Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1-2
Proceedings of the XXXVth International Conference of the Round Table on Archives Reykjavik, Iceland, 10-13 October 2001
Actes de la XXXVe Confrence internationale de la Table ronde des Archives Reykjavik, Islande, 10-13 octobre 2001
51
1 2
Public Records Act 1958, s 10(1) Records Storage Management, Cabinet Office / PRO. February 1997
52
Sir Hilary Jenkinson (1922) A Manual of Archive Administration, 2nd ed pub 1965 T R Schellenberg (1956) Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques 1954, Report of the Committee fn Departmental Records (Grigg Committee) Cmd 9163 HMSO
53
preservation. A physical computer disk or tape can survive for twenty-five years, but it is extremely unlikely that the information it contains will be accessible at the end of the period. The technology itself demands that we make selection decisions at the earliest possible stage. Ideally this should happen at the time of creation or even before, when the system for managing and storing the records is first set up. The traditional model does not deal effectively with an increasing requirement for accountability and transparency in government. It does not provide mechanisms for systematically recording the basis on which appraisal decisions were taken and making it available to the public. Finally, the values set out in our traditional approach reflected the priorities of the 1950s. Great emphasis was placed on the need to document the structures and functions of the creating organizations and there was a tendency to select records showing the development of government policy without selecting those records which showed how it was implemented in practice. By the 1990s new research interests, techniques and disciplines had arisen. It was important to ensure that the selection priorities being pursued in the 1990s accommodated this research. These weaknesses were not only characteristics of the UK approach to appraisal. Across the world national archives have been querying their approach to the selection of records for permanent preservation, and a range of international responses have developed, including the Canadian macroappraisal approach and the Australian functional approach which includes an element of stakeholder analysis. The PROs new approach to the selection of records for permanent preservation rests on the principles of transparency and partnership. In the modern government environment it is imperative that the decision-making processes of the state are transparent to its customers. The Freedom of Information Act 2000 has reinforced this requirement. All our selection policy documents are the subject of public consultation; all are available to the public and all are on the PRO website. We accept comment even after they have been finalised and we have promised to review them regularly. Our premise is that we will always document clearly what we do and why, so that our customers and successors will be able to track our decisions and understand them. Furthermore, the PRO seeks to develop its approach to selection in partnership with government departments, fellow professionals and the public. For many years the Office has had a good relationship with government departments. Departmental staff have valuable knowledge and expertise and the PRO is eager to develop further its relationship with government departments. At the same time we are seeking to extend our relationship with fellow professionals, in the international and national archive community. We also aim to include our users in the development of our selection priorities both the academic community and the genealogical community which now makes up most of our regular users. The PRO staff involved in the selection of records for permanent preservation are regular participants in a programme of seminars on contemporary British history, at which academics are invited to speak about particular aspects of contemporary British history and to describe which areas they consider are likely to be of especial interest to posterity. In addition, we are developing the Offices links with representative user groups, such as the Royal Historical Society and the genealogical community. In common with other national archives, the PRO has adopted a top-down approach to the identification of records for permanent preservation. Rather than following a purely functional approach, the Offices approach involves identifying those themes which are priorities for permanent preservation. It then considers the functions and record-keeping structures of the organizations concerned to establish where the records supporting these themes can be found. For existing records the approach is based on provenance and content rather than function our aim is to identify the lead records for a particular area of interest. The analysis is verified by an examination of the individual records concerned.
54
55
The PRO and relevant government departments develop OSPs jointly, with the PRO preparing the initial draft. Consultation with users forms an essential part of the process, largely with academics, researchers and special interest groups relevant to the subject of the OSP. So far ten OSPs have been produced, covering such subjects as Fiscal Policy, the Security Service, Nuclear Weapons Policy, the Preservation and Use of the Countryside for Recreational Purposes. This is an ongoing programme with six more to be produced by the end of March 2002. These will include UK diplomatic relations, the budget process and the central direction of policies and programmes. Just as important is the development of a framework of guidance for records managers working within government departments through the provision of standards and toolkits, including one on sampling techniques for the selection of case records. The relationship between the PROs records management staff and those in each department has to be effective and close if this new approach to selection and appraisal is to work properly. This is part of the partnership element I mentioned earlier.
Next steps
The acquisition and disposition policies are high-level statements, while OSPs are detailed statements of selection criteria. We needed to develop a sense for how the OSPs would work in practice and how they could be of most use in the selection process. Now that we have real, practical experience in this area, we will define an overall framework for the Operational Selection Policy Programme. This will set out how each Operational Selection Policy relates to all the others as well as how they relate to the selection themes. The work will be completed this year. We have also now started to develop in detail our new appraisal methodologies to identify the records we wish to keep. The Grigg method, based on a fileby-file approach, is no longer practicable, especially for electronic records. The new, more flexible approach we are looking for is largely untested and unknown territory. There is a risk in abandoning such a well-established system as Grigg-based method but we have no choice. We will, of course, consult with our government colleagues and clients, and also with other users, as this work develops. Over time this new work will need to be tested and refined. We will keep the whole system under regular review, while it grows and extends. Underpinning this new approach are training and communications - not only for public records bodies, but also with our user communities and our professional colleagues, so that we can share approaches and best practice and promote debate with users and fellow professionals. For further information on the implementation of the PROs new approach to the selection of records for permanent preservation, please see our website: http://www pro.gov.uk/recordsmanagement/acquisition/default.htm.
Comma, 2002 - 1/2 Duncan Simpson and Susan Graham Bibliography Other international approaches to appraisal include:
56
Canada: Terry Cook, Towards a new theory of archival appraisal in Barbara Craig (ed) The Canadian Archival Imagination: Essays in Honour of Hugh Taylor pp 38-70 Ottawa, 1992 Holland: R C Hol & A G de Vries, PIVOT Down Under: A Report, Archives and Manuscripts vol 26 May 1998 pp 78-102 Australia : http://www.naa.gov.au/recordkeeping/disposal/appraisal/intro.html