For 2010:
In 2009 the company Debt-to-Equity was 12.15 which tells us that creditors are providing 12.15 Paisa of Financing for each 1 Rupee being provided by the shareholders. In 2010 the companys Debt-to-Equity ratio was 10.79 which tells that the creditors are providing 10.79 Paisa of Financing for each 1 Rupee being provided by the shareholders. In 2009 Debt-to-Equity ratio was 12.15 which decrease to 10.79 in 2010 which is a good sign for the company.
Debt to total assets ratio: Total debt / Total assets For 2009: 2.524529629 x 1010 / 27,323,206,780 = 0.924
Page1
For 2010:
Ratio of long term capitalization: Long term debt / Total capitalization For 2009: 17,807,230,237 / 1.988514072 x 1010 = 0.895
For 2010:
COVERAGE RATIO:
Earning before interest and taxes / Interest Expense 2,998,725,229 / 2,064,426,443 = 1.45
For 2010:
Page1
In 2009 the ORIX Leasing Company interest coverage ratio was 1.45 which means that if the company have 1 Rupee of interest expense then it have 1.45 Rupees of EBIT to cover those interest expenses. It is a lower ratio and is a threat for company ability to cover its interest payments. In 2010 the interest ratio becomes 1.06 which is again much
ACTIVITY RATIO :
For 2010:
In 2009 the companys Receivable Turnover ratio was 2.89 which tells that 2.89 times account receivable have been turnover (In Cash) during 2009. In 2010 the company RT Ratio Increase to 3.50 (Good Sign) which tells that 3.50 time account receivable have been turnover during 2010. The Increase RT ratio from 2009 to 2010 is a good sign for Company.
For 2010:
If we convert this ratio in days then in 2009 the company takes 125 days to convert account receivables to cash. According to the companys annual report the company collection policy was Net 90 which means that company should have to strict its policies for account receivables and in 2010 the company takes 104 days to convert the account receivable into the cash which is a improvement toward companies collections policy and a good achievements from 2009 to 2010.
Page1
*In 2009 there was no Profit, the Company bears a loss of 467,096,343
For 2010:
In 2009 the companys ROI ratio was -0.017 which tells that ORIX employs 1 Rupee of Assets and it generate -0.017 Paisa of loss, then -ive sign shows the loss, then why the ORIX bears a huge loss in 2009. While in 2010 the ROI Ratio was 0.44 which tells that the company generates Net Profit of 0.44 Paisa when 1 Rupee total assets are employed. As it is a profit but it seems to be very less and also we do not know the industry average ratios.
RETURN ON EQUITY (ROE) RATIO: ROE Ratio: For 2009: Net Profit after Taxes / Share holders Equity 467,096,343 /2,077,910,485 = (0.2247)*
For 2010:
Page1
In 2009 the companys ROE Ratio was -0.224 which shows a loss. It tells that the shareholders have interested 100 Rupees at it generate 22.4 Rupees of loss. Which was a huge loss for the company in 2009. While in 2010 the ROE ratio was 0.0518 or 51.8%
Page1