Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BCG growth-share matrix is a portfolio planning model developed by Bruce Henderson of the Boston Consulting Group in the early 1970s. It is based on the observation that a companys business unit can be classified into four categories base on combination of market growth and market share relative to the largest competitor, hence the name growth-share. Market growth serves as a proxy for industry attractiveness, and relative market share serves as a proxy for competitive advantage. BCG MATRIX is method is based on the product life cycle theory that can be used to determine what priorities should be given in the product portfolio of a business unit. To ensure long-term value creation, company should have a portfolio of products that contains both high-growth products in need o f cash input and low-growth products that generate a lot of cash. It has 2 dimensions: market share and market growth. The basic idea behind it is that the bigger the market share a product has or faster the products market grows the better it is for the company. The growth-share matrix thus maps the business unit positions within these two important determinants of profitability. This framework assumes that an increase in relative market share will result in an increase in the generation of cash. This assumption often is true because of the experience curve; increased relative market share implies that the firm in moving forward on the experience curve relative to its competitor, thus developing a cost advantage. A second assumption is that a growing market requires investment in asset to increase capacity and therefore results in the consumption of cash. Thus the position of a business on the growth-share matrix provides an indicator of its cash generation and its cash consumption. Henderson Use the BCG matrix model Each product has its product life cycle, and each stage in product's life-cycle represents a different profile of risk and return. In general, a company should maintain a balanced portfolio of products. Having a balanced product portfolio includes both high-growth products as well as low-growth products. A high-growth product is for example a new one that we are trying to get to some market. It takes some effort and resources to market it, to build distribution channels, and to build sales infrastructure, but it is a product that is expected to bring the gold in the future. An example of this product would be an iPod. A low-growth product is for example an established product known by the market. Characteristics of this product do not change much, customers know what they are getting, and the price does not change much either. This product has only limited budget for marketing. The is the milking cow that brings in the constant flow of cash. An example of this product would be a regular Colgate toothpaste.
Page 1
10 x
1x
0.1 x
1. Stars (high growth, high market share) - Stars represent business units having large market share in a fast growing industry. They may generate cash but because of fast growing market, stars require huge investments to maintain their lead. Net cash flow is usually modest. SBUs located in this cell are attractive as they are located in a robust industry and these business units are highly competitive in the industry. If successful, a star will become a cash cow when the industry matures.
Page 2
3. Question Marks (high growth, low market share) - Question marks represent business units having low relative market share and located in a high growth industry. They require huge amount of cash to maintain or gain market share. They require attention to determine if the venture can be viable. Question marks are generally new goods and services which have a good commercial prospective. There is no specific strategy which can be adopted. If the firm thinks it has dominant market share, then it can adopt expansion strategy, else retrenchment strategy can be adopted. Most businesses start as question marks as the company tries to enter a high growth market in which there is already a market-share. If ignored, then question marks may become dogs, while if huge investment is made, then they have potential of becoming stars.
4. Dogs (low growth, low market share) - Dogs represent businesses having weak market shares in low-growth markets. They neither generate cash nor require huge amount of cash. Due to low market share, these business units face cost disadvantages. Generally retrenchment strategies are adopted because these firms can gain market share only at the expense of competitors/rival firms. These business firms have weak market share because of high costs, poor quality, ineffective marketing, etc. Unless a dog has some other strategic aim, it should be liquidated if there is fewer prospects for it to gain market share. Number of dogs should be avoided and minimized in an organization.
Limitations of BCG Matrix The BCG Matrix produces a framework for allocating resources among different business units and makes it possible to compare many business units at a glance. But BCG Matrix is not free from limitations, such as1. BCG matrix classifies businesses as low and high, but generally businesses can be medium also. Thus, the true nature of business may not be reflected. 2. Market is not clearly defined in this model. 3. High market share does not always leads to high profits. There are high costs also involved with high market share. Anjuman-I-Islams Allana Institute of Management Studies Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Company background Established in 1929 1st brands- Parle Glucose and Parle
Page 6
Page 7
Biscuits Parle-G Krackjack Krackjack crispy cream Monaco Hide and Seek Hide and Seek Milano Parle Marie Milk Shakti
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Beverages Frooti Appy fizz & grapo fizz LMN Parle Bisleri
Page 11
Page 12
Cont
Page 13
What has made them keep the price low??? Economies of scale for a product like PARLE-G Understood the consumer psyche of value for money
Anjuman-I-Islams Allana Institute of Management Studies Page 14
BCG matrix
Page 15
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW Anjuman-I-Islams Allana Institute of Management Studies Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Core competencies Unmatched reach Low cost leader Related diversified group
Page 21
SWOT
Page 22
Page 23