Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This project is about financial statement analysis of any company of Pakistan to gain knowledge about its financial performance for last five years. My analytical report is about the financial situation of the Fuji fertilizer limited, the largest manufacturers of fertilizer in Pakistan. They are one of the top companies of the country with a massive share in the market of urea. This analysis would certainly help us in knowing the current financial status of the company.
What is financial statement analysis? Process of identifying financial strengths and weaknesses of the firm by properly establishing relationship between the items of the balance sheet and the profit and loss account. Our purpose of doing financial statement analysis: Financial statements are prepared to meet external reporting obligations and also for decision making purposes. They play a dominant role in setting the framework of managerial decisions. But the information provided in the financial statements is not an end in itself as no meaningful conclusions can be drawn from these statements alone. However, the information provided in the financial statements is of immense use in making decisions through analysis and interpretation of financial statements. Tools and Techniques of Financial Statement Analysis: Following are the most important tools and techniques of financial statement analysis: 1. Horizontal and Vertical Analysis 2. Ratios Analysis
INTRODUCTION TO COMPANY:
With a vision to acquire self - sufficiency in fertilizer production in the country, FFC was Incorporated in 1978 as a private limited company. This was a joint venture between Fauji Foundation (a leading charitable trust in Pakistan) and Haldol Topsoil A/S oftener. The initial authorized capital of the company was 813.9 Million Rupees. The Present share capital of the company stands at Rs. 3.0 Billion. Additionally, FFC has Rs.1.0 Billion stakes in the subsidiary Fauji Fertilizer Bin Qasim Limited (formerly CJoran Fertilizer Company Limited).FFC commenced commercial production of urea in 1982 with annual capacity of 570,000 metric tons. Through De-Bottle Necking (DBN) program, the production capacity of the existing plant increased to 695,000 metric tons per year. FFC participated as a major shareholder in a new DAPS/Urea manufacturing complex with participation of major international/national institutions. The new company FaujiFertilizer Bin Qasim Limited (formerly FFC-Jordan Fertilizer Company Limited) commenced commercial production with effect from January 01, 2000. The facility isdesigned to produce 551,000 metric tons of urea and 445,500 metric tons of DAP This excellent performance was due to hard work and dedication of all employees and the progressive approach and support from the top management. In the year 2002, FFC acquired ex Pak Saudi Fertilizers Limited (PSFL) Urea Plant situated at Mirpur Mathelo, District Ghotki from National Fertilizer Corporation (NFC) through privatization process of the Government of Pakistan. This acquisition at Rs 8,151 million represents one of the largest industrial sector transactions in Pakistan Companys brand name is SONA under the umbrella of the Fauji fertilizer company that is abbreviated as given. The company introduced its product under the name of SONA UREA in 1982 as the first plant was underway as far as the production is concerned; the company and brand name had already been registered when the company entered the business in 1978.At first, the company had put all its efforts in the production of urea as there was a definite
need for the urea production in the country because of the high demand and consumption. Talking about the current situation and the future prospective, the company has been one of the leading Organizations of the country for a long time now and the brand name are very well established.
COMMON SIZE ANALYSIS, as used in vertical analysis of financial statements, an item is used as a base value and all other accounts in the financial statement are compared to this base value. On the balance sheet, total assets equal 100% and each asset is stated as a percentage of total assets. Similarly, total liabilities and stockholders equity are assigned 100%, with a given liability or equity account stated as a percentage of total liabilities and stockholders equity. On the income statement, 100% is assigned to net sales, with all revenue and expense accounts then related to it in percentages.
Vertical analysis is Technique for identifying relationship between items in the same financial statement by expressing all amounts as the percentage of the total amount taken as 100. In a balance sheet, for example, cash and other assets are shown as a percentage of the total assets and, in an income statement, each expense is shown as a percentage of the sales revenue. Financial statements using this technique are called common size financial statements.
MENT)
SALES COST SALES GROSS PROF- 35.58% 40.39% 32.42% 35.59% 40.40% IT DISTRIBUTION 8.5% 9.30% 9.17% 8.51% 8.72% COST 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 100 100 100 100 100 OF 64.41% 64.29% 67.58% 64.41% 59.60%
OPERATING PROFIT FINANCE COST OTHER EXPENSES OTHER INCOME NET PROFIT BEFORE TAX PROVISION FOR TAXATION NET PROFIT AFTER TAX
27.08% 26.40% 23.42% 27.08% 31.67% 2.47% 2.97% 4.44% 1.28% 2.46% 5.65% 1.67% 2.46% 4.21% 2.47% 2.97% 5.86% 2.27% 2.93% 6.35%
29.02% 28.31% 23.32% 27.49% 32.82% 9.98% 9.09% 7.84% 8.63% 11.49%
Interpretation: Throughout 5 years there fluctuations in percentage of gross profit to sales. 1stly it increases then starts decreasing through 2011.gross profit also fluctuate accordingly. Over all vertical common size analysis shows that due to
200 7 SALES COST OF SALES GROSS PROFIT DISTRIBUTION COST OPERATING PROFIT FINANCE COST OTHER EXPENSES 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
2008
2009
2010
2011
121.18 142.44 135.20 145.49 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % 124.51 153.84 139.17 138.59 115.62 123.38 128.56 157.04 134.22 155.49 136.92 151.08 110.23 114.08 126.16 158.78 87.44% 134.33 188.77 186.35 111.83 131.31 150.76 159.86 111.70 110.75 118.97 156.67
% OTHER (DIVIDEND/OTHERS) NET PROFIT BE- 100 FORE TAX PROVISION TAX NET PROFIT AF- 100 TER TAX FOR 100 INCOME 100 %
% %
% %
% %
118.21 114.45 128.05 164.52 % % % % % % % % % % % % 110.38 111.91 116.91 167.51 122.31 115.78 133.89 162.96
Interpretation: There is material increase in sales as compared to base year .expenses and cost of goods sold also increase. And ultimately net profit also increases as compared to base year throughout five years. LIQUIDITY ANALYSIS OF FFC:
Definition of 'Liquidity'
1. The degree to which an asset or security can be bought or sold in the market without affecting the asset's price. Liquidity is characterized by a high level of trading activity. Assets that can be easily bought or sold are known as liquid assets. 2. The ability to convert an asset to cash quickly. Also known as "marketability". There is no specific liquidity formula; however, liquidity is often calculated by using liquidity ratios.
Liquidity Ratios: Liquidity ratios measure the short term solvency of financial position of a firm. These ratios are calculated to comment upon the short term paying capacity of a concern or the firm's ability to meet its current obligations. Following are the most important liquidity ratios. 1) Current ratio 2) Liquid / Acid test / Quick ratio 3) Accounts receivable turnover 4) Inventory turnover 5) Cash ratio
CURRENT RATIO:
Definition: Current ratio may be defined as the relationship between current assets and current liabilities. This ratio is also known as "working capital ratio". It is a measure of general liquidity and is most widely used to make the analysis for short term financial position or liquidity of a firm. It is calculated by dividing the total of the current assets by total of the current liabilities. Formula: Following formula is used to calculate current ratio: Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities.
Current ratio
2007 0.44
2008 0.8
2009 0.83
2010 0.83
2011 1.06
Graphical representation:
current ratio
1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
current ratio
Quick ratio:
Definition:
An indicator of a company's short-term liquidity. The quick ratio measures a company's ability to meet its short-term obligations with its most liquid assets. The higher the quick ratio, the better the position of the company. The quick ratio is calculated as:
Quick ratio
2007 0.88
2008 0.009
2009 0.82
2010 0.82
2011 1.04
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION:
QUICK RATIO
1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
QUICK RATIO
Definition:
An accounting measure used to quantify a firm's effectiveness in extending credit as well as collecting debts. The receivables turnover ratio is an activity ratio, measuring how efficiently a firm uses its assets. Formula:
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
21.18 times
27.57 times
96 times
145.97 times
248 times
Definition:
A ratio showing how many times a company's inventory is sold and replaced over a period The days in the period can then be divided by the inventory turnover formula to calculate the days it takes to sell the inventory on hand or "inventory turnover days". .
FORMULA:
Inventory turnover
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION:
CASH RATIO:
The cash ratio is an indicator of a company's liquidity that further refines both the current ratio and the quick ratio by measuring the amount of cash, cash equivalents or invested funds there are in current assets to cover current liabilities. Formula:
2008 0.37
2009 0.59
2010 0.64
2011 0.89
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION:
CASH RATIO
1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 CASH RATIO
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
12.11
15.44
14.82
43.19
43.20
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION:
LONG TRRM DEBT TO EQUITY: LONG-TERM DEBT TO EQUITY LONG-TERM DEBT TO EQUITY expresses the relationship between long-term capital contributions of creditors as related to that contributed by owners (investors). As opposed to DEBT TO EQUITY, Long-Term Debt to Equity expresses the degree of protection provided by the owners for the long-term creditors. A company with a high long-term debt to equity is considered to be highly leveraged. It is calculated as:
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
39.55%
63.57%
58.21%
49.36%
28.33%
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION:
DEBT RATIO:
The debt ratio compares a company's total debt to its total assets, which is used to gain a general idea as to the amount of leverage being used by a company. A low percentage means that the company is less dependent on leverage, i.e., money borrowed from and/or owed to others. The lower the percentage, the less leverage a company is using and the stronger its equity position. In general, the higher the ratio, the more risk that company is considered to have taken on. Formula:
Debt sets
to 2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION:
Debt ratio
68.00% 66.00% 64.00% 62.00% 60.00% 58.00% 56.00% 54.00% 52.00% 50.00% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Debt to equity ratio
DEBT TO EQUITY:
Definition:
A measure of a company's financial leverage calculated by dividing its total iabties by stockholders' equity. It indicates what proportion of equity and debt the company is using to finance its assets. Formula:
Debt
to 2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION:
200%
50%
Debt to tangible net worth: This ratio calculates the relationship between a company's debt and its tangible net worth. By definition, it is a more conservative measure than the traditional "Debt / Worth" calculation. As with "Debt / Worth", the lower the ratio the higher the degree of relative capitalization and the lower the degree of leverage.
Debt to Tangible Net worth Ratio
We calculate this ratio by dividing total debt of a company to Net worth minus intangible assets. Total Debts Debt to Tangible Net Worth Ratio= Net Worth - Intangible Assets
to 2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
tangible
147%
183%
221%
128%
233%
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION:
200%
50%
PROFITIBILITY ANALYSIS: Definition of 'Profitability Ratios' A class of financial metrics that are used to assess a business's ability to generate earnings as compared to its expenses and other relevant costs incurred during a specific period of time. For most of these ratios, having a higher value relative to a competitor's ratio or the same ratio from a previous period is indicative that the company is doing well. Following are profitability ratios: 1) Net profit margin 2) Total assets turnover 3) Return on assets 4) Operating income margin 5) Operating assets turnover 6) Return on operating assets
Net profit margin: Definition: Net profit divided by net revenues, often expressed as a percentage. This number is an indication of how effective a company is at cost control. The higher the net profit margin is, the more effective the company is at converting revenue into actual profit... Also called net margin. The formula for net profit margin is: (Total Revenue Total Expenses)/Total Revenue = Net Profit/Total Revenue = Net Profit margin NET PROFIT MARGIN 18.86% 21.33% 24.40% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Assets turnover:
ASSETS TURNOVER
2007 0.97
2008 0.96
2009 0.94
2010
2011
RETURN ON ASSETS:
RETURN ON ASSETS
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
18.33%
20.44%
22.89%
Operating margin is a measurement of what proportion of a company's revenue is left over after paying for variable costs of production such as wages, raw materials, etc. A healthy operating margin is required for a company to be able to pay for its fixed costs, such as interest on debt.
Description: The return on operating assets measure only includes in the denominator those assets actively used to create revenue. This focuses management attention on the
amount of assets actually required to run the business, so that it has a theoretical targeted asset level to achieve. A typical result of this measurement is an ongoing campaign to eliminate unnecessary assets. FORMULA:
Operating assets turnover= Earnings before Interest and Taxes / Operating Assets x 100
2008 53.11%
2009 67.44%
2010
2011