The Raleigh number characterizes the flow regime in free convection exactly as did the Reynolds number in forced convection. The heat transfer process depends strongly on the nature of the flow, and the physics is almost completely removed once we get to a boundary layer.
The Raleigh number characterizes the flow regime in free convection exactly as did the Reynolds number in forced convection. The heat transfer process depends strongly on the nature of the flow, and the physics is almost completely removed once we get to a boundary layer.
The Raleigh number characterizes the flow regime in free convection exactly as did the Reynolds number in forced convection. The heat transfer process depends strongly on the nature of the flow, and the physics is almost completely removed once we get to a boundary layer.
Viscous forces The resulting flow will be governed by a balance of viscous and buoyant forces in constrast to a balance of inertial and viscous forces in the case of forced convection (which was governed by the Reynolds number). We need a new dimensionless parameter to describe free convection flows.
Introduce the Grashof number
We can expect, in general then that free convection
flows may be governed by Re, Pr as before, as well as this new parameter, Gr
In practice though, any significant Re will dominate
over the natural convection and therefore, the problem will be described by the Grashof number and the Prandtl number, the product of which is given another name,
This parameter characterizes both the ratio of
buoyancy forces to viscous forces, and the relative scale of the thermal and viscous boundary layers. We can expect then that correlations for free convection will be functions of Ra.
The Raleigh number characterizes the flow regime in
free convection exactly as did the Reynolds number in forced convection.
A note on convection correlations in general.
Often (way too often) people express experimental results in terms of non-dimensional parameters and calculate the exponents such as ‘n’ above. They then use these ‘n’ values to declare for example that the flow is laminar or turbulent, or some other physical interpretation. This is very often wrong! The heat transfer process depends strongly on the nature of the flow, and the physics is almost completely removed once we get to a correlation.