Constitutional Income: Do You Have Any?

Supplemental Documents
I. Historical Documents
A. B. C. D. E. F. G. Magna Carta 1628, Petition of Right The Charter of Massachusettes Bay, 1629 The Charter of Maryland, 1632 1689, Bill of Rights Resolutions of the Stamp Act Congress, 1765 Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress, 1774 H. Declaration of Independence I. The Constitution of the United States

II.

Periodicals
A. Constitutional Law: Income Tax: Sixteenth Amendment, 4 California Law Review 333 (1915-6). B. The Federal Income Tax Law of 1913: Construction of the Sixteenth Amendment, 1 Cornell Law Quarterly 298 (1916). C. The Income Tax and the Sixteenth Amendment, 29 Harvard Law Review 536 (1915-6). D. Washington Notes. The Income Tax Decision, 24 Journal of Political Economy 299 (1916). E. Income Tax Upheld in Broad Decision, New York Times, page 5, (January 25, 1916). F. Sen. Norris Brown, Shall the Income Tax Amendment be Ratified, Senate Doc. No. 705, 61st Congress, 3rd Session (1910).

III.

Supreme Court Cases

I. II. III. IV. Bill of Complaint, Misc. Brief for Stanton Amicus Curiae Brief by John R. Van Derlip, Attorney Court Opinion

Stanton vs. Baltic Mining 240 U.S. 103 (1916)

A. Tyee Realty Company vs. Anderson, Collector of Internal

Revenue, 240 U.S. 115 (1916).

I. II. Bill of Complaint, Misc. Brief for Tyee Realty

B. Brushaber vs. Union Pacific Railroad 240 U.S. 1 (1916) I. Bill of Complaint, Misc. II. Brief for The United States III. Brief for Brushaber IV. Oral Argument of Julien Davies, Attorney for Brushaber V. U.S. Supreme Court Opinion (FindLaw.com)

Pollock vs. Farmers Loan and Trust Co. Second Hearing 158 U.S. 601 (1895).
I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. Authorities on Stare Decisis Opening Argument by Mr. Guthrie on behalf of Appellantsfirst case Argument of Edward B. Whitney, Assistant Attorney General Extracts From Turgot, Minister of the Treasury, France 1774-1776 John G. Moore vs. Joseph Miller, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Brief for Moore Reply Brief by U.S., Moore vs. Miller Opening Argument by Mr. Guthrie on behalf of appellants Rehearing Charles Pollock & Lewis H. Hyde-Rehearing Closing Argument by Mr. Choate Oral Argument of Hon. Richard Olney Attorney General-Rehearing Charles Pollock vs. the Farmers Loan and Trust Co.-Historical Argument Opinion of The Court, Rehearing

C. Pollock vs. Farmers Loan and Trust Co., First Hearing 157 U.S.

429 (1895).
I. The Teachings of Political Economists Defining Direct and Indirect Taxes. By Max West Ph D. University of Chicago