Coolants for Nuclear Reators

http://clonemaster.homestead.com/files/coolants.htm

PLANT/COOLANT TYPES FOR NUCLEAR REACTORS

The coolant which passes through the nuclear reactors is used to transport the reactor heat either to a boiler where steam is raised to run a conventional turbine or it is used as a thermodynamic heat engine fluid and passes directly into the turbine and back to the reactor. Pressurized water, organic liquids, sodium, and most gas cooled nuclear power plants employ an intermediate steam boiler. Boiling water and some gas cool reactors use the coolant directly in the turbine. Regardless of the method used, coolants should ideally have the following properties: Low melting point High boiling point Non-corrosive properties Low neutron absorption cross section High moderating ratio (for thermal reactors) Radiation stability Thermal stability Low induced radioactivity No reaction with turbine working fluid High heat transport and transfer coefficient Low pumping power No single coolant has all of these properties, and as a result a number of different coolants have been used in nuclear reactors. Each coolant with its own particular advantages for certain type of reactors. Among these coolants are light and heavy water (both pressurized and boiling), organic liquids, sodium, sodium potassium mixtures, fused salts, and a number of gases - air, carbon dioxide, helium, nitrogen, hydrogen and steam.

PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR

1 of 6

10-03-2012 11:08

Coolants for Nuclear Reators

http://clonemaster.homestead.com/files/coolants.htm

Click HERE for an animated view of a PWR (809k). The first pressurized water reactor, the Mark I prototype for the Nautilus submarine, began operation in May 1953 at the National Reactor Testing Center in Idaho. Since that time the development of pressurized reactors for military and civilian purposes has been intensively pursued specially in the United States. By definition, in a pressurized water reactor the fission heat is removed from the fluid elements by the water coolant without bulk boiling occurring. This implies a two circuit heat transfer system - a primary loop containing the reactor and one side of steam generator containing a steam side of the steam generator and the turbine generator. The extensive use of water as a reactor coolant is related to the relatively low pressure drops accompanying flow at significant rates, and the relatively high heat transfer coefficients. Figure shows the relationship of heat flux to the temperature difference between the fuel element surface and the water. The nucleate boiling stage is attractive for reactor operation, because of the favorable heat fluxes that can be obtained. However, as the temperature difference increases to the point where bulk boiling and film boiling occurs, there is a drop in heat flux and the danger that the fuel element surface temperature will rise above their melting point (burn out).

PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR

ADVANTAGES: Water technology well known Water is cheap Water is very effective moderator of neutron energy Core is compact Water has high heat capacity Negative temperature coefficient Ordinary leakage can be tolerated Fission products are contained, not circulated Radioactivity of coolant is short-lived if kept pure Conversion ratio may be high Superheating steam in separately fired superheater is possible Appreciable fast fission effect attainable DISADVANTAGES: Water must be highly pressurized to achieve even reasonably high temperature without boiling Fuel element fabrication expensive The temperature is limited in metallic fuel elements Fission product activity in the core builds up to high a level Pure hot water is highly corrosive, requires special materials for the primary loop Fuel must be at least slightly enriched Heat exchanger and control rods required Large excess reactivity at operating temperature Heat transfer only moderately efficient

2 of 6

10-03-2012 11:08

Coolants for Nuclear Reators

http://clonemaster.homestead.com/files/coolants.htm

Fuel reprocessing a difficult task Rector must be shut down to unload and reload core Water would flash to steam in case of rupture of primary loop Water reacts with uranium, thorium, and structural metals under certain conditions Low thermal heads make heat exchanger, pumps and piping large Hot-channel factors are significant

BOILING WATER REACTOR

Click HERE for an animated view of a BWR (827k). Although reactors using boiling heat transfer had been considered during the World War II Manhattan project in the United States, it was generally believed at that time such reactors would be unstable in operation. During the planning of the water cooled submarine reactors in 1947, the stability question was still unresolved and high pressure non-boiling reactors were chosen for the submarine program. The first test of basic heat transfer phenomenon was made at Argonne National Lab in 1952.

BOILING WATER REACTOR

ADVANTAGES: Some intermediate heat exchange equipment eliminated Pressure is lower for given steam output conditions than in pressurized water reactor Metal surface temperatures are lower for given steam output conditions than in DISADVANTAGES: Boiling limits power density Radioactivity builds up in turbine Changes in load on turbine reflected back to reactor as pressure changes Separately fired superheater cannot conveniently be employed

3 of 6

10-03-2012 11:08

Coolants for Nuclear Reators

http://clonemaster.homestead.com/files/coolants.htm

pressurized water reactor Power excursion quickly damped by formation of steam Overall thermal efficiency quite high Water is cheap Core is compact if void coefficient is low Negative temperature coefficient Ordinary leakage can be tolerated Fission products are contained, not circulated Radioactivity of coolant is short-lived if kept pure Conversion ratio may be high Heat may be taken from circulating water increasing power output

System must be designed to overcome tendency to react negatively to load increases Fuel must be at least slightly enriched Fuel handling necessitates complex equipments Reactor must be shut down to unload and reload core Water flashes to steam in case of rupture of primary system Condenser leak may cause serious trouble

HEAVY WATER REACTOR

Although the reactors mentioned above are classified generally by the type of coolants used, the title heavy water refers to the use of heavy water as a moderator. The reactors discussed here are cooled by heavy water.

HEAVY WATER REACTOR

ADVANTAGES: Any fuel including natural uranium can be used Heavy water is excellent moderator Heavy water has high heat capacity Specific power high Negative temperature coefficients Fission product are contained, not circulated Radioactivity of coolant is short lived if kept pure DISADVANTAGES: Heavy water expensive Special precautions must be taken to make primary loop leak proof and to prevent loss of heavy water during refueling operations Primary loop must be highly pressurized to achieve even high temperatures without boiling Pure hot heavy water is highly corrosive Fuel suffers radiation damage Heat exchanges and control rod required Heat transfer only moderately efficient Fuel reprocessing a difficult task Reactors must be shut down to unload and reload core Heavy water would flush to steam in case of rupture of primary loop Heavy water reacts with uranium, thorium and structural metals Low thermal heads make heat exchangers, pumps, and piping large Hot channel factors are significant

ORGANIC COOLED REACTORS

Organic cooled reactors use certain types of organic liquids, particularly mixtures of diphenyl and diphenyl oxide have been used as high-temperature heat transfer media. Three major reasons for which it
4 of 6 10-03-2012 11:08

Coolants for Nuclear Reators

http://clonemaster.homestead.com/files/coolants.htm

never became popular are: a general unfamiliarity with organic heat transfer agents; the poorer heat transfer properties of organics compared to water; and, particularly, the sensitivity of organics to radiation.

DIPHENYL REACTOR
ADVANTAGES: Boiling point of diphenyl is very high Extremely good moderator Fission products are contained, not circulated Negative temperature coefficients Coolant would not vaporize to any great extent in case of rupture of primary loop Coolant doesn't become radioactive Ordinary leakage can be tolerated Corrosion of metal surface is negligible DISADVANTAGES: High temperatures tend to polymerized diphenyl Decomposition products of diphenyl may be deposited on fuel elements and other heat transfer surfaces Fuel suffers radiation damage Fuel reprocessing a difficult task Heat transfer not so efficient as in water system Hydrogen gas is produced

LIQUID METAL COOLED REACTORS

The extraordinary heat transfer properties of liquid metals make them attractive reactor coolants for both thermal and fast reactors. In addition, liquid metal systems operate at low pressure require the minimum of pumping power and are capable of operating at the high temperatures required to generate steam for modern turbine generators. Two liquid metals, sodium and eutectic mixtures of sodium and potassium have been used extensively in nuclear reactors.

SODIUM FAST REACTOR

ADVANTAGES: No moderator required Full advantage is taken of excellent heat removal characteristics of sodium Sodium doesn't react with uranium and thorium Fuel can be bonded to container with liquid metal Electromagnetic pumps can be used with fair efficiency DISADVANTAGES: Sodium reacts violently with water and actively with air Radiation damage a serious problem, except with molten fluid Sodium must be kept free of oxygen High thermal stress complicates reactor vessel and steam generator design Fuel handling very difficult Sodium is strongly activated by nuclear bombardment Special precautions must be taken to contain sodium which may leak out of the primary or secondary loop and to prevent its contracting atmosphere or water Provisions must be made to heat coolant if it freezes

GAS COOLED REACTOR

The gas cooled natural uranium fuel reactors were not first built for the primary purpose of power production but rather for the production of plutonium. At the present state of the reactor art, it is difficult

5 of 6

10-03-2012 11:08

Coolants for Nuclear Reators

http://clonemaster.homestead.com/files/coolants.htm

to argue that these gas cooled reactors are any more or less economic or reliable than the water, organic and sodium cooled reactors.

CARBON DIOXIDE GRAPHITE REACTOR

ADVANTAGES: Corrosion by coolant is negligible Coolant doesn't react with fuel or with other core materials Coolant will not flash into vapor if primary system is ruptured Coolant has very low capture cross section System can be designated with negative temperature coefficient Any fuel can be used, including natural uranium Coolant is cheap Ordinary leakage can be tolerated Gas turbine may be employed DISADVANTAGES: Reactor vessel and heat exchangers large and expensive Heat transfer efficiency is low Coolant must be pressurized Power density is low Carbon dioxide dissociates above 300 Centigrade

(Use "Back" Button of Browser to Return)

6 of 6

10-03-2012 11:08