A.M. No.

07-7-12-SC (full text): Amendments to Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65 of the Ru les of Court Posted onFebruary 18, 2008byAdminA.M. No. 07-7-12-SCAMENDMENTS TO RULES 41, 45, 58 AND 65 OF THE RULES OF COURT(Full text alsohere)RESOLUTIONActing on the recommend ation of the Chairperson and Members of the Subcommittee on the Revision of Rule 65 submitting for this Courts consideration and approval the proposed amendments to Rules 41, 45, 58 and 65 of theRules of Court, the Court Resolved to APPROVE the same.This Resolution shall take effect on December 27. 2007 following its pu blication in a newspaper of general circulation.December 4, 2007.AMENDMENTS TO R ULES 41, 45, 58AND 65 OF THE RULES OF COURTRULE 41SECTION 1.Subject of appeal. An appeal may be taken from a judgment or final order that completely disposes of the case, or of a particular matter therein when declared by these Rules to be a ppealable.No appeal may be taken from:(a) An order denying a petition for relief or any similar motion seeking relief from judgment;(b) An interlocutory order;( c) An order disallowing or dismissing an appeal;(d) An order denying a motion to set aside a judgment by consent, confession or compromise on the ground of frau d, mistake or duress, or any other ground vitiating consent;(e) An order of exec ution;(f) A judgment or final order for or against one or more of several partie s or in separate claims, counterclaims, cross-claims and third-party complaints, while the main case is pending, unless the court allows an appeal therefrom; an d(g) An order dismissing an action without prejudice.In any of the foregoing cir cumstances, the aggrieved party may file an appropriate special civil action as provided in Rule 65.RULE 45SECTION 1.Filing of petition with Supreme Court. A party desiring to appeal by certiorari from a judgment, final order or resolution of the Court of Appeals, the Sandiganbayan, the Court of Tax Appeals, the Regional Trial Court or other courts, whenever authorized by law, may file with the Supre me Court a verified petition for review on certiorari. The petition may include an application for a writ of preliminary injunction or other provisional remedie s and shall raise only questions of law, which must be distinctly set forth. The petitioner may seek the same provisional remedies by verified motion filed in t he same action or proceeding at any time during its pendency.RULE 58SEC. 5.Prelim inary injunction not granted without notice; exception. No preliminary injunction shall be granted without hearing and prior notice to the party or persons sought to be enjoined. If it shall appear from facts shown by affidavits or by the ver ified application that great or irreparable injury would result to the applicant before the matter can be heard on notice, the court to which the application fo r preliminary injunction was made, may issue ex parte a temporary restraining or der to be effective only for a period of twenty (20) days from service on the pa rty or person sought to be enjoined, except as herein provided. Within the twent y-day period, the court must order said party or person to show cause at a speci fied time and place, why the injunction should not be granted. The court shall a lso determine, within the same period, whether or not the preliminary injunction shall be granted, and accordingly issue the corresponding order.However, subjec t to the provisions of the preceding sections, if the matter is of extreme urgen cy and the applicant will suffer grave injustice and irreparable injury, the exe cutive judge of a multiple-sala court or the presiding judge of a single-sala co urt may issue ex parte a temporary restraining order effective for only seventytwo (72) hours from issuance, but shall immediately comply with the provisions o f the next preceding section as to service of summons and the documents to be se rved therewith. Thereafter, within the aforesaid seventy-two (72) hours, the jud ge before whom the case is pending shall conduct a summary hearing to determine whether the temporary restraining order shall be extended until the application for preliminary injunction can be heard. In no case shall the total period of ef fectivity of the temporary restraining order exceed twenty (20) days, including the original seventy-two hours provided herein.In the event that the application for preliminary injunction is denied or not resolved within the said period, th e temporary restraining order is deemed automatically vacated. The effectivity o f a temporary restraining order is not extendible without need of any judicial d eclaration to that effect, and no court shall have authority to extend or renew

the same on the same ground for which it was issued.However, if issued by the Co urt of Appeals or a member thereof, the temporary restraining order shall be eff ective for sixty (60) days from service on the party or person sought to be enjo ined. A restraining order issued by the Supreme Court or a member thereof shall be effective until further orders.The trial court, the Court of Appeals, the San diganbyan or the Court of Tax Appeals that issued a writ of preliminary injuncti on against a lower court, board, officer, or quasi-judicial agency shall decide the main case or petition within six (6) months from the issuance of the writ.RU LE 65Sec. 4. When and where to file the petition. The petition shall be filed no t later than sixty (60) days from notice of the judgment, order or resolution. I n case a motion for reconsideration or new trial is timely filed, whether such m otion is required or not, the petition shall be filed not later than sixty (60) days counted from the notice of the denial of the motion.If the petition relates to an act or an omission of a municipal trial court or of a corporation, a boar d, an officer or a person, it shall be filed with the Regional Trial Court exerc ising jurisdiction over the territorial area as defined by the Supreme Court. It may also be filed with the Court of Appeals or with the Sandiganbayan, whether or not the same is in aid of the court appellate jurisdiction. If the petition i nvolves an act or an omission of a quasi-judicial agency, unless otherwise provi ded by law or these rules, the petition shall be filed with and be cognizable on ly by the Court of Appeals.In election cases involving an act or an omission of a municipal or a regional trial court, the petition shall be filed exclusively w ith the Commission on Elections, in aid of its appellate jurisdiction.Sec. 7.Expe diting proceedings; injunctive relief. The court in which the petition is filed may issue orders expediting the proceedings, and it may also grant a temporary r estraining order or a writ of preliminary injunction for the preservation of the rights of the parties pending such proceedings. The petition shall not interrup t the course of the principal case, unless a temporary restraining order or a wr it of preliminary injunction has been issued, enjoining the public respondent fr om further proceeding with the case.The public respondent shall proceed with the principal case within ten (10) days from the filing of a petition for certiorar i with a higher court or tribunal, absent a temporary restraining order or a pre liminary injunction, or upon its expiration. Failure of the public respondent to proceed with the principal case may be a ground for an administrative charge.Se c. 8.Proceedings after comment is filed. After the comment or other pleadings requi red by the court are filed, or the time for the filing thereof has expired, the court may hear the case or require the parties to submit memoranda. If, after su ch hearing or filing of memoranda or upon the expiration of the period for filin g, the court finds that the allegations of the petition are true, it shall rende r judgment for such relief to which the petitioner is entitled.However, the cour t may dismiss the petition if it finds the same patently without merit or prosec uted manifestly for delay, or if the questions raised therein are too unsubstant ial to require consideration. In such event, the court may award in favor of the respondent treble costs solidarily against the petitioner and counsel, in addit ion to subjecting counsel to administrative sanctions under Rules 139 and 139-B of theRules of Court.The Court may impose motu proprio, based on res ipsa loquitu r, other disciplinary sanctions or measures on erring lawyers for patently dilat ory and unmeritorious petitions for certiorari.