You are on page 1of 1

Introduction to Islamic Leadership

Islamic Point of View In my opinion the rules list are not so deviate from the points of Islam, but there are some measure "how to Choose the Rector and Vice-Chancellor", who sya is less agreement, as in the act 7, "Obedient Muslims" I think we do not can say how much faith a person, because it Is the God man, that we can not tell by just saying that he never forgot the prayer, he never forgot to pray, he is a good reader of the Qur'an, or even how many times that he go to Hajj. So I think this act should be removed so it will not create misunderstanding in the interpretation. Human Rights Point of View In my opinion, violate even more act, I want to start from the right to vote, in the amount of act 8 is said that there is only one representative from each agency designate an official to join the election. And I think it is very discriminatory, because I think the president is the head of one of the universities and the universities that are the focus of the majority of students. So if students can not join the head of the university is very wrong, at the very least I think the university should allow all members of official institutions to choose the rector pointed, and also about the act of 8 participants is highly discriminatory voter "only tenured faculty can choose chancellor candidates "I think all members of the university are eligible also can enroll the requirements to become voters so that all eligible people can also join in elections. Two mentions on a number of act on the confidentiality of the results, I think it is irrelevant, because will arouse suspicion. Therefore it should be supposed to act more in the fix. We must be transparent so that it will minimize the intention to be sabotage, and also this is one of the points of democracy. End of said several act 19 (9) and 26 (10) on if there is noise at about two times that the candidate appointed officials will each decide which one to choose, I think in this act is a very high risk of sabotage because one this is a very personal decision without using the musyawarah idea. Gender Equality Point of View In my opinion, in this case things go wrong, it's not about the qualifications mention in the act of gender so it is not clear which one is allowed or what is not. So up the possibility of sabotage, and probably some discrimination for women candidates if there is one in the future, so I think the university should create clarity about gender clarity and I think there should be no difference between the gender that allows it to be a candidate(s). Ethics Point of View I think I would make the overall opinion in this perspective, I think of all the act mention in the paper, I think the act is still very "non-democratic". Many violation occur because the substance is still thinking about personal interests and I think also about the investment, money,and other. So that from the whole I think it still need to be revise to be better. Name : Nur Wahid Satrio Kusma M - 11410550

You might also like