Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BRYAN J. FREEDMAN, Esq. (SBN 151990) BRIAN E. TURNAUER, Esq. (SBN 214768)
FREEDMAN & TAITELMAN, LLP
2 3
4
FILED
bturnauer@ftllp.com
/PR 12 2012
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff International Creative Management, Inc. John A, ciarKe. Executive ofli<xf/Cicrk
by AaM^T'.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
, Deputy
9 10
11
BC48874*
INTERNATIONAL CREATIVE
Case No.:
12 13
14
COMPLAINT FOR:
15 16 17
18
PAUL DELVECCHIO, JR. aka "DJ Pauly D,' an individual; BLOWOUT ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Rhode Island limited liability
3. QUANTUM MERUIT
4. ACCOUNTING
5. DECLARATORY RELIEF
19
20 21
_)
"ICM"), complains against defendants Paul DelVecchio, Jr. aka "DJ Pauly D," an individual ("DelVecchio"), Blowout Enterprises, LLC, aRhode Island limited liability corporation
("Blowout") (collectively, Defendants"), and DOES 1-50, as follows:
III
?? ^ * q
22
m t4
:d <"> *
23
24 25
26
27
as -n t)
5 5 S S
t
3 *
8 " *
III
III
CI
? n S M a
N *0 -*
ro
o rC1 try
III III
1
ssS
O
ar
28
ID
ID
8"
COMPLAINT
1
2
INTRODUCTION
1.
DelVecchio goes by the name "DJ Pauly D" on a widely popular MTV reality
3
4 5
television show entitled Jersey Shore (the "Jersey Shore"). DelVecchio asked ICM torepresent
him after the first season ofthe Jersey Shore when MTV refused to compensate him despite the
virtually overnight success ofthe show. ICM went to bat for DelVecchio, successfully
6
7 8 9 10 11
each season ofJersey Shore and has endorsement deals and side-projects based on his DJ Pauly D
persona.
2.
the representation. Now, DelVecchio and Blowout refuse to pay ICM nearly $400,000 in
commissions on amounts Defendants have already received. Defendants have also unequivocally
12
13
14 15 16
17
announced that they have no intention ofpaying ICM over $200,000 in commissions on future
money DelVecchio and Blowout are set to earn from Jersey Shore despite their contractual
obligation to do so.
3.
ICM attempted to resolve the matter informally, but DelVecchio refused to even
acknowledge the contractual obligations binding him and his loan out company. Accordingly,
ICM was left with no choice but to file this lawsuit. By this complaint, ICM seeks to hold
18 19
20 21 22
Defendants liable for their purposeful and intentional breach oftheir talent agency agreement with
ICM. ICM seeks judicial intervention to help the agency collect commissions on the hundreds of
thousands of dollars that Defendants have already earned onJersey Shore. ICM further seeks a
judicial declaration that itis entitled to commissions on substantial sums in excess of$200,000 to
be paid to Defendants as a result ofICM's hard work and dedication to Defendants' career.
PRELIMINARY ALLEGATIONS
23
24 25
4.
ICM is, and at all times material hereto has been, a corporation duly organized and
26
27
\
operating under the laws of the State ofDelaware, with its principal place ofbusiness located in
the County ofLos Angeles, State ofCalifornia. ICM is, and at all times relevant hereto was,
licensed as a talent agency by the Labor Commissioner of the State ofCalifornia.
2
28
\
1*
ID
COMPLAINT
5.
Upon information and belief, ICM alleges that at all times material hereto,
2 3
4
5
DelVecchio has been an "artist" as that term is defined in Section 1700.4(b) of the California
Labor Code. DelVecchio is an actor regularly working in the entertainment industry and,
accordingly, has entered into numerous contracts in the County of Los Angeles, California, including a contract with MTV. DelVecchio is and has been represented by entertainment
counsel, business managers and agents whose offices are located in Los Angeles,
7
8 9
California. These lawyers, agents and business managers regularly conduct business onhis
behalf in the County of Los Angeles, California. Moreover, upon information and belief,
ICM alleges that DelVecchio performs DJ services and other music related performances in
the County of Los Angeles, State of California
10 11
12 13 14 15
6.
Upon information and belief, ICM alleges that Blowout is a Rhode Island limited
liability corporation which, at all relevant times, was authorized to do business in the State of
California. At all times material hereto, Blowout has been DelVecchio's personal services
16 17
18
which therefore sues said defendants by such fictitious names. ICM alleges on information and
belief that each of thedefendants, including those designated as a Doe, are responsible for the
19
20
events alleged herein and the damages caused thereby asa principal, agent, co-conspirator or
aider and abettor. ICM will seek leave of Court to amend this Complaint to allege the true
21
22
names and capacities of such defendants when the same have been ascertained.
8.
Upon information and belief, ICM alleges that Defendants and Does 1-50 atall
23
24
times relative to this action, were the agents, servants, partners, jointventurers and employees
of each of the other Defendantsand Does 1-50 and, in doing the acts alleged herein, were acting
25
26
with the knowledge and consent ofeach ofthe other Defendants and Does 1-50 in this action.
9. This Court hasjurisdiction over all Defendants becauseon information and
27
28
belief, Defendants have entered into numerous contracts in thisforum, regularly conduct
business in this forum, have performed several concerts in this forum and have hired agents,
3
COMPLAINT
1
2
managers and other representatives with offices in this forum. Moreover, Defendants' payment
for services is processed in this forum. Thus, Defendants have sufficient minimum contacts in
California and otherwise intentionally avail themselves ofthe California market so as to render
3
4
5
the exercise ofjurisdiction over them by the California courts consistent with traditional notions
of fair play and substantialjustice.
10.
This Court is the proper court for trial ofthis matter because the agreement which
7
8 9
is the subject ofthis action was entered into in Los Angeles County, California. The parties'
obligations under the agreement were incurred and to be performed in Los Angeles County,
California.
10 11
12
13 14
11.
talent agency. Initially, Defendants operated under an oral agency agreement with ICM
from January 2010 through July 2010. In late July 2010, ICM and Defendants entered into
ICM's written standard "General Services Agreement" (the "Agency Agreement"). The
15
16
17
Agency Agreement clearly set forth the terms, conditions and obligations ofthe parties.
12. Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Agency Agreement states:
18
19
20
21
4. I [Defendants] agree to pay you [ICM] ten percent (10%) of the gross compensation earned or received by me for, or in connection with, (i) any contracts for, or engagements of, my services (collectively and individually
hereinafter sometimes referred to as "employment") now in existence, except
22
another agent, or contracts entered into or negotiated for during the term, including, but not limited to, all gross compensation therefrom, and payments thereon, that are earned or received by me, or become due or payable to me after the expiration of the term, and (ii) for, or in connection with all
modifications, renewals, additions, substitutions, supplements, replacements, or extensions of or to such contracts and engagements, whether negotiated
23
24
25 26
27
s
t*
during or after the term hereof. You shall continue to perform your obligations hereunder after the term with respect to all employment with respect to which you are entitled to your commission as provided in the immediately preceding sentence. "Gross compensation" includes all forms of compensation, money, things ofvalue orother emoluments (including, but not
limited to, salaries, earnings, fees, residuals, royalties, bonuses, gifts,
10 'K t* 10
28
monetary and non-monetary consideration, securities and shares of profits or gross receipts) received by me orany person, firm orcorporation, partnership,
4
COMPLAINT
(hereinafter "my firm") or in which I may have any right, title or interest, on my behalf, from such contracts or engagements and modifications, renewals, additions, substitutions, supplements, replacements, and extensions of or to
such contracts or engagements, whether or not procured by you or by anyone else as well as from any form of advertising, or commercial tie-ups or
infomercials using my name, likeness, or voice.
5. In the event that my firm, if any, has or hereafter during the term
6
7 8
request to do so, I shall cause my firm to enter into a written exclusive agency agreement with you with respect to such services upon all of the
terms and conditions herein contained, specifically including an
9 10 11
12
my firm, directly or indirectly, for furnishing my services. For the purposes ofthis Paragraph 5, the term "gross compensation" shall be deemed
to include gross compensation paid and/or payable tomy firm ifit would have been gross compensation pursuant to Paragraph 4 if paid or payable to me.
Notwithstanding the fact that my firm may enter into such agency agreement
13 14
15
with you, I shall in all events remain primarily liable, jointly and severally with my firm, to pay compensation to you as provided in Paragraph 4 above,
based on the gross compensation paid and/or payable to my firm, directly or indirectly, for furnishing my services; and I shall indemnify you against a
16
17 18
failure ofmy firm to execute said agency agreement, or, if ithas executed said agency agreement, any failure of my firm to pay commissions pursuant thereto or otherwise to comply with the provisions thereof, and hold you harmless from any loss, cost, or expense incurred by you as a result of said failure. No waiver, extension, change, or amendment with respect to said agency agreement, nor failure for any reason to execute same, shall be deemed
to release me of or from any liability hereunder.
19
20 21
The above terms were expressly discussed and agreed to by the Parties. Thus, pursuant to
the terms of the Agency Agreement, Defendants became obligated to pay ICM a
22 23
24 25 26
27 28
commission equal to ten percent (10%) ofthe gross compensation earned or received by
DelVecchio or on his behalf by any business, including, but not limited to, loan-out
companies such as Blowout inconnection with any contracts for, orengagements of,
DelVecchio's services, in existence at the time of the Agency Agreement (except to the
extentsuch commissions were already owedto anotheragency), or entered into or
negotiated during the relationship, and for, or in connection with, all modifications, renewals, additions, substitutions, supplements, replacements, or extensions of or to such
COMPLAINT
1 2
contracts and engagements, whether negotiated during or after the relationship. A true and correct copy of the Agency Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated
herein by this reference.
ICM Successfully Modifies Defendants' MTV Participant Agreements
3
4
5 6
7
13.
8 9
Defendants rendered talent services on Jersey Shore. The first season of Jersey Shore
achieved an unprecedented level of television ratings success on MTV. 14. On or about January 29, 2010, during ICM's representation of Defendants,
10
11
12 13
14 15
increased and options for Defendants' services on cycles 2 and 3 of Jersey Shore were
granted to MTV.
15.
On or about April 14, 2010, attorneys for MTV sent a notice to Defendants
16
17
and ICM that the second cycle option ("Cycle 2") for Jersey Shore was beingexercised by
MTV pursuant to the First Amendment to Participant Agreement. ICM is informed and
18 19
20
21
believes, and thereupon alleges, thatCycle 2 for Jersey Shore was a twenty-four (24) episode order thatwas ultimately divided into twoseparate seasons of Jersey Shore by
MTV, which were categorized as Cycle 2A and Cycle 2B by MTV. Cycle 2A was filmed
in Miami, Florida and Cycle 2B was filmed in Seaside Heights, New Jersey.
16. Pursuant to the terms of the Agency Agreement with ICM, Defendants remitted
22 23
24
25
Cycle 2A and Cycle 2B of Jersey Shore. Both Cycle 2A and Cycle 2B each produced
tremendous television ratings for MTV.
26
27
\
I-
17.
w \
II)
28
2
3 4
5 6
7
Defendants' services on cycles 3 and 4 ofJersey Shore were granted to MTV. Pursuant to the
third paragraph of the Second Amendment to Participant Agreement, Cycle2A was re-
categorized as Cycle 2 and Cycle 2B was re-categorized as Cycle 3 of Jersey Shore (which had
already filmed and aired).
8 9 10
11 12
18.
19.
On or about January 26, 2011, attorneys for MTV sent a notice to Defendants
13
14 15
and ICM that the fourth cycle option ("Cycle 4") for Jersey Shore was being exercised by
MTV pursuant to the Second Amendment to Participant Agreement.
20.
Again taking advantage of the huge ratings success of Jersey Shore, in or around
16 17 18 19 20
21
22
April 2011, during ICM's representation of Defendants and before filming on Cycle 4 began,
ICM began and managed to successfully negotiate another improved amendment for Defendants to provide services onadditional seasons ofJersey Shore, which was entered into and effective
as of March 31, 2011 (the "ThirdAmendment to Participant Agreement"). The Third
Defendants beginning with Cycle 4 of Jersey Shore andalso contained options for Defendants'
services on cycles 5 and 6 of Jersey Shore.
Defendants Breach the Agency Agreement by Failing to Pay Commissions for Cycle 4
23
24
21.
25 26
27
V10
)* W
entitled to a $400,000 signing bonus and $100,000 per episode for the first twelve (12) episodes of Cycle 4 of Jersey Shore. ICM is informed and believes, and thereupon alleges, that 12
episodes, a launch special, multiple "after-shows" and a reunion show of Cycle 4 of Jersey
Shore were produced. Therefore, Defendants were entitled to $1,600,000 plus additional
7 COMPLAINT
28
1 2 3
4
compensation, including but not limited to"after-shows," a launch special, a reunion show, participations, merchandising and bonuses pursuant to the Third Amendment to Participant
Agreement for Cycle 4. ICM is informed and believes, and thereupon alleges, that Defendants
also received a total of $107,037.33 in gross compensation representing contractual
5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12
participations and $200,000 in gross compensation as a "thank you" bonus on Cycle 4 ofJersey
Shore, bringing Defendants' known total gross compensation onCycle 4 ofJersey Shore to
$190,703.73 plus 10% commission on any other compensation received by Defendants from
Cycle 4 ofJersey Shore, including but not limited to "after-shows," a launch special, a reunion
show, other participations, merchandising and bonuses pursuant to the Third Amendment to
Participant Agreement. To date, Defendants have failed to remit any commission inconnection
with Cycle 4 of Jersey Shore to ICM. Defendants Are Required to Pay Post-Termination Commissions on ICM-Negotiated Deals
13
14
15
22.
ICM acknowledged its discharge and confirmed that, pursuant to the written Agency Agreement
16
17
and custom and practice in the entertainment industry, Defendants remained contractually
obligated to pay ICM a commission on all gross compensation Defendants would receive in the
future onany deals negotiated before Defendants' discharge of ICM, including but not limited to
Defendants' Third Amendment to Participant Agreement for Jersey Shore (with an effective
date of March 31,2011 clearly before Defendants' discharge of ICM on or about May 5,
18 19 20
21 22
2011). Indeed, it is standard custom and practice in the entertainment industry that talent
agencies are entitled to post-termination commissions on all deals they negotiate for their client.
See The Stein Agency v. James Tripp-Haith (Cal. Labor Comm'n 2006) (enforcing oral agreement for post-termination commissions as to options exercised well after end of agency
relationship); The Endeavor Agency, LLC v. Milano, TAC 10-05 (Cal. Labor Comm'n 2005)
23
24 25 26
(citing Cal. Civ. Code 1656; Rest. 2d Contracts 221) (awarding post-termination commissions
to talent agency based on oral agency agreement on grounds that "the evidence established that the overwhelming industry custom and practice requires an artist to pay post termination
8
27
10
(0
28
COMPLAINT
23.
On or about June 8, 2011, attorneys for MTV sent a notice to Defendants and
3
4 5 6
7
ICM that the fifth cycle option ("Cycle 5") for Jersey Shore was beingexercised by MTV
pursuant to the Third Amendmentto Participant Agreement.
24.
entitled to $150,000 per episode for the first twelve (12) episodes of Cycle 5 of Jersey Shore. ICM is informed and believes, and thereupon alleges, that 12 episodes, multiple "after-shows"
8
9 10 11
and reunion shows of Cycle 5 were produced. Cycle 5 is currently airing on MTV. If 12
episodes, multiple "after-shows" and reunion shows of Cycle 5 were in fact produced, Defendants would be entitled to $1,800,000 plus additional compensation, including butnot limited to "after-shows," reunion shows, participations, merchandising and bonuses pursuant to
the ThirdAmendment to Participant Agreement. Accordingly, at a 10% commission rate, ICM would be entitled to a minimum of $180,000 plus 10% commission on any othercompensation
received by Defendants from Cycle 5 of Jersey Shore, including but not limited to "aftershows,"reunion shows, participations, merchandising and bonuses pursuantto the Third
Amendmentto Participant Agreement.
12 13
14 15
16
17
25.
ICM is informed and believes, and thereupon alleges, that on or about March 19,
18
19 20 21 22 23
24
2012, MTV decided to exercise the sixth cycle option ("Cycle 6") for Jersey Shore pursuant to the
Third Amendment to Participant Agreement. Perthe Third Amendment to Participant
Agreement, whenCycle 6 is produced by MTV, Defendants will be entitled to $175,000 per
episode for the first twelve (12) episodes of Cycle 6 of Jersey Shore. If 12episodes of Cycle 6 of Jersey Shore are in fact produced, Defendants will be entitled to $2,100,000 plus additional compensation, including but not limited to "after-shows," reunion shows, participations,
25
26
27
\
\*
10% commission on any other compensation received by Defendants for Cycle 6 of Jersey Shore,
including but not limited to "after-shows," reunion shows, participations, merchandising and bonuses pursuant to the potential exercise of MTV's option to produce Cycle 6 ofJersey Shore.
9
(U
28
\
I-
10
COMPLAINT
26.
2 3 4
5
Ms. Hillary Hughes, whereby Defendants denied (i) any obligation to pay ICM commission on
compensationreceived pursuant to Cycle 4 of Jersey Shore and (ii) any obligation to pay ICM
any additional commission from Defendants.
27.
6
7
8 9
10
11 12
29.
To date, Defendants have not remitted any commission to ICM for monies
received pursuant to the Third Amendment to Participant Agreement, including but not limited
to compensation received by Defendants pursuant to Cycle 4 and Cycle 5 of Jersey Shore, which
13
14
includesThree Hundred SeventyThousand Seven Hundred Three Dollars and SeventyThree Cents ($370,703.73) in commission (the "Outstanding Commission") for monies earned by Defendantsfor Cycle 4 (i.e., $190,703.73 in commission) and Cycle 5 (i.e., $180,000 in
commission) of Jersey Shore. 30. As of the filing of this petition, Defendants have not paid ICM the Outstanding
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 23
24
31.
ICM re-alleges herein by this reference each and every allegation contained in
25 26 27
*
became obligated to pay ICM a commission equal to ten percent (10%) of the gross
compensation earned or received by DelVecchio or on his behalf by any business,
including, but not limited to, loan-out companies such as Blowout in connection with any
contracts for, or engagements of, DelVecchio's services, in existence at the time of the
10 COMPLAINT
\
>
1
<
10
28
10
1
2
Agency Agreement (except to the extent such commissions were already owed to another
agency), or entered into or negotiated during the relationship, and for, or in connection with,
ail modifications, renewals, additions, substitutions, supplements, replacements, or
3
4
5
extensions of or to such contracts and engagements, whether negotiated during or after the
relationship. This included Defendants' obligation to payICM a commission on all gross compensation Defendants would receive in thefuture on any deals negotiated by-ICM on
Defendants' behalf before Defendants' discharge of ICM.
6
7
8 9
10
33.
ICM has fully performed each of the promises, covenants and conditions to be
performed by it under the Agency Agreement with Defendants and Does 1-50, except tothe extent such performance was prevented or excused by Defendants and Does 1-50.
34. Defendants and Does 1-50 breached the AgencyAgreement by failing and
11
12 13
14
refusing to pay ICM commissions in an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the gross
compensation received by Defendants pursuant to Cycle 4 and Cycle 5 ofJersey Shore arising
out of the Third Amendment to Participant Agreement.
15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22
35.
As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' and Does 1-50's breach ofthe
Agency Agreement, ICM has been damaged, and will be damaged ina sum not yet fully
ascertained, but inany event not less than $370,703.73, together with interest thereon at the
legal rate from the date each payment became or becomes due.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(In the Alternative, For Breach of OralContract Against Defendants and Does 1-50)
36. ICM re-alleges herein by this reference each and every allegation contained in
23
24
37.
ICM alleges in the alternative that, only to the extent that the Defendants did
notsign the written Agency Agreement and as a result no written agreement was formed,
ICM and Defendants agreed and contracted orally to abide by the terms of the Agency
25
26
Agreement, thereby forming an oral agreement the terms of which are expressly articulated
in the Agency Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein.
38. Under the terms of the oral agreement which are set forth in the Agency
11
27
s \
K*
28
10 \
I* 10
COMPLAINT
Agreement, Defendants and Does 1-50 became obligated to pay ICM a commission equal to ten percent (10%) of the gross compensation earned or received by DelVecchio or on his
behalf by any business, including, but not limited to, loan-out companies such as Blowout
2 3
4
in connection with any contracts for, or engagements of, DelVecchio's services, in existence
at the time of the Agency Agreement (except to the extent such commissions were already
5 6 7
8
owed to another agency), or entered into or negotiated during the relationship, and for, or in
connection with, all modifications, renewals, additions, substitutions, supplements,
9
10 11
commission on all gross compensation Defendants would receive in the future on any deals
negotiated by ICM on Defendants' behalf before Defendants' discharge of ICM.
12
13
39.
ICM has fully performed each of the promises, covenants and conditions to be
performed by it under the terms of the oral agreement which are set forth in the Agency Agreement with Defendants and Does 1-50, except to the extent such performance was
prevented or excused by Defendants and Does 1-50.
14
15
16
17
40.
Defendants and Does 1-50 breached the oral agreement, the terms of which are
set forth in the Agency Agreement by failing and refusing to pay ICM commissions in an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the gross compensation received by Defendants pursuant
to Cycle 4 and Cycle 5 of Jersey Shore arising out of the Third Amendment to Participant
Agreement.
18 19 20
21 22
41.
As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' and Does 1-50's breach of the
oral agreement, the terms of which are set forth in the Agency Agreement, ICM has been
23
24 25
damaged, and will be damaged in a sum not yet fully ascertained, but in any event not less than
$370,703.73, together with interest thereon at the legal rate from the date each payment became
or becomes due. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
26
27
s s
10
28
42.
ICM re-alleges herein by this reference each and every allegation contained in
12 COMPLAINT
\
t
10
1 2
3
4
services rendered by ICM as the agent with respect to the Third Amendment to Participant
Agreement as herein described, and for which Defendants, and each of them, promised to pay
Plaintiff the reasonable value thereof. Defendants, and each of them, knew that these services
6
7
were being provided and accepted, used, and enjoyed the services provided by ICM. 44. Defendants knew that ICM was providing talent agency services to Defendants
8 9
10
11
and on Defendants' behalfand, accordingly become indebted to ICM for the reasonable value of
said talent agency services.
45.
Defendants accepted, used and enjoyed and continue to enjoy, the benefits of the
talent agency servicesprovided by ICM. Though Defendants initially paid ICM commissions for compensation received pursuant to the Agency Agreement as a result of the talent agency services that they accepted, used and enjoyed, Defendants have failed and refused to fully
12
13
14 15
compensate ICM for the full value of the talent agency services employed by ICM. Defendants
have not paid the commissions from the gross compensation received by Defendants pursuant to Cycle 4 and Cycle 5 of Jersey Shore and refuseto pay commissions from future gross
16
17 18
19
20
21
22
Defendants to ICM relating to its talent agency services is ten percent (10%) of the gross
23
24
and services rendered, ICM has been damaged in an amount according to proof at hearing, \but in any event not less than $370,703.73, together with interest thereon at the legal rate from the
date each payment became or becomes due.
///
///
13
25
26 27 28
10
\
to
COMPLAINT
2 3
4
48.
Plaintiff re-alleges herein by this reference each and every allegation contained
in paragraphs numbers 1 through 47 of this Complaint as if set forth fully herein. 49. Pursuant to the Agency Agreement, ICM is entitled to an accounting of all
5 6
7
monies or other consideration payable to Defendants in connection with the Third Amendment
to Participant Agreement. 50. Demand is hereby made for such accounting.
8
9
51.
Defendants have not provided an accounting to ICM for all monies or other
10
11
consideration earned or received by or on behalfof Defendants in connection with the Third Amendment to Participant Agreement. An accounting is required to determine the total amount
of the moniesor other consideration received by or on behalfof Defendants pursuant to the
12
13 14
Third Amendment to Participant Agreement and the exact amount of commissions that are due
and owing to ICM.
FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
15 16
17
52.
ICM re-alleges herein by this reference each and every allegation contained in
18 19
20 21
commission on all gross compensationDefendants will receive as a result of any and all deals
that were negotiated by ICM on Defendants' behalf before Defendants' discharge of ICM. This
22
23
includes, but is not limited to, any future compensation Defendants receive under the Third
Amendment to Participant Agreement (with an effective date of March 31,2011 clearly
before Defendants' discharge of ICM on or about May 5,2011), such as Cycle 6.
54. Defendants contend that they do not and will not owe ICM such commissions.
24
25
26
55.
Accordingly, an actual controversy has arisen and now exists between ICM, and
27
% X
I* 10 \
10
28
56.
ICM desires a judicial determination of its rights and duties, and a declaration
14
COMPLAINT
1 2
that Defendants, and eachof them, are obligated to pay ICM a commission on all gross
3
4 5
57.
Ajudicial declaration therefore isnecessary and appropriate atthis time under the
6
7
circumstances in order to determine ICM's rights and Defendants' obligations under the Agency
Agreement.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
8
9
WHEREFORE, ICM prays for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, as
follows:
10
11 12 13
14 15
1.
For general damages in a sum in excess of the minimum jurisdiction of the court,
according to proof at trial;
2.
3.
16
17
4.
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
On The Second Cause Of Action For Breach of Oral Contract In the Alternative:
18
19
1.
For general damages in a sum in excess of the minimum jurisdiction of the court,
according to proof at trial;
20
21 22
2.
3.
4.
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
23
24
1.
For general damages in a sum in excess of the minimum jurisdiction of the court,
according to proof at trial;
25 26 27
\
I"
2.
3.
10
10
28
4.
For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
15
COMPLAINT
1 2 3 4
5
1.
For ICM to be provided with a written accounting with respect to all monies or
other consideration received by or on behalf ofDefendants in connection with the
Third Amendment to Participant Agreement;
2.
For payment to ICM of the amount due from Defendants as a result of the
accounting;
6
7 3.
8 9
4.
5.
For such other and further reliefas the Court may deem just and proper.
1.
11
12
For an order declaring that Defendants, and each ofthem, are obligated to pay ICM
a commission on all gross compensation Defendants receive on any deals
13
14
15
2.
16
3.
17
For such otherand further reliefas the Courtmay deem just and proper.
18
FREEDMA^TAITELj^AN, LLP
19
20
21
BrydfTJ.
Brian E. Turnauer
22
23
24 25
26 27
I* 10
28
16
\
I* 10
COMPLAINT
CM-Q1Q
Bar "srarroi number, and address): ATTORNEYOR PARV.WIJHOUT ATTORNEY(Nama.
FOR COURT USe ONLY
FILED
310-201-0005
fax no.:
310-201 0045
case name:
[~x~1 Unlimited
(Amount
Limited
(Amount
BC48 2 741
JUDGE: Filed with first appearance by defendant demanded demanded is (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.402) DEPT: exceeds $25,000) $25.000 or less) Items 1-6 below must be completed (see instructionson page 2). 1. Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case:
Auto Tort
Contract
HAuto (22) Uninsured motorist (46) Other PI/PD/WD (Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort
Other collections (09) Insurance coverage (18) Other contract (37) Real Property I I Eminent domain/Inverse condemnation (14)
Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400-3.403) I I Antitrust/Trade regulation(03) 1 I Construction defect (10)
I
I
I I
Enforcement of Judgment
I
I I I
I I
2.
IFraud (16)
IIntellectual property (19) I Professional negligence (25) IOther non-PI/PD/WD tort (35)
IWrongful termination (36) IOtheremployment (15)
I I
I
I
I
I RICO (27)
I Othercomplaint (not specified above) (42)
I Partnership and corporate governance (21)
I
I
I
IDrugs (38)
IAsset forfeiture (05)
I Petition re: arbitration award (11)
Judicial Review
Employment
Thiscase
I is
I IOther judicial review (39) I x I is not complex underrule3.400ofthe California Rules of Court. Ifthe case is complex, mark the
a. I
d. I
f. I
b. I
c. I
3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a. SH monetary b. CED nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c. 1ZZ1 punitive
4. Number of causes of action (specify): 1)Breach ofWritten Contract, 2) IntheAltemativ^f-B^each ofOral Contract, 3)Quantum Meruit,
5. This case 1 I is
I x 1 is not
a classaction suit.
4) Accounting, ancj;
lentT")
6. Ifthere are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case/
i CM-015.)
NOTICE
Plaintiff mustfile this cover sheet with the first paper filed inthe action or proceeding (exceptsmall claims cases or cases filed underthe Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. RulesofCourt, rule3.220.) Failure to file mayresult
in sanctions.
s File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule.
> Unless this is a collections \
FortsAdopted tor Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
iS If this case iscomplex under rule 3.400 et seq.oftheCalifornia Rules ofCourt, you must serve a copy ofthis cover sheet on all
,!} otherpartiesto the action or proceeding. case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only.
_ Pagt1of2
Cal. Rutaa of Court, rulas 2.30. 3.220.3.400-3 403,3.740.
ScfjZj
insUS
To Plaintiffs and Cohere Filing First Papers. If you are filing afirst paper (for example, acomplaint) in ai civil case " !"
CM-10
complete and file, along with your first paper, the Civil Case Cover Sheet contained on page 1. This informal on will be used to compile statistics about the types and numbers of cases filed. You must complete items 1through 6on the sheet. In item 1, you must check one box for the case type that best describes the case. If the case fits both ageneral and amore specific type of case listed in item 1, check the more specific one. If the case has multiple causes of action, check the box that best indicates the primary cause of action To assist you in completing the sheet, examples of the cases that belong under each case type in item 1are prov.ded below. Acover sheet must be filed only with your initial paper. Failure to file acover sheet with the first paper filed in acivil case may subject aparty, its
counsel orboth to sanctions under rules 2.30 and 3.220 ofthe California Rules of Court.
To Parties in Rule 3.740 Collections Cases. A"collections case" under rule 3.740 is defined as an action for recovery of money owed in asum stated to be certain that is not more than $25,000, exclusive of interest and attorney's fees, arising from atransaction in which
damages. (2) punitive damages. (3) recovery of real property, (4) recovery of personal property, or (5) aprejudgment writ of attachment. The identification of acase as arule 3.740 collections case on this form means that it will be exempt from the general time-for-service requirements and case management rules, unless adefendant files aresponsive pleading. Arule 3.740 collections case will be subject tothe requirements for service and obtaining a judgment in rule 3.740. *.... To Parties in Complex Cases. In complex cases only, parties must also use the Civil Case Cover Sheet odesignate whether the case is complex. If aplaintiff believes the case is complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court, this must be indicated by completing the appropriate boxes in items 1and 2. If aplaintiff designates acase as complex, the cover sheet must be served wi h he complaint on all parties to the action. Adefendant may file and serve no later than the time of its first appearance ajonderiin the plaintiffs designation, acounter-designation that the case is not complex, or, if the plaintiff has made no designation, adesignation that
the case is complex.
Auto Tort
property, services, or money was acquired on credit. Acollections case does not include an action seeking the following: (1) tort
Asbestos (04)
Asbestos Property Damage Asbestos Personal Injury/ Wrongful Death Product Liability (not asbestos or
toxic/environmental) (24) Medical Malpractice (45) Medical Malpractice-
Real Property
Eminent Domain/Inverse
Mortgage Foreclosure
Quiet Title
Negligent Infliction of
Emotional Distress
Other PI/PD/WD
Case (non-tort/non-complex)
Other Civil Complaint
Practice (07)
Drugs (38)(ifthecase involves illegal drugs, check this item:otherwise, report as Commercial or Residential)
Judicial Review
. (non-tort/non-complex)
Miscellaneous Civil Petition
Election Contest
Employment
Wrongful Termination (36)
Other Judicial Review (39) Review of Health Officer Order Notice of Appeal-Labor Commissioner Appeals
CASE NUMBER
UC48274*
I IHOURS/IT1 PAY?
Item II. Indicate thecorrect district and courthouse location (4steps - If you checked "Limited Case", skip to Item III, Pg. 4):
Step 1: After first completing the Civil Case Cover Sheet form, find the main Civil Case Cover Sheet heading for your
case in the left margin below, and, to the right in Column A, the Civil Case Cover Sheet casetype you selected.
Step 2: Check one Superior Court type of action in Column Bbelow which best describes the nature of this case.
Step 3: In Column C, circle the reason for the court location choice that applies to the type of action you have
checked. Forany exception to the court location, see Local Rule 2.0.
1. Class actions must be filed in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse, central district.
9. Location where one or more of the parties reside. 10. Location of Labor Commissioner Office
6. Location of property orpermanently garaged vehicle. 7. Location where petitioner resides. 8. Location wherein defendant/respondent functions wholly.
Step 4: Fill in the information requested on page 4 in Item III; complete Item IV. Sign the declaration.
Auto (22)
Uninsured Motorist (46)
1.. 2,4.
<
I
I
1., 2., 4.
Asbestos (04)
ft
I
I
I
fi
si
I
Other
1..4.
1..4.
2 i
I
I
Page 1 of 4
LA-CV109
CASE NUMBER
"
1., 3. 1,2., 3.
I
I I |
n 2
Fraud (16)
iE
28
I
I I I I
0
a.
E
LU
2., 5.
I x I A6008 Contract/Warranty Breach -SellerPlaintiff (no fraud/negligence) I l A6019 Negligent Breach of ContractA/Varranty (no fraud) I I A6028 Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence)
I I A6002 Collections Case-Seller Plaintiff
|g),
1..2..5. 1..2..5.
2., 5., 6. 2., 5.
"5
n
E
o
Collections (09)
I
I
I
1..2..3., 5.
1., 2 3., 8.
I
Eminent Domain/Inverse
Condemnation (14)
&
p
I i
2., 6. 2., 6.
2., 6.
I
Unlawful Detainer-Commercial
1A6060 0therRealProperry(noteminentdomain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) I A6021 Unlawful Detainer-Commercial (notdrugs orwrongful eviction) I A6020 Unlawful Detainer-Residential (not drugs orwrongful eviction)
I A6020F Unlawful Detainer-Post-Foreclosure
2., 6.
2,6. 26.
2., 6.
(31)
Unlawful Detainer-Residential
I I
I
(32)
Unlawful Detainer-
2., 6.
s
LAQIV 109 (Rev. 03/11)
Page 2 of 4
EnfMoriscemlanRJtoeusdvivciofJwsauCldoognmisPpveantlosi
MiscelaL^1 nCotugmpyilenx r
CASE NUMBER
,
^^^^^^^^^^K^^^KChecKlonivioneli^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^i^H 1
2., 6.
2., 5.
|
I
2., 8.
2.
I |
| A6152 Writ- Mandamus on Limited Court Case Matter J A6153 Writ- OtherLimited Court Case Review
I A6150 Other Writ /Judicial Review
2.
2,8.
I I I
I |
I A6003 Antitrust/Trade Regulation J A6007 Construction Defect I A6006 Claims Involving Mass Tort
I A6035 Securities Litigation Case | A6036 Toxic Tort/Environmental
1.,2.,8.
1.. 2., 3.
1., 2., 8.
1., 2., 8. 1., 2., 3., 8.
Environmental (30)
o
cW
0.
|
I
I
1,2.5., 8.
2,9.
26.
Enforcement
|
I
2., 9.
2., 8.
of Judgment (20)
2,8.
I"
RICO (27)
2., 8., 9.
1.,2.,8.
Other Complaints
I | |
I
I A6030 Declaratory Relief Only | A6040 Injunctive Relief Only (not domestic/harassment) | A6011 Other Commercial Complaint Case(non-tort/non-complex)
I A6000 Other Civil Complaint (non-tort/non-complex)
| A6113 Partnership andCorporate Governance Case
| A6121 Civil Harassment | A6123 Workplace Harassment
1..2..8.
2., 8.
Partnership Corporation
Governance (21)
|
I I
2., 3., 9.
2., 3., 9. 2., 3., 9.
2.
|
Other Petitions
I |
|
I
2., 7.
2., 3,4., 8.
2., 9.
**
[U
I case number
circumstance indicated in Item II., Step 3 on Page 1, as the proper reason for filing in the courtlocation you selected.
REASON: Check the appropriate boxes for the numbers shown under Column C for the type of action that you have selected for
this case.
Item III. Statement of Location: Enter the address of the accident, party's residence or place of business, performance, or other
address: j Q250 Constellation Boulevard
CITY:
l.E2.a3O4O5O6O7.D8.a9.ni0.
STATE:
ZIP CODE:
Los Angeles
CA
90012
Item IV. Declaration ofAssignment Ideclare under penalty of perjury underthe laws ofthe State of California thai the foregoing is true
andcorrect andthatthe above-entitled matter is properly filed for assignment tothe Stanley Mosk courthouse in the CENTRAL District of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles [CodeCiv. Proa, 392 et seq., and Local
Rule 2.0. subds. (b), (c) and (d)].
(SlgflfTlJa^^TroRNEWlWG PARTyT"
Bryan J. Freedman
PLEASE HAVE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS COMPLETED AND READY TO BE FILED IN ORDER TO PROPERLY
COMMENCE YOUR NEW COURT CASE:
4. Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Location form, LACIV 109, LASC Approved 03-04 (Rev.
03/11).
5. Payment in full of the filing fee, unless fees have been waived.
6. Asigned orderappointing the Guardian ad Litem, Judicial Council form CIV-010, ifthe plaintiff or petitioner is a
minor under 18 years of age will be required by Court in order to issue a summons.
7. Additional copies of documents to be conformed by the Clerk. Copies of the cover sheet and this addendum must be served along with the summons and complaint, or other initiating pleading in the case.
i*
Page 4 of 4